Back to chapter

15.2:

Reactivity of Enolate Ions

JoVE Core
Organic Chemistry
A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content.  Sign in or start your free trial.
JoVE Core Organic Chemistry
Reactivity of Enolate Ions

Languages

Share

The α hydrogens of carbonyls are acidic in nature, as their conjugate bases are resonance-stabilized. So, enolate ions are often more useful in reactions than enols are, because of their solution stability and better nucleophilicity.

Like the allylic anion, the enolate ion behaves as a three-atom four-electron conjugated system. Replacing carbon with oxygen lowers the energy of the two occupied π molecular orbitals and distorts them.

In the lowest occupied π orbital, electrons are delocalized across the three constituent atoms, with greater contribution from the electronegative oxygen. This additional overlap and stabilization makes carbonyl α hydrogens more acidic than allylic hydrogens of alkenes.

The HOMO has a significant α-carbon character, with a node at the carbon–oxygen bond. While reactions dominated by interaction with the HOMO tend to occur on the α carbon, leading to α-substitution, those driven by electrostatic interactions tend to occur on oxygen, forming enol derivatives.

Since enolates have two distinct reactive nucleophilic centers, they are ambident nucleophiles.

15.2:

Reactivity of Enolate Ions

Enolate ions are formed by the acid–base reaction of a carbonyl compound with a base. This leads to deprotonation of the α hydrogen atom, leading to a resonance-stabilized enolate ion where one of the contributing structures is an oxyanion, which imparts additional stability. Therefore, the proton on the α carbon is more acidic in nature than that of other sp3-hybridized C–H bonds but less acidic than those in O–H bonds where the negative charge in the conjugate base is localized on the oxygen atom. This is reflected in their trend of pKa values. For example, acetic acid, ethanol, acetone, 1-propene, and ethane have pKa values of 4.8, 16, 19.2, 43, and 50, respectively.

The enolate ion is an example of an ambident nucleophile—i.e., a nucleophile with two reactive sites. The contributing structures of enolate ions show that both carbon and oxygen atoms can bear the negative charge. Hence, the enolate ion is the conjugate base of both keto and enol forms. In theory, it can react with a particular electrophile to form two different products by bond formation at the two different sites. However, an enolate ion usually reacts at the carbon end, as this is more nucleophilic than the oxygen site.

As enolate ions are Brønsted bases, they react with Brønsted acids, like protons. This leads to hydrogen exchange at the α position of carbonyl compounds with that of solvent, leading to isotope exchange in the presence of D2O and an aqueous base. An optically active aldehyde or ketone undergoes racemization if there is an asymmetric α carbon in the molecule. The loss in stereogenicity owes to the formation of an achiral enolate intermediate where all three atoms are trigonal planar due to sp2 hybridization and conjugation through p-orbital overlap. Since the pKa of an α hydrogen is very high in the case of esters, the various consequences of enolate ion formation is observed specifically for aldehydes and ketones.

Enolate ions also react as Lewis bases, where they act as nucleophiles. Therefore, they can undergo two types of reaction leading to the formation of new bonds at the α carbon:

  1. Substitution reactions with electrophiles to yield halogenated and alkylated products with molecular halogen (X2) in the presence of an acid or base and an alkyl halide (RX) or sulfonate ester (RSO3), respectively.
  2. Addition reactions with carbonyl groups at the electrophilic carbon center followed by nucleophilic acyl substitution reactions depending on the structure of the carbonyl group.

Suggested Reading

  1. Solomons, G., & Fryhle, C. & Snyder, S. (2015). Organic Chemistry. New Jersey, NJ: Wiley, 822.
  2. Loudon, M., & Parise, J. (2016). Organic Chemistry. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishers, 1103.
  3. Clayden, J., & Greeves, N., & Warren, S. (2012). Organic Chemistry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 449.
  4. Carey, F. A. (2000). Organic Chemistry, McGraw-Hill, 702.
  5. McMurry, J. (2016). Organic Chemistry. Cengage Learning. Boston. MA. 728.
  6. Smith, J. G. (2008) Organic Chemistry, McGraw Hill, 884.