Summary

危重病人中的应用手册肌力测试:下肢肌力测量方法

Published: April 12, 2011
doi:

Summary

急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)和危重病的幸存者经常制定长期的肌肉无力。人工肌肉测试(MMT)的是一个标准化的临床检查,常用来衡量周围骨骼肌肉群的力量。本视频演示了市场失当行为审裁处使用了6点的医学研究理事会的规模。

Abstract

急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)和其他原因造成的重大疾病的幸存者往往有全身乏力,运动耐受力降低,以及出院后的持久性神经和肌肉损伤 。1-6使用一个明确的协议与结构化方法,培训和质量保证人工肌肉测试(MMT)的研究人员,是一个高度可靠的方法评估实力,采用标准化的临床检查,以下ARDS患者,,就可以完成与机械通气的病人,他可以容忍坐在直立在床上,并能够按照两个步骤的命令7, 8

本视频演示了一个审裁处,已教≥43,> 280 ARDS的幸存者进行> 800评估的研究人员的协议。修改为长期卧床的病人。定位,稳定,电阻,触诊为每6点序号医学研究理事会的规模分,每一块肌肉测试的具体技术是在本议定书分级 7,9-11三上,三下肢肌肉:肩外展屈肘,伸腕,髋关节屈曲,膝关节伸直,踝关节背屈。这些肌肉ICU获得前出版物中使用的弱点评估病人的标准方法的基础上选择1,2。

Protocol

1。简介在人工肌肉测试(MMT)的双边,每个肌肉群进行测试。出于演示的目的,只有一方是在这6肌肉群中的每一个视频进行测试。一方面考官适用于电阻或palpates收缩肌肉或肌腱,​​而另一方面,稳定保持在测试中的地位,它正在测试的肢体。重复测试,如果病人不理解的说明,或不将尽最大的努力。 2。分级如下医学研究理事会(MRC),系统(表1?…

Discussion

根据诊断标准,9 – ICU患者的87%,发展神经肌肉并发症,这是长时间机械通气相关,增加了住院和康复时间,并有可能与死亡率增加相关肌肉1,2,16-18定期评估。强度,使用可靠的方法,最大限度地减少评分间变异检测随着时间的推移变化是有益的。使用MRC评分系统的市场失当行为的重要限制是6点序规模。举行测功机手的肌肉力量测试是不太常用,但使用的比例尺度测量优势。19…

Offenlegungen

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

由美国国立卫生研究院授予#R01HL088045支持。博士。涡流风扇和米歇尔哥是每个从加拿大卫生研究院的奖学金奖的支持。

Referenzen

  1. De Jonghe, B. Paresis acquired in the intensive care unit: a prospective multicenter study. JAMA. 288, 2859-2867 (2002).
  2. Ali, N. A. Acquired weakness, handgrip strength, and mortality in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 178, 261-268 (2008).
  3. Angel, M. J., Bril, V., Shannon, P., Herridge, M. S. Neuromuscular function in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 34, 427-432 (2007).
  4. Cheung, A. M. Two-year outcomes, health care use, and costs of survivors of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 174, 538-544 (2006).
  5. Stevens, R. D. Neuromuscular dysfunction acquired in critical illness: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 33, 1876-1891 (2007).
  6. Herridge, M. S. One-year outcomes in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 348, 683-693 (2003).
  7. Medical Research Council. . Aids to the Investigation of the Peripheral Nervous System. , (1976).
  8. Fan, E. Inter-rater reliability of manual muscle strength testing in ICU survivors and simulated patients. Intensive Care Med. 34, 1038-1043 (2010).
  9. Hislop, H. J., Montgomery, J. M. . Daniels and Worthingham’s Muscle Testing. , (2007).
  10. Reese, N. B. . Muscle and Sensory Testing. , (2005).
  11. Kendall, F. P. . Muscles; Testing and Function with Posture and Pain. , (2005).
  12. Lieu, B. K., Hough, C. L. Assessment of Weakness in Critically Ill Patients Using Physical Examination. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 175, A218-A218 (2007).
  13. Gregson, J. M. Reliability of measurements of muscle tone and muscle power in stroke patients. Age Ageing. 29, 223-228 (2000).
  14. Great Lakes ALS Study Group. . A comparison of muscle strength testing techniques in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology. 61, 1503-1507 (2003).
  15. Kleyweg, R. P., van der Meche, F. G., Schmitz, P. I. Interobserver agreement in the assessment of muscle strength and functional abilities in Guillain-Barre syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 14, 1103-1109 (1991).
  16. Zink, W., Kollmar, R., Schwab, S. Critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy in the intensive care unit. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 5, 372-379 (2009).
  17. Sharshar, T. Presence and severity of intensive care unit-acquired paresis at time of awakening are associated with increased intensive care unit and hospital mortality. Crit. Care Med. 37, 3047-3053 (2009).
  18. Griffiths, R. D., Hall, J. B. Intensive care unit-acquired weakness. Crit. Care Med. 38, 779-787 (2010).
  19. Bohannon, R. W. Measuring knee extensor muscle strength. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 80, 13-18 (2001).
  20. Needham, D. M. Mobilizing patients in the intensive care unit: improving neuromuscular weakness and physical function. JAMA. 300, 1685-1690 (2008).

Play Video

Diesen Artikel zitieren
Ciesla, N., Dinglas, V., Fan, E., Kho, M., Kuramoto, J., Needham, D. Manual Muscle Testing: A Method of Measuring Extremity Muscle Strength Applied to Critically Ill Patients. J. Vis. Exp. (50), e2632, doi:10.3791/2632 (2011).

View Video