Automated Charting of the Visual Space of Housefly Compound Eyes

Published: March 31, 2022

doi:

Maurico Muñoz Arias, John K. Douglass³, Martin F. Wehling, Doekele G. Stavenga

¹Design Group, Faculty of Science and Engineering,University of Groningen, ²Air Force Research Laboratory, Eglin Air Force Base, ³Surfaces and thin films department, Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials,University of Groningen

Summary

The protocol here describes the measurement of the spatial organization of the visual axes of housefly eyes, mapped by an automatic device, using the pseudopupil phenomenon and the pupil mechanism of the photoreceptor cells.

Abstract

This paper describes the automatic measurement of the spatial organization of the visual axes of insect compound eyes, which consist of several thousands of visual units called ommatidia. Each ommatidium samples the optical information from a small solid angle, with an approximate Gaussian-distributed sensitivity (half-width on the order of 1˚) centered around a visual axis. Together, the ommatidia gather the visual information from a nearly panoramic field of view. The spatial distribution of the visual axes thus determines the eye’s spatial resolution. Knowledge of the optical organization of a compound eye and its visual acuity is crucial for quantitative studies of neural processing of the visual information. Here we present an automated procedure for mapping a compound eye’s visual axes, using an intrinsic, in vivo optical phenomenon, the pseudopupil, and the pupil mechanism of the photoreceptor cells. We outline the optomechanical setup for scanning insect eyes and use experimental results obtained from a housefly, Musca domestica, to illustrate the steps in the measurement procedure.

Introduction

The compactness of insect visual systems and the agility of their owners, demonstrating highly developed visual information processing, have intrigued people from both scientific and non-scientific backgrounds. Insect compound eyes have been recognized as powerful optical devices enabling acute and versatile visual capacities¹^,². Flies, for instance, are well-known for their fast responses to moving objects, and bees are famous for possessing color vision and polarization vision².

The compound eyes of arthropods consist of numerous anatomically similar units, the ommatidia, each of which is capped by a facet lens. In Diptera (flies), the assembly of facet lenses, known collectively as the cornea, often approximates a hemisphere. Each ommatidium samples incident light from a small solid angle with half-width on the order of 1˚. The ommatidia of the two eyes together sample approximately the full solid angle, but the visual axes of the ommatidia are not evenly distributed. Certain eye areas have a high density of visual axes, which creates a region of high spatial acuity, colloquially called a fovea. The remaining part of the eye then has a coarser spatial resolution³^,⁴^,⁵^,⁶^,⁷^,⁸^,⁹.

A quantitative analysis of the optical organization of the compound eyes is crucial for detailed studies of the neural processing of visual information. Studies of the neural networks of an insect's brain¹⁰ often require knowledge of the spatial distribution of the ommatidial axes. Furthermore, compound eyes have inspired several technical innovations. Many initiatives to produce bio-inspired artificial eyes have been built on existing quantitative studies of real compound eyes¹¹^,¹²^,¹³. For instance, a semiconductor-based sensor with high-spatial resolution was designed based on the model of insect compound eyes¹¹^,¹⁴^,¹⁵^,¹⁶^,¹⁷. However, the devices developed so far have not implemented the actual characteristics of existing insect eyes. Accurate representations of insect compound eyes and their spatial organization will require detailed and reliable data from natural eyes, which is not extensively available.

The main reason for the paucity of data is the extreme tediousness of the available procedures for charting the eyes' spatial characteristics. This has motivated attempts to establish a more automated eye mapping procedure. In a first attempt at automated analyses of insect compound eyes, Douglass and Wehling¹⁸ developed a scanning procedure for mapping facet sizes in the cornea and demonstrated its feasibility for a few fly species. Here we extend their approach by developing methods for not only scanning the facets of the cornea but also assessing the visual axes of the ommatidia to which the facets belong. We present the case of housefly eyes to exemplify the procedures involved.

The experimental setup for scanning insect eyes is: partly optical, i.e., a microscope with camera and illumination optics; partly mechanical, i.e., a goniometer system for rotating the investigated insect; and partially computational, i.e., use of software drivers for the instruments and programs for executing measurements and analyses. The developed methods encompass a range of computational procedures, from capturing images, choosing camera channels, and setting image processing thresholds to recognizing individual facet locations via bright spots of light reflected from their convex surfaces. Fourier transform methods were crucial in the image analysis, both for detecting individual facets and for analyzing the facet patterns.

The paper is structured as follows. We first introduce the experimental setup and the pseudopupil phenomenon-the optical marker used to identify the visual axes of the photoreceptors in living eyes¹⁹^,²⁰^,²¹. Subsequently, the algorithms used in the scanning procedure and image analysis are outlined.

Protocol

The protocol is in accordance with the University's insect care guidelines. 1. Preparation of a housefly, Musca domestica Collect the fly from the laboratory-reared population. Place the fly in the brass holder (Figure 1). Cut 6 mm from the upper part of the restraining tube (see Table of Materials). The new upper part of the tube has an external diameter of 4 mm and an internal diam…

Representative Results

Animals and optical stimulation Experiments are performed on houseflies (Musca domestica) obtained from a culture maintained by the Department of Evolutionary Genetics at the University of Groningen. Before the measurements, a fly is immobilized by gluing it with a low-melting-point wax in a well-fitting tube. The fly is subsequently mounted on the stage of a motorized goniometer. The center of the two rotary stages coincides with the focal point of a microscopic setup24<…

Discussion

The spatial distribution of the visual axes of housefly eyes can be charted using the pseudopupil phenomenon of compound eyes and the reflection changes caused by the light-dependent pupil mechanism. Therefore, an investigated fly is mounted in a goniometric system, which allows inspection of the local facet pattern with a microscope setup equipped with a digital camera, all under computer control. Image analysis yields eye maps. An essential difficulty encountered is that without careful positioning of the eye at the be…

Divulgations

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research/European Office of Aerospace Research and Development AFOSR/EOARD (grant FA9550-15-1-0068, to D.G.S.). We thank Dr. Primož Pirih for many helpful discussions and Kehan Satu, Hein Leertouwer, and Oscar Rincón Cardeño for assistance.

Materials

Digital Camera	PointGrey	BFLY-U3-23S6C-C	Acquision of amplified images and digital communication with PC
High power star LED	Velleman	LH3WW	Light source for observation and imaging the compound eye
Holder for the investigated fly	University of Groningen		Different designs were manufactured by the university workshop
Linear motor	ELERO	ELERO Junior 1, version C	Actuates the upper microscope up and down. (Load 300N, Stroke speed 15mm/s, nominal current 1.2A)
Low temperature melting wax	various		The low-temperature melting point wax serves to immobilize the fly and fix it to the holder
Microscope	Zeiss		Any alternative microscope brand will do; the preferred objective is a 5x
Motor and LED Controller	University of Groningen	Z-o1	Designed and built by the University of Groningen and based on Arduino and Adafruit technologies.
Motorized Stage	Standa (Vilnius, Lithuania)	8MT175-50XYZ-8MR191-28	A 6 axis motorized stage modified to have 5 degrees of freedom.
Optical components	LINUS		Several diagrams and lenses forming an epi-illumination system (see Stavenga, Journal of Experimental Biology 205, 1077-1085, 2002)
PC running MATLAB	University of Groningen		The PC is able to process the images of the PointGrey camera, control the LED intensity, and send control commants to the motor cotrollers of the system
Power Supply (36V, 3.34A)	Standa (Vilnius, Lithuania)	PUP120-17	Dedicated power supply for the STANDA motor controllers
Soldering iron	various		Used for melting the wax
Stepper and DC Motor Controller	Standa (Vilnius, Lithuania)	8SMC4-USB-B9-B9	Dedicated controllers for the STANDA motorized stage capable of communicating with MATLAB
Finntip-61	Finnpipette Ky, Helsinki	FINNTIP-61, 200-1000μL	PIPETTE TIPS FOR FINNPIPETTES, 400/BOX. It is used to restrain the fly
Carving Pen Shaping/Thread Burning Tool	Max Wax		The tip of the carving pen is designed to transfer wax to the head of fly
MATLAB	Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA	main program plus Image Acquisition, Image Analysis, and Instrument Control toolboxes.	Programming language used to implement the algorithms

References

Land, M. F., Nilsson, D. . Animal Eyes. , (2012).
Cronin, T. W., Johnsen, S., Marshall, N. J., Warrant, E. J. . Visual Ecology. , (2014).
Horridge, G. A. The separation of visual axes in apposition compound eyes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. 285 (1003), 1-59 (1978).
Land, M. F., Eckert, H. Maps of the acute zones of fly eyes. Journal of Comparative Physiology. A. 156, 525-538 (1985).
Warrant, E. J., Barth, F. G., Schmid, A. The design of compound eyes and the illumination of natural habitats. Ecology of Sensing. , 187-213 (2001).
Warrant, E. J., Kelber, A., Kristensen, N. P., Kristensen, N. P. Eyes and vision. In. Handbook of Zoology, Vol. IV, Part 36, Lepidoptera, Moths and Butterflies, Vol 2: Morphology, Physiology and Development. , 325-359 (2003).
Petrowitz, R., Dahmen, H., Egelhaaf, M., Krapp, H. G. Arrangement of optical axes and spatial resolution in the compound eye of the female blowfly Calliphora. Journal of Comparative Physiology. A. 186 (7-8), 737-746 (2000).
Smolka, J., Hemmi, J. M. Topography of vision and behaviour. The Journal of Experimental Biology. 212, 3522-3532 (2009).
Krapp, H. G., Gabbiani, F. Spatial distribution of inputs and local receptive field properties of a wide-field, looming sensitive neuron. Journal of Neurophysiology. 93 (4), 2240-2253 (2005).
Strausfeld, N. J. . Arthropod Brains: Evolution, Functional Elegance, and Historical Significance. , (2012).
Jeong, K. H., Kim, J., Lee, L. P. Biologically inspired artificial compound eyes. Science. 312 (5773), 557-561 (2006).
Davis, J., Barrett, S., Wright, C., Wilcox, M. A bio-inspired apposition compound eye machine vision sensor system. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics. 4 (4), 046002 (2009).
Lee, G. J., Choi, C., Kim, D., Song, Y. M. Bioinspired artificial eyes: Optic components, digital cameras, and visual prostheses. Advanced Functional Materials. 28 (24), 1870168 (2018).
Zhang, K., et al. Origami silicon optoelectronics for hemispherical electronic eye systems. Nature Communications. 8, 1782 (2017).
Wang, M., et al. Subtle control on hierarchic reflow for the simple and massive fabrication of biomimetic compound eye arrays in polymers for imaging at a large field of view. Journal of Materials Chemistry. C. 4, 108-112 (2016).
Floreano, D., et al. Miniature curved artificial compound eyes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 110, 9267-9272 (2013).
Song, Y. M., et al. Digital cameras with designs inspired by the arthropod eye. Nature. 497 (7447), 95-99 (2013).
Douglass, J. K., Wehling, M. F. Rapid mapping of compound eye visual sampling parameters with FACETS, a highly automated wide-field goniometer. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 202 (12), 839-851 (2016).
Franceschini, N., Snyder, A. W., Menzel, R. Sampling of the visual environment by the compound eye of the fly: fundamentals and applications. Photoreceptor Optics. , 98-125 (1975).
Franceschini, N., Kirschfeld, K. The automatic control of the light flux in the compound eye of Diptera. Spectral, statistical, and dynamical properties of the mechanism. Biological Cybernetics. 21, 181-203 (1976).
Stavenga, D. G., Autrum, H. Pseudopupils of compound eyes. Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol VII/6A. , 357-439 (1979).
Stavenga, D. G., Kruizinga, R., Leertouwer, H. L. Dioptrics of the facet lenses of male blowflies Calliphora and Chrysomia. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 166, 365-371 (1990).
Straw, A. D., Warrant, E. J., O’Carroll, D. C. A "bright zone" in male hoverfly (Eristalis tenax) eyes and associated faster motion detection and increased contrast sensitivity. The Journal of Experimental Biology. 209, 4339-4354 (2006).
Stavenga, D. G. Reflections on colourful ommatidia of butterfly eyes. The Journal of Experimental Biology. 205, 1077-1085 (2002).
Beersma, D. G. M., Stavenga, D. G., Kuiper, J. W. Organization of visual axes in the compound eye of the fly Musca domestica L. and behavioural consequences. Journal of Comparative Physiology. 102, 305-320 (1975).
Taylor, G. J., et al. Bumblebee visual allometry results in locally improved resolution and globally improved sensitivity. eLife. 8, 40613 (2019).
Rigosi, E., Warrant, E. J., O’Carroll, D. C. A new, fluorescence-based method for visualizing the pseudopupil and assessing optical acuity in the dark compound eyes of honeybees and other insects. Scientific Reports. 11, 21267 (2021).

Play Video

PDF

DOI

DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

Citer Cet Article

Muñoz Arias, M., Douglass, J. K., Wehling, M. F., Stavenga, D. G. Automated Charting of the Visual Space of Housefly Compound Eyes. J. Vis. Exp. (181), e63643, doi:10.3791/63643 (2022).