Summary

High-Efficiency Gene Disruption in Primary Bone Marrow-Derived Macrophages Using Electroporated Cas9-sgRNA Complexes

Published: August 04, 2023
doi:

Summary

This protocol describes the procedure for genome editing in mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages using Cas9-sgRNA ribonucleoprotein complexes assembled in vitro and delivered by electroporation.

Abstract

Bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) from mice are a key tool for studying the complex biology of tissue macrophages. As primary cells, they model the physiology of macrophages in vivo more closely than immortalized macrophage cell lines and can be derived from mice already carrying defined genetic changes. However, disrupting gene function in BMDMs remains technically challenging. Here, we provide a protocol for efficient CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in BMDMs, which allows for the introduction of small insertions and deletions (indels) that result in frameshift mutations that disrupt gene function. The protocol describes how to synthesize single-guide RNAs (sgRNA-Cas9) and form purified sgRNA-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes (RNPs) that can be delivered by electroporation. It also provides an efficient method for monitoring editing efficiency using routine Sanger sequencing and a freely available online analysis program. The protocol can be performed within 1 week and does not require plasmid construction; it typically results in 85% to 95% editing efficiency.

Introduction

Macrophages are innate immune cells that play critical roles in tissue repair and immunity1,2. Immortalized macrophage cell lines, such as mouse RAW 264.7 cells or human THP-1 cells, have several beneficial characteristics, including robust growth and ease of gene disruption by delivering vectors for RNA interference or CRISPR/Cas93,4. However, oncogenic transformation dramatically alters their physiology, which results in the aberrant activation of some pathways and muted responses of others5,6. Primary bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) more closely recapitulate in vivo macrophage physiology, but remain challenging to genetically manipulate due to the low efficiency of both plasmid transfection and viral transduction in these primary immune cells7,8. Thus, more efficient methods for disrupting gene function are needed.

CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing is a powerful tool for genetic manipulation across a range of biological systems, including mammalian cells9,10,11,12. The Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 protein efficiently and specifically cleaves double-stranded DNA when complexed with a sequence-specific guide RNA. DNA repair through the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) of the cleaved DNA results in small insertions or deletions (indels) that create frameshift mutations. In early studies, Cas9 and sgRNAs were delivered through plasmid or lentiviral vectors, which are effective delivery methods for many cell lines9,10. However, primary cells and, in particular, primary immune cells are often refractory to these methods due to the low efficiency of vector delivery by transfection or transduction. Subsequently, methods have been developed to generate sgRNA-Cas9 complexes in vitro and to deliver them via electroporation, and these methods have achieved high efficiency in a variety of cell types13,14. The results have suggested the possibility of using this approach to carry out genome editing in primary macrophages.

Here, we provide a protocol for using sgRNA-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes (RNPs) to carry out genome editing in primary BMDMs. It contains steps to mitigate the activation of the immune sensors present in primary immune cells and results in up to 95% editing at targeted loci with minimal toxicity. This protocol also includes workflows to evaluate editing efficiency using routine polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Sanger sequencing, followed by in silico analysis by Tracking of Indels by Decomposition (TIDE)15, a well-validated online software tool.

Protocol

1. sgRNA design NOTE: This step describes selection of the target sequences and design of the sgRNAs. It is helpful to design guides that are in the first large coding exon, so that any translated protein is disrupted early in the open reading frame. It is also helpful to select target sequences that lie within the same exon, as this will streamline the analysis of the editing efficiency (step 6). The examples of genome editing provided with this protocol used sgRNAs targeting t…

Representative Results

The IVT template is a 127 bp PCR product (Figure 1B). The full-length IVT product is a 98 nt RNA, which migrates similarly to a 70 bp double-stranded DNA fragment (Figure 1C). After electroporation, the cells should be >90% viable, with a total cell count of >70% of the starting cell number. The resulting pool of mutant cells should have a diverse set of indels, starting near the Cas9 cleavage site. The analysis of the targete…

Discussion

Genome editing using electroporated Cas9-sgRNA complexes allows effective disruption of gene function in BMDMs. The editing efficiency varies by the target sequence and gene. Typically, four to five sgRNAs are generally screened to identify one that is highly active. Some loci have lower editing efficiencies, most likely due the chromatin structure. In these cases, several modifications can be made to increase the editing efficiency. Co-delivery of two active sgRNAs to the same exon results in improved editing for some g…

Divulgations

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the NIH grant 5R01AI144149. The schematic figures were created with BioRender.

Materials

3T3-MCSF Cell Line Gift from Russell Vance not applicable
Alt-R Cas9 Electroporation Enhancer IDT 1075915
Ampure XP Reagent Beads Beckman Coulter A63880
Calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase NEB M0525S
DNase NEB M0303S
DPBS +Ca/Mg (0.9mM CaCl2 and 0.5mM MgCl2) Thermo Fisher 14040-133
DPBS -Ca/Mg Thermo Fisher 14190-144
ExoI NEB M0293S
Fetal Calf Serum (FCS) Corning 35-015-CV
Herculase DNA polymerase & buffer Agilent 600677
HiScribe T7 High Yield RNA Synthesis Kit NEB E2040S
LoBind conical tubes 15 mL Eppendorf 30122216
LoBind Eppendorf tubes 2 mL Eppendorf 22431102
NEBuffer r2.1 NEB B6002S
Neon Transfection System Thermo Fisher MPK5000, MPP100, MPS100
Neon Transfection System 10 uL Tips Thermo Fisher MPK1025 or MPK1096
PBS + 1mM EDTA Lonza BE02017F
Proteinase K Thermo Fisher EO0491
rCutSmart Buffer for ExoI NEB B6004S
Ribolock Thermo Fisher EO0384
RNA loading dye NEB B0363S
RNeasy Mini Kit Qiagen 74104
S. pyogenes Cas9-NLS University of California Macro Lab not applicable Available to non-UC investigators through  https://qb3.berkeley.edu
S. pyogenes Cas9-NLS, modified 3rd Generation IDT 1081059
SAP NEB M0371S

References

  1. Murray, P. J., Wynn, T. A. Protective and pathogenic functions of macrophage subsets. Nature Reviews Immunology. 11 (11), 723-737 (2011).
  2. Wynn, T. A., Chawla, A., Pollard, J. W. Macrophage biology in development, homeostasis, and disease. Nature. 496 (7446), 445-455 (2013).
  3. Paddison, P. J., Caudy, A. A., Hannon, G. J. Stable suppression of gene expression by RNAi in mammalian cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 99 (3), 1443-1448 (2002).
  4. Laugel, B., et al. Engineering of isogenic cells deficient for MR1 with a CRISPR/Cas9 lentiviral system: Tools to study microbial antigen processing and presentation to human MR1-restricted T cells. The Journal of Immunology. 197 (3), 971-982 (2016).
  5. Andreu, N., et al. Primary macrophages and J774 cells respond differently to infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Scientific Reports. 7, 42225 (2017).
  6. Roberts, A. W., et al. Cas9+ conditionally-immortalized macrophages as a tool for bacterial pathogenesis and beyond. eLife. 8, e45957 (2019).
  7. Oberdoerffer, P., et al. Efficiency of RNA interference in the mouse hematopoietic system varies between cell types and developmental stages. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 25 (10), 3896-3905 (2005).
  8. Ma, S., et al. YTHDF2 orchestrates tumor-associated macrophage reprogramming and controls antitumor immunity through CD8+ T cells. Nature Immunology. 24 (2), 255-266 (2023).
  9. Cong, L., et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science. 339 (6121), 819-823 (2013).
  10. Mali, P., et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science. 339 (6121), 823-826 (2013).
  11. Cho, S. W., Kim, S., Kim, J. M., Kim, J. S. Targeted genome engineering in human cells with the Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease. Nature Biotechnology. 31 (3), 230-232 (2013).
  12. Jinek, M., et al. RNA-programmed genome editing in human cells. eLife. 2, e00471 (2013).
  13. Kim, S., Kim, D., Cho, S. W., Kim, J., Kim, J. S. Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purified Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Genome Research. 24 (6), 1012-1019 (2014).
  14. Lin, S., Staahl, B. T., Alla, R. K., Doudna, J. A. Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery. eLife. 3, 04766 (2014).
  15. Brinkman, E. K., Chen, T., Amendola, M., van Steensel, B. Easy quantitative assessment of genome editing by sequence trace decomposition. Nucleic Acids Research. 42 (22), e168 (2014).
  16. Craft, J. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing in primary murine bone marrow-derived macrophages. University of California, Davis. , (2022).
  17. Herb, M., Farid, A., Gluschko, A., Krönke, M., Schramm, M. Highly efficient transfection of primary macrophages with in vitro transcribed mRNA. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (153), e60143 (2019).
  18. Yu, X., et al. Improved delivery of Cas9 protein/gRNA complexes using lipofectamine CRISPRMAX. Biotechnology Letters. 38 (6), 919-929 (2016).
check_url/fr/65264?article_type=t

Play Video

Citer Cet Article
Craft, J., Truong, T., Penn, B. H. High-Efficiency Gene Disruption in Primary Bone Marrow-Derived Macrophages Using Electroporated Cas9-sgRNA Complexes. J. Vis. Exp. (198), e65264, doi:10.3791/65264 (2023).

View Video