Summary

Imaging Flow Cytometry to Study Microbial Autoaggregation

Published: September 29, 2023
doi:

Summary

This protocol describes a quantitative approach to measure microbial autoaggregation using imaging flow cytometry.

Abstract

Beneficial and probiotic bacteria play essential roles in their hosts, providing various health benefits, including immunity to infectious diseases. The Lactobacillaceae family consists of Gram-positive bacteria with confirmed probiotic properties. This study utilizes Lactobacillaceae species as a model to demonstrate the effectiveness of single-cell high throughput analysis in studying cellular aggregation. The focus is on analyzing the response of these beneficial species to simple carbohydrates from the diet.

The study showcases how Imaging Flow Cytometry (IFC) can overcome the fundamental differences in the assembly of probiotic bacteria in the presence and absence of carbohydrates. IFC combines the power and speed of conventional flow cytometry with the spatial resolution of microscopy, enabling high-rate complex morphometric measurements in a phenotypically defined manner across a library of beneficial bacterial strains and conditions. This protocol provides insights into the autoaggregation of Lactobacillaceae species and sheds light on their response to dietary carbohydrates, contributing to understanding the mechanisms behind the beneficial effects of these probiotic bacteria.

Introduction

Bacterial autoaggregation is considered a primary step in biofilm formation. In this process (sometimes also called autoagglutination or flocculation), bacteria of the same type form multicellular clumps that eventually settle at the bottom of culture tubes or attach to their target tissue or surface1.

Autoaggregation is a widely observed phenomenon and has been shown so far in Gram-negative pathogens such as the opportunistic pathogen Acinetobacter baumannii2, the dental pathogen Aggregobacter actinomycetemcomitans3, and the emerging pathogen Burkholderia pseudomallei4. Autoaggregation has also been described in several probiotic Gram-positive strains5,6,7,8. In Lactobacillus (L.) acidophilus, autoaggregation was partially mediated by S-layer proteins and correlated with an adhesion to xylan7. Similarly, we found a correlation between glucose-dependent autoaggregation and induction of the adhesive properties (as judged by adhesion to mucin) of the probiotic species Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG, Lacticaseibacillus casei, L. acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum5. The increased autoaggregation most likely reflected changes in the expression of cellular adhesins in response to glucose and its catabolites9. While the molecular mechanisms of autoaggregation remain to be determined, it has been shown that this process alters the phenotype of the aggregated bacteria and grants them enhanced tolerance to environmental stressors1, as well as increased sensitivity to quorum sensing molecules10.

Several approaches have been used to measure autoaggregation; one experimental approach is to let cultures stand statically in narrow culture tubes for a given time. Control cultures remain turbid, whereas autoaggregation cultures will settle at the bottom of the tube. A more quantitative approach measures autoaggregation by sedimentation or settling assay11.

Flow cytometry has also been increasingly employed in recent years to investigate bacterial autoaggregation. This method is appropriate for analyzing particles between approximately 0.5 and 1000 µm in size. The single bacterium or formed aggregates are suspended in fluid, fed into a stream, and can be detected one by one11. Recording forward scattered light allows measuring the relative size of the cell or aggregate. It is relatively fast and straightforward but cannot detect several parameters, such as aggregate size or the average number of cells in aggregates. Therefore, this approach can be complemented microscopically, allowing more parameters to be checked12. However, traditional microscopy is time-consuming and thereby limits the number of tested samples and the statistical power of the analysis. In general, imaging flow cytometry provides several features compared to traditional flow cytometry, such as simultaneous analysis of cell morphology and phenotype, conducting image-based analysis, detecting rare events, and validating flow cytometry data13. These advantages enhance the capabilities of flow cytometry and facilitate a more detailed examination of cell populations.

This study provides a valuable protocol for imaging flow cytometry to monitor autoaggregation in lactic acid bacteria (LAB). These Gram-positive rods are facultative anaerobes and belong to the LAB group. These efficient glucose fermenters generate lactic acid as their main end-product of carbohydrate metabolism14. These bacteria are beneficial core members of the microbiome and are naturally found in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) of humans and animals, as well as in the urogenital tract of females15. Therefore, the exact characterization of their autoaggregation properties is of high biotechnological and clinical interest.

Our previous findings indicated that the basal level of autoaggregation differs between different probiotic strains. This heterogeneity is affected by the different carbohydrates used as a carbon source5. To overcome this fundamental property of probiotic bacteria, the effects of carbohydrates from the diet were monitored on autoaggregation on the single-cell level using IFC. This IFC-based approach combines the power and speed of traditional flow cytometers with the microscope's resolution. Therefore, it allows high-rate complex morphometric measurements in a phenotypically defined way16,17. This approach can be extended to other probiotic and pathogenic bacteria, combined with fluorescent reporters to monitor gene expression, and fluorescently labeled strains to monitor the presence and abundance of specific bacterial species in heterogeneous aggregates.

Protocol

The .ast file, with the template for Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) as an example, is provided in Supplementary Coding File 1. 1. Media preparation Prepare Lactobacilli MRS broth following the manufacturer's instructions (55 g in 1 L of deionized water) and Lactobacilli MRS agar plates with 1.5% (w/v) agar (see Table of Materials). After autoclave sterilization, the medium is ready to use directly or can be stor…

Representative Results

The results demonstrate that this method can easily measure the differences in autoaggregation in response to dietary sugars in LAB bacteria. By separating individuals from aggregates, the method allows calculating the percentage of the population of the aggregation events out of all events in response to fermentable or non-fermentable sugars from the diet. Additionally, it was possible to measure if there are differences in the mean size of the aggregate's population between treatments. T…

Discussion

Flow cytometry is a widely used method for quantifying fluorescence intensities in eukaryotic cells, but it may not provide accurate measurements for bacterial cells due to their larger size or small aggregates. These factors can significantly impact the precise quantification of autoaggregation and the basal level of aggregate formation in different conditions. To address this, imaging flow cytometry (IFC) was employed to gain a better resolution of how carbohydrates affect the aggregation of probiotic bacteria<sup clas…

Divulgations

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Israeli Science Foundation (Grant 119/16) and IMoh grant (3-15656) to IKG. R.S. supported by the Kreitman fellowship. 

Materials

14 mL culture tubes Falcon 352051
15 mL centrifuge tube Falcon 352096
Bacto Agar Baeton,Dickinson and Company 214010
Bacto Typtic Soy Broth Baeton,Dickinson and Company 211825
D-(+)-Glucose Sigma G7021-1KG
D-(+)-Raffinose pentahydrate Sigma 83400-25G
Difco Lactobacilli MRS broth Baeton,Dickinson and Company 288130
EASY-LOCK MICROPR. 1.5 mL (Eppendorf) FL medical 23053
IDEAS Software Amnis/EMD Millipore N/A  Details available at: https://www.merckmillipore.com/INTL/en/20150212_144049?ReferrerURL=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F&bd=1
ImageStream X Mark II Amnis/EMD Millipore N/A  Details available at: https://www.merckmillipore.com/INTL/en/20150121_205948?ReferrerURL=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F
MOPS, 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid Fisher bioreagents BP308-500
Potassium phosphate dibasic Fisher Scientific, 174.18 g/mol BP363-1
Potassium phosphate monobasic Sigma, 136.09 g/mol P0662-500G

References

  1. Trunk, T., Khalil, H. S., Leo, J. C. Bacterial autoaggregation. AIMS Microbiology. 4 (1), 140-164 (2018).
  2. Ishikawa, M., Nakatani, H., Hori, K. AtaA, a new member of the trimeric autotransporter adhesins from Acinetobacter sp. Tol 5 mediating high adhesiveness to various abiotic surfaces. PLoS One. 7, e48830 (2012).
  3. Inoue, T., et al. Molecular characterization of low-molecular-weight component protein, Flp, in Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans fimbriae. Medical Microbiology and Immunology. 42 (4), 253-258 (1998).
  4. Boddey, J. A., Flegg, C. P., Day, C. J., Beacham, I. R., Peak, I. R. Temperature-regulated microcolony formation by Burkholderia pseudomallei requires pilA and enhances association with cultured human cells. Infection and Immunity. 74 (9), 5374-5381 (2006).
  5. Suissa, R., et al. Context-dependent differences in the functional responses of Lactobacillaceae strains to fermentable sugars. Frontiers in Microbiology. 13, 949932 (2022).
  6. Isenring, J., Geirnaert, A., Lacroix, C., Stevens, M. J. A. Bistable auto-aggregation phenotype in Lactiplantibacillus plantarum emerges after cultivation in in vitro colonic microbiota. BMC Microbiology. 21, 268 (2021).
  7. Kos, B., et al. Adhesion and aggregation ability of probiotic strain Lactobacillus acidophilus M92. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 94 (6), 981-987 (2003).
  8. Zommiti, M., et al. In vitro assessment of the probiotic properties and bacteriocinogenic potential of Pediococcus pentosaceus MZF16 isolated from artisanal tunisian meat "Dried Ossban". Frontiers in Microbiology. 9, 2607 (2018).
  9. Suissa, R., et al. Metabolic rewiring of the probiotic bacterium rhamnosus</em> GG contributes to cell-wall remodeling and antimicrobials production. bioRxiv. , (2023).
  10. Connell, J. L., Kim, J., Shear, J. B., Bard, A. J., Whiteley, M. Real-time monitoring of quorum sensing in 3D-printed bacterial aggregates using scanning electrochemical microscopy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 111 (51), 18255-18260 (2014).
  11. Misawa, N., Blaser, M. J. Detection and characterization of autoagglutination activity by Campylobacter jejuni. Infection and Immunity. 68 (11), 6168-6175 (2000).
  12. Sherlock, O., Schembri, M. A., Reisner, A., Klemm, P. Novel roles for the AIDA adhesin from diarrheagenic Escherichia coli: cell aggregation and biofilm formation. Journal of Bacteriology. 186 (23), 8058-8065 (2004).
  13. . Imaging flow cytometry. Nature Reviews Methods Primers. 2, 87 (2022).
  14. Wang, Y., et al. Metabolism characteristics of lactic acid bacteria and the expanding applications in food industry. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 9, 612285 (2021).
  15. Turroni, F., et al. Molecular dialogue between the human gut microbiota and the host: a Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium perspective. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 71, 183-203 (2014).
  16. Zuba-Surma, E. K., Kucia, M., Abdel-Latif, A., Lillard, J. W., Ratajczak, M. Z. The ImageStream System: a key step to a new era in imaging. Folia Histochemica et Cytobiologica. 45, 279-290 (2007).
  17. Dashkova, V., Malashenkov, D., Poulton, N., Vorobjev, I., Barteneva, N. S. Imaging flow cytometry for phytoplankton analysis. Methods. 112, 188-200 (2017).
  18. Maan, H., Gilhar, O., Porat, Z., Kolodkin-Gal, I. Bacillus subtilis colonization of arabidopsis thaliana roots induces multiple biosynthetic clusters for antibiotic production. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 11, 722778 (2021).
  19. Maan, H., et al. Imaging flow cytometry reveals a dual role for exopolysaccharides in biofilms: To promote self-adhesion while repelling non-self-community members. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal. 20, 15-25 (2022).
  20. Konieczny, M., Rhein, P., Czaczyk, K., Bialas, W., Juzwa, W. Imaging flow cytometry to study biofilm-associated microbial aggregates. Molecules. 26 (23), 7096 (2021).
  21. Niederdorfer, R., Peter, H., Battin, T. J. Attached biofilms and suspended aggregates are distinct microbial lifestyles emanating from differing hydraulics. Nature Microbiology. 1, 16178 (2016).
check_url/fr/65788?article_type=t

Play Video

Citer Cet Article
Suissa, R., Hadad, U., Meijler, M., Kolodkin-Gal, I. Imaging Flow Cytometry to Study Microbial Autoaggregation. J. Vis. Exp. (199), e65788, doi:10.3791/65788 (2023).

View Video