Summary

The Establishment of a Murine Maxillary Orthodontic Model

Published: October 27, 2023
doi:

Summary

Here we demonstrate step-by-step a manageable, orthodontic tooth movement protocol operated on a murine maxillary model. With the explicit explanation of each step and visual demonstration, researchers can master this model and apply it to their experimental needs with a few modifications.

Abstract

Due to the lack of reproducible protocols for establishing a murine maxillary orthodontic model, we present a reliable and reproducible protocol to provide researchers with a feasible tool to analyze mechanical loading-associated bone remodeling. This study presents a detailed flowchart in addition to different types of schematic diagrams, operation photos, and videos. We performed this protocol on 11 adult wide-type C57/B6J mice and harvested samples on postoperative days 3, 8, and 14. The micro-CT and histopathological data have proven the success of tooth movements coupled with bone remodeling using this protocol. Furthermore, according to the micro-CT results on days 3, 8, and 14, we have divided bone modeling into three stages: preparation stage, bone resorption stage, and bone formation stage. These stages are expected to help researchers concerned with different stages to set sample collection time reasonably. This protocol can equip researchers with a tool to carry out regenerative analysis of bone remodeling.

Introduction

Bone is a highly active reconstructed tissue that adapts its size, shape, and properties through the lifetime of the individual1,2. In addition to hormones, aging, nutrition, and other biological or biochemical factors3, the idea that mechanical load is the most determining factor has garnered general acceptance4,5. Under some circumstances with abnormal mechanical load, the imbalance between bone resorption and bone formation may lead to abnormal bone remodeling and bone disorders. Bone diseases such as disuse osteoporosis and bone loss during long-term bed rest or in the presence of microgravity at spaceflight have a close relationship with abnormal mechanical load6,7,8.

Mechanical load has also been used to treat bone-related diseases such as distraction treatment and orthodontic treatment. Distraction treatment has been used in developmental diseases such as craniosynostosis and mandibular hypoplasia9,10, while orthodontic treatment has been widely used to rectify abnormal teeth position and any malocclusion11. The core of orthodontic treatment is also the management of mechanical load. When the bone tissue is subjected to mechanical load, a highly coordinated bone remodeling process is induced by coupling of bone resorption followed by bone formation, which can move teeth to achieve the orthodontic purpose12,13.

Although orthodontic treatment has been widely applied for clinical practice, as our knowledge of the biological effects of mechanical load is limited, the results of orthodontic treatment are uncontrollable. To overcome these limitations, several animal models such as mouse, rat, rabbit, cat, dog, monkey, and pig have been established to investigate the underlying mechanism of mechanical load-induced bone remodeling (Table 1)14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32. Large animals such as dogs, monkeys, and pigs have some advantages over small animals in orthodontic operation-they have more human-like teeth and dentition so that the surgical procedure is easy to replicate in humans. Additionally, a wide view can reduce the operation difficulty and make it possible to apply a variety of orthodontic schemes33,34. However, large animals are difficult to obtain, leading to challenges related to sample size, and they are subject to ethical restrictions35. Furthermore, routine extraction procedures and complex instruments make the experiments difficult to perform due to which large animals are rarely used.

Under such circumstances, rodents are mainly used to establish orthodontic models. Among these models, rats and rabbits have lower operating difficulty and more tooth movement schemes compared with mice. However, the murine model has the unique advantage that there are a large number of genetically modified mice available, which is especially crucial for investigating the underlying mechanisms36. However, the murine model is the most difficult model to manipulate because of its small size. Reviewing the current methods, moving the first molar in the mesial direction is the only practical method for an orthodontic model. Two devices are mainly used to move the tooth-coil spring and elastic band. Using an elastic band is easier, but the orthodontic force varies greatly, which makes it difficult to obtain stable results.

Xu et al.15 have established a murine model with a coil spring on the mandible. However, due to the mobility of the mandible and the obstructive nature of the tongue, operation on the maxilla is always the first choice for both intraoperative and postoperative considerations. Taddei et al.16 described a more detailed protocol on the murine maxilla 10 years ago and more visual and pellucid details should be added. In summary, this protocol has systematically described a detailed orthodontic tooth movement protocol in a murine maxillary model to help researchers master the modeling method in a standardized way and enable the comparative evaluation between different studies.

Protocol

The animal procedures in this study were reviewed and approved by the Ethical Committee of the West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University (WCHSIRB-D-2017-041). Adult C57BL/6 mice were used in this study (see the Table of Materials). This protocol adds mechanical load to the right maxillary first molar (M1) for mesial movement where a highly coordinated bone remodeling process is induced by coupling of bone resorption and bone formation (Figure 1). <p class="jov…

Representative Results

We have performed the OTM surgery on 11 adult male mice (C57/BL6, 3 months old). They were euthanized for results on days 3, 8, and 14 post surgery. In these experiments, the right maxillary side is the operation side, while the left maxillary side is the control side. The micro-CT showed that there was a temporal consecutive increase in the distance between M1 and M2: 30 µm, 70 µm, and 110 µm at days 3, 8, and 14 post surgery, respectively (Figure 4). The low-density periodon…

Discussion

In this paper, we tried to describe the simplest orthodontic tooth movement protocol on murine maxillary model step by step to study the latent mechanisms of mechanical load-induced bone remodeling. Apart from research on bone remodeling, there are some other mainstream applications of this method: 1) methodological research on the acceleration of orthodontic tooth movement; 2) research on orthodontic root resorption; 3) biological mechanisms of orthodontic tooth movement and pain; 4) research on the transgenic model.</p…

Divulgations

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China grant 82100982 to F.L.

Materials

Experimental Models: Mouse Lines
C57/B6J  Gempharmatech Experimental Animals Company  C57/B6J
Critical Commercial Assays
Hematoxylin and Eosin Stain Kit Biosharp BL700B
Masson’s Trichrome Stain Kit Solarbio G1340
Instruments
27 G needle Chengdu Xinjin Shifeng Medical Apparatus & Instruments Co. LTD. SB1-074(IV)
Adhesives Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 41282
Corkboard DELI Group Co., Ltd. 8705
Cotton balls Haishi Hainuo Group Co.,  Ltd. 20120047
Cotton sticks Lakong Medical Devices Co., Ltd. M6500R
Customized coil spring Chengdu Mingxing Spring Co., Ltd. 1109-02
Forceps Chengdu Shifeng Co., Ltd. none
Light-cured fluid resin Shofu Dental Trading (SHANGHAI) Co., Ltd. 518785
Light curer Liang Ya Dental Equipment Co., Ltd. LY-A180
Medical adhesive tapes  Haishi Hainuo Group Co.,  Ltd. 0008-2014
Medical non-woven fabric Henan Yadu Industrial Co., Ltd. 01011500018
Needle holders Chengdu Shifeng Co., Ltd. none
Rubber bands Haishi Hainuo Group Co.,  Ltd. 32X1
Surgical scissors Chengdu Shifeng Co., Ltd. none
Tweezers Chengdu Shifeng Co., Ltd. none

References

  1. Kenkre, J. S., Bassett, J. The bone remodeling cycle. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry. 55 (3), 308-327 (2018).
  2. Feng, X., McDonald, J. M. Disorders of bone remodeling. Annual Review of Pathology. 6 (1), 121-145 (2011).
  3. Alliston, T. Biological regulation of bone quality. Current Osteoporosis Reports. 12 (3), 366-375 (2014).
  4. Duncan, R. L., Turner, C. H. Mechanotransduction and the functional response of bone to mechanical strain. Calcified Tissue International. 57 (5), 344-358 (1995).
  5. García-Aznar, J. M., Nasello, G., Hervas-Raluy, S., Pérez, M. &. #. 1. 9. 3. ;., Gómez-Benito, M. J. Multiscale modeling of bone tissue mechanobiology. Bone. 151 (10), 1-12 (2021).
  6. Rolvien, T., Amling, M. Disuse osteoporosis: clinical and mechanistic insights. Calcified Tissue International. 110 (5), 592-604 (2022).
  7. Vico, L., Hargens, A. Skeletal changes during and after spaceflight. Nature Reviews Rheumatology. 14 (4), 229-245 (2018).
  8. Iwaniec, U. T., Turner, R. T. Influence of body weight on bone mass, architecture and turnover. Journal of Endocrinology. 230 (3), R115-R130 (2016).
  9. Governale, L. S. Craniosynostosis. Pediatric Neurology. 53 (5), 394-401 (2015).
  10. Sahoo, N. K., Issar, Y., Thakral, A. Mandibular Distraction osteogenesis. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 30 (8), e743-e746 (2019).
  11. Roberts-Harry, D., Sandy, J. Orthodontics. Part 1: Who needs orthodontics. British Dental Journal. 195 (8), 433-437 (2003).
  12. Li, Y., Jacox, L. A., Little, S. H., Ko, C. C. Orthodontic tooth movement: The biology and clinical implications. Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences. 34 (4), 207-214 (2018).
  13. Will, L. A. Orthodontic tooth movement: a historic prospective. Frontiers of Oral Biology. 18, 46-55 (2016).
  14. Xu, H., Lee, A., Sun, L., Naveh, G. R. S. 3D Imaging of PDL collagen fibers during orthodontic tooth movement in mandibular murine model. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (170), e62149 (2021).
  15. Taddei, S. R., et al. Experimental model of tooth movement in mice: a standardized protocol for studying bone remodeling under compression and tensile strains. Journal of Biomechanics. 45 (16), 2729-2735 (2012).
  16. Deguchi, T., Takeshita, N., Balam, T. A., Fujiyoshi, Y., Takano-Yamamoto, T. Galanin-immunoreactive nerve fibers in the periodontal ligament during experimental tooth movement. Journal of Dental Research. 82 (9), 677-681 (2003).
  17. Gudhimella, S., et al. A rodent model using skeletal anchorage and low forces for orthodontic tooth movement. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 155 (2), 254-263 (2019).
  18. Lira Dos Santos, E. J., et al. Orthodontic tooth movement alters cementocyte ultrastructure and cellular cementum proteome signature. Bone. 153 (12), 116-139 (2021).
  19. Danz, J. C., Bibby, B. M., Katsaros, C., Stavropoulos, A. Effects of facial tooth movement on the periodontium in rats: a comparison between conventional and low force. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 43 (3), 229-237 (2016).
  20. Kohno, T., Matsumoto, Y., Kanno, Z., Warita, H., Soma, K. Experimental tooth movement under light orthodontic forces: rates of tooth movement and changes of the periodontium. Journal of Orthodontics. 29 (2), 129-135 (2002).
  21. Gad, A. M., Soliman, S. O. Evaluation of systemic Omega-3 PUFAs effect on orthodontic tooth movement in a rabbit model: RCT. Angle Orthodontist. 93 (4), 476-481 (2023).
  22. Huang, C. Y., et al. Comparison of tooth movement and biological response resulting from different force magnitudes combined with osteoperforation in rabbits. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 29 (2), 20200734 (2021).
  23. Alhasyimi, A. A., Pudyani, P. P., Asmara, W., Ana, I. D. Enhancement of post-orthodontic tooth stability by carbonated hydroxyapatite-incorporated advanced platelet-rich fibrin in rabbits. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research. 21 (2), 112-118 (2018).
  24. Elkattan, A. E., et al. Effects of Different Parameters of Diode Laser on Acceleration of Orthodontic Tooth Movement and Its Effect on Relapse: An Experimental Animal Study. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences. 7 (3), 412-420 (2019).
  25. von Böhl, M., Maltha, J. C., Von Den Hoff, J. W., Kuijpers-Jagtman, A. M. Focal hyalinization during experimental tooth movement in beagle dogs. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 125 (5), 615-623 (2004).
  26. Machibya, F. M., et al. Effects of bone regeneration materials and tooth movement timing on canine experimental orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthodontist. 88 (2), 171-178 (2018).
  27. Deguchi, T., et al. Histomorphometric evaluation of alveolar bone turnover between the maxilla and the mandible during experimental tooth movement in dogs. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 133 (6), 889-897 (2008).
  28. Tanimoto, K., et al. Experimental tooth movement into new bone area regenerated by use of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Cleft Palate-craniofacial Journal. 52 (4), 386-394 (2015).
  29. Oltramari, P. V., et al. Orthodontic movement in bone defects filled with xenogenic graft: an experimental study in minipigs. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 131 (3), e10-e17 (2007).
  30. Verna, C., Dalstra, M., Lee, T. C., Melsen, B. Microdamage in porcine alveolar bone due to functional and orthodontic loading. European Journal of Morphology. 42 (1-2), 3-11 (2005).
  31. Steiner, G. G., Pearson, J. K., Ainamo, J. Changes of the marginal periodontium as a result of labial tooth movement in monkeys. Journal of Periodontology. 52 (6), 314-320 (1981).
  32. Celebi, A. A., Demirer, S., Catalbas, B., Arikan, S. Effect of ovarian activity on orthodontic tooth movement and gingival crevicular fluid levels of interleukin-1β and prostaglandin E(2) in cats. Angle Orthodontist. 83 (2), 70-75 (2013).
  33. Holmes, H. D., Tennant, M., Goonewardene, M. S. Augmentation of faciolingual gingival dimensions with free connective tissue grafts before labial orthodontic tooth movement: an experimental study with a canine model. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 127 (5), 562-572 (2005).
  34. Wennström, J. L., Lindhe, J., Sinclair, F., Thilander, B. Some periodontal tissue reactions to orthodontic tooth movement in monkeys. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 14 (3), 121-129 (1987).
  35. Ibrahim, A. Y., Gudhimella, S., Pandruvada, S. N., Huja, S. S. Resolving differences between animal models for expedited orthodontic tooth movement. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research. 20, 72-76 (2017).
  36. Kirschneck, C., Bauer, M., Gubernator, J., Proof, P., Schröder, A. Comparative assessment of mouse models for experimental orthodontic tooth movement. Scientific Reports. 10 (1), 1-12 (2020).
  37. Ransom, R. C., et al. Mechanoresponsive stem cells acquire neural crest fate in jaw regeneration. Nature. 563 (7732), 514-521 (2018).
  38. Mardas, N., et al. Experimental model for bone regeneration in oral and cranio-maxillo-facial surgery. Journal of Investigative Surgery. 27 (1), 32-49 (2014).
check_url/fr/66033?article_type=t

Play Video

Citer Cet Article
Liu, J., Yu, C., Li, F. The Establishment of a Murine Maxillary Orthodontic Model. J. Vis. Exp. (200), e66033, doi:10.3791/66033 (2023).

View Video