Summary

Steg-specifik Sortering av mus spermatider med flödescytometri

Published: December 31, 2015
doi:

Summary

We describe a sorting strategy for mouse spermatids using flow cytometry. Spermatids are sorted into four highly pure populations, including round (spermiogenesis steps 1-9), early elongating (spermiogenesis steps 10-12), late elongating (spermiogenesis steps 13-14) and elongated spermatids (spermiogenesis steps 15-16). DNA staining, size and granulosity are used as selection parameters.

Abstract

Differentieringen av mus spermatider är en kritisk process för framställning av en funktionell hangamet med en intakt genom att överföras till nästa generation. Hittills har molekylära studier av denna morfologiska övergång hämmats av bristen på en metod som tillåter tillräcklig åtskillnad av dessa viktiga steg i spermatid differentiering för efterföljande analyser. Tidigare försök till korrekt grind av dessa celler med användning av flödescytometri kan ha varit svårt på grund av en egendomlig ökning av DNA-fluorescens i spermatider genomgår kromatin remodeling. Baserat på denna observation, vi lämna uppgifter om en enkel flödescytometri systemet möjliggör reproducerbar rening av fyra populationer av mus spermatider fast med etanol, var och en representerar en annan stat i kärn remodelleringsprocessen. Befolknings anrikning bekräftas med hjälp av stegspecifika markörer och morfologiska criterions. De renade spermatider kan användas för genomisk och proteomic analyser.

Introduction

Haploid round spermatids differentiate into spermatozoa by a process called spermiogenesis. This involves many different steps including the acquisition of a flagellum, chromatin and cytoskeleton remodeling, condensation of the nucleus as well as the loss of most of the cytoplasm. These unique cellular events must be finely regulated in order to produce a mature functional gamete with an intact genome suitable for fertilization. Spermiogenesis can hardly be studied in vitro since no reliable cell culture system has so far been able to support progression through the different steps of the process. Moreover, actual in vitro techniques lead to a poor yield1,2. In vivo, proper transitions through the different steps of spermiogenesis are crucial for the natural functional integrity of the male gamete. Successful purification of spermatids according to their differentiation steps has never been accomplished with a level of enrichment sufficient to allow molecular characterization of spermiogenesis. For instance, purification of key steps of the spermatidal differentiation would be especially useful to study the developing acrosome, formation of the midpiece3, cell junction dynamics4, RNA dynamics5, chromatin remodeling process6,7 or genomic stability8. Purification of spermatids has been hampered by their progressive morphological transformation, the lack of known stage-specific external biomarkers, and their peculiar shape and size.

Although most male germ cells display a direct relationship between DNA staining and ploidy (DNA content), we noticed that such positive correlation is no longer applicable to spermatids. This stems from our early observation that seminiferous tubule sections show variable intensity of DNA staining throughout the different spermiogenesis steps. Although DNA staining is consistent with their haploid set of chromosomes from spermiogenesis steps 1 to 7 (round spermatids), we observed a sharp increase in fluorescence intensity with DAPI or SYTO 16 around the onset of nuclear reorganization and chromatin remodeling (spermiogenesis step 8) reaching a peak at the onset of nuclear condensation (spermiogenesis steps 11-12). Following condensation of the nucleus, DNA staining intensity decreases until spermiation (spermiogenesis step 16). We surmised that this was likely associated with the formation of their peculiar chromatin structure transition where histones are replaced by protamines. We therefore developed a reliable flow cytometry method that allows the separation of spermatids using the variation of DNA intensity of spermatids as a main selection parameter.

A simple flow cytometry approach is described to separate mouse spermatids with high purity (95-100%) based on their apparent DNA content (SYTO16 staining), size and granulosity. Spermatids are separated into four populations; spermiogenesis steps 1-9, 10-12, 13-14 and 15-16. Purified spermatids are suitable for genetic/genomic analysis, as well as proteomic applications as described in a recent publication from our group9.

Protocol

Djuromsorg var i enlighet med djuromsorg och använda kommitté Université de Sherbrooke. 1. Tube Framställning Dagen före cellsortering, tillsätt 1-2 ml värmeinaktiverat fetalt bovint serum (FBS) till 5 ml polypropylen rund bottenrören, och till 15 ml och 50 ml polypropylen koniska rör. Avgörande steg: Se till att alla rör som används i protokollet är belagda. Obs: FBS beläggning förhindrar könsceller från att fastna vid rörväggarna. <li…

Representative Results

Gating strategi som används med flödescytometri Figur 1 visar grind strategi som används i flödescytometri för att sortera fyra mycket rena spermatid populationer. Kortfattat, celler med positiv DNA färgning (Alexa Fluor 488-A) först väljs med Gate 1. spermatider från spermiogenesen stegen 1-12 väljs (Gate 2) på ett punktdiagram som visar granulosity (SSC-A) vs storlek (FSC -A) från Gate 1. Däreft…

Discussion

Spermatogenescykler celler har alltid varit en utmaning att studera med tanke på komplexiteten av seminiferiepitel, liksom den begränsade framgången för in vitro kultur. Under årens lopp har många metoder rena könsceller från olika arter utvecklades. Sedimenteringstekniker som använder gravitation rening med Percoll eller bovinserumalbumin gradienter brukar ge en god avkastning på intakta germinalceller, men saknar ordentlig definition mellan vissa celltyper såsom meiotiska tetraploida celler och spe…

Divulgazioni

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Författarna vill tacka Dr Leonid Volkov och Éric Bouchard för sina tekniska råd om epifluorescensmikroskopi.

Ekonomiskt stöd

Finansieras av den kanadensiska Institutes of Health Research (bidrags # MOP-93.781) till GB

Materials

Isoflurane ABBOT 05260-05 For mouse anesthesia before euthanasia
Fetal bovine serum Wisent 90150 For tube coating
1X PBS
EDTA BioShop EDT For sorting buffer preparation
HEPES Sigma H For sorting buffer preparation
100 % Ethanol Les alcools de commerce 092-09-11N For cell fixation
SYTO 16 Life Technologies S7578 DNA staining
5 ml polypropylene round bottom tubes BD Falcon 352063 Sorted cells collection
15 ml polypropylene conical bottom tubes PROgene 1500
50 ml polypropylene conical bottom tubes PROgene 5000
TEC4 anaesthetic vaporizer Ohmeda 1160526 For mouse euthanasia
CO2 gas tank Praxair C799117902 For mouse euthanasia
O2 gas tank Praxair O254130501 For mouse euthanasia
Homemade mouse gas chamber For mouse euthanasia
40 µm Falcon cell strainer Corning Incorporated 352340
50-micron sample line filters BD Biosciences 649049
Vortex mixer Labnet international, inc. S0200 For cell fixation
Dynac centrifuge Clay Adams 101
Celltrics 50 µm filters Partec 04-004-2327
488 nm laser-euipped cell sorter BD Biosciences FACSAria III
Accudop Fluorescent Beads BD Biosciences 345249
Sorting Buffer: 1X PBS, 1mM EDTA pH 8.0, 25mM HEPES pH 7.0, 1%FBS FBS is heat-inactivated. Make fresh solution, 0.22 μm filtered and keep at 4°C.

Riferimenti

  1. Sato, T., et al. In vitro production of functional sperm in cultured neonatal mouse testes. Nature. 471 (7339), 504-507 (2011).
  2. Sato, T., et al. In vitro production of fertile sperm from murine spermatogonial stem cell lines. Nat. Commun. 2, 472 (2011).
  3. Sun, X., Kovacs, T., Hu, Y. -. J., Yang, W. -. X. The role of actin and myosin during spermatogenesis. Mol. Biol. Rep. 38 (6), 3993-4001 (2011).
  4. Cheng, C. Y., Mruk, D. D. Cell junction dynamics in the testis: Sertoli-germ cell interactions and male contraceptive development. Physiol. Rev. 82, 825-874 (2002).
  5. Laiho, A., Kotaja, N., Gyenesei, A., Sironen, A. Transcriptome profiling of the murine testis during the first wave of spermatogenesis. PLoS ONE. 8 (4), (2013).
  6. Leduc, F., Maquennehan, V., Nkoma, G. B., Boissonneault, G. DNA damage response during chromatin remodeling in elongating spermatids of mice. Biol. Reprod. 78 (2), 324-332 (2008).
  7. Meistrich, M. L., Mohapatra, B., Shirley, C. R., Zhao, M. Roles of transition nuclear proteins in spermiogenesis. Chromosoma. 111 (8), 483-488 (2003).
  8. Grégoire, M. -. C., et al. Male-driven de novo mutations in haploid germ cells. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 19 (8), 495-499 (2013).
  9. Simard, O., et al. Instability of trinucleotidic repeats during chromatin remodeling in spermatids. Hum. Mutat. , (2014).
  10. Wykes, S. M., Krawetz, S. Separation of spermatogenic cells from adult transgenic mouse testes using unit-gravity sedimentation. Mol. Biotechnol. 25 (2), 131-138 (2003).
  11. Yoshida, S., et al. The first round of mouse spermatogenesis is a distinctive program that lacks the self-renewing spermatogonia stage. Development (Cambridge, England). 133 (8), 1495-1505 (2006).
  12. Moreno, R. D., Lizama, C., Urzúa, N., Vergara, S. P., Reyes, J. G. Caspase activation throughout the first wave of spermatogenesis in the rat. Cell Tissue Res. 325 (3), 533-540 (2006).
  13. Meistrich, M. L., Trostle-Weige, P. K., Van Beek, M. E. Separation of specific stages of spermatids from vitamin A-synchronized rat testes for assessment of nucleoprotein changes during spermiogenesis. Biol. Reprod. 51 (2), 334-344 (1994).
  14. van Pelt, A. M., de Rooij, D. G. Synchronization of the seminiferous epithelium after vitamin A replacement in vitamin A-deficient mice. Biol. Reprod. 43, 363-367 (1990).
  15. Getun, I. V., Torres, B., Bois, P. R. J. Flow cytometry purification of mouse meiotic cells. J. Vis. Exp. , (2011).
  16. Kovtun, I. V., McMurray, C. T. Trinucleotide expansion in haploid germ cells by gap repair. Nature Genet. 27 (4), 407-411 (2001).
  17. Bastos, H., et al. Flow cytometric characterization of viable meiotic and postmeiotic cells by Hoechst 33342 in mouse spermatogenesis. Cytometry A. 65 (1), 40-49 (2005).
  18. Lassalle, B., Ziyyat, A., Testart, J., Finaz, C., Lefèvre, A. Flow cytometric method to isolate round spermatids from mouse testis. Hum. Reprod. 14 (2), 388-394 (1999).

Play Video

Citazione di questo articolo
Simard, O., Leduc, F., Acteau, G., Arguin, M., Grégoire, M., Brazeau, M., Marois, I., Richter, M. V., Boissonneault, G. Step-specific Sorting of Mouse Spermatids by Flow Cytometry. J. Vis. Exp. (106), e53379, doi:10.3791/53379 (2015).

View Video