Summary

A Simple and Inexpensive Running Wheel Model for Progressive Resistance Training in Mice

Published: April 28, 2022
doi:

Summary

This procedure describes a translatable progressive loaded running wheel resistance training model in mice. The primary advantage of this resistance training model is that it is entirely voluntary, thus reducing stress for the animals and the burden on the researcher.

Abstract

Previously developed rodent resistance-based exercise models, including synergistic ablation, electrical stimulation, weighted-ladder climbing, and most recently, weighted-sled pulling, are highly effective at providing a hypertrophic stimulus to induce skeletal muscle adaptations. While these models have proven invaluable for skeletal muscle research, they are either invasive or involuntary and labor-intensive. Fortunately, many rodent strains voluntarily run long distances when given access to a running wheel. Loaded wheel running (LWR) models in rodents are capable of inducing adaptations commonly observed with resistance training in humans, such as increased muscle mass and fiber hypertrophy, as well as stimulation of muscle protein synthesis. However, the addition of moderate wheel load either fails to deter mice from running great distances, which is more reflective of an endurance/resistance training model, or the mice discontinue running nearly entirely due to the method of load application. Therefore, a novel high-load wheel running model (HLWR) has been developed for mice where external resistance is applied and progressively increased, enabling mice to continue running with much higher loads than previously utilized. Preliminary results from this novel HLWR model suggest it provides sufficient stimulus to induce hypertrophic adaptations over the 9 week training protocol. Herein, the specific procedures to execute this simple yet inexpensive progressive resistance-based exercise training model in mice are described.

Introduction

Skeletal muscle mass comprises approximately 40% of body mass in adult humans; thus, maintaining skeletal muscle mass throughout life is critical. Skeletal muscle mass plays an integral role in energy metabolism, maintaining core body temperature, and glucose homeostasis1. The maintenance of skeletal muscle is a balance between protein synthesis and protein degradation, but many gaps still exist in the understanding of the intricate molecular mechanisms that drive these processes. To study the molecular mechanisms that regulate the maintenance and growth of muscle mass, human subjects' research models often employ resistance exercise-based interventions, since mechanical stimuli play an integral role in the regulation of skeletal muscle mass. While human subjects research has been successful, the time necessary to exhibit adaptations and ethical concerns regarding invasive procedures (i.e., muscle biopsies) limit the quantity of data that can be obtained. While the adaptations to resistance exercise are fairly ubiquitous across mammalian species, animal models provide the benefit of being able to precisely control the diet and exercise regimen while also allowing for the collection of whole tissues throughout the body, such as the brain, liver, heart, and skeletal muscle.

Many resistance training models have been developed for use in rodents: synergistic ablation2, electrical stimulation3,4, weighted ladder climbing5, weighted sled pulling6, and canvassed squatting7. It is evident that all of these models, if done correctly, can be effective models to induce skeletal muscle adaptations, such as hypertrophy. However, the downfalls of these models are that they are mostly involuntary, not part of normal rodent behavior, time-/labor-intensive, and invasive.

Fortunately, many mouse and rat strains voluntarily run long distances when given access to a running wheel. Moreover, free-running wheel (FWR) exercise models do not rely on extensive conditioning, positive/negative reinforcement, or anesthesia to force movement or muscle activity8,9. Running activity depends greatly on mouse strain, sex, age, and an individual basis. Lightfoot et al. compared the running activity of 15 different mouse strains and found that daily running distance ranges from 2.93 km to 7.93 km, with C57BL/6 mice running the farthest, regardless of sex10. FWR is commonly accepted as an excellent model for inducing endurance adaptations in skeletal and cardiac muscles11,12,13,14,15,16; however, utilizing wheel running in resistance training models is less commonly investigated.

As one could suspect, the hypertrophic effect of wheel running might be augmented by adding resistance to the running wheel, termed loaded wheel running (LWR), thus requiring greater efforts to run on the wheel to more closely mimic resistance training. Using varied methods of load application, previous studies have demonstrated that the LWR model utilizing rats and mice routinely displayed increases in limb muscle mass of 5%-30% in a matter of 6-8 weeks17,18,19,20,21. Furthermore, D'hulst et al. demonstrated that a single bout of LWR led to a 50% greater increase in activation of the protein synthesis signaling pathway compared to FWR22. Wheel resistance has been most commonly applied by a friction-based, constant loading method, whereby a magnetic brake or tension bolt is utilized to apply wheel resistance12,19,23,24. One caveat of the friction-based, constant load method is that when moderate to high resistance is applied, the animal cannot overcome the high resistance to initiate movement of the wheel, effectively ceasing training. Most importantly, many of the cage and wheel systems used for rodent running wheel models are quite costly and require specialized equipment.

Recently, Dungan et al. developed a progressive weighted-wheel-running (PoWeR) model, which applies a load to the wheel asymmetrically via external masses adhered to a single side of the wheel. The unbalanced wheel loading and variable resistance of the PoWeR model are thought to encourage continued running activity and promote shorter bursts of loaded wheel running in mice, more closely imitating the sets and repetitions performed with resistance training17. Despite the average running distance being 10-12 km per day, the PoWeR model yielded a 16% and 17% increase in plantaris muscle wet mass and fiber cross-sectional area (CSA), respectively. Despite many practical advantages, the PoWeR model of LWR does have some limitations. As recognized by the authors, the PoWeR model is a high-volume "hybrid" stimulus that is reflective of a blended endurance/resistance exercise model (i.e., concurrent training in humans), as opposed to a more strictly resistance exercise-based model, potentially introducing an interference effect and contributing to the less pronounced hypertrophy or different mechanisms by which hypertrophy is induced25. Ensuring that a concurrent training phenomenon does not occur in what is intended to be a resistance exercise training model is imperative. Therefore, the PoWeR model was modified to develop a LWR model that utilizes higher loads than previously used to more closely resemble a resistance training model. Herein, details are provided for a simple and inexpensive 9 week progressive resistance training LWR model in C57BL/6 mice.

Protocol

This study was approved by Appalachian State University's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (#22-05). 1. Animals Procure C57BL/6 mice from the in-house mouse colony. NOTE: Male mice 5-8 months of age at the start of the study were used. Daily running activity peaks and plateaus at around 9-10 weeks of age26. Previous studies have demonstrated that old mice (22-24 months) will also perform loaded wheel running<sup class="…

Representative Results

In this study, 24 C57BL/6 mice (6.3 ± 0.7 months at the start of this study) were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: sedentary (SED), loaded wheel running (LWR; same as PoWeR described by Dungan et al.17), or high LWR (HLWR), and then completed their respective 9 week protocol. After the acclimation week (week 1), there were no group or group x time differences in running distance or training volume (Figure 5). <p class="jove_content biglegen…

Discussion

Existing resistance exercise models in rodents have proven invaluable for skeletal muscle research; however, many of these models are invasive, involuntary, and/or time- and labor-intensive. LWR is an excellent model that not only induces similar muscular adaptations as those observed in other well-accepted resistance exercise training models, but also provides a chronic, low-stress exercise stimulus for the animal with minimal time/labor commitment by the researcher. Additionally, since LWR models require minimal direct…

Divulgazioni

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Graduate Student Government Association, Office of Student Research, and the Department of Health and Exercise Science at Appalachian State University for providing funding to support this project. Additionally, we would like to thank Monique Eckerd and Therin Williams-Frey for overseeing daily operations of the animal research facility.

Materials

1 g disc neodymium magnets Applied Magnets ND018-6 Used for all sensor magnets and 1 g increments of wheel loading
2.5 g disc neodymium magnets Applied Magnets ND022 Used for 2.5 g increments of wheel loading
8-32 x 1" stainless steel screws Amazon https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07939RS23/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&psc=1
8-32 Wing Nuts Amazon https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07YYWW2SB/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&th=1
10 µL pipette tip box (empty) Thermo Scientific 2140 We used empty ART Pipette tip boxes, but any similar sized boxes/trays would suffice
Extreme Liquid Glue Loctite
Laminin primary antibody Novus Biologicals NB300-144AF647 primary antibody conjugated with AF657; 1:200 in PBS containing 10% normal goat serum
Lithium 3 V battery n/a CR2032
M10 (3/16" x 1 1/4") stainless steel fender washers Amazon https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00OHUHEU8/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&th=1
MyoVision: Automated Image Quantification Platform  Wen et al. (2017) v1.0 https://www.uky.edu/chs/center-for-muscle-biology/myovision
Polycarbonate rodent cage (430 mm L x 290 mm W x 201 mm H), with narrow width stainless steel wired bar lid Orchid Scientific Polycarbonate Rat Cage Type II https://orchidscientific.com/product/rat-cage/ – 1519974600758-c29bc1c5-6dfa
Sigma Sport 509 Bike Computer Sigma Sport Does not need to be this model in particular, but must have distance and time monitoring capabilities
Silent Spinner Running Wheel (mini 11.4 cm) Kaytee SKU# 100079369 https://www.kaytee.com/all-products/small-animal/silent-spinner-wheel

Riferimenti

  1. Frontera, W. R., Ochala, J. Skeletal muscle: A brief review of structure and function. Calcified Tissue International. 96 (3), 183-195 (2015).
  2. Goldberg, A. L. Protein synthesis during work-induced growth of skeletal muscle. Journal of Cell Biology. 36 (3), 653-658 (1968).
  3. Baar, K., Esser, K. Phosphorylation of p70S6k correlates with increased skeletal muscle mass following resistance exercise. American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology. 276 (1), 120-127 (1999).
  4. Wong, T. S., Booth, F. W. Skeletal muscle enlargement with weight-lifting exercise by rats. Journal of Applied Physiology. 65 (2), 950-954 (1988).
  5. Hornberger Jr, T. A., Farrar, R. P. Physiological hypertrophy of the FHL muscle following 8 weeks of progressive resistance exercise in the rat. Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology. 29 (1), 16-31 (2004).
  6. Zhu, W. G., et al. Weight pulling: A novel mouse model of human progressive resistance exercise. Cells. 10 (9), 2459 (2021).
  7. Tamaki, T., Uchiyama, S., Nakano, S. A weight-lifting exercise model for inducing hypertrophy in the hindlimb muscles of rats. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 24 (8), 881-886 (1992).
  8. De Bono, J. P., Adlam, D., Paterson, D. J., Channon, K. M. Novel quantitative phenotypes of exercise training in mouse models. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 290 (4), 926-934 (2006).
  9. Goh, J., Ladiges, W. Voluntary wheel running in mice. Current Protocols in Mouse Biology. 5 (4), 283-290 (2015).
  10. Lightfoot, J. T., Turner, M. J., Daves, M., Vordermark, A., Kleeberger, S. R. Genetic influence on daily wheel running activity level. Physiological Genomics. 19 (3), 270-276 (2004).
  11. Allen, D. L., et al. Cardiac and skeletal muscle adaptations to voluntary wheel running in the mouse. Journal of Applied Physiology. 90 (5), 1900-1908 (2001).
  12. Ishihara, A., et al. Effects of running exercise with increasing loads on tibialis anterior muscle fibres in mice. Experimental Physiology. 87 (2), 113-116 (2002).
  13. Kurosaka, M., et al. Effects of voluntary wheel running on satellite cells in the rat plantaris muscle. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine. 8 (1), 51-57 (2009).
  14. Lambert, M. I., Noakes, T. D. Spontaneous running increases VO2max and running performance in rats. Journal of Applied Physiology. 68 (1), 400-403 (1990).
  15. Rodnick, K. J., Reaven, G. M., Haskell, W. L., Sims, C. R., Mondon, C. E. Variations in running activity and enzymatic adaptations in voluntary running rats. Journal of Applied Physiology. 66 (3), 1250-1257 (1989).
  16. Sexton, W. L. Vascular adaptations in rat hindlimb skeletal muscle after voluntary running-wheel exercise. Journal of Applied Physiology. 79 (1), 287-296 (1995).
  17. Dungan, C. M., et al. Elevated myonuclear density during skeletal muscle hypertrophy in response to training is reversed during detraining. American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology. 316 (5), 649-654 (2019).
  18. Ishihara, A., Roy, R. R., Ohira, Y., Ibata, Y., Edgerton, V. R. Hypertrophy of rat plantaris muscle fibers after voluntary running with increasing loads. Journal of Applied Physiology. 84 (6), 2183-2189 (1998).
  19. Konhilas, J. P., et al. Loaded wheel running and muscle adaptation in the mouse. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 289 (1), 455-465 (2005).
  20. Legerlotz, K., Elliott, B., Guillemin, B., Smith, H. K. Voluntary resistance running wheel activity pattern and skeletal muscle growth in rats: Wheel running activity pattern and muscle growth. Experimental Physiology. 93 (6), 754-762 (2008).
  21. Mobley, C. B., et al. Progressive resistance-loaded voluntary wheel running increases hypertrophy and differentially affects muscle protein synthesis, ribosome biogenesis, and proteolytic markers in rat muscle. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 102 (1), 317-329 (2018).
  22. D’Hulst, G., Palmer, A. S., Masschelein, E., Bar-Nur, O., De Bock, K. Voluntary resistance running as a model to induce mTOR activation in mouse skeletal muscle. Frontiers in Physiology. 10, 1271 (2019).
  23. Soffe, Z., Radley-Crabb, H. G., McMahon, C., Grounds, M. D., Shavlakadze, T. Effects of loaded voluntary wheel exercise on performance and muscle hypertrophy in young and old male C57Bl/6J mice: Exercise and muscle hypertrophy in old mice. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports. 26 (2), 172-188 (2016).
  24. White, Z., et al. Voluntary resistance wheel exercise from mid-life prevents sarcopenia and increases markers of mitochondrial function and autophagy in muscles of old male and female C57BL/6J mice. Skeletal Muscle. 6 (1), 45 (2016).
  25. Murach, K. A., McCarthy, J. J., Peterson, C. A., Dungan, C. M. Making mice mighty: Recent advances in translational models of load-induced muscle hypertrophy. Journal of Applied Physiology. 129 (3), 516-521 (2020).
  26. Swallow, J. G., Garland, T., Carter, P. A., Zhan, W. -. Z., Sieck, G. C. Effects of voluntary activity and genetic selection on aerobic capacity in house mice (Mus domesticus). Journal of Applied Physiology. 84 (1), 69-76 (1998).
  27. Murach, K. A., et al. Late-life exercise mitigates skeletal muscle epigenetic aging. Aging Cell. 21 (1), 13527 (2022).
  28. Mackay, A. D., Marchant, E. D., Louw, M., Thomson, D. M., Hancock, C. R. Exercise, but not metformin prevents loss of muscle function due to doxorubicin in mice using an in situ method. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 22 (17), 9163 (2021).
  29. Godwin, J. S., Hodgman, C. F., Needle, A. R., Zwetsloot, K. A., Andrew, R. Whole-body heat shock accelerates recovery from impact- induced skeletal muscle damage in mice. Conditioning Medicine. 2 (4), 184-191 (2020).
  30. Wen, Y., et al. MyoVision: Software for automated high-content analysis of skeletal muscle immunohistochemistry. Journal of Applied Physiology. 124 (1), 40-51 (2018).
  31. Manzanares, G., Brito-da-Silva, G., Gandra, P. G. Voluntary wheel running: Patterns and physiological effects in mice. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. 52 (1), 7830 (2019).
  32. Bartling, B., et al. Sex-related differences in the wheel-running activity of mice decline with increasing age. Experimental Gerontology. 87, 139-147 (2017).
  33. Zwetsloot, K. A., Westerkamp, L. M., Holmes, B. F., Gavin, T. P. AMPK regulates basal skeletal muscle capillarization and VEGF expression, but is not necessary for the angiogenic response to exercise: AMPK and the skeletal muscle angiogenic response to exercise. The Journal of Physiology. 586 (24), 6021-6035 (2008).
check_url/it/63933?article_type=t

Play Video

Citazione di questo articolo
Koopmans, P. J., Zwetsloot, K. A. A Simple and Inexpensive Running Wheel Model for Progressive Resistance Training in Mice. J. Vis. Exp. (182), e63933, doi:10.3791/63933 (2022).

View Video