Summary

Virusformering og cellebaseret kolorimetrisk kvantificering

Published: April 07, 2023
doi:

Summary

The present protocol describes the propagation of Zika virus (ZIKV) in Vero African green monkey kidney cells and the quantification of ZIKV using cell-based colorimetric immunodetection methods in 24-well and 96-well (high throughput) formats.

Abstract

Zikavirus (ZIKV) er en mygbåren virus tilhørende slægten Flavivirus. ZIKV-infektion har været forbundet med medfødte hjerneabnormiteter og potentielt Guillain-Barré syndrom hos voksne. Forskning i ZIKV for at forstå sygdomsmekanismerne er vigtig for at lette vaccine- og behandlingsudvikling. Metoden til kvantificering af vira er afgørende og grundlæggende inden for virologi. Fokusdannende assay (FFA) er et viruskvantificeringsassay, der detekterer det virale antigen med antistoffer og identificerer infektionsfoci af celler ved hjælp af peroxidaseimmunfarvningsteknikken. Den aktuelle undersøgelse beskriver virusudbredelses- og kvantificeringsprotokollen ved hjælp af både 24-brønd og 96-brønd (høj gennemstrømning) formater. Sammenlignet med andre lignende undersøgelser har denne protokol yderligere beskrevet foci størrelsesoptimering, som kan tjene som vejledning til at udvide brugen af dette assay til andre vira. For det første udføres ZIKV-formering i Vero-celler i 3 dage. Den kultursupernatant, der indeholder ZIKV, høstes og kvantificeres ved hjælp af FFA. Kort fortalt podes viruskulturen på Vero-celler og inkuberes i 2-3 dage. Focidannelse bestemmes derefter efter optimerede farvningsprocesser, herunder cellefiksering, permeabilisering, blokering, antistofbinding og inkubation med peroxidasesubstrat. De farvede virusfoci visualiseres ved hjælp af et stereomikroskop (manuel tælling i 24-brøndformat) eller softwareanalysator (automatiseret tælling i 96-brøndformat). FFA giver reproducerbare, relativt hurtige resultater (3-4 dage) og er egnet til brug for forskellige vira, herunder ikke-plakdannende vira. Derefter er denne protokol nyttig til undersøgelse af ZIKV-infektion og kan bruges til at detektere andre klinisk vigtige vira.

Introduction

Zika virus (ZIKV) infection is an emerging mosquito-borne viral disease. The first isolation of ZIKV was in Uganda in 19471,2; it remained neglected from 1947 to 2007, as the clinical symptoms are most commonly asymptomatic and characterized by self-limiting febrile illness. In 2007, the Zika epidemic began in the Yap islands3,4, followed by larger epidemics in the Pacific regions (French Polynesia, Easter Island, Cook Islands, and New Caledonia) from 2013 to 20145,6,7,8, where the severe neurological complication Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) was reported in adults for the first time9. During 2015 and 2016, the first widespread ZIKV epidemic swept across the Americas after the emergence of the Asian genotype of ZIKV in Brazil in as early as 201310. During this outbreak, 440,000 to 1.3 million cases of microcephaly, and other neurological disorders, were reported in newborn babies11. There is currently no specific cure or treatment for ZIKV infection; hence, there is an urgent medical need for ZIKV vaccines capable of preventing infections, particularly during pregnancy.

Virus quantification is a process to determine the number of viruses present in a sample. It plays an important role in research, and academic laboratories involve many fields, such as medicine and life sciences. This process is also important in commercial sectors, such as the production of viral vaccines, recombinant proteins, viral antigens, or antiviral agents. Many methods or assays can be used for virus quantification12. The choice of methods or assays normally depends on the virus characteristics, desired level of accuracy, and the nature of the experiment or research. In general, methods of quantifying viruses can be divided into two categories: molecular assays that detect the presence of viral nucleic acid (DNA or RNA) and assays that measure virus infectivity in vitro12. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR, for DNA) or quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR, for RNA)13 and digital droplet PCR14 are examples of common molecular techniques used to quantitate the viral nucleic acid in a given sample15. However, these highly sensitive molecular techniques cannot differentiate between viable and non-viable viruses15. Therefore, research that requires information on biological features, such as virus infectivity on cells, cannot be completed using the abovementioned molecular techniques; assays that can measure and determine the presence of viable viruses are needed. Assays that measure virus infectivity include the plaque forming assay (PFA), 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50), the fluorescent focus assay, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM)12.

The PFA, developed by Renato Dulbecco in 1952, is one of the most commonly used methods for virus titration, including for ZIKV16. It is used to directly determine the viral concentrations for infectious lytic virions. The method is based on the ability of a lytic virus to produce cytopathic effects (CPEs; zones of cell death or plaques, an area of infection surrounded by uninfected cells) in an inoculated cell monolayer after viral infection. However, there are several drawbacks to the assay that affect its utility. The assay is time-consuming (takes approximately 7-10 days, depending on viruses), CPE-dependent, and prone to errors. In the present study, we report an immunocolorimetric technique, the focus forming assay (FFA), for detecting and quantifying ZIKV in 24-well plate and 96-well plate formats.

Protocol

1. Virus propagation Cell preparation Grow Vero cells in a 75 cm2 cell culture flask containing 12 mL of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 2 mM L-glutamine (see Table of Materials). Incubate the cells in a cell culture incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Monitor the cells under a microscope; once the cells reach 70%-90% confluency, they are ready to be used (<stron…

Representative Results

ZIKV can be quantified using the FFA, as outlined schematically in Figure 3. For the 24-well plate, the infected Vero cells were fixed at 48 h, 60 h, 72 h, 84 h, and 96 h post-infection. The results showed that the cells remained intact (no cell detachment was observed) after 96 h (4 days) post-infection (Figure 4 and Supplementary Figure 8A-E). The appearance of virus foci was first observed at 48 h (2 days) post-infection (<strong class="xfig"…

Discussion

There are several assays to determine virus titer; the PFA has a similar virus quantitation protocol as the FFA, in which the virus inoculum is diluted to allow individual plaques or foci to be distinguished. After staining, each plaque or foci indicates a single infectious particle in the inoculum19. The PFA is stained with crystal violet to visualize plaque formation caused by cell lysis or death. Hence, the PFA is more time-consuming, as it requires a longer time for the virus to cause CPEs, an…

Divulgazioni

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This research received support from the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia under the Long-Term Research Grant Scheme (LRGS MRUN Phase 1: LRGS MRUN/F1/01/2018) and funding for the Higher Institution Centre of Excellence (HICoE) program (MO002-2019). Figure 3 in this study that shows the workflow of staining for the foci forming assay is adapted from "DAB Immunohistochemistry" by BioRender.com (2022). Retrieved from https://app.biorender.com/biorender-templates/t-5f3edb2eb20ace00af8faed9-dab-immunohistochemistry.

Materials

0.22 µm Polyethersulfone syringe filter Sartorius S6534-FMOSK
1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube Nest 615601
10 mL sterile serological pipette Labserv 14955156
1x Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (dPBS) Gibco 14190-136
2.0 mL Screw cap tube  Axygen SCT-200-SS-C-S
24-well plate Corning 3526
25 mL Sterile serological pipettes Labserv 14955157
3,3'Diaminobenzidine (DAB) peroxidase substrate Thermo Scientific 34065
37 °C incubator with 5% CO2 Sanyo MCO-18AIC
5 mL sterile serological pipette Labserv 14955155
50 mL centrifuge tube Falcon LAB352070
75 cm2 tissue culture flask  Corning 430725U
96-well plate Falcon 353072
Anti-flavivirus monoclonal antibody, 4G2 (clone D1-4G2-4-15) MilliporeSigma MAB10216
Autoclaved 20x Phosphate buffered saline (PBS) N/A N/A 22.8 g of 8 mM Na2HPO4, 4.0 g of 1.5 mM KH2PO4, 160 g of 0.14 M NaCl, 4.0 g of 2.7 mM KCl, 1 L of MilliQ H2O
Biological safety cabinet, Class II Holten HB2448
CTL S6 Universal ELISpot/FluoroSpot Analyzer ImmunoSpot, Cellular Technology Limited (CTL) CTL-S6UNV12 Commercial software analyzer
Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) Gibco 12800-017
Fetal bovine serum (FBS) Bovogen SFBS
Goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) MilliporeSigma 12-349
Hemacytometer Laboroptik LTD Neubauer improved
IGEPAL CA-630 detergent Sigma-Aldrich I8896 Octylphenoxy poly(ethyleneoxy)ethanolIGEPAL 
Inverted microscope ZEISS TELAVAL 31
Laboratory rocker FINEPCR CR300
L-Glutamine Gibco 25030-081
Low viscosity carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) Sigma-Aldrich C5678
Multichannel micropipette (10 – 100 µL) Eppendorf 3125000036
Multichannel micropipette (30 – 300 µL) Eppendorf 3125000052
Paraformaldehyde Sigma-Aldrich P6148
Penicillin-streptomycin Gibco 15140-122
Single channel pipettes (10 – 100 µL) Eppendorf 3123000047
Single channel pipettes (100 – 1000 µL) Eppendorf 3123000063
Single channel pipettes (20 – 200 µL) Eppendorf 3123000055
Skim milk Sunlac Low Fat N/A Prepare 3% Skim milk in 1x PBS for blocking stage in staining
Sodium Hypochlorite Clorox N/A To disinfect any discarded infectious liquid waste from flasks/plates
Stereomicroscope Nikon SMZ1000
Syringe disposable, Luer Lock, 10 mL with 21 G Needle Terumo SS10L21G
Vero African green monkey kidney cells  ECACC 88020401 Received from collaborator. However, Vero cells obtained from other suppliers should be able to be used with some optimization.

Riferimenti

  1. Dick, G. W. A., Kitchen, S. F., Haddow, A. J. Zika virus. I. Isolations and serological specificity. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 46 (5), 509-520 (1952).
  2. Dick, G. W. A., Kitchen, S. F., Haddow, A. J. Zika virus. II. Pathogenicity and physical properties. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 46 (5), (1952).
  3. Duffy, M. R., et al. Zika virus outbreak on Yap Island, Federated States of Micronesia. The New England Journal of Medicine. 360 (24), 2536-2543 (2009).
  4. Musso, D., Nilles, E. J., Cao-Lormeau, V. M. Rapid spread of emerging Zika virus in the Pacific area. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 20 (10), O595-O596 (2014).
  5. Cao-Lormeau, V. -. M., et al. Zika virus, French polynesia, South pacific, 2013. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 20 (6), 1085-1086 (2014).
  6. Dupont-Rouzeyrol, M., et al. Co-infection with Zika and dengue viruses in 2 patients, New Caledonia, 2014. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 21 (2), 381-382 (2015).
  7. Roth, A., et al. Concurrent outbreaks of dengue, chikungunya and Zika virus infections-an unprecedented epidemic wave of mosquito-borne viruses in the Pacific 2012-2014. Euro Surveillance. 19 (41), 20929 (2014).
  8. Tognarelli, J., et al. A report on the outbreak of Zika virus on Easter Island, South Pacific, 2014. Archives of Virology. 161 (3), 665-668 (2016).
  9. Oehler, E., et al. Zika virus infection complicated by Guillain-Barre syndrome-case report, French Polynesia, December 2013. Euro Surveillance. 19 (9), 20720 (2014).
  10. Faria, N. R., et al. Zika virus in the Americas: early epidemiological and genetic findings. Science. 352 (6283), 345-349 (2016).
  11. Rapid risk assessment: Zika virus epidemic in the Americas: potential association with microcephaly and Guillain-Barré syndrome – 4th update. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/rapid-risk-assessment-zika-virus-epidemic-americas-potential-association (2015)
  12. Payne, S. Methods to study viruses. Viruses. , 37-52 (2017).
  13. Bustin, S. A., Mueller, R. Real-time reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) and its potential use in clinical diagnosis. Clinical Science. 109 (4), 365-379 (2005).
  14. Sedlak, R. H., Jerome, K. R. Viral diagnostics in the era of digital polymerase chain reaction. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease. 75 (1), 1-4 (2013).
  15. Bae, H. -. G., Nitsche, A., Teichmann, A., Biel, S. S., Niedrig, M. Detection of yellow fever virus: a comparison of quantitative real-time PCR and plaque assay. Journal of Virological Methods. 110 (2), 185-191 (2003).
  16. Dulbecco, R. Production of plaques in monolayer tissue cultures by single particles of an animal virus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 38 (8), 747-752 (1952).
  17. Nahapetian, A. T., Thomas, J. N., Thilly, W. G. Optimization of environment for high density Vero cell culture: effect of dissolved oxygen and nutrient supply on cell growth and changes in metabolites. Journal of Cell Science. 81, 65-103 (1986).
  18. Agbulos, D. S., Barelli, L., Giordano, B. V., Hunter, F. F. Zika virus: quantification, propagation, detection, and storage. Current Protocols in Microbiology. 43, (2016).
  19. Brien, J. D., Lazear, H. M., Diamond, M. S. Propagation, quantification, detection, and storage of West Nile virus. Current Protocols in Microbiology. 31, (2013).
  20. Bolívar-Marin, S., Bosch, I., Narváez, C. F. Combination of the focus-forming assay and digital automated imaging analysis for the detection of dengue and Zika viral loads in cultures and acute disease. Journal of Tropical Medicine. 2022, 2177183 (2022).
  21. Dangsagul, W., et al. Zika virus isolation, propagation, and quantification using multiple methods. PLoS One. 16 (7), e0255314 (2021).
  22. Brien, J. D., et al. Genotype-specific neutralization and protection by antibodies against dengue virus type 3. Journal of Virology. 84 (20), 10630-10643 (2010).
  23. Lazear, H. M., et al. A mouse model of Zika virus pathogenesis. Cell Host & Microbe. 19 (5), 720-730 (2016).
  24. Miner, J. J., et al. Zika virus infection during pregnancy in mice causes placental damage and fetal demise. Cell. 165 (5), 1081-1091 (2016).
  25. Kang, W., Shin, E. -. C. Colorimetric focus-forming assay with automated focus counting by image analysis for quantification of infectious hepatitis C virions. PLoS One. 7 (8), e43960 (2012).
  26. Brien, J. D., et al. Isolation and quantification of Zika virus from multiple organs in a mouse. Journal of VIsualized Experiments. (150), e59632 (2019).
  27. Payne, A. F., Binduga-Gajewska, I., Kauffman, E. B., Kramer, L. D. Quantitation of flaviviruses by fluorescent focus assay. Journal of Virological Methods. 134 (1-2), 183-189 (2006).
  28. Moser, L. A., et al. Growth and adaptation of Zika virus in mammalian and mosquito cells. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 12 (11), e0006880 (2018).
  29. Ishimine, T., Tadano, M., Fukunaga, T., Okuno, Y. An improved micromethod for infectivity assays and neutralization tests of dengue viruses. Biken Journal. 30 (2), 39-44 (1987).
  30. Leiva, S., et al. Application of quantitative immunofluorescence assays to analyze the expression of cell contact proteins during Zika virus infections. Virus Research. 304, 198544 (2021).
  31. Lee, E. M., Titus, S. A., Xu, M., Tang, H., Zheng, W. High-throughput Zika viral titer assay for rapid screening of antiviral drugs. ASSAY and Drug Development Technologies. 17 (3), 128-139 (2019).
check_url/it/64578?article_type=t

Play Video

Citazione di questo articolo
Tan, J., Wong, J., Zainal, N., AbuBakar, S., Tan, K. Virus Propagation and Cell-Based Colorimetric Quantification. J. Vis. Exp. (194), e64578, doi:10.3791/64578 (2023).

View Video