JoVE Educazione Scientific
Developmental Psychology
È necessario avere un abbonamento a JoVE per visualizzare questo.  Accedi o inizia la tua prova gratuita.
JoVE Educazione Scientific Developmental Psychology
Metacognitive Development: How Children Estimate Their Memory
  • 00:00Panoramica
  • 00:57Experimental Design
  • 01:52Running the Experiment
  • 03:43Representative Results
  • 04:32Applications
  • 05:19Summary

メタ認知の発達: 子供が彼らの記憶を推定方法

English

Condividere

Panoramica

ソース: ジュディス ・ Danovitch ・ ニクラス Noles 所-ルイビル大学

人間の記憶は当てにならないと人々 はしばしば彼らが何を見ているか聞いたことを思い出すことができない正確に。大人は、リハーサルおよびニーモニック デバイスなど、戦略を使用して、重要な情報の彼らの回収を改善するために、メモリ容量の制限に注意してください。大人は、メモリの制限を理解し、知っている店に着くとき項目を覚えようとするのではなく、買い物リストの項目を記述するより理にかなっています。1 つのメモリについて考えることはメタ記憶と呼ばれます。メタは自らの知識について考える人間ができる認知プロセスの広範なセットの 1 つのコンポーネントと考えてと呼ばれるメタ認知。

幼児は、人々 が思考と知識の限られた量であることを理解して、彼らはしばしば自分の知識や認知的スキルの限界を認める問題があります。長年にわたり小学校独自のメモリ容量を正確に推定する子供の能力と能力を向上させます。メタ記憶とその開発を測定する一般的な方法の 1 つは、彼らが何かを覚えていることができますどれだけを予測する機会を子供に与えると、どれだけ彼らの予測に一致彼らの実際のリコールを観察することです。

この実験は、信、氏ビョークランドとベックが開発した手法に基づく子どものメタ記憶を測定する方法を示します。1

Procedura

6 歳から 9 歳までのお子様を募集します。このデモの目的の 1 つだけの子がテストされます。実験を行う場合、(ベック、ビヨルクルンド、新研究の1) のようにサンプル サイズが大きくお勧めします。 参加者は、発達障害の歴史はないはず、通常の聴覚とビジョン。 1 教材を準備します。 一般的なオブジェクトの白黒画像とオブジ…

Risultati

Researchers tested 32 6-year-olds and 32 9-year-olds and found that children’s predictions improved with age (Figure 1). Older children predicted they would remember less items than younger children, yet the total number of items they actually recalled was higher. The average prediction accuracy score for 6-year-olds was 4.19, indicating that they consistently overestimated their memory. The average prediction accuracy score for 9-year-olds was 1.02, indicating that their predictions about their memory were more realistic. Similarly, 78% of 6-year-olds overestimated their memory, but only 46% of 9-year-olds did so (Figure 2). Chi-square tests comparing the number of children who overestimated their memory across age groups were significant at the p < 0.05 level.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Average predicted and actual recall for children in each age group (out of 18 items).

Figure 2
Figure 2. Percentage of children at each age who overestimated their memory.

Applications and Summary

Children’s tendency to overestimate their knowledge and abilities, including their memory, has consequences for their behavior in a number of situations. In the classroom, thinking that they remember or know more than they do can make it hard for children to understand the value of studying or rehearsing new information. Even when young children are faced with direct evidence of their limitations (e.g., failing to remember items in a memory test), they often persist in overestimating their abilities.

This excessively positive view of themselves can also have consequences for children’s physical well-being, as younger children are more likely to engage in a dangerous behavior, like a bicycle stunt, because they believe they are capable of doing so successfully. Older children who realize their limitations are less likely to risk activities well outside of their capabilities.

Although it may seem like overestimating yourself and having poor metacognitive awareness would only have negative consequences for young children, some researchers have proposed that children’s overestimation of their abilities is beneficial in some ways, as well. In reality, young children are not very capable. They still have a lot to learn, and it may be that having a true understanding of the limits of their knowledge, memory, strength, etc., would decrease their motivation to try new things or face a challenging task. However, because children believe they are capable, and in some ways invincible, they are willing to take on challenges, like learning to multiply or doing a cartwheel. Thus, thinking that they will succeed (even if it is actually unlikely) can help motivate children to try new activities and learn more about the world.

Riferimenti

  1. Shin, H., Bjorklund, D. F., & Beck, E. F. The adaptive nature of children's overestimation in a strategic memory task. Cognitive Development. 22 (2), 197-212 (2007).

Trascrizione

Conceptualizing one’s own memory, referred to as metamemory, is often difficult for young children to do.

Although young children understand that people have thoughts and a limited amount of knowledge, they often have trouble acknowledging the limits of their own memory abilities, often overestimating their capabilities.

Importantly, their ability to accurately estimate their own memory capacity improves over the elementary school years, and they start using adult-like strategies, such as making lists to improve recall of information.

This video demonstrates how to design and conduct an experiment investigating metamemory in school-aged children, as well as how to analyze and interpret results involving predicted and actual memory recall.

In this experiment, children in two age groups—6 and 9 year-olds—are first asked to predict how well they think they can remember objects before being shown the items.

After observing the objects and waiting through a short delay, in which they complete distractor puzzles to prevent rehearsal, the children are then asked to recall as many objects as possible.

Here, the dependent variables are the number of objects the child predicted to remember as well as the total number of objects the child actually recalled during the memory test.

Children’s capacity to accurately predict memory ability is expected to improve with age. In other words, the prediction of 9-year-olds will more closely match their actual recall, compared to 6-year-olds.

Before the experiment begins, gather the study materials, which include a set of 18 cards that contain different black and white pictures of common objects with their names labeled and a number line that ranges from 1 to 18.

When the child arrives, verify with the parent or guardian that they have no history of developmental disorders and normal hearing. Have them sit on the opposite side of the table.

To begin the experiment, inform the child that they will be playing a memory game and will have time to study the cards at the end.

Using the number line, ask the child how many of the 18 pictures they think they will remember, and record their response.

During the object presentation phase, present each card, one at a time, and ask the child to name the object or read the label. Make sure to provide feedback every time, and place the card face up on the table.

After all 18 cards have been presented, inform the child that they will have 2 min to study the pictures. Start the timer, and allow them to study in any way they want to. When the time has elapsed, pick up the cards.

To ensure that the child is not continuing to rehearse the studied items, create a buffer between the study and memory test by giving them a set of puzzles to work on during a delay period of 5 min.

At the end of the delay period, ask the child to recall as many of the 18 items as possible. Record their responses. Continue to encourage the child to remember as many items as possible, until they fail to recall any items for about 10 s.

When the child fails to recall more items, end the memory test session and thank them for their participation.

Once the study is finished, average both the number of items that children predicted they would recall and the number they actually recalled by age group. Notice the difference between age groups.

To calculate each child’s prediction accuracy, subtract the actual number of items recalled from the predicted recall value. Using these scores, now graph the percentage of children by age group who overestimated their memory—that is, those who predicted that they would recall more than they did—and compare the percentages using a chi-square test. Note that fewer 9-year-olds overestimated their memory compared to 6-year-olds, indicating that memory prediction improves as a function of age.

Now that you are familiar with children’s tendencies to overestimate their memory abilities, let’s examine both positive and negative consequences for their behavior in a number of situations across development.

The mere thought of thinking about succeeding can help motivate children to face challenging tasks. For example, their naivety likely contributes to their willingness to try new activities—like jumping into a swimming pool.

In contrast, children’s excessively positive views of themselves can also have risky consequences for their physical well-being. Younger children are more likely to engage in a dangerous behavior—like performing a bicycle stunt—as a consequence of their tendency to overestimate their knowledge and abilities.

You’ve just watched JoVE’s introduction for studying how children’s metamemory develops over time. Now you should have a good understanding of how to design and conduct the experiment, and finally how to analyze and interpret the results.

Thanks for watching!

Tags

Cite This
JoVE Science Education Database. JoVE Science Education. Metacognitive Development: How Children Estimate Their Memory. JoVE, Cambridge, MA, (2023).