A protocol for organic reaction screening using stop-flow micro-tubing (SFMT) reactors employing gaseous reactants and/or visible-light mediated reactions is presented.
A new reaction screening technology for organic synthesis was recently demonstrated by combining elements from both continuous micro-flow and conventional batch reactors, coined stop-flow micro-tubing (SFMT) reactors. In SFMT, chemical reactions that require high pressure can be screened in parallel through a safer and convenient way. Cross-contamination, which is a common problem in reaction screening for continuous flow reactors, is avoided in SFMT. Moreover, the commercially available light-permeable micro-tubing can be incorporated into SFMT, serving as an excellent choice for light-mediated reactions due to a more effective uniform light exposure, compared to batch reactors. Overall, the SFMT reactor system is similar to continuous flow reactors and more superior than batch reactors for reactions that incorporate gas reagents and/or require light-illumination, which enables a simple but highly efficient reaction screening system. Furthermore, any successfully developed reaction in the SFMT reactor system can be conveniently translated to continuous-flow synthesis for large scale production.
Flow chemistry is well poised towards the movement of green and sustainable processes1,2. In contrast to batch reactors, continuous flow reactors possess significant advantages, such as improved thermal management, enhanced mixing control, and internal pressure regulation. These advantages greatly reduce the formation of by-products in the continuous flow system. Furthermore, continuous-flow enhances the biphasic gas-liquid reactions within the micro-tubing due to the excellent interfacial surface area of the reagents in different states. Continuous flow reactors also provide a good platform for photosynthesis due to the enhanced and uniform light illumination across the micro-tubing3.
Despite success in continuous-flow technology, there are still limitations in reaction screening for parameters that involve catalysts, solvents and reagents2. Changes made to the pressure in the flow system will drastically affect the flow equilibrium. Moreover, a classic continuous flow system generally is limited to one reaction screening at a time, making it time consuming for efficient parallel reaction screening. The reaction time in continuous flow synthesis is also limited by its micro-tubing reactor size. Furthermore, continuous flow screening is prone to cross-contamination at higher temperature, even though carrier medium is employed between different reactions4.
Hence, to address the difficulty of screening discrete parameters in continuous-flow systems, we developed a stop-flow micro-tubing (SFMT) reactor system for reaction screening that involves gaseous reagents and/or photo-mediated reactions2. SFMT reactors comprise elements of both batch reactors and continuous flow reactors. The introduction of shut-off valves entraps the reagents within the micro-tubing, a concept that is similar to a batch reactor, and when the system is pressurized, the SFMT behaves as a miniature high-pressure reactor. The SFMT can then be submerged into a water or oil bath, introducing heat to the reactor system. Visible lights can also be shone on the micro-tubing during the reaction period to facilitate photo-mediated reactions.
In SFMT, flammable or toxic gases, such as ethylene, acetylene, and carbon monoxide, can be utilized to generate valuable chemicals in a safer way compared to batch reactors1,2,4. It is an asset to use such reactive gases as they are inexpensive chemical feedstocks and can be readily removed after reactions are completed, providing a cleaner procedure2. On the contrary, most reaction development carried out in batch reactors tends to exclude the use of reactive gases due to its inconvenience and risk of explosion at elevated pressure and temperature. If gaseous reagents are employed, they are usually introduced into batch reactors via bubbling or balloons. This generally gave lower reproducibility or reactivity due to the low mixing efficiency at the interface. Although high-pressure vessels are commonly applied to enhance reactivity and solubility of gases, they are laborious with a risk of explosion, especially with flammable gases. In addition, the opaque surface of those commonly used high-pressure reactors made it unsuitable for photo-mediated reactions. Hence, reactions that consist of gaseous reagents and photo-mediated reactions are generally left unexplored. In this context, SFMT reactors provide an ideal platform because the gaseous reagents can be utilized within the micro-tubing with the assistance of a back pressure regulator (BPR) to regulate the internal pressure in a safe and convenient manner2. Apart from reactions that involve gaseous reagents, visible-light promoted synthesis also displays great promises for organic synthesis5,6. However, one of the greatest downfall of visible-light mediated reactions is the scalability in conventional batch reactors due to the attenuation effect of photon transport in large vessels7. If high-power light sources are used, over-irradiation may result in by-product formation. Moreover, gaseous reagents have seldom been applied in photo-chemical reactions mainly due to the complex apparatus system when using gas-phase reactants at high pressure2. Through the introduction of a narrow channel, like SFMT, a high-pressure gas environment can be easily achieved under light irradiation.
Hence, this detailed video aims to help more scientists understand the advantages and the procedure of using SFMT for condition screening of gas-involved transformations and light-mediated reactions.
Refer to all relevant material safety data sheets (MSDS) before handling any possible toxic and carcinogenic chemicals. Conduct appropriate risk assessments before starting any reactions, including the use of engineering controls, such as fume hoods and gas cylinders, as well as wearing sufficient personal protective equipment. Proper training should be conducted before using any highly flammable gas to avoid any accidents caused by mishandling of the gas cylinders.
1. Gas-involved Reaction2
2. Photo-mediated Reaction5
3. Photo-mediated Gas-involved Reaction2
In this study, SFMT is used to carry out transformations that include gaseous reagents ( Table 1), light-mediated reactions (Table 2), and reactions that involves both gaseous reagents and photo-catalysis (Table 3).
Figure 1 displays a typical set-up for the gas regulator to be connected to the gas cylinder so as to regulate the pressure of the gas being pumped into the SFMT system.
Figure 2 represents the set-up of how reagents are being linked for the reagents to be pumped into the SFMT system. The length of the tubing depends on the total volume used in the reaction, and they can be secured by cable tie as shown in Figure 2a or secured by rubber band and test tube in Figure 2b.
Note: For more details on the connectivity of the various equipment in the flow system, please refer to this paper, Ref 8.
Figure 3 illustrates the schematic scheme of how a SFMT system in 2D for better illustration.
Figure 4 shows a typical set-up for degassing chemicals. A balloon is usually attached to a disposable syringe and secured with a rubber band. The balloon is purged with argon gas at least three times before filling up with argon gas, and it is attached to a long needle and fully submerged to the bottom, as shown below. An outlet is also inserted to allow the gas to escape, with visible bubbles during the process.
Note: For more details on the degassing process, please refer to this website, Ref 9.
In Figure 5, various parts of the flow system has been shown. Typically, the furrule and Nut part is the important part attached to the end of the tubing (Figure 5a). This is to allow the tubing to be attached to a syringe via a syringe connector (Figure 5b) or a needle connector (Figure 5c). In some cases, to connect two tubes together, a Union Body Peek could be used, as shown in Figure 5a.
Figure 5d shows a needle valve (left), which could be used to regulate the flow rate of the gas or liquid entering the system, and a BPR (right), which aids in regulating the pressure within the system.
Figure 5e shows a T-connector (left), which is used to mix two reagents (liquid or gas) together to enter the system. In the middle and on the right of Figure 5e displays the shut-off valve in its open and close position, respectively. In the open state, the reagents can enter the system while the close position prevents the chemical from entering or exiting the system.
Figure 6 shows the 1:1 ratio in the plug which can be adjusted accordingly with the needle valve for the amount of gas entering the system. Maintaining an equilibrium is important to ensure that there is enough acetylene gas in the tubing for the reaction to proceed.
Table 1 illustrates the optimization data for Sonogashira coupling with acetylene gas. Various conditions such as solvent, palladium catalysts and temperatures are tested with acetylene gas and 4-iodoanisole in SFMT. The optimal condition in SFMT is shown in entry 10. The reaction was repeated in a batch reactor, as shown in entry 11, however, both the conversion and selectivity were significantly lower than that in the SFMT reactors. The yield of these reactions were determined by GC analysis using 1, 3, 5-trimethoxybenzene as the internal standard.
Table 2 shows the alkylation of tetramethylethylene ( 2a) and benzylidenemalonitrile ( 2b) via photo-mediated activation of an organic catalyst. The reaction was carried out in both batch and SFMT reactors during optimization, and the yield are similar. However, a shorter time is required in the SFMT reactors. The yields of these reactions were determined by 1H NMR analysis with 1, 3, 5-trimethoxybenzene as the internal standard.
Table 3 demonstrates a photo-mediated gas reaction that uses acetylene as a feedstock to generate fluorinated styrene compounds. Comparison was performed in both batch and SFMT reactors, where acetylene gas was bubbled into the solvent using a balloon in the former. The product yield and selectivity were determined by 19F-NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixture.
Figure 1: Gas regulator set-up with gas cylinder. A gas regulator is attached to the gas cylinder to regulate the gas pressure pump into the SFMT reactor. The high pressure gauge (green box) is adjusted by attaching a wrench to the part (black box) by turning clockwise or anti-clockwise. The low pressure gauge (blue box) is regulated by the tap valve (yellow box). The arrestor (orange) is connected to prevent any flame from entering the gas cylinder for safety purposes. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Set-up for SFMT reactor. [2a] Liquid reagents are usually pumped into the system via the syringe pump. The BPR is usually attached at the end and inserted into a glass vial filled with acetone to ensure that the pressure of the gas is sufficient in the tubing (yellow box). This is the plug in the set-up to observe that the liquid and gas is in 1:1 or 1:2 ratio (blue box) by regulating the needle valve connected to the gas cylinder (black box). [2b] Tubing is secured to a test tube or bottle that is connected to shut-off valve. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Note: The end in Figure 2a is usually attached to a gas cylinder regulated by a gas regulator.
Figure 3: Schematic scheme for the connectivity of a SFMT set-up. A basic SFMT set-up usually consists of two shut-valves, reaction tubing, a BPR and a syringe pump. Adapted with permission from Ref. 2. Copyright (2017) The Royal Society of Chemistry. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Degas set-up. A balloon is attached with a long needle to bubble the solvent for degassing. This long needle is inserted into the vial until the tip touches the bottom. A short needle is inserted into the headspace, and the tip does not touch the solvent. This serves as an outlet to allow gas to escape.
Figure 5: Different parts needed for the SFMT system. [5a] Furrule and nut part (left) and Union Body PEEK (right), [5b] syringe connector, [5c] needle connector, [5d] needle valve (left), back pressure regulator (BPR) (right), [5e] T-connector (left), shut-off valve in open position (middle) and shut-off valve in closed position (right).
Figure 6: 1:1 ratio of liquid:gas in tubing plug. In the yellow box, an example is shown for how to adjust the liquid:gas ratio to 1:1 with the shut-off valve.
![]() |
|||||
Entry[i] | Pd-cat | Solvent | T [°C] | Yield of 1b [%][ii] | Yield of 1c [%][ii] |
1 | Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 | DMSO | 100 | 73 | 3 |
2 | Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 | DMF | 100 | 20 | <1 |
3 | Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 | NMP | 100 | <1 | <1 |
4 | Pd(PPh3)4 | DMSO | 100 | 73 | 3 |
5 | Pd(dppf)Cl2 | DMSO | 100 | 56 | 2 |
6[iii] | Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 | DMSO | 100 | 24 | <1 |
7 | Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 | DMSO | 60 | 80 | 4 |
8 | Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 | DMSO | 40 | 87 | 2 |
9 | Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 | DMSO | rt | 78 | 3 |
10[iv] | Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 | DMSO | rt | 96 | 4 |
11[v] | Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 | DMSO | rt | 45 | 14 |
Table 1: Optimization of 4-iodoanisole with acetylene gas. [i] Reactions were carried out with 1a at 0.1M. [ii] The yields of the reactions was determined using 1, 3, 5-trimethoxybenzene as the internal standard in GC analysis. [iii] The reaction was carried out with 1 mol% Pd(PPh3)2Cl2. [iv] The reaction was conducted for 2 hours before quenching. [v] Reaction was carried out in a batch reactor whereby the gas was introduced by bubbling acetylene gas. Adapted with permission from Ref. 2. Copyright (2017) The Royal Society of Chemistry.
![]() |
|||
Entry | Reactor | T [h] | Yield of 2c [%][i] |
1 | Batch | 18 | 91 |
2 | SFMT | 5 | 90 |
Table 2: Transformation of tetramethylethylene (2a) and benzylidenemalonitrile ( 2b) under photo-mediated conditions. [i] Yields were determined using 1, 3, 5-trimethoxybenzene as the internal standard in 1H NMR spectra analysis. Adapted with permission from Ref. 5. Copyright (2017) The Royal Society of Chemistry.
![]() |
|||
Entry | Reactor | Conversion [%][i] | 3b : 3c |
1 | Batch | <5 | – |
2[ii] | SFMT | 97 | 3.6 : 1 |
Table 3: Utilization of acetylene gas as feedstock for photo-redox catalysis. [i] The product yield and selectivity were determined by 19F-NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixture. [ii] Reaction was carried out with 20 PSI back pressure rRegulator (BPR). Adapted with permission from Ref. 2. Copyright (2017) The Royal Society of Chemistry.
The newly developed SFMT reactor is a modification of the continuous-flow system by adding shut-off valves to the micro-tubing2. In this system, the flow rate of a desired volume of reagents can be halted at will, simulating a batch reactor but in micro-tubing2,10,11. These valves aid in the trapping of desired amount of reagents in the HPFA or stainless steel tubing while maintaining the pressure within, similar to a high-pressure vessel. This convenient system is capable of screening multiple reaction conditions by setting multiple SFMTs in parallel while reducing the time needed in comparison to continuous flow system.
The reactivity and selectivity of 4-iodoanisole were investigated in both batch and SFMT reactor (Table 1). Low selectivity between terminal and symmetric internal alkynes was observed in conventional batch reactors. This was likely due to poor interfacial interaction between the liquid mixture and acetylene gas. Continuous flow reactors are also inefficient for screening optimization because they require a relatively long reaction time of 2 hours. On the other hand, SFMT reactors provided a great platform for screening the proposed reactions under 10 different conditions in less than 3 hours, which in principal could take more than 20 hours in a continuous flow reactor. Therefore, SFMT is a logical choice for screening gas-involved transformations compared to batch and continuous flow reactors. In SFMT, the reactor provides higher interfacial surface area between the gaseous and liquid phase, allowing the reactions to proceed with better selectivity and reactivity than batch reactors, as shown in Entry 10 and 11 de Table 1.
De Table 2, the required reaction time of visible-light promoted alkylation was greatly reduced from 18 hours to 5 hours when a SFMT reactor was utilized5. This could be explained using the Bouguer-Beer-Lambert's law, whereby the intensity of the light is reduced due to the scattering or absorption of light by the particles in the solution within the batch reactor7. On the other hand, SFMT allows an enhanced homogenous scattering of light to the reagents within the micro-tubing, which eventually shortens the time needed for the reaction. Therefore, our results emphasise that light-irradiation was greatly improved in SFMT reactors, making the platform suitable for light-mediated reaction development.
The transformation in Table 3 further demonstrates the usefulness of SFMT reactors when the reaction consists of both gaseous reagents and a photo-mediated catalyst. Unlike an acetylene filled balloon, which gives poor interfacial mixing between gaseous and liquid phases, the SFMT greatly improves the solubility of acetylene gas as the internal tubing pressure was increased with the aid of BPR1,2. In the vinylation reaction, acetylene has a really poor solubility in acetonitrile at 60oC in the batch reactor, which is the optimal condition obtained in our SFMT reactors. This is probably the reason why <5% conversion was observed. This result highlights the efficiency of SFMT reactors for gas-involved light-promoted transformations, which enables conventional inaccessible transformations.
Despite the low mixing efficiency in SFMT when compared to the stirring in batch reactors, the circular flow patterns in Taylor flow promoted efficient gas/liquid interfacial contact, which enhances the reactivity and yield significantly2,12. Moreover, SFMT is a time-efficient technique that allows parallel screening of reactions whereby each reactor can be set to a different pressure and/or temperature2. The flexibility in using SFMT is definitely an ideal way to test new reactions for optimization or discovery. As SFMT is a modified version of the continuous-flow reactor system, it is also easier to translate it into continuous-flow synthesis for upscale purposes.
In conclusion, SFMT is a new technique that allows experiments to be carried out at varying temperatures and pressures with simple tools and micro-tubing. Cheap and reactive feedstock like acetylene gas and ethylene gas can be used for future synthesis in SFMTs, expanding the possibilities of reaction screening in the field of chemistry. Furthermore, the efficiency of reaction screening is boost with the ease of screening of reactions in parallel.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
We are grateful for the financial support provided by the National University of Singapore (R-143-000-645-112, R-143-000-665-114) and GSK-EDB (R-143-000-687-592).
Acetylene Cylinder | Chem Gas PTE LTD (Singapore) | ||
Logato 200 series Syringe pumps | KD Scientific Inc | 788200 | |
Blue LED Strips | Inwares Pte Ltd (Singapore) | 3528 FlexiGlow LED Strips | |
PFA Tubing High Purity 1/16" OD x .030" ID x 50ft | IDEX Health&Science | 1632-L | Depending on diameter of tubings needed |
KDS Stainless Steel Syringe | KD Scientific Inc | 780802 | |
Shut-Off Valve Tefzel (ETFE) with 1/16" Fittings | IDEX Health&Science | P-782 | |
BPR Assembly 20 psi | IDEX Health&Science | P-791 | |
Luer Adapter Female Luer – Female Union | IDEX Health&Science | P-628 | Known as syringe connector in this paper |
1/4-28 Female to Male Luer Assy | IDEX Health&Science | P-675 | Known as needle connector in this paper |
Union Body PEEK .020 thru hole, for 1/16" OD" | IDEX Health&Science | P-702-01 | |
Super Flangeless Ferrule w/SST Ring, 1/4-28 Flat-Bottom, for 1/16" OD | IDEX Health&Science | P-250X | |
PEEK Low Pressure Tee Assembly 1/16" PEEK .020 thru hole | IDEX Health&Science | P-712 | Known as T-connector in this paper |
Super Flangeless Nut PEEK 1/4-28 Flat-Bottom, for 1/16" & 1/32" OD | IDEX Health&Science | P-255X | |
Micro Metering Valve Assembly, 1/4-28 Flat-Bottom, for 1/16" OD | IDEX Health&Science | P-445NF | Known as Needle valve in this paper |
Shut Off Valve Assembly PEEK .020 | IDEX Health&Science | P-732 | |
Terumo Syringe without needle | Terumo medical | 1 mL and 3 mL depending on the volume needed | |
Terumo needle | Terumo medical | 22G X 1½” (0.70 X 38 mm) |
|
Sterican needle | B | Braun Sharing Enterprise | 21G X 4¾” (0.80 X 120 mm) |
|
Bruker ACF300 (300 MHz) | For 300 MHz NMR scanning | ||
AV-III400 (400 MHZ) | For 400 MHz NMR scanning | ||
AMX500 (500 MHz) | For 500 MHz NMR scanning | ||
Merck 60 (0.040-0.063 mm) mesh silica gel | Merck | ||
4-Iodoanisole | Sigma Aldrich | I7608-100G | |
412740 ALDRICH Bis(triphenylphosphine) palladium(II) dichloride ≥99% trace metals basis |
Sigma Aldrich | 412740-5G | |
Copper(I) iodide purum, ≥99.5% |
Sigma Aldrich | 03140-100G | |
N,N-Diisopropylethylamine | Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd | D1599 | |
1, 3, 5-trimethoxybenzene | Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd | P0250 | |
2,3-Dimethyl-2-butene ≥99% |
Sigma Aldrich | 220159-25ML | |
Bromopentafluorobenzene 99% |
Sigma Aldrich | B75158-10G | |
TEMPO Green Alternative 98% |
Sigma Aldrich | 214000-25G | |
Acetonitrile | Sigma Aldrich | 271004-1L | |
Diethylether | Sigma Aldrich | 346136-1L | |
Dimethyl sulfoxide | VWR chemical | 23500.322- 25L | |
1,2-Dichloroethane | Sigma Aldrich | 284505-1L | |
9-mesityl-10-methylacridinium perchlorate | Refer to Ref. 8 for synthesis | ||
Ir(ppy)2(dtbbpy)PF6 | Refer to Ref. 9 for synthesis |