Summary

From Cells to Cell-Free Protein Synthesis within 24 Hours Using Cell-Free Autoinduction Workflow

Published: July 22, 2021
doi:

Summary

This work describes the preparation of cell extract from Escherichia coli (E. coli) followed by cell-free protein synthesis (CFPS) reactions in under 24 hours. Explanation of the cell-free autoinduction (CFAI) protocol details improvements made to reduce researcher oversight and increase quantities of cell extract obtained.

Abstract

Cell-free protein synthesis (CFPS) has grown as a biotechnology platform that captures transcription and translation machinery in vitro. Numerous developments have made the CFPS platform more accessible to new users and have expanded the range of applications. For lysate based CFPS systems, cell extracts can be generated from a variety of organisms, harnessing the unique biochemistry of that host to augment protein synthesis. Within the last 20 years, Escherichia coli (E. coli) has become one of the most widely used organisms for supporting CFPS due to its affordability and versatility. Despite numerous key advances, the workflow for E. coli cell extract preparation has remained a key bottleneck for new users to implement CFPS for their applications. The extract preparation workflow is time-intensive and requires technical expertise to achieve reproducible results. To overcome these barriers, we previously reported the development of a 24 hour cell-free autoinduction (CFAI) workflow that reduces user input and technical expertise required. The CFAI workflow minimizes the labor and technical skill required to generate cell extracts while also increasing the total quantities of cell extracts obtained. Here we describe that workflow in a step-by-step manner to improve access and support the broad implementation of E. coli based CFPS.

Introduction

The use of cell-free protein synthesis (CFPS) for biotechnology applications has grown substantially over the past few years1,2,3. This development can be attributed in part to increased efforts in understanding the processes that occur in CFPS and the role of each component4,5. Additionally, reduced costs attributed to optimized set-ups and alternative energy sources have made cell-free technology easier to implement for new users6,7,8,9. In order to implement the necessary transcription and translation factors for protein synthesis, cell extract is often used to drive cell-free reactions10. Recently published user guides have provided simple protocols for producing functional extract, making it easier to implement for new and experienced users alike1,11,12,13,14. Cell extract is usually obtained through the lysis of a cell culture, which can be grown using different organisms depending on the specific use desired1,15,16.

Escherichia coli (E. coli) has rapidly become one of the most commonly used host organisms for producing functional extracts17. The BL21 Star (DE3) strain is preferred because it removes the proteases from the outer membrane (OmpT protease) and the cytoplasm (Lon protease), providing an optimal environment for the recombinant protein expression. Additionally, the DE3 contains the λDE3 that carries the gene for T7 RNA polymerase (T7 RNAP) under the control of the lacUV5 promoter; the star component contains a mutated RNaseE gene which prevents cleavage of mRNA4,14,18,19. Under the lacUV5 promoter, isopropyl-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) induction allows the expression of T7 RNAP20,21. These strains are used to grow and harvest cells, which give raw material for extract preparation. Cell lysis can be performed using a variety of methods, including bead beating, French press, homogenization, sonication, and nitrogen cavitation1,11,12,22.

The process of bacterial culture and harvesting is consistent across most platforms when using E. coli, but requires multiple days and intense researcher oversight1,11,13. This process generally starts with an overnight seed culture in LB broth, which upon overnight growth is then inoculated into a larger culture of 2xYTPG (yeast, tryptone, phosphate buffer, glucose) the next day. The growth of this larger culture is monitored until it reaches the early-to-mid log phase, at an optical density (OD) of 2.514,20. Constant measurement is required as the components of transcription and translation have been previously demonstrated to be highly active in the early-to-mid log phase23,24. While this process can create reproducible extract, our lab has recently developed a new method using Cell-Free Autoinduction (CFAI) Media, which reduces researcher oversight, increases the overall yield of extract for a given liter of cell culture, and improves access to E. coli-based extract preparation for both experienced and new users (Figure 1). Here we provide the step-by-step guide for implementing the CFAI workflow, to go from a streaked plate of cells to a completed CFPS reaction within 24 hours.

Protocol

1. Media growth Prepare 960 mL of CFAI media as described in Table 1 and adjust the pH to 7.2 using KOH. Transfer culture media to a 2.5 L baffled flask and autoclave for 30 min at 121 °C. Prepare a 40 mL sugar solution as described in Table 1. Filter-sterilize the solution into a separate autoclaved glass container. NOTE: The sugar solution can be stored in a 30 °C incubator until further use. Allow the media to completely cool …

Representative Results

When preparing CFAI media, glucose was exchanged for an increase in lactose and glycerol as the main energy substrate in the media. Additionally, the buffering capacity of the CFAI media was increased as well. These specific components are given in Table 1. The cells were then grown to both an OD600 of 10 and the standard 2.5 in CFAI media to show consistency with extract quality despite varying extract quantities. The 2.5 OD600 CFAI media was grown after…

Discussion

Researcher oversight is traditionally needed for two key actions during cell growth: the induction of T7 RNAP and harvesting cells at a specific OD600. CFAI obviates both of those requirements to decrease the researcher's time and technical training required in order to prepare high quality cell extracts. Auto-induction of T7 RNAP is achieved by replacing glucose with lactose as the primary sugar in the media, obviating the previous need to actively monitor the growth and then induce with IPTG at a pr…

Declarações

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Jennifer VanderKelen and Andrea Laubscher for technical support. Authors would also like to thank Nicole Gregorio, Max Levine, Alissa Mullin, Byungcheol So, August Brookwell, Elizabeth (Lizzy) Vojvoda, Logan Burrington and Jillian Kasman for helpful discussions. Authors also acknowledge funding support from the Bill and Linda Frost Fund, Center for Applications in Biotechnology's Chevron Biotechnology Applied Research Endowment Grant, Cal Poly Research, Scholarly, and the National Science Foundation (NSF-1708919).

Materials

1.5 mL Microfuge Tubes Phenix MPC-425Q
1L Centrifuge Tube Beckman Coulter A99028
Avanti J-E Centrifuge Beckman Coulter 369001
CoA Sigma-Aldrich C3144-25MG
Cytation 5 Cell Imaging Multi-Mode Reader Biotek BTCYT5F
D-Glucose Fisher D16-3
D-Lactose Alfa Aesar J66376
DTT ThermoFisher 15508013
Folinic Acid Sigma-Aldrich F7878-100MG
Glycerol Fisher BP229-1
Glycine Sigma-Aldrich G7126-100G
HEPES ThermoFisher 11344041
IPTG Sigma-Aldrich I6758-1G
JLA-8.1000 Rotor Beckman Coulter 366754
K(Glu) Sigma-Aldrich G1501-500G
K(OAc) Sigma-Aldrich P1190-1KG
KOH Sigma-Aldrich P5958-500G
L-Alanine Sigma-Aldrich A7627-100G
L-Arginine Sigma-Aldrich A8094-25G
L-Asparagine Sigma-Aldrich A0884-25G
L-Aspartic Acid Sigma-Aldrich A7219-100G
L-Cysteine Sigma-Aldrich C7352-25G
L-Glutamic Acid Sigma-Aldrich G1501-500G
L-Glutamine Sigma-Aldrich G3126-250G
L-Histadine Sigma-Aldrich H8000-25G
L-Isoleucine Sigma-Aldrich I2752-25G
L-Leucine Sigma-Aldrich L8000-25G
L-Lysine Sigma-Aldrich L5501-25G
L-Methionine Sigma-Aldrich M9625-25G
L-Phenylalanine Sigma-Aldrich P2126-100G
L-Proline Sigma-Aldrich P0380-100G
L-Serine Sigma-Aldrich S4500-100G
L-Threonine Sigma-Aldrich T8625-25G
L-Tryptophan Sigma-Aldrich T0254-25G
L-Tyrosine Sigma-Aldrich T3754-100G
Luria Broth ThermoFisher 12795027
L-Valine Sigma-Aldrich V0500-25G
Mg(Glu)2 Sigma-Aldrich 49605-250G
Mg(OAc)2 Sigma-Aldrich M5661-250G
Microfuge 20 Beckman Coulter B30134
Molecular Grade Water Sigma-Aldrich 7732-18-5
NaCl Alfa Aesar A12313
NAD Sigma-Aldrich N8535-15VL
New Brunswick Innova 42/42R Incubator Eppendorf M1335-0000
NH4(Glu) Sigma-Aldrich 09689-250G
NTPs ThermoFisher R0481
Oxalic Acid Sigma-Aldrich P0963-100G
PEP Sigma-Aldrich 860077-250MG
Potassium Phosphate Dibasic Acros, Organics A0382124
Potassium Phosphate Monobasic Acros, Organics A0379904
PureLink HiPure Plasmid Prep Kit ThermoFisher K210007
Putrescine Sigma-Aldrich D13208-25G
Spermidine Sigma-Aldrich S0266-5G
Tris(OAc) Sigma-Aldrich T6066-500G
tRNA Sigma-Aldrich 10109541001
Tryptone Fisher Bioreagents 73049-73-7
Tunair 2.5L Baffled Shake Flask Sigma-Aldrich Z710822
Ultrasonic Processor QSonica Q125-230V/50HZ
Yeast Extract Fisher Bioreagents 1/2/8013

Referências

  1. Gregorio, N. E., Levine, M. Z., Oza, J. P. A user’s guide to cell-free protein synthesis. Methods and Protocols. 2 (1), 1-34 (2019).
  2. Silverman, A. D., Karim, A. S., Jewett, M. C. Cell-free gene expression: an expanded repertoire of applications. Nature Reviews Genetics. 21 (3), (2020).
  3. Swartz, J. R. Expanding biological applications using cell-free metabolic engineering: An overview. Metabolic Engineering. 50, 156-172 (2018).
  4. Jared, B., Dopp, L., Tamiev, D. D., Reuel, N. F. Cell-free supplement mixtures: Elucidating the history and biochemical utility of additives used to support in vitro protein synthesis in E. coli extract. Biotechnology Advances. 37 (1), 246-258 (2019).
  5. Jewett, M. C., Swartz, J. R. Mimicking the Escherichia coli cytoplasmic environment activates long-lived and efficient cell-free protein synthesis. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 86 (1), 19-26 (2004).
  6. Calhoun, K. A., Swartz, J. R. Energizing cell-free protein synthesis with glucose metabolism. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 90 (5), 606-613 (2005).
  7. Levine, M. Z., Gregorio, N. E., Jewett, M. C., Watts, K. R., Oza, J. P. Escherichia coli-based cell-free protein synthesis: Protocols for a robust, flexible, and accessible platform technology. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (144), e58882 (2019).
  8. Sun, Z. Z., et al. Protocols for Implementing an Escherichia coli Based TX-TL Cell-Free Expression. System for Synthetic Biology. , 1-14 (2013).
  9. Pardee, K., et al. Portable, on-demand biomolecular manufacturing. Cell. 167, 248-254 (2016).
  10. Moore, S. J., Macdonald, J. T., Freemont, P. S. Cell-free synthetic biology for in vitro prototype engineering. Biochemical Society Transactions. 45 (3), 785-791 (2017).
  11. Cole, S. D., Miklos, A. E., Chiao, A. C., Sun, Z. Z., Lux, M. W. Methodologies for preparation of prokaryotic extracts for cell-free expression systems. Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology. 5 (4), 252-267 (2020).
  12. Didovyk, A., Tonooka, T., Tsimring, L., Hasty, J. Rapid and scalable preparation of bacterial lysates for cell-free gene expression. ACS Synthetic Biology. 6 (12), 2198-2208 (2017).
  13. Dopp, J. L., Reuel, N. F. Process optimization for scalable E. coli extract preparation for cell-free protein synthesis. Biochemical Engineering Journal. 138, 21-28 (2018).
  14. Kwon, Y. C., Jewett, M. C. High-throughput preparation methods of crude extract for robust cell-free protein synthesis. Scientific Reports. 5, 8663 (2015).
  15. Endo, Y., Sawasaki, T. Cell-free expression systems for eukaryotic protein production. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 17 (4), 373-380 (2006).
  16. Zemella, A., Thoring, L., Hoffmeister, C., Kubick, S. Cell-free protein synthesis: Pros and cons of prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems. ChemBioChem. 16 (17), 2420-2431 (2015).
  17. Laohakunakorn, N., Grasemann, L., Lavickova, B., Michielin, G. Bottom-up construction of complex biomolecular systems with cell-free synthetic biology. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 8, (2020).
  18. Ahn, J. H., et al. Cell-free synthesis of recombinant proteins from PCR-amplified genes at a comparable productivity to that of plasmid-based reactions. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 338 (3), 1346-1352 (2005).
  19. Kim, T. W., et al. Simple procedures for the construction of a robust and cost-effective cell-free protein synthesis system. Journal of Biotechnology. 126 (4), 554-561 (2006).
  20. Hunt, J. P., et al. Streamlining the preparation of “endotoxin-free” ClearColi cell extract with autoinduction media for cell-free protein synthesis of the therapeutic protein crisantaspase. Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology. 4 (4), 220-224 (2019).
  21. Studier, F. W. Protein production by auto-induction in high-density shaking cultures. Protein Expression and Purification. 41, 207-234 (2005).
  22. Shrestha, P., Holland, T. M., Bundy, B. C. Streamlined extract preparation for Escherichia coli-based cell-free protein synthesis by sonication or bead vortex mixing. BioTechniques. 53 (3), 163-174 (2012).
  23. Bosdriesz, E., Molenaar, D., Teusink, B., Bruggeman, F. J. How fast-growing bacteria robustly tune their ribosome concentration to approximate growth-rate maximization. FEBS Journal. 282 (10), 2029-2044 (2015).
  24. Zawada, J., Swartz, J. Maintaining rapid growth in moderate-density Escherichia coli fermentations. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 89 (4), 407-415 (2005).
  25. Kim, J., Copeland, C. E., Padumane, S. R., Kwon, Y. C. A crude extract preparation and optimization from a genomically engineered Escherichia coli for the cell-free protein synthesis system: Practical laboratory guideline. Methods and Protocols. 2 (3), 1-15 (2019).
  26. Failmezger, J., Rauter, M., Nitschel, R., Kraml, M., Siemann-Herzberg, M. Cell-free protein synthesis from non-growing, stressed Escherichia coli. Scientific Reports. 7 (1), 1-10 (2017).
  27. Levine, M. Z., et al. Activation of energy metabolism through growth media reformulation enables a 24-h workflow for cell-free expression. ACS Synthetic Biology. 9 (10), 2765-2774 (2020).
  28. Martin, R. W., et al. Cell-free protein synthesis from genomically recoded bacteria enables multisite incorporation of noncanonical amino acids. Nature Communications. , 1-9 (2018).
  29. Soye, B. J. D., et al. Resource A highly productive, One-pot cell-free protein synthesis platform based on genomically recoded Escherichia coli resource. Cell Chemical Biology. 26 (12), 1743-1754 (2019).
  30. Ezure, T., Suzuki, T., Ando, E. A cell-free protein synthesis system from insect cells. Methods in Molecular Biology. , 285-296 (2014).
  31. Heide, C., et al. development and optimization of a functional mammalian cell-free protein synthesis platform. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 8, 1-10 (2021).
check_url/pt/62866?article_type=t

Play Video

Citar este artigo
Smith, P. E. J., Slouka, T., Dabbas, M., Oza, J. P. From Cells to Cell-Free Protein Synthesis within 24 Hours Using Cell-Free Autoinduction Workflow. J. Vis. Exp. (173), e62866, doi:10.3791/62866 (2021).

View Video