Summary

Detection of Plasmodium Sporozoites in Anopheles Mosquitoes using an Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay

Published: September 30, 2021
doi:

Summary

This protocol describes a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to detect salivary gland sporozoites in mosquitoes. Using easily available monoclonal antibodies, the method enables cost-effective, high-throughput detection of mosquitoes carrying Plasmodium falciparum or Plasmodium vivax. The method is suitable for malaria transmission research, including vector surveys.

Abstract

Plasmodium sporozoites are the infective stage of malaria parasites that infect humans. The sporozoites residing in the salivary glands of female Anopheles mosquitoes are transmitted to humans via mosquito bites during blood feeding. The presence of sporozoites in the mosquito salivary glands thus defines mosquito infectiousness. To determine whether an Anopheles mosquito carries Plasmodium sporozoites, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method has been the standard tool to detect the Plasmodium circumsporozoite protein (CSP), the major surface protein of the sporozoites. In this method, the head along with the thorax of each mosquito is separated from the abdomen, homogenized, and subjected to a sandwich ELISA to detect the presence of CSP specific to Plasmodium falciparum and each of the two subtypes, VK210 and VK247, of Plasmodium vivax.This method has been used to study malaria transmission, including the seasonal dynamics of mosquito infection and the species of the major malaria vectors in the study sites.

Introduction

Plasmodium sporozoites are the infectious stage of the malaria parasites in the mosquitoes. The sporozoites are delivered to humans via mosquito bites. In the mosquito, the sporozoites first form inside the oocysts on the midgut wall. Once ready, they are released into the hemocoel and travel to the mosquito salivary glands. There, they mature and become ready for transmission to humans during blood feeding. In humans, the sporozoites are deposited in the dermis. Then, they enter the blood vessel and travel along the blood circulation to reach the liver to establish infection in the hepatocytes1,2.

Three different methods have been used to determine sporozoite infection of the mosquito salivary glands. The first method is the dissection of the salivary glands followed by direct examination of sporozoites under a light microscope. This method is the gold standard to detect and quantify sporozoites in Anopheles mosquito salivary glands3. However, it requires a technician well trained in both dissection and microscopic examination. Moreover, it cannot be used to determine Plasmodium species and CSP subtyping (for P. vivax)4,5. The second method uses polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect Plasmodium DNA in the upper part of the mosquito body6. Given the specificity of PCR, both species and subtyping of the parasite are possible7,8,9,10. Although PCR is increasingly used, it requires relatively expensive equipment and well-trained staff. The last method, the ELISA to detect the Plasmodium specific circumsporozoite protein (CSP), has been the mainstay for three decades11,12,13. CSP is present in both oocyst sporozoites and salivary gland sporozoites12,14. Using specific antibodies, this method allows Plasmodium species identification and CSP subtyping of P. vivax sporozoites. The rationale for this assay is the requirement of a simple high-throughput assay to examine a large number of wild mosquitoes to understand malaria transmission (i.e., determine the sporozoite infection rate).

The ELISA method has two key advantages over microscopic examination. First, it allows researchers to keep mosquito samples until they are ready for sample processing. Second, the ELISA method can be used to differentiate Plasmodium species through species-specific monoclonal antibodies. In addition, ELISA can accommodate a larger number of mosquito specimens, permitting a much higher throughput15. Compared to PCR, which detects sporozoite DNA, the ELISA procedure takes more time but costs less16. The ELISA assay described here was developed to determine the mosquito infectivity and separately detect CSP of P. falciparum and each of the two CSP variants of P. vivax, VK210 and VK247. This ELISA method has been used in many studies to determine the seasonal dynamics of mosquito infection and identify the species of the major malaria vectors in the field12,13,17,18. To perform this assay, a standard laboratory equipped with an ELISA plate reader is sufficient.

The overall approach is summarized in Figure 1. In this sandwich ELISA, the primary (capture) monoclonal antibody (mAb) specific for each Plasmodium species/subtype is first used to coat the ELISA plate. Each plate is coated with a single capture mAb. The function of the mAb is to capture the corresponding CSP antigen in the mosquito homogenates. After antigen capture and plate washes, a second CSP-specific antibody labeled with peroxidase is used to detect the presence of CSP bound to the capture mAb. The chemical reaction catalyzed by peroxidase results in color development in wells positive for CSP.

Protocol

1. Preparation of reagents NOTE: Refer to the Table of Materials for a list of equipment, reagents, and other consumables used in this protocol and to Table 1 for a list of solutions and their composition. Capture and peroxidase-conjugated mAbs To reconstitute the mAb, resuspend the lyophilized mAb in a 1:1 mixture of distilled water:glycerol at 0.5 mg/mL. Make aliquots as needed to avoid repeated freeze-thawing, and st…

Representative Results

Representative ELISA results are shown in Figure 2. In this experiment, the P. falciparum ELISA detected sporozoite infection in well A7. The positive well could be visually detected by its faint green color (Figure 2A). The absorbance value of this well was above the cut-off threshold (twice the mean value of the four negative control wells) (Figure 2B). The distribution of the absorbance values of all 80 unknown wells is …

Discussion

The CSP-ELISA provides a highly specific and cost-effective method to detect Plasmodium CSP. It allows discrimination between P. falciparum and P. vivax sporozoites as well as between the two subtypes, VK210 and VK247, of P vivax11,13,14,15. Certain critical points should be considered to obtain reliable and reproducible results. All solutions should be kept …

Declarações

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

We thank Mr. Kirakorn Kiatibutr, MVRU, for training and guidance. We also thank Mrs. Pinyapat Kongngen, MVRU, for her technical assistance in preparing Figure 2. This work was supported by a grant from the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the National Institute of Health (U19 AI089672).

Materials

Equipment
ELISA plate reader BioTek Instrument, Inc. Synergy H1 Absorbance is measured using UV-VIS absorbance detection mode
Grinder pestle Axygen PES-15-B-SI For homogenizing the mosquito head/thorax
Reagents
ABTS substrate 2-component KPL 50-62-00 For peroxidase driven detection
Blocking buffer (BB) Note: solution
Capture and peroxidase-conjugated monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) Note: mAbs can be obtained in the lyophilized form as part of the Sporozoite ELISA Reagent Kits (MRA-890 for P. falciparum and MRA-1028K for P. vivax) from BEI Resources (https://www.beiresources.org.)
Casein Sigma aldrich 9000-71-9 For blocking buffer preparation
Grinding buffer (GB) Note: solution
Igepal CA-630 Sigma aldrich 9002-93-1 For grinding buffer preparation
KCl Sigma aldrich 7447-40-7 For phosphate buffer saline preparation
KH2PO4 Sigma aldrich 7778-77-0 For phosphate buffer saline preparation
Na2HPO4 Sigma aldrich 7558-79-4 For phosphate buffer saline preparation
NaCl Sigma aldrich 7647-14-5 For phosphate buffer saline preparation
NaOH Sigma aldrich 1310-73-2 For blocking buffer preparation
PBS-Tween
Pf capture mAb CDC Pf-CAP For capturing Pf circumsporozoite protein
Pf peroxidase mAb CDC Pf-HRP For detecting Pf circumsporozoite protein
Pf positive control CDC Pf-PC Pf positive control
Phenol red Sigma aldrich 143-74-8 For blocking buffer preparation
Phosphate buffered saline (PBS) Note: solution
Positive controls Note: solution
Pv210 capture mAb CDC Pv210-CAP For capturing Pv210 circumsporozoite protein
Pv210 peroxidase mAb CDC Pv210-HRP For detecting Pv210 circumsporozoite protein
Pv210 positive control CDC Pv210-PC Pv210 positive control
Pv247 capture mAb CDC Pv247-CAP For capturing Pv247 circumsporozoite protein
Pv247 peroxidase mAb CDC Pv247-HRP For detecting Pv247 circumsporozoite protein
Pv247 positive control CDC Pv247-PC Pv247 positive control
Tween20 Sigma aldrich 9005-64-5 For PBS-Tween preparation
Consumables
Disposable pipetting reservoirs Generic For working reagents
ELISA plates: 96 well clear round bottom PVS Corning Life Science 2797 For ELISA
Gloves: disposable gloves and freezer gloves Generic For personal protection
Lab gown Generic for personal protection
Multichannel Pipette P30-300 Generic For solution transfer
Pipette set, P2, P20, P200, and P1000 Generic For solution transfer
Pipette tips 10 µL, 200 µL, and 1000 µL Generic For solution transfer
Serological pipettes 5 mL, 10 mL Generic For solution transfer
Transfer pipettes Generic For solution transfer

Referências

  1. Bray, R. S., Garnham, P. C. The life-cycle of primate malaria parasites. British Medical Bulletin. 38 (2), 117-122 (1982).
  2. Held, J. R. Primate malaria. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 162 (1), 587-593 (1969).
  3. World Health Organization. Division of Malaria and Other Parasitic Diseases. Manual on practical entomology in Malaria, Part I and Part II. World Health Organization. , (1975).
  4. Robert, V., et al. Study of the distribution of circumsporozoite antigen in Anopheles gambiae infected with Plasmodium falciparum, using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 82 (3), 389-391 (1988).
  5. Fontenille, D., Meunier, J. Y., Nkondjio, C. A., Tchuinkam, T. Use of circumsporozoite protein enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay compared with microscopic examination of salivary glands for calculation of malaria infectivity rates in mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) from Cameroon. Journal of Medical Entomology. 38 (3), 451-454 (2001).
  6. Echeverry, D. F., et al. Fast and robust single PCR for Plasmodium sporozoite detection in mosquitoes using the cytochrome oxidase I gene. Malaria Journal. 16 (1), 230 (2017).
  7. Singh, B., et al. A genus- and species-specific nested polymerase chain reaction malaria detection assay for epidemiologic studies. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 60 (4), 687-692 (1999).
  8. Snounou, G. Genotyping of Plasmodium spp. Nested PCR. Methods in Molecular Medicine. 72, 103-116 (2002).
  9. Snounou, G., Singh, B. Nested PCR analysis of Plasmodium parasites. Methods in Molecular Medicine. 72, 189-203 (2002).
  10. Snounou, G., Viriyakosol, S., Jarra, W., Thaithong, S., Brown, K. N. Identification of the four human malaria parasite species in field samples by the polymerase chain reaction and detection of a high prevalence of mixed infections. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology. 58 (2), 283-292 (1993).
  11. Wirtz, R. A., et al. Identification of Plasmodium vivax sporozoites in mosquitoes using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 34 (6), 1048-1054 (1985).
  12. Wirtz, R. A., Burkot, T. R., Graves, P. M., Andre, R. G. Field evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax sporozoites in mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) from Papua New Guinea. Journal of Medical Entomology. 24 (4), 433-437 (1987).
  13. Wirtz, R. A., Sattabongkot, J., Hall, T., Burkot, T. R., Rosenberg, R. Development and evaluation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for Plasmodium vivax-VK247 sporozoites. Journal of Medical Entomology. 29 (5), 854-857 (1992).
  14. Burkot, T. R., Williams, J. L., Schneider, I. Identification of Plasmodium falciparum-infected mosquitoes by a double antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 33 (5), 783-788 (1984).
  15. Rosenberg, R., et al. Circumsporozoite protein heterogeneity in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium vivax. Science. 245 (4921), 973-976 (1989).
  16. Marie, A., et al. Evaluation of a real-time quantitative PCR to measure the wild Plasmodium falciparum infectivity rate in salivary glands of Anopheles gambiae. Malaria Journal. 12, 224 (2013).
  17. Arevalo-Herrera, M., et al. Immunoreactivity of sera from low to moderate malaria-eEndemic areas against Plasmodium vivax rPvs48/45 proteins produced in Escherichia coli and chinese hamster ovary systems. Frontiers in Immunology. 12, 634738 (2021).
  18. Balkew, M., et al. An update on the distribution, bionomics, and insecticide susceptibility of Anopheles stephensi in Ethiopia, 2018-2020. Malaria Journal. 20 (1), 263 (2021).
  19. Wirtz, R. A., Avery, M., Benedict, M., Sutcliffe, A. Plasmodium sporozoite ELISA. Methods in Anopheles Research. , 333-343 (2016).
  20. Durnez, L., et al. False positive circumsporozoite protein ELISA: a challenge for the estimation of the entomological inoculation rate of malaria and for vector incrimination. Malaria Journal. 10, 195 (2011).
check_url/pt/63158?article_type=t

Play Video

Citar este artigo
Kumpitak, C., Nguitragool, W., Cui, L., Sattabongkot, J., Bantuchai, S. Detection of Plasmodium Sporozoites in Anopheles Mosquitoes using an Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay. J. Vis. Exp. (175), e63158, doi:10.3791/63158 (2021).

View Video