Summary

Dual Test Gas Pulmonary Diffusing Capacity Measurement During Exercise in Humans Using the Single-Breath Method

Published: February 02, 2024
doi:

Summary

This protocol presents a method to assess pulmonary alveolar-capillary reserve measured by combined single-breath measurement of the diffusing capacity to carbon monoxide (DL,CO) and nitric oxide (DL,NO) during exercise. Assumptions and recommendations for using the technique during exercise form the foundation of this article.

Abstract

The combined single-breath measurement of the diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (DL,CO) and nitric oxide (DL,NO) is a useful technique to measure pulmonary alveolar-capillary reserve in both healthy and patient populations. The measurement provides an estimate of the participant's ability to recruit and distend pulmonary capillaries. The method has recently been reported to exhibit a high test-retest reliability in healthy volunteers during exercise of light to moderate intensity. Of note, this technique permits up to 12 repeated maneuvers and only requires a single breath with a relatively short breath-hold time of 5 s. Representative data are provided showing the gradual changes in DL,NO and DL,CO from rest to exercise at increasing intensities of up to 60% of maximal workload. The measurement of diffusing capacity and evaluation of alveolar-capillary reserve is a useful tool to evaluate the lung's ability to respond to exercise both in the healthy population as well as in patient populations such as those with chronic lung disease.

Introduction

Exercise leads to a considerable increase in energy demand compared to the resting state. The heart and lungs respond by increasing cardiac output and ventilation resulting in an expansion of the alveolar-capillary bed, mainly the recruitment and distention of pulmonary capillaries1. This ensures a sufficient pulmonary gas exchange, which can be measured by an increase in pulmonary diffusing capacity (DL)2,3,4. The first attempts to measure DL during exercise date back more than a century5,6,7. The ability to increase DL from the resting state is often referred to as the alveolar-capillary reserve8, 9.

Experimentally, the relative contributions of alveolar-capillary membrane diffusing capacity (DM) and pulmonary capillary blood volume (VC) to alveolar-capillary reserve can be assessed by different methods, including the classical multiple fractions of inspired oxygen (Equation 1) method10. An alternative technique that may be useful in this context is the dual-test gas method, in which the DL to carbon monoxide (CO) and nitric oxide (NO) (DL,CO/NO) are concurrently measured11. This technique was developed in the 1980s, and takes advantage of the fact that the reaction rate of NO with hemoglobin (Hb) is substantially greater than that of CO, such that the pulmonary diffusion of CO depends more on VC than does NO. Hence, the main site of resistance (~75%) to CO diffusion is located within the red blood cell, while the main resistance (~60%) to NO diffusion is at the alveolar-capillary membrane and pulmonary plasma12. The concurrent measurement of DL,CO and DL,NO thus permits the assessment of the relative contributions of DM and VC to DL12, where the change in DL,NO observed during exercise thus largely reflects the expansion of the alveolar-capillary membrane. An additional advantage of this method when obtaining measurements during exercise is that it involves a relatively short breath-hold time (~5 s) and fewer maneuvers compared to the classical Equation 1 technique, where multiple repeated maneuvers with a standardized 10 s breath-hold are performed at different oxygen levels. Although Equation 1 has recently been applied with a shorter breath-hold time and fewer maneuvers at each intensity13. Nevertheless, Equation 1 only permits a total of six DL,CO maneuvers per session, whereas up to 12 repeated DL,CO/NO maneuvers can be performed without any measurable effect on the resultant estimates14. These are important considerations when obtaining measurements during exercise since both a long breath-hold and multiple maneuvers may be difficult to perform at very high intensities or in patient populations who experience dyspnea.

The present paper provides a detailed protocol, including theoretical considerations and practical recommendations on the measurement of DL,CO/NO during exercise and its use as an index of the alveolar-capillary reserve. This method is easily applicable in the experimental setting and permits the assessment of how diffusion limitation in the lungs may affect oxygen uptake in different populations.

Theory and measurement principles
The DL,CO/NO method involves a single breath of a gas mixture with the assumption that the gases distribute equally in the ventilated alveolar space after inhalation. The gas mixture consists of several gases including an inert tracer gas. The dilution of the tracer gas in the ventilated alveolar space, as based on its fraction in end-expiratory air, can be used to calculate the alveolar volume (VA)15. The gas mixture also includes the test gas CO and NO, both of which are diluted in the ventilated alveolar space and diffuse across the alveolar-capillary membrane. Based on their alveolar fractions, their individual rates of disappearance (k), also termed the diffusing constant, from the alveolar space can be calculated. By convention, the DL for a test gas measured during a single-breath maneuver, is derived by the following equation16:

Equation 2

where FA0 is the alveolar fraction of the test gas (CO or NO) at the onset of the breath-hold of the individual DL maneuver, while FA is the alveolar fraction of the test gas at the end of the breath-hold, and tBH is the breath-hold time. DL is mechanically equivalent to the conductance of the test gas across the alveolar-capillary membrane, through plasma and the red blood cell interior to hemoglobin. It thus depends both on the conductance of DM and the so-called specific conductance of pulmonary capillary blood (θ), of which the latter depends both on the conductance of the test gas in blood and on its reaction rate with hemoglobin10. Given that the reciprocal of conductance is resistance, the total resistance to the transfer of a test gas depends on the following resistances in series10:

Equation 3

These components may be distinguished by concurrently measuring the DL to CO and NO, because these have different θ-values, and their respective DL values thus depend differently on VC. The pulmonary diffusion of CO depends more heavily on VC than does NO, with the main site of resistance (~75%) to CO diffusion being located within the red blood cell12. In contrast, the main resistance (~60%) to NO diffusion is at the alveolar-capillary membrane and pulmonary plasma, because the reaction rate of NO with hemoglobin is substantially greater than that of CO. Hence, by concurrently measuring DL,CO and DL,NO, changes in both DM and VC will markedly affect the former, while the latter will depend much less on VC, thus permitting an integrative assessment of the factors that determine DL.

The reporting of DL,CO/NO metrics may be done using different units. Hence, the European respiratory society (ERS) uses mmol/min/kPa, whereas the American Thoracic society (ATS) uses mL/min/mmHg. The conversion factor between the units is 2.987 mmol/min/kPa = mL/min/mmHg.

Protocol

The Scientific Ethical Committee for the Capital Region of Denmark has previously approved the measurement of DL,CO/NO at rest, during exercise, and in the supine position in both healthy volunteers and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) at our institution (protocols H-20052659, H-21021723, and H-21060230). NOTE: Before DL,CO/NO is measured during exercise, a dynamic spirometry, and a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) must be performed. The dyna…

Representative Results

The protocol was implemented in 2021 and at the time of writing a total of 124 measurements during exercise (i.e., 51 in healthy volunteers and 73 in patients with COPD of various severities) had been performed. The maneuvers, as well as data on fulfilled acceptability and repeatability criteria, and the failure rate are all provided in Table 3. Calculations As an example, calculations from a single DL,CO/NO maneuver are …

Discussion

The protocol provides a standardized approach to the measurement of DL,CO/NO during exercise using the dual test gas single-breath technique. Since the obtained DL,CO/NO-metrics increase due to pulmonary capillary recruitment and distension, the method provides a physiologically meaningful measure of the alveolar-capillary reserve.

Critical steps in the protocol
The method requires an exhalation to residual volume followed by an inspiration to total…

Declarações

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The study received financial support from The Svend Andersen Foundation. The Centre for Physical Activity Research is supported by TrygFonden Grants ID 101390, ID 20045, and ID 125132. JPH is funded by HelseFonden and Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, while HLH is funded by the Beckett Foundation.

Materials

HemoCue Hb 201+  HemoCue, Brønshøj, Denmark Unkown For measurements of hemoglobin
Jaeger MasterScreen PFT pro (Lung Function Equipment) CareFusion, Höchberg, Germany Unkown For measurements of DLCO/NO
Mouthpiece SpiroBac, Henrotech, Aartselaar, Belgium Unkown Used together with the Lung Fuction Equipment. (dead space 56 ml, resistance to flow at 12 L s−1 0.9 cmH2O) 
Nose-clip IntraMedic, Gentofte, Denmark JAE-892895
Phenumotach IntraMedic, Gentofte, Denmark JAE-705048 Used together with the Lung Fuction Equipment
SentrySuite Software Solution Vyaire's Medical GmbH, Leibnizstr. 7, D-97204 Hoechberg Germany Unkown
Test gasses IntraMedic, Gentofte, Denmark Unkown Concentrations: 0.28% CO, 20.9% O2, 69.52% N2 and 9.3% He

Referências

  1. Johnson Jr, R. L., Heigenhauser, G. J. F., Hsia, C. C., Jones, N. L., Wagner, P. D. Determinants of gas exchange and acid-base balance during exercise. Compr Physiol. , 515-584 (2011).
  2. Rampulla, C., Marconi, C., Beulcke, G., Amaducci, S. Correlations between lung-transfer factor, ventilation, and cardiac output during exercise. Respiration. 33 (6), 405-415 (1976).
  3. Tedjasaputra, V., Bouwsema, M. M., Stickland, M. K. Effect of aerobic fitness on capillary blood volume and diffusing membrane capacity responses to exercise. J Physiol. 594 (15), 4359-4370 (2016).
  4. Tamhane, R. M., Johnson, R. L., Hsia, C. C. W. Pulmonary membrane diffusing capacity and capillary blood volume measured during exercise from nitric oxide uptake. Chest. 120 (6), 1850-1856 (2001).
  5. Bohr, C. On the determination of gas diffusion through the lungs and its size during rest and work. Zentralblatt für Physiologie. 23 (12), 374-379 (1909).
  6. Krogh, A., Krogh, M. On the rate of diffusion of carbonic oxide into the lungs of man. Skandinavisches Archiv Für Physiologie. 23 (1), 236-247 (1910).
  7. Krogh, M. The diffusion of gases through the lungs of man. J Physiol. 49 (4), 271-300 (1915).
  8. Hsia, C. C., Herazo, L. F., Ramanathan, M., Johnson, R. L. Cardiopulmonary adaptations to pneumonectomy in dogs IV. Membrane diffusing capacity and capillary blood volume. J Appl Physiol. 77 (2), 998-1005 (1994).
  9. Behnia, M., Wheatley, C. M., Avolio, A., Johnson, B. D. Alveolar-capillary reserve during exercise in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 12, 3115-3122 (2017).
  10. Roughton, F. J., Forster, R. E. Relative importance of diffusion and chemical reaction rates in determining rate of exchange of gases in the human lung, with special reference to true diffusing capacity of pulmonary membrane and volume of blood in the lung capillaries. J Appl Physiol. 11 (2), 290-302 (1957).
  11. Borland, C., Higenbottam, T. A simultaneous single breath measurement of pulmonary diffusing capacity with nitric oxide and carbon monoxide. Eur Respir J. 2 (1), 56-63 (1989).
  12. Zavorsky, G. S., et al. Standardisation and application of the single-breath determination of nitric oxide uptake in the lung. Eur Respir J. 49 (2), 1600962 (2017).
  13. Tedjasaputra, V., Van Diepen, S., Collins, S., Michaelchuk, W. M., Stickland, M. K. Assessment of pulmonary capillary blood volume, membrane diffusing capacity, and intrapulmonary arteriovenous anastomoses during exercise. J Vis Exp. (120), e54949 (2017).
  14. Zavorsky, G. S. The rise in carboxyhemoglobin from repeated pulmonary diffusing capacity tests. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 186 (1), 103-108 (2013).
  15. Graham, B. L., et al. ERS/ATS standards for single-breath carbon monoxide uptake in the lung. Eur Respir J. 49 (1), 1600016 (2017).
  16. Hughes, J. M., Pride, N. B. Examination of the carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) in relation to its KCO and VA components. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 186 (2), 132-139 (2012).
  17. Balady, G. J., et al. Clinician’s guide to cardiopulmonary exercise testing in adults: a scientific statement from the American heart association. Circulation. 122 (2), 191-225 (2010).
  18. Hanel, B., Clifford, P. S., Secher, N. H. Restricted postexercise pulmonary diffusion capacity does not impair maximal transport for O2. J Appl Physiol. 77 (5), 2408-2412 (1994).
  19. Sheel, A. W., Coutts, K. D., Potts, J. E., McKenzie, D. C. The time course of pulmonary diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide following short duration high intensity exercise. Respir Physiol. 111 (3), 271-281 (1998).
  20. Graham, B. L., et al. Standardization of spirometry 2019 update an official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society technical statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 200 (8), e70-e88 (2019).
  21. Glaab, T., Taube, C. Practical guide to cardiopulmonary exercise testing in adults. Respir Res. 23 (1), 9 (2022).
  22. Munkholm, M., et al. Reference equations for pulmonary diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide and nitric oxide in adult Caucasians. Eur Respir J. 52 (1), 1500677 (2018).
  23. Dressel, H., et al. Lung diffusing capacity for nitric oxide and carbon monoxide: dependence on breath-hold time. Chest. 133 (5), 1149-1154 (2008).
  24. Madsen, A. C., et al. Pulmonary diffusing capacity to nitric oxide and carbon monoxide during exercise and in the supine position: a test-retest reliability study. Exp Physiol. 108 (2), 307-317 (2023).
  25. Ross, B. A., et al. The supine position improves but does not normalize the blunted pulmonary capillary blood volume response to exercise in mild COPD. J Appl Physiol. 128 (4), 925-933 (2020).
  26. Zavorsky, G. S., Lands, L. C. Lung diffusion capacity for nitric oxide and carbon monoxide is impaired similarly following short-term graded exercise. Nitric Oxide. 12 (1), 31-38 (2005).
  27. Alves, M. M., Dressel, H., Radtke, T. Test-retest reliability of lung diffusing capacity for nitric oxide during light to moderate intensity cycling exercise. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 304, 103940 (2022).
  28. Jorgenson, C. C., Coffman, K. E., Johnson, B. D. Effects of intrathoracic pressure, inhalation time, and breath hold time on lung diffusing capacity. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 258, 69-75 (2018).
  29. Zavorsky, G. S., Quiron, K. B., Massarelli, P. S., Lands, L. C. The relationship between single-breath diffusion capacity of the lung for nitric oxide and carbon monoxide during various exercise intensities. Chest. 125 (3), 1019-1027 (2004).
  30. Coffman, K. E., Boeker, M. G., Carlson, A. R., Johnson, B. D. Age-dependent effects of thoracic and capillary blood volume distribution on pulmonary artery pressure and lung diffusing capacity. Physiol Rep. 6 (17), e13834 (2018).
  31. Borland, C. D. R., Hughes, J. M. B. Lung diffusing capacities (DL) for nitric oxide (NO) and carbon monoxide (CO): The evolving story. Compr Physiol. 11 (1), 1371 (2021).
  32. Tedjasaputra, V., Van Diepen, S., Collins, S. &. #. 2. 0. 1. ;., Michaelchuk, W. M., Stickland, M. K. Assessment of pulmonary capillary blood volume, membrane diffusing capacity, and intrapulmonary arteriovenoua anastomoses during exercise. J. Vis. Exp. (120), e54949 (2017).
  33. Thomas, A., et al. The single-breath diffusing capacity of CO and NO in healthy children of European descent. PLoS One. 12 (6), e0179097 (2017).
  34. Blakemore, W. S., Forster, R. E., Morton, J. W., Ogilvie, C. M. A standardized breath holding technique for the clinical measurement of the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide. J Clin Invest. 36 (1), 1-17 (1957).
  35. Cotes, J. E., et al. Iron-deficiency anaemia: its effect on transfer factor for the lung (diffusiong capacity) and ventilation and cardiac frequency during sub-maximal exercise. Clin Sci. 42 (3), 325-335 (1972).
  36. Mann, T., Lamberts, R. P., Lambert, M. I. Methods of prescribing relative exercise intensity: Physiological and practical considerations. Sports Med. 43 (7), 613-625 (2013).
  37. Forster, R. E. Exchange of gases between alveolar air and pulmonary capillary blood: pulmonary diffusing capacity. Physiol Rev. 37 (4), 391-452 (1957).
  38. Tedjasaputra, V., et al. Pulmonary capillary blood volume response to exercise is diminished in mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med. 145, 57-65 (2018).
  39. Nymand, S. B., et al. Exercise adaptations in COPD: the pulmonary perspective. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 323 (6), L659-L666 (2022).
  40. Rodríguez-Roisin, R., et al. Ventilation-perfusion imbalance and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease staging severity. J Appl Physiol. 106 (6), 1902-1908 (2009).
  41. Hsia, C. C., Johnson, R. L., Shah, D. Red cell distribution and the recruitment of pulmonary diffusing capacity. J Appl Physiol. 86 (5), 1460-1467 (1999).
  42. Wilhelm, E., Battino, R., Wilcock, R. J. Low-pressure solubility of gases in liquid water. Chem Rev. 77 (2), 219-262 (1977).
  43. Forster, R. E. . Diffusion of gases across the alveolar membrane. , (1987).
check_url/pt/65871?article_type=t

Play Video

Citar este artigo
Nymand, S. B., Hartmann, J. P., Hartmeyer, H. L., Rasmussen, I. E., Andersen, A. B., Mohammad, M., Al-Atabi, S., Hanel, B., Iepsen, U. W., Mortensen, J., Berg, R. M. G. Dual Test Gas Pulmonary Diffusing Capacity Measurement During Exercise in Humans Using the Single-Breath Method. J. Vis. Exp. (204), e65871, doi:10.3791/65871 (2024).

View Video