부수적 코드화
English
COMPARTILHAR
Visão Geral
출처: 조나단 플롬바움 연구소 -존스 홉킨스 대학
장기 기억은 인간 인식의 중요한 특징이며 실험 심리학에서 연구의 두드러진 초점이었습니다. 장기 메모리를 탭하도록 설계된 많은 패러다임은 참가자에게 콘텐츠를 배우거나 공부하도록 요청한 다음 해당 콘텐츠에 대한 메모리를 테스트하는 데 의존합니다. 이는 메모리가 교육 성취도를 지원하는 방법(예: 명시적 연구가 프로세스의 일부인 경우)을 이해하려는 경우 좋은 방법입니다. 그러나, 일상 생활에서, 사람들은 종종 새로운 추억을 형성 , 많은 오랜 시간 동안 지속 –부수적으로. 사람들은 잡지에서 읽은 내용, 파트너가 만난 순간, 좋아하는 이야기의 줄거리 등을 기억하지 못합니다. 어떻게 든, 경험의 좋은 거래는 인생이 간다으로 메모리에 인코딩됩니다. 장기 기억의 이 쪽을 공부하기 위하여는, 실험심리학자는 부수적인 인코딩 패러다임에게 불린 무언가를 이용합니다.
패러다임은 강한 장기 기억을 생성하는 경향이 경험의 종류를 조사하는 데 특히 유용합니다. 연구자들은 개인, 순수 지적, 깊은 또는 얕은 등 그들이 요구하는 참여의 종류에 대한 경험에 대해 생각합니다. 부수적 인 인코딩 패러다임은 개인을 자극에 노출시키는 데 사용되는 커버 작업을 변경하여 다양한 종류의 참여 중에 장기 메모리 형성을 대조하는 데 사용할 수 있습니다. 커버 작업은 참가자가 나중에 작업의 자극에 대한 메모리를 테스트한다는 것을 모르고 완료하도록 요청받는 작업입니다.
이 비디오는 부속 인코딩 패러다임과 두 가지 다른 커버 작업을 사용하여 자극에 대한 명시적 연구가 요구되지 않을 때 장기 메모리를 조사하기 위한 표준 절차를 보여줍니다.
Procedimento
Resultados
An influential effect in the domain of long-term memory is that objects are more likely to be remembered when incidental processing is more elaborate, especially when it is personal. Memory performance in a surprise test is therefore usually worse among participants exposed to the letter ‘C’ task and age-matched participants exposed to the more personal “have you ever touched it” task. Figure 5 graphs this result, which suggests that encoding into memory is not a random process, but instead, one that is influenced by the kinds of interactions a person is engaged in.
Figure 5. Memory performance in a surprise state discrimination task as a function of incidental encoding cover task, either impersonal and superficial (blue) or personal and more elaborate (green). Elaborate and personal interactions are more likely to lead to strong long-term memory through incidental exposure.
Applications and Summary
Incidental encoding followed by surprise memory testing is the primary vehicle of current research into the mechanisms of long-term memory formation, attempts to improve memory, and attempts to understand memory disorders like Alzheimer’s disease, in particular. It is well established that intentional encoding in Alzheimer’s disease is extremely impaired. For example, if patients try to remember stimuli, because they know they will be tested later, then they remember very little compared with controls. This can be shown by exposing patients to images just as they would be in the incidental-encoding task, but instructing them to try to remember each image because they will be tested later. In contrast, Alzheimer’s patients have better memory for images encoded incidentally in tasks that involve emotional or personal processing of the stimulus. This suggests that some kinds of incidental processing leads to stronger memories than even intentional encoding, and it suggests that activation of emotion areas in the brain may foster memory encoding.
Transcrição
A great deal of our daily experiences gets encoded into long-term memory incidentally, as life goes by, without us explicitly trying to encode it.
For example, people do not remember the moment they first met a friend because they try to; rather, they just do.
Such implicit long-term memory is studied with an incidental encoding paradigm, which enables memories to be formed without the participant being asked to specifically remember a series of images.
This encoding is accomplished through the use of a cover task, where images are shown, but individuals are not explicitly told to remember them. At a later time, they are surprised with a memory test of the images.
This video demonstrates methods for investigating implicit long-term memory, including how to design stimuli and perform an experiment involving an incidental encoding paradigm, as well as how to analyze the data and interpret the results.
A typical incidental encoding experiment has two phases. The first consists of the encoding phase, where participants are exposed to a large set of pictures of real-world, everyday objects.
During this session, images are individually shown on the screen for 2 sec, with an inter-image interval of 1 sec. Half the participants are asked to do a cover task where they evaluate the object in an impersonal, and relatively superficial way by determining if there is a letter ‘c’ in its name.
The other half of the participants are asked to complete a more personal and detailed evaluation of the object by determining if they have ever touched the object on the screen. Note that including two cover tasks allows researchers to investigate whether the type of object engagement differentially affects incidental encoding into long-term memory.
The second phase of the experiment is the surprise memory recall test. All participants are randomly shown two images of the same object: one is the same as what was presented during the cover task, while the other is slightly different. Participants are asked to choose the image they think they previously saw.
In this case, the dependent variable is the number of correct choices during the recall test. Memory performance is expected to be greater for those who completed the more personal cover task, compared to the impersonal one.
To begin the experiment, greet the participant in the lab and explain the general procedures that will be used for the task.
During the experiment, have the participant sit comfortably in front of the screen and keyboard. Randomly assign participants to one of the two cover tasks, and instruct them to press the ‘Y’ key to respond yes or the ‘N’ key for no after the image is presented.
After judging 100 objects in the initial encoding phase, allow the participant to have a 20-min break.
When the break is over, explain to the participant that there is a final memory recall test, where two objects will appear and they must choose the one they think they saw during the initial phase by pressing the left or right arrow keys this time.
During this final recall phase, have each participant complete 100 paired trials, with the incidental objects presented in random order.
To analyze the results, compute the proportion of correct responses made by all of the participants during the surprise memory test phase and graph the results. Note that chance level is 50%, since there were only two choices.
Notice that incidental encoding into memory occurred during both cover tasks; however, having a more personal engagement with the presented items strengthened the formation of memories.
Now that you are familiar with an incidental encoding paradigm, let’s take a look at other ways experimental psychologists use the task to investigate long-term memory formation.
The incidental encoding paradigm is used to investigate the memory deficits caused by diseases such as Alzheimer’s. Patients remember very little compared with healthy controls when they are asked to study and remember images.
However, if an incidental encoding paradigm with a personal or emotional cover task is used, patients have a much better memory, suggesting that activation of emotion areas in the brain may foster memory encoding.
Other researchers have combined incidental encoding paradigms with functional magnetic resonance imaging to elucidate the brain regions involved in memory formation of emotional items, including the amygdala, hippocampus, and other medial temporal lobe structures.
You’ve just watched JoVE’s introduction to incidental encoding. Now you should have a good understanding of how to setup and perform an experiment, as well as analyze and assess the results.
Thanks for watching!