JoVE Science Education
Aeronautical Engineering
É necessária uma assinatura da JoVE para visualizar este conteúdo.  Faça login ou comece sua avaliação gratuita.
JoVE Science Education Aeronautical Engineering
Multicopter Aerodynamics: Characterizing Thrust on a Hexacopter
  • 00:01Concepts
  • 03:01Dynamometer Experiment
  • 04:18Static Text
  • 05:51Dynamic Thrust Test
  • 07:57Resultados

Aérodynamique des multicoptères : Caractérisation de la poussée sur un hexacoptère

English

COMPARTILHAR

Visão Geral

Source: Prashin Sharma et Ella M. Atkins, Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

Les multicopoptères sont de plus en plus populaires pour une variété d’applications commerciales et de loisirs. Ils sont généralement disponibles sous forme de quadcopter (quatre propulseurs), hexacopter (six propulseurs) et octocopter (huit propulseurs) configurations. Ici, nous décrivons un processus expérimental pour caractériser la performance multicopter. Une petite plate-forme modulaire d’hexacopter fournissant la redondance d’unité de propulsion est examinée. La poussée motrice statique individuelle est déterminée à l’aide d’un dynamomètre et de commandes d’hélice et d’entrée variables. Cette poussée statique est alors représentée en fonction du régime moteur, où le régime est déterminé à partir de la puissance motrice et de l’entrée de contrôle. L’hexacopter est ensuite monté sur un banc d’essai de cellules de charge dans une soufflerie de recirculation à basse vitesse de 5 pi x 7 po, et ses composants aérodynamiques de résistance à la portance et à la force de traînée ont été caractérisés pendant le vol à différents signaux moteurs, la vitesse de débit libre et l’angle d’attaque.

Un hexacopter a été choisi pour cette étude en raison de sa résistance à la défaillance du moteur (unité de propulsion), tel que rapporté dans Clothier1. En plus de la redondance dans le système de propulsion, le choix des composants à haute fiabilité est également nécessaire pour un vol sûr, en particulier pour les missions surpeuplées. Dans Ampatis2, les auteurs discutent de la sélection optimale des pièces multicopter, telles que les moteurs, les lames, les batteries et les contrôleurs de vitesse électroniques. Des recherches similaires ont également été rapportées dans Bershadsky3, qui se concentre sur le choix approprié d’un système d’hélice pour satisfaire aux exigences de la mission. En plus de la redondance et de la fiabilité des composants, la compréhension des performances du véhicule est également essentielle pour s’assurer que les limites de l’enveloppe de vol sont respectées et pour choisir la conception la plus efficace.

Princípios

Procedimento

Ce protocole caractérise la poussée et l’aérodynamique des hexacopters. Pour cette expérience, nous avons utilisé des composants disponibles dans le commerce et disponibles sur le marché pour l’hexacopter, et les détails sont fournis dans le tableau 2. Pour le contrôleur de vol, nous avons sélectionné un pilote automatique open-source, Librepilot,9 car il a fourni la flexibilité pour commander les commandes motrices individuelles émises à l’hexacopter. Le banc d’essai p…

Resultados

Dynamometer Tests

In Figures 5-6, the plots illustrate the variation of thrust and torque, respectively, with increasing motor RPM. From these plots, the minimum motor RPM required for the multicopter to hover can be determined. A plot showing data from multiple propellers can be obtained from Sharma12. Further, the quadratic relations between thrust vs. RPM and moment vs. RPM can be clearly observed, which are described in Equations (1) and (2). Using this quadratic relationship, we can then determine the and coefficients for the 6040 propeller, which are as follows:

Figure 7 shows that an increase in RPM corresponding with an increase in electrical power consumption results in decreased motor efficiency. Similar experiments can be conducted for different propellers to obtain motor efficiency for the motor-propeller pair. The results from such experiments are useful during vehicle design to determine the optimal motor-propeller pair to be used on the multicopter. These decisions are based on the desired mission parameters, such as the duration and speed of the flight.

Since there is no direct RPM sensor feedback on the low-cost hexacopter, we estimate RPM by fitting a surface across RPM, electrical power, and throttle (PWM) command. This surface fit is used to estimate RPM as a function of electrical power and PWM value. Based on data collected from the dynamometer, the surface fit is shown in Figure 8, with the corresponding equation:

where is the motor PWM (throttle) setting normalized by the mean bias value 1550 with a standard deviation of 201.9 , while is normalized by bias 71.11 W with a standard deviation of 55.75 W.

After analyzing the dynamometer data, a second dataset was collected for validation and provided as an input to function. The results are then plotted in a time series of RPM variation, as seen in Figure 9 and Figure 10. These plots confirm that the fit estimates RPM to within 95% bounds of the actual RPM, as shown in Figure 9.

Wind Tunnel Results

Experiments in the wind tunnel were conducted following the test matrix in Table 1. To reduce complexity, a zero yaw (sideslip) angle condition was maintained at all times. This is consistent with most flight profiles in which cameras and other sensors are mounted with a preferred forward-facing orientation. The variation of drag and lift are plotted against different pitch angles of the hexacopter and are shown in Figures 11 and 12, respectively. Both plots show that increasing the throttle command results in a significant increase in lift (motor thrust) force. Similarly, an increase in wind tunnel speed results in a significant increase in the drag force acting on hexacopter. These trends are consistent with Equation (7).

A static thrust model only requires dynamometer testing. However, to gain an accurate estimate of dynamic thrust and drag, wind tunnel experiments with FT load cell sensing were required. With collected data, we can develop a lookup table of and and drag coefficients , as a function of pitch angle and free stream airspeed to enable accurate hexacopter FT modeling.


Figure 1. Reference world and body coordinate frames. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.


Figure 2. Multicopter load cell test stand. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.


Figure 3. Wind tunnel data acquisition (DAQ) system diagram. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.


Figure 4. Dynamometer setup. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.


Figure 5. Relationship between motor thrust and RPM. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.


Figure 6. Relationship between motor torque and RPM. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.


Figure 7. Overall motor efficiency vs. RPM. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.


Figure 8. Surface fit over throttle (PWM), electrical power, and RPM. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.


Figure 9. Validation of with RPM measured directly from the dynamometer. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.


Figure 10. Validation of estimated thrust data with measured thrust data. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.


Figure 11. Load cell lift and drag forces for different pitch angles and throttle commands given constant wind speed of 5 m/s. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.


Figure 12. Load cell lift and drag forces for different pitch angles and throttle commands given constant wind speed of 8.47 m/s. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Table 1. Wind tunnel test matrix

Wind Tunnel Test Matrix
Wind Speed (m/s) Pitch Angle (°) Yaw Angle(°) Throttle Command (ms)
2.2 30 to -30 0 0 and 1300 to 1700
4.5 30 to -30 0 0 and 1300 to 1700
6.7 30 to -30 0 0 and 1300 to 1700
8.9 30 to -30 0 0 and 1300 to 1700

Table 2. Parts list

Parts List for Hexacopter
Sr No Part No Description Img Link Qty
1 SKU: 571000027-0 HobbyKing™ Totem Q450 Hexacopter Kit https://hobbyking.com/en_us/hobbykingtm-totem-q450-hexacopter-kit.html 1
2 SKU: 571000064-0 OpenPilot CC3D Revolution (Revo) 32bit F4 Based Flight Controller w/Integrated 433Mhz OPLink https://hobbyking.com/en_us/openpilot-cc3d-revolution-revo-32bit-flight-controller-w-integrated-433mhz-oplink.html 1
3 SKU: 571000065-0 Openpilot OPLink Mini Ground Station 433 MHz https://hobbyking.com/en_us/openpilot-oplink-mini-ground-station-433-mhz.html 1
4 SKU: 9536000003-0 Multistar Elite 2204-2300KV 3-4s 4 pack (2/CCW 2/CW) https://hobbyking.com/en_us/multistar-elite-2204-2300kv-set-of-4-cw-ccw-2-ccw-2-cw.html 2
5 SKU: 9192000131-0 Afro 20A Muti-Rotor ESC (SimonK Firmware) https://hobbyking.com/en_us/afro-esc-20amp-multi-rotor-motor-speed-controller-simonk-firmware.html 8
6 SKU: T2200.3S.30 Turnigy 2200mAh 3S 30C Lipo Pack https://hobbyking.com/en_us/turnigy-2200mah-3s-30c-lipo-pack.html 1
7 SKU: 9171000144 Hobby King Octocopter Power Distribution Board https://hobbyking.com/en_us/hobby-king-octocopter-power-distribution-board.html 1
8 SKU: 426000022-0 King KongMultirotor Prop 6×4 CW/CCW https://hobbyking.com/en_us/kingkong-multirotor-propeller-6×4-cw-ccw-black-20pcs.html 1
8 SKU: 329000304-0 Gemfan Propeller 5×3 Black (CW/CCW) (2pcs) https://hobbyking.com/en_us/gemfan-propeller-5×3-black-cw-ccw-2pcs.html 10
9 Spektrum DX6 Transmitter System MD2 with AR610 Receiver https://www.amazon.com/Spektrum-Transmitter-System-AR610-Receiver/dp/B01B9DYOWG/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1494000219&sr=8-2&keywords=spektrum+dx6 1
10 709-RSP-1600-12 Switching Power Supplies 1500W 12V 125A https://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Mean-Well/RSP-1600-12/?qs=%2fha2pyFadujYDPrAgY3T1JlGoR5AZMKL7jhmRydJUc1Z44%252bNekUvbQ%3d%3d 1
Parts List for DAQ
Sr No Part No Description Img Link Qty
1 ATHM800-256ALP Rev F Athena II PC /104 SBC http://www.diamondsystems.com/products/athenaii 1
2 SI-145-5 Mini 45 Force /Torque Sensor http://www.ati-ia.com/products/ft/ft_models.aspx?id=Mini45 1
3 Hobbypower Airspeed Sensor MPXV7002DP Differential Pressure https://www.amazon.com/Hobbypower-Airspeed-MPXV7002DP-Differential-controller/dp/B00WSFWO36/ref=pd_day0_21_2?_encoding=UTF8&pd_rd_i=B00WSFWO36&pd_rd_r=8KRZ03PR2XAJ1HXD4BKS&pd_rd_w=M1tek&pd_rd_wg=LVHjU&psc=1&refRID=8KRZ03PR2XAJ1HXD4BKS 1
Parts List for Dynamometer
Sr No Part No Description Img Link Qty
1 Series-1580 RC Benchmark Dynamometer https://www.rcbenchmark.com/dynamometer-series-1580/ 1

Applications and Summary

Here we describe a protocol to characterize the aerodynamic forces acting on a hexacopter. This protocol can be applied to other multirotor configurations directly. Proper characterization of aerodynamic forces is needed to improve control design, understand flight envelope limits, and estimate local wind fields as in Xiang13. The presented protocol for determining motor RPM based on power consumption and throttle command has direct applications to estimate RPM and thrust when low-cost electronic speed controllers (ESCs) without RPM sensing are used.  Finally, the application of advanced control techniques, such as in model predictive control for trajectory tracking, require knowledge of vehicle aerodynamics and thrust forces, as described in Kamel14.

Referências

  1. Clothier, R.A., and Walker, R.A., “Safety Risk Management of Unmanned Aircraft Systems,” Handbook  of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, Springer, 2015, pp. 2229–2275.
  2. Ampatis, C., and Papadopoulos, E., “Parametric Design and Optimization of Multi-rotor Aerial Vehicles,” Applications of Mathematics and Informatics in Science and Engineering, Springer, 2014, pp. 1–25. 

  3. Bershadsky, D., Haviland, S., and Johnson, E. N., “Electric Multirotor UAV Propulsion System Sizing for Performance Prediction and Design Optimization,” 57th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conf., 2016.
  4. Bangura, M., Melega, M., Naldi, R., and Mahony, R., “Aerodynamics of Rotor Blades for Quadrotors,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.00733, 2016
  5. Ducard, G., and Minh-Duc Hua. "Discussion and Practical Aspects on Control Allocation for a Multi-rotor Helicopter." Conf. on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle in Geomatics, 2011.
  6. Powers C., Mellinger D., Kumar V. “Quadrotor Kinematics and Dynamics” In: Handbook of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Springer, 2015
  7. McClamroch, N. Harris. “Steady Aircraft Flight and Performance.” Princeton University Press, 2011.
  8. Quan, Q., “Introduction to Multicopter Design and Control”, Springer Singapore, 2017.
  9. LibrePilot, https://www.librepilot.org/site/index.html
  10. Foster, J. and Hartman, D., “High-Fidelity Multi-Rotor Unmanned Aircraft System Simulation Development for Trajectory Prediction under Off-Nominal Flight Dynamics,” Proc. Air Transportation Integration & Operations (ATIO) Conference, AIAA, 2017. 
  11. Russell, Carl R., et al. "Wind Tunnel and Hover Performance Test Results for Multicopter UAS Vehicles," 2016.
  12. Sharma, P. and Atkins, E., “An Experimental Investigation of Tractor and Pusher Hexacopter Performance,” Proc. AIAA Aviation Conference, AIAA, June 2018. (to appear)
  13. Xiang, X., et al. "Wind Field Estimation through Autonomous Quadcopter Avionics." 35th AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), IEEE, 2016.
  14. Kamel, M., et al. "Model Predictive Control for Trajectory Tracking of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles using Robot Operating System." Robot Operating System (ROS). Springer, Cham, 2017, 3-39.

Transcrição

Multicopters are small aerial vehicles with multiple rotors, as opposed to traditional helicopters with one main rotor. A traditional helicopter rotor has variable pitch, which enables the pilot to control lift and steering. However, multicopters rely on fixed pitch rotors. Some rotate clockwise, and some rotate counterclockwise. Flight is controlled by varying the speed of one or more rotors. For example, in this hexacopter, all of the propellers operate at the same speed. This produces the same thrust for it to hover.

Like fixed wing aircraft, hexacopter attitude is described about three axes: the pitch axis, the roll axis, and the yaw axis. The hexacopter can be controlled about the pitch axis by increasing the speed of the propellers on one side of the pitch axis and decreasing the speeds of the ones on the other side. This creates a thrust differential between the two sides. If thrust is increased in the rear propellers and decreased in the forward propellers, the hexacopter pitches forward.

Similarly, the hexacopter can be controlled about the roll axis in the same way. This causes side-to-side movement. This is done by increasing the speed of the propellers on one side and decreasing the speed of the propellers on the other side.

Yaw control, which changes the heading angle, is achieved by balancing the clockwise propeller rotational torques with the counterclockwise propeller rotational torques. By spinning the counterclockwise propellers faster than the clockwise propellers, the opposite net reaction induces a clockwise rotation about the yaw axis.

We can calculate the thrust and torque of each propeller unit using the equations shown. where T is the thrust generated, CT is the thrust coefficient, tau is the torque, CQ is the torque coefficient, and omega is the rotational speed in RPM. Both the electrical power input and the mechanical power output can be calculated using the following equations. The electrical and mechanical power are then used to determine the efficiency of the propeller motor. The two coefficients, along with the electrical and mechanical power, are calculated using data acquired from experiments.

In this lab, we will demonstrate how to calculate aerodynamic and thrust forces on a hexacopter using a load cell mounted on a test stand. Then, we will characterize and analyze lift and drag over a range of air speeds using a wind tunnel.

To begin this experiment, we’ll use a dynamometer to measure and calculate parameters of one propeller. First, obtain a dynamometer with an onboard data acquisition system. Run the graphical user interface provided with the dynamometer system. Mount the motor on the dynamometer test stand and connect all device wires. Then, calibrate the system by following the onscreen instructions, using weights and the known lever arm when prompted.

Once calibration is complete, attach the propeller in a ‘puller’ configuration. Before running the experiments, make sure the dynamometer is firmly secured to the workbench using C-clamps, and that it is placed behind a plexiglass protection wall.

Now connect the battery to the dynamometer. Run the step input program, which powers the DC motors using a pulsed signal. The program will record the measured thrust, torque, motor RPM, motor current, and pulse with modulation throttle command.

For this part of the experiment, we will measure thrust from the hexacopter using a load cell outside of the wind tunnel to avoid disturbances from the wind tunnel walls.

First, fasten the hexacopter onto the load cell test stand using mounting screws. Then, open the data acquisition system and run the load cell strain gauge bias program to remove all of the bias load cell values. Connect the hexacopter flight controller to the computer using a micro USB cable, and connect the power supply to the hexacopter.

Then, open the ground controller station program. Under the configuration tab, link all motors by clicking the tick mark on the right side. Move the output channel slider to the desired throttle command at 1,300 microseconds. Let the system stabilize for a few seconds and then run the program to collect data from the load cell.

When the program is complete, stop the motors by moving the output channel sliders to the left on the ground controller station. Repeat the test with throttle commands of 1,500 and 1,700 microseconds. Then stop the motors, and transfer all of the data to a flash drive to use as a baseline for the wind tunnel measurements in the next test.

For the next part of the experiment, we will conduct the same test, except it will be done inside of the wind tunnel with airflow. To begin, mount the hexacopter on the load cell test stand. Then, connect the load cell to the data acquisition computer, and connect the hexacopter to the ground control station. Secure the test stand to the base of the wind tunnel using C-clamps, making sure that the hexacopter is free of the wind tunnel walls, floor, and ceiling to minimize free stream flow disturbances.

Then, mount two pitot tubes inside of the wind tunnel using industrial tape, making sure to place them a few feet away from the hexacopter to sample the undisturbed airflow. Now, set the pitch angle of the hexacopter to 0° by adjusting the hinge joint of the test stand. Then, close the wind tunnel.

Connect the pitot tube sensors to the data acquisition system. Next, run the bias program to establish the load cell voltage biases. Then, initialize the wind tunnel and set the wind speed to about 430 ft/min, or 2. 2 m/s. Once the free stream flow speed settles to the desired value, collect the baseline lift and drag readings from the load cell with the hexacopter motors off.

Now, turn the hexacopter motors on by initializing the throttle command to 1,300 microseconds. Let the air speed in the wind tunnel settle and then collect the readings from the load cell and from the pitot tubes. Then, repeat the test again for the three throttle command settings at varied hexacopter pitch angles and wind tunnel air speeds. To reduce complexity, a zero-yaw angle was maintained at all times.

Now let’s interpret the results. First, plot the thrust versus RPM and torque versus RPM data collected from the dynamometer experiment.

Here, we show the data for one motor. The plots illustrate that an increase in motor RPM results in an increase in torque and thrust. Now, fit a quadratic curve to the data in the form of the following equations. Using the quadratic relation, we can then determine the thrust coefficient, CT, and the torque coefficient, CQ.

Next, plot input motor RPM, electrical power, and throttle command on a 3-D plot. Since there is no direct RPM sensor feedback on our hexacopter, we have fit a polynomial surface to the data to obtain the actual RPM as a function of electrical power and throttle command.

Now that we’ve looked at the dynamometer results, let’s take a look at the wind tunnel experiments conducted using the parameters listed here. The variation of drag and lift are plotted against the different pitch angles tested. Both plots show that increasing the throttle command results in significant increase in lift, or motor thrust, as well as an increase in drag. An increase in wind tunnel air speed does not significantly increase lift. However, higher air speed did result in a significant increase in the drag force acting on the hexacopter.

In summary, we learned how aerodynamic forces control the flight of multicopters. We then tested a hexacopter in a wind tunnel and analyzed the lift and drag forces produced over a range of air speeds.

Tags

Cite This
JoVE Science Education Database. JoVE Science Education. Multicopter Aerodynamics: Characterizing Thrust on a Hexacopter. JoVE, Cambridge, MA, (2023).