This video shows and compares two experimental models to study the development of obliterative airway disease (OAD) in mice, the heterotopic and orthotopic tracheal transplantation model.
A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
This video shows and compares two experimental models to study the development of obliterative airway disease (OAD) in mice, the heterotopic and orthotopic tracheal transplantation model.
Obliterative airway disease (OAD) is the major complication after lung transplantations that limits long term survival (1-7).
To study the pathophysiology, treatment and prevention of OAD, different animal models of tracheal transplantation in rodents have been developed (1-7). Here, we use two established models of trachea transplantation, the heterotopic and orthotopic model and demonstrate their advantages and limitations.
For the heterotopic model, the donor trachea is wrapped into the greater omentum of the recipient, whereas the donor trachea is anastomosed by end-to-end anastomosis in the orthotopic model.
In both models, the development of obliterative lesions histological similar to clinical OAD has been demonstrated (1-7).
This video shows how to perform both, the heterotopic as well as the orthotopic tracheal transplantation technique in mice, and compares the time course of OAD development in both models using histology.
DONOR PREPARATION
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Mice are available in different transgeneic and knockout model, and therefore suitable to study mechanistic questions related to OAD (4).
Both models of tracheal transplantation shown in this video can be used as reliable models for studying OAD development.
However, each model demonstrates advantages and limitations.
The heterotopic tracheal transplantation is easy to perform and does not require special surgical training (3, 5). After het.......
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Sonja Schrepfer has received a research grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) (SCHR992/3–1).]
All animals received human care in compliance with the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care, experiments on animals were performed in accordance with the guidelines and regulations set forth by the National Society for Medical research and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the National Institutes of Health (National Institutes of Health publication 85-23, revised 1985).
All animals were obtained from Charles River Laboratories (Sulzfeld, Germany) and were maintained in the animal care facilities of the University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf. The animals received standard chow and water ad libitum.
The authors thank Christiane Pahrmann (Lab Manager).
....Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.