Experimental porcine OLTx is a challenging procedure for a research setting without the intensive care resources of a clinical scenario. Possible complications include hemodynamic instability, hemorrhage, organ ischemia, hypothermia, and metabolic, as well as respiratory, decompensation. For any research group, sufficient procedural training of the surgical technique5 as well as the pig anesthesia14,15 is mandatory in order to achieve representative and reproducible results.
Many technical subtleties have been described in the literature, especially regarding the vascular reconstruction phase5. The OLTx protocol described above provides the required information for a cava-replacing model resembling human OLTx. The provided results demonstrate reliable animal survival and graft recovery in both HBD and DCD models. The protocol is applicable in short-term survival scenarios used in graft reperfusion experiments, for example, as well as in long-term survival models such as tolerance studies.
One great obstacle of porcine OLTx is the relatively poor tolerance of cava and portal vein cross-clamping. Splanchnic congestion during the anhepatic phase causes venous hypertension and capillary damage that can lead to major intestinal ischemia and hemodynamic instability to the point of an irreversible shock even after organ reperfusion7. Since the vena cava is completely embedded in liver parenchyma, a cava-preserving piggy-back procedure is not feasible. The total occlusion of the vena cava during the cava reconstruction phase impairs the hemodynamic stability of the pig. Although a few reports show that porcine OLTx can be accomplished during total cava and portal vein occlusion of less than 25 min16,17, a porto-cava-jugular bypass technique for the time of vascular reconstruction is the safer and more practical option7-9,18. In the authors’ experience, a passive porto-jugular bypass is not optimal to keep the pig hemodynamically stable during the anhepatic phase. The bypass model, including active decompression of both infrahepatic cava and portal vein, allows a calm reconstruction phase of the suprahepatic caval and portal anastomoses even with extended clamping time due to unforeseen complications. Contrary to earlier reports7, a splenectomy is not mandatory when the portal bypass catheter is removed. Both splenic artery and vein are closed about halfway along the spleen’s length leaving the proximal half sufficiently perfused. Complications like bleeding or air embolism due to bypass disconnection are avoidable by ensuring that the bypass is placed carefully and secured properly.
In long-term survival OLTx experiments, the bile duct anastomosis is considered a weak spot due to its high complication rate19. The biliary tissue is very fragile and needs special care when being handled. Many different anastomosis techniques have been described5,19. An end-to-end anastomosis is technically easy and associated with minimal complications19. A continuous suture with a non-cutting needle including big sections of peribiliary connective tissue appears to be superior to an interrupted suture. The bile duct is placed under unnecessary tension when the single stitches of the interrupted suture are knotted. This may result in tissue tears and consecutive bile leaks. The suture material – absorbable or non-absorbable – is usually not important, given its limited lifespan until the pig is terminated. For long-term survival models over several months, absorbable sutures – like in human OLTx – are preferable.
Specific care must be taken with the post-operative follow-up. Sufficient nutrition and fluid supply, a reliable pain relief protocol, and a proper immunosuppression regime are obligatory. For long-term experiments, immunosuppression appears particularly important. Compared to other mammals, pigs show a surprisingly low immunological rejection rate after OLTx20,21. Round cell infiltrations are maximal during the second week after transplantation and diminish spontaneously even without immunosuppression. Rejection is rarely the cause of death after porcine OLTx22. However, even with the immunosuppression protocol involving administering steroids i.v. and calcineurin inhibitors p.o. mentioned here, graft rejection is indicated by a mild increase of transaminases starting at about 4 days after OLTx and confirmed by apparent portal field round cell infiltration. Calcineurin inhibitors can be given either p.o.23,24 or i.v.25,26; both methods have disadvantages. Even with oral application aids, the actual amount reaching the gastro-intestinal tract remains elusive. On the other hand, continuous i.v. infusion in a pig’s pen with an active animal is difficult. Hence, the i.v. application must be performed as a bolus, which results in high drug concentration peaks along with potential toxic effects. Nonetheless, both methods of application appear to allow long-term survival.
Similar to a clinical setting, post-operative stress ulcer prophylaxis is recommended. Post-operative bleeding from peptic ulcers is a frequent problem and may be related to an impaired liver function27. After a few cases of gastrointestinal bleeding in both OLTx groups, the authors began regular prophylaxis with pantoprazole and did not experience any gastrointestinal bleeding ever since.
Strict maintenance of sterile conditions intraoperatively, comparable to the conditions in a clinical operating room, and consequent antibiotic prophylaxis, decreases the risk of infectious complications.
In conclusion, this article provides practical information for establishing a porcine OLTx program in a research setting. Sufficient dedication, practice, and teamwork is important in order to decrease the learning period, to produce reliable results, and to reduce costs and the number of research animals.