$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
A more fundamental understanding of how T-cells recognize antigens requires looking at the right place, that is, within the immunological synapse formed between the T-cell and the APC. Here, molecular binding kinetics are not only determined by the inherent biochemical properties of the interaction partners involved but depend to a large extent on cellular parameters, which include cellular forces, membrane architecture and lateral interactions between membrane proteins as well as synapse-specific geometrical constraints 3. Biochemical approaches are limited in resolving power as they necessitate the disruption of at least one of the synaptic membranes involved. For this reason a FRET-based imaging methodology was developed to monitor binding of the TCR to antigenic pMHCs 2. Here T-cells are decorated with a recombinant and site-specifically labeled TCRβ-reactive single chain antibody fragment (scFV) and confronted with planar glass-supported lipid bilayers (SLBs), which harbor MHC class II molecules loaded with a fluorescently labeled antigenic peptide, costimulatory molecules and adhesion proteins. Synaptic binding between dye-labeled TCR and dye-labeled pMHC results in FRET, which can be monitored on a bulk and single molecule level by Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy.
In this article it is explained in detail how to utilize SLBs for assaying T-cell synapses, verify their integrity through a functional T-cell calcium-flux assay, conduct FRET measurements in bulk and with single molecule sensitivity, and analyze the acquired data. Recommendations are offered to producing properly conformed proteins required for bilayer functionalization. For more specific information regarding bilayer formation and setup of a suitable TIRF microscope please refer to an additional public access JoVE publication published back to back 4.
Nature of SLBs
Functionalizable SLBs can be readily generated from unilamellar vesicles (SUVs) containing the two lipids 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-gylcero-3-phosphocholine (short: POPC, 90-99%) and 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-{[N(5-amino-1-carboxypentyl) iminodiacetic acid] succinyl} (short: DGS NTA-Ni, 1-10%). SUVs spread on clean glass slides to form a contiguous planar bilayer 4. DGS-NTA-Ni serves to anchor polyhistidine-tagged proteins via polyhistidine-mediated complex-formation with the synthetic NTA-Ni-containing head group (Figure 1A). For stable association one typically replaces the native transmembrane domain and cytoplasmic tail of the adhesion protein ICAM-1 and the costimulatory molecule B7-1 with one tag containing twelve histidines (ICAM-1-12H, B7-1 -12H) (Figure 1B). The peptide-loaded class II molecule I-Ek contains two membrane-embedded (α and β) polypeptide chains. The transmembrane/cytoplasmic domains of both chains have to be replaced with a tag containing six histidines each (I-Ekα6H β6H or I-Ek-2x6H). As an alternative, extending the α-chain with twelve histidines and leaving the extracellular domain of the β-chain untagged (giving rise to I-Ekα12H β0H or I-Ek-12H) gives rise to satisfactory results (Figure 1B).
Site-specific labeling of pMHCs
It is important to label the pMHC stoichiometrically and site-specifically in order to be able to convert measured FRET yields into meaningful equilibrium binding constants. This can be achieved by chemical labeling of a synthetic peptide that is loaded into the peptide-binding cleft of recombinant histidine-tagged MHC class II molecules 2,5. The peptide includes all residues of the T-cell epitope as well as a short C-terminal linker (GGS) followed by cysteine (e.g. in the moth cytochrome c (MCC) peptide ANERADLIAYLKQATK-GGSC, the linker is marked in bold). This cysteine is used to label the peptide stoichiometrically with the use of maleimide-dye derivatives. At this point extra care should be devoted to verifying quantitative dye-coupling to the cysteine-containing peptide. HPLC-purification of the peptide-dye adduct is recommended and has to be followed by electrospray ionization mass spectroscopy. Any recorded masses corresponding to the peptide educt (without dye) reflect incomplete labeling. If this is true, the HPLC-purified peptide should be subjected to consecutive rounds of dye-labeling until labeling is deemed quantitative. Note that MALDI-TOF mass spectroscopy should be avoided as this method involves laser radiation for sample ionization. This treatment disintegrates the attached sensitive fluorophores before peptide mass is read out and thus underrepresents degrees of dye-conjugation.
Indirect yet site-specific labeling of cell-bound TCRs with the use of monovalent single chain FV fragments
It is still challenging to attach dyes to cell surface-associated proteins of living cells in a site-specific manner. To overcome this hurdle for surface-exposed TCRs, a monovalent single chain version (scFV) from the genes of the TCRβ -reactive monoclonal antibody H57-197 2has been constructed. The crystal structure of this antibody in complex with the TCR allows to rationally design a version, in which a serine residue in close proximity to the C-terminus of the MHC associated peptide (where the corresponding FRET partner dye is attached) is substituted for a cysteine residue. This mutant cysteine then serves as an acceptor for dye conjugation (Figure 2).
Methodologies to record FRET
Bulk FRET values are best suited to verify the relationship between chosen inter-dye distances and FRET efficiencies measured in this TCR-pMHC binding system 2. In addition, bulk FRET measurements reveal qualitative and quantitative differences in synaptic TCR-pMHC affinities (see below and protocol section 3.2). Various approaches for quantifying FRET efficiencies have been introduced in the literature 6. In this article FRET is recorded via
(a) donor recovery after acceptor bleaching, and via
(b) sensitized FRET acceptor emission.
The first method (a) requires the use of a FRET acceptor that can be easily photobleached, and a donor, which is rather photostable. In addition it is important to ensure that the photobleached acceptor is no longer capable of quenching the donor fluorescence. As the same detection channel (donor) is used for quantification, no correction factors and no chromatic aberrations have to be considered, which renders this methodology simple and reliable. However, quantitative measurements cannot be repeated on the same specimen spot and changes in FRET cannot be recorded over time. To avoid effects caused by molecular diffusion or cellular motility a fast bleaching step should be aimed for, which minimizes the time passing between the first FRET donor (before acceptor bleaching) and the second FRET donor image acquisition (after FRET acceptor bleaching). It is recommend to employ a powerful laser light source of the FRET acceptor excitation wavelength in order to minimize illumination and bleaching times.
In contrast, in the approach of sensitized FRET emission measurement (b) the FRET donor is excited and the emission of the FRET acceptor is observed in the FRET acceptor channel. Changes in FRET acceptor signal can be recorded over time but emission of the FRET donor into the red-shifted acceptor channel (termed bleedthrough) and FRET acceptor cross-excitation via donor excitation have to be accurately determined and subtracted from the recorded FRET acceptor channel. For this the corresponding FRET donor and FRET acceptor images have to be spatially aligned.
Detection of single molecule (sm) FRET events
With the use of lasers as excitation source, a sensitive camera and noise-attenuated TIRF microscopy the fluorescence of single fluorophores can be easily traced over time. Similar is true for the detection of intermolecular smFRET events. However, complications may be caused by FRET donor bleedthrough and cross-excitation of the FRET acceptor, and thus great care has to be taken when adjusting the fluorophore densities in the smFRET experiment.
In the protocol provided below (protocol section 4) the TCR was chosen as FRET donor in high abundance and pMHC as FRET acceptor in low abundance. To attenuate FRET donor bleedthrough sufficiently, decorate 10-30% of the TCRs with fluorescent scFV and 90-70% of the TCRs with non-fluorescent scFV. Here the FRET acceptor channel was chosen as single molecule channel because it is confocal with the single molecule FRET channel. This helps to align smFRET events with single molecule FRET acceptors, which is the basis of smFRET validation.
Extracting synaptic off-rates through smFRET measurements
Photobleaching of both FRET donor and FRET acceptor have to be accounted for when extracting the half-life of interactions from single molecule FRET traces. The number of observable FRET-signals at the beginning of their appearance as single donor-acceptor pair N(0) is reduced over time by both unbinding of the receptor-ligand complex and photobleaching. The number of surviving complexes at a given time N(t) can be mathematically expressed as follows:

In the photobleaching term exp(-t/τbleach) the time t is described by the product of the number of observations n and the illumination time till because of the non-continuous, discrete observation mode (i.e., bleaching only occurs during illumination). Within the kinetic term exp-(t/τoff) the time t is the product of the number of observations n and the time tlag for a single FRET observation (i.e., kinetic unbinding happens continuously). Equation 1 can be expressed as:

The term τbleach/τill describes the number of observations until bleaching occurs and is defined as the expectation value bleach> of its exponential function. Equation 2 can be simplified as follows:

The expectation value lag)> of the number of frames N(t) with observable FRET-events after time t is directly determined from the experiment. It depends on the settable time between observations (tlag) chosen in the experiment and the unknown values for τoff (the inverse of the off-rate koff ) and bleach>, the expectation value of number of observations before bleaching occurs.
Thus, calculation of the expectation value lag)> for at least two values of tlag allows the experimental determination of bleach> and τoff .
Extracting synaptic 2D-KD values through FRET-based measurements
Measuring TCR occupancy a, i.e., the ratio between bound TCRs and total TCRs, is central to determining synaptic 2D-KD values. According to equation 4 this term is directly proportional to the measured FRET yield as long as TCRs serves as FRET donors and pMHCs as FRET acceptors.

with a = TCR occupancy, C =conversion factor
C is a constant, which depends on the FRET system and the fluorophores used. It can be determined experimentally as shown below. a can be converted into a 2D-KD according to equation 5 when the initial density of TCR ligands prior to addition of T-cells to the bilayer is known. This is because of the high mobility of SLB-attached proteins and also because SLBs provide an almost inexhaustible reservoir of ligands 2.

with [pMHC initial] = initial density of pMHC prior to the addition of T-cells
With equations 4 and 5 one can now easily determine the synaptic 2D-KD between TCR and pMHC. This is most reliably done with FRET measurements based on donor recovery after acceptor bleaching (see protocol section 3.1).
However, to measure C the relationship between the FRET intensity IFRET (corrected for background, FRET donor bleedthrough and FRET acceptor cross-excitation) and TCR occupancy a has to be determined. For this, one needs to know the ratio R between the average fluorescence intensity of single TCR-associated FRET donor fluorophores (e.g. Cy3 or AF555) sm IFRET donor and the average intensity of single molecule FRET events sm IFRET. R depends on the FRET system in question, emission filters and camera used for fluorescence detection.
The TCR occupancy a can then be directly determined according to equation 6.

with R = sm IFRET donor / sm IFRET
R was determined as 1.45 for the H57 scFv- Cy3/pMHC-Cy5 system leads to:
a= bulk IFRET/ bulk ITCR-cy3 • 1.45
The relationship between the TCR occupancy a and the FRET yield can be determined by FRET donor recovery after acceptor bleaching. For this both parameters are plotted against one another for a number TCR microclusters as shown in Figure 4A.The slope of the linear fit indicates the conversion factor C (from equation 4).
As demonstrated in Figure 4A, C amounts for (a) the H57 scFV- Cy3/pMHC-Cy5 FRET system and (b) the applied microscope system configuration to 1.995. The TCR occupancy a can be readily deduced as follows:
TCR occupancy a = FRET yield • 1.995