A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Biofilm Removal Using Carbon Dioxide Aerosols without Nitrogen Purge

6.2K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/54827

⸱

November 6th, 2016

 , 

In This Article

Summary

Biofilms on surfaces can be effectively and rapidly removed by using a periodic jet of carbon dioxide aerosols without a nitrogen purge.

Abstract

Biofilms can cause serious concerns in many applications. Not only can they cause economic losses, but they can also present a public health hazard. Therefore, it is highly desirable to remove biofilms from surfaces. Many studies on CO2 aerosol cleaning have employed nitrogen purges to increase biofilm removal efficiency by reducing the moisture condensation generated during the cleaning. However, in this study, periodic jets of CO2 aerosols without nitrogen purges were used to remove Pseudomonas putida biofilms from polished stainless steel surfaces. CO2 aerosols are mixtures of solid and gaseous CO2 and are generated when high-pressure CO2 gas is adiabatically expanded through a nozzle. These high-speed aerosols were applied to a biofilm that had been grown for 24 hr. The removal efficiency ranged from 90.36% to 98.29% and was evaluated by measuring the fluorescence intensity of the biofilm as the treatment time was varied from 16 sec to 88 sec. We also performed experiments to compare the removal efficiencies with and without nitrogen purges; the measured biofilm removal efficiencies were not significantly different from each other (t-test, p > 0.55). Therefore, this technique can be used to clean various bio-contaminated surfaces within one minute.

Introduction

Biofilms are complex bacterial community structures in which bacterial cells are embedded within self-produced matrices of extracellular polymeric substances, held together, and protected from the external environment. Biofilms can present a public health risk and cause economic losses because they can form on various surfaces, including medical implant materials and devices, food processing equipment, and heat exchangers. In fact, biofilms have been found to be associated with 65% of all bacterial infectious diseases in humans, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention1.

Autoclaves and disinfectants such as chl....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

1. Preparation of Surface for Biofilm Formation

  1. Cut 1-mm-thick 304 stainless steel plates into chips (10 × 10 mm2) with a mechanical cutter.
  2. Perform ultrasonic cleaning of the chips in acetone, methanol, and deionized (DI) water sequentially for 10 min each. Use a solvent-resistant container, made of substances such as glass, to remove organic contamination.
  3. Rinse the chips with flowing DI water for 3-5 sec.
  4. Dry the chips using N2 gas flow for 3-5 sec.

2. Preparation of Bacterial Culture

  1. Take a P. putida KT2440 (kindly provided by Prof. Sung Kuk....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

CO2 aerosols were used to remove the P. putida biofilms from SUS304 surfaces (Figure 1). Most of the surfaces were covered with the biofilm after 24 hr of growth. Most of the biofilm was removed using the CO2 aerosols (Figure 2). As expected, Figure 3 shows an increase in biofilm removal efficiency as the CO2 aerosol treatment time increased. For the treatment time of 88 sec, the removal efficiency was determined to be as high as.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Previously, we conducted optimization studies on CO2 gas pressure, jet angle, and distance to the solid surface in CO2 aerosol cleaning7. Unlike our previous studies, in the present study, a nitrogen purge was not included in the aerosol (Figure 1). Moreover, 304 stainless steel was used in this protocol, since it is one of the most common stainless steels and is widely used in the food industry. The polished surface is beneficial for fluorescence analysis because of a un.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning (# 2015R1A2A2A01006446).

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
304 stainless steelSteelni
(South Korea)
Polished and diced ones
Ultrasonic cleanerBranson
(USA)
5510E-DTH
Luria-Bertani (LB)Becton, Dickinson and Company
(USA)
244620500 g
AgarBecton, Dickinson and Company
(USA)
214010500 g
6-well culture plateSPL Life Sciences
(South Korea)
32006
Ammonium acetate bufferSigma-Aldrich
(USA)
66740410 mM
Dual gas unitApplied Surface Technologies
(USA)
K6-10DGOne nozzle for CO2 gas
& 8 nozzles for N2 gas
SYTO9Thermo Fissher Scientific
(USA)
InvitrogenExcitaion: 480 nm
Emission: 500 nm
Epifluorescence microscope Nikon (Japan)Eclipse 80i
40X objective lensNikon
(Japan)
Plan FluorNA: 0.75
CCD camera Photometrics
(USA)
Cool SNAP HQ2Monochrome

References

  1. Jain, A., Gupta, Y., Agrawal, R., Khare, P., Jain, S. K. Biofilms - A microbial life perspective: A critical review. Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug. 24 (5), 393-443 (2007).
  2. Bott, T. R. Biofouling control with ultrasound. Heat Transfer Eng. 21 (3), 43-49 (2000).
  3. Meyer, B.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

Pseudomonas PutidaStainless Steel SurfacesFluorescence MicroscopyAerosol Treatment TimeRemoval EfficiencyTri-Phase CleaningBio-Contaminated Surfaces