This protocol measures human taste responses and includes a brief anatomical assessment, a short taste test, and a validation method using the subject's reported sensation and taste receptor genotype.
A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
This protocol measures human taste responses and includes a brief anatomical assessment, a short taste test, and a validation method using the subject's reported sensation and taste receptor genotype.
The emerging importance of taste in medicine and biomedical research, and new knowledge about its genetic underpinnings, has motivated us to supplement classic taste-testing methods in two ways. First, we explain how to do a brief assessment of the mouth, including the tongue, to ensure that taste papillae are present and to note evidence of relevant disease. Second, we draw on genetics to validate taste test data by comparing reports of perceived bitterness intensity and inborn receptor genotypes. Discordance between objective measures of genotype and subjective reports of taste experience can identify data collection errors, distracted subjects or those who have not understood or followed instructions. Our expectation is that fast and valid taste tests may persuade researchers and clinicians to assess taste regularly, making taste testing as common as testing for hearing and vision. Finally, because many tissues of the body express taste receptors, taste responses may provide a proxy for tissue sensitivity elsewhere in the body and, thereby, serve as a rapid, point-of-care test to guide diagnosis and a research tool to evaluate taste receptor protein function.
Measures of human taste perception can be both part of medical care and a target of biomedical research, yet taste has received scant attention compared with hearing and vision (Table 1). From the medical perspective, when clinicians evaluate patients complaining of taste loss, in most cases the actual loss is of smell1, which has led to dismissal of taste loss as an uncommon and often invalid presenting complaint. Taste distortions (dysgeusia) are more common and frequently arise from the secondary effects of medications or peripheral nerve injury2,3, but neither form ....
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review board approved this protocol. We excluded subjects if they were under 18 years of age or were pregnant.
1. Oral Cavity Evaluation: Disease Assessment and Papilla Identification
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Results from the taste test have been pooled for all subjects evaluated (n = 840) and are presented after segregation by genotype. The full data set is accessible at https://carayata.shinyapps.io/TasteBoxplots/ and can be reviewed for each tastant assessed and for TAS2R38 and TAS2R19 genotypes. Results confirm the existence of perceptual taste differences for PTC among subjects grouped by TAS2R38 receptor genotype (Figure 3). Rating.......
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The significance of this method is that it uses a multidisciplinary approach with features from medicine (the oral exam), experimental psychology (the taste test) and genetics (a validation step). Taste information is likely to develop as a diagnostic and prognostic tool because taste provides a window into the function of proteins elsewhere in the body. From an experimental psychology viewpoint, the addition of a simple exam can identify subjects who are not appropriate for the study of normative taste function. From a .......
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
NAC and DRR are co-inventors on a patent under review (Therapy and Diagnostics for Respiratory Infection 61/697,652, WO2013112865).
Awards from the National Institutes of Health supported this research (R01DC013588 to NAC, R21DC013886 to NAC and DRR, and NIDCD Administrative Research Supplement to Promote Emergence of Clinician-Scientists in Chemosensory Research to JED). We collected genotype data from equipment purchased in part with NIH funds from OD018125.
....Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
| Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Disposable diagnostic penlight | Primacare | DL-9223 | |
| UltraLite Pro headlight | Integra LifeSciences | AX2100BIF | |
| Millipore Q-Gard 2 water purification system | EMB Millipore | QGARD00D2 | |
| Denatonium benzoate | Sigma Aldrich | D5765 | |
| Phenylthiocarbamide | Sigma Aldrich | P7629 | |
| Quinine hydrochloride dihydrate | Sigma Aldrich | Q1125 | |
| Sodium Chloride | Sigma Aldrich | S1679 | |
| Sucrose | Sigma Aldrich | S0389 | |
| Glass scintillation vials | Thomas Scientific | 1230L59 | Same as Wheaton catalog no. 986580 |
| Oragene Discover OGR-500 DNA collection kit | DNA Genotek | OGR-500 | |
| prepIT L2P Protocol reagents | DNA Genotek | PT-L2P-5 | |
| rs713598 TaqMan SNP genotyping assay | ThermoFisher Scientific | C___8876467_10 | |
| rs1726866 TaqMan SNP genotyping assay | ThermoFisher Scientific | C___9506827_10 | |
| rs10246939 TaqMan SNP genotyping assay | ThermoFisher Scientific | C___9506826_10 | |
| rs10772420 TaqMan SNP genotyping assay | ThermoFisher Scientific | C___1317426_10 |
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.