There are multiple critical steps in this protocol. First, minimization of motion during intravital imaging of the liver is essential for generating movies that are usable for capillary flow analysis using STAFF. Due to the proximity of the diaphragm, short periods of respiration-induced motion occur, with the secured liver returning to its initial position after each breath. Securing the surgically exposed liver against the coverslip-bottomed dish using gauze, then imaging from below using an inverted microscope serves to immobilize the organ between respirations16,17,18,19. Second, an image acquisition speed of 100 fps is strongly recommended because the speed of flow that can be measured is a function of the speed of image acquisition and the minimum length of the segments in which flow is measured11. Third, producing a high-quality skeleton, the line drawing representation of the vascular network, is the next critical step in obtaining capillary flow velocities using STAFF. Skeleton line segments should lie near the midpoint of the vasculature between respirations over the time course being analyzed and vascular branching out of the image plane should be identified. The locations of these hidden branches along a vascular segment can be inferred by viewing the movie, by examining the kymograph or examining the velocity values over time for that segment. Viewing the movie, these vascular segments are seen either as having bidirectional flow, emanating away from or converging towards the location of the unseen branch, or as having an abrupt change in flow speed at that point along the vascular segment. The location of hidden branch points can be identified in kymographs as the location of a change in angle that is produced by the change in flow direction or velocity. In the spreadsheet, vascular segments with hidden branch locations may spuriously change direction (sign) or change between the values of the two contributing segments. If the time series includes too many branch points that are out of the image plane, STAFF analysis should be repeated after manually editing the skeleton, by placing a gap (using the paint tool) in the line drawing at the locations of the missed branch points.
We uncovered a common issue in image acquisition that typically goes unnoticed but had a strong effect on measuring flow velocities using STAFF. In image acquisition, instability or “flicker” in the intensity of the epi-illumination lamp light source or from area lighting in the microscope room can occur. From either source, light/dark banding over time with the period of the flicker occurs at zero angle in the kymographs. If the zero angle peak is the major peak, then even if the angle produced by motion of red blood corpuscles through the vessel where flow speed is being measured is obvious to the human eye, the directionality plugin fits a curve to the zero peak and reports a value very near zero degrees, resulting in velocity measurements that are unrealistically high. Even if the zero-angle peak is not the major peak, it will influence the directionality curve fit such that the velocity reported is shifted toward a higher value. To address this problem, STAFF provides a “Flicker correction” option that ignores peak angles occurring at 0°. This modification eliminated the effects of lamp flicker without affecting velocity quantifications.
The main limitation of obtaining flow velocities using widefield microscopy is that image acquisition is restricted to thin preparations such as mesenteric vasculature, or the zebrafish intersegmental vessels or the superficial layers of organs such as liver or kidney that can be exteriorized.
A significant advantage of using STAFF over existing methods of flow quantification is that it enables rapid and unbiased detection of spatial and temporal patterns of vascular flow. Collection and analysis of microvascular flow data using raster scanning systems are generally limited to measurements of single user selected capillaries at a time20,21,22,23. Methods exist to extract flow velocities across fields24,25,26, however none of these approaches support analysis across entire fields and all are labor intensive. Using STAFF, analysis of every capillary segment over time across the entire image field of a dataset with tens of thousands of images can be accomplished within a day. Manual analysis of even a single dataset of full-field vascular flow would take months to years. Thus, manual analysis is impractical even for characterization of normal flow and clearly does not permit comparison of multiple treatment groups.
The ease of STAFF quantification of spatiotemporal patterning of vascular flow provides the opportunity for future users to link vascular morphological observations to effects on capillary flow velocity patterning. By defining the relationship between the vascular morphology measures of vessel diameters and network topology to flow velocity patterning we may then be able to predict flow patterns from vascular morphology. Similarly, correlating vascular flow patterning and vascular morphology with events such as timing, localization and extent of immune cell infiltration, tissue damage from toxicant exposure or disease, or status of intracellular transport, would not only give us a better understanding of flow patterning and cellular function in health and disease, but would also provide a framework for identifying particularly harmful pathophysiological scenarios.