Summary

Versatility of Protocols for Resistance Training and Assessment Using Static and Dynamic Ladders in Animal Models

Published: December 17, 2021
doi:

Summary

The present protocol describes resistance training and testing using static and dynamic ladders in animal models.

Abstract

Resistance training is a physical exercise model with profound benefits for health throughout life. The use of resistance exercise animal models is a way to gain insight into the underlying molecular mechanisms that orchestrate these adaptations. The aim of this article is to describe exercise models and training protocols designed for strength training and evaluation of resistance in animal models and provide examples. In this article, strength training and resistance evaluation are based on ladder climbing activity, using static and dynamic ladders. These devices allow a variety of training models as well as provide precise control of the main variables which determine resistance exercise: volume, load, velocity, and frequency. Furthermore, unlike resistance exercise in humans, this is a forced exercise. Thus, aversive stimuli must be avoided in this intervention to preserve animal welfare. Prior to implementation, a detailed design is necessary, along with an acclimatization and learning period. Acclimatization to training devices, such as ladders, weights, and clinical tape, as well as to the manipulations required, is necessary to avoid exercise rejection and to minimize stress. At the same time, the animals are taught to climb up the ladder, not down, to the resting area on the top of the ladder. Resistance evaluation can characterize physical strength and permit adjusting and quantifying the training load and the response to training. Furthermore, different types of strength can be evaluated. Regarding training programs, with appropriate design and device use, they can be sufficiently versatile to modulate different types of strength. Furthermore, they should be flexible enough to be modified depending on the adaptive and behavioral response of the animals or the presence of injuries. In conclusion, resistance training and assessment using ladders and weights are versatile methods in animal research.

Introduction

Physical exercise is a determinant lifestyle factor for promoting health and decreasing the incidence of the most prevalent chronic diseases as well as some types of cancer in humans1.

Resistance exercise has raised interest because of its overwhelming relevance for health throughout life2, especially due to its benefits in counteracting age-related diseases that affect the locomotor system, such as sarcopenia, osteoporosis, etc3. Moreover, resistance exercise also affects tissues and organs not directly involved in the execution of movement, such as the brain4. This relevance in recent years has encouraged the development of resistance exercise models in animals to study the underlying tissular and molecular mechanisms, when it is not possible in humans or when the animals provide better insight and are a more controlled model.

Unlike resistance exercise in humans, for animal models researchers usually rely on forced procedures. However, aversive stimuli must be avoided in this context, mainly to preserve animal welfare, reduce stress, and decrease the severity of the experimental procedures5. It should be noted that animals enjoy exercise even in the wild6. For these reasons, it is necessary to improve adaptation to the experiment through prolonged stepwise acclimatization.

The devices, materials, and protocols used for resistance training and assessment in experimental animals must allow the precise control and modulation of numerous variables: load, volume, speed, and frequency7. They should also allow different types of muscle contractions to be performed: concentric, eccentric, or isometric. Considering the above, the protocols used should be able to specifically evaluate or train for different applications of strength: maximal strength, hypertrophy, speed, and endurance.

There are several methods of strength training, such as jumping in water8,9, weighted swimming in water10, or muscle electrostimulation11. However, static and dynamic ladders are versatile devices that are widely used12,13,14.

Resistance assessment in experimental animal models provides valuable information for many research settings, such as describing the phenotypic characteristics of genetically modified animals, evaluating the effect of different intervention protocols (dietary components supplementation, drug treatments, microbiota transplantation, etc.), or assessing the effect of training protocols. Training models provide insight into the physiology of adaptation to strength exercise, which helps to better understand the effect of exercise on health status and pathophysiology.

Consequently, there is no universal protocol for resistance training or the functional assessment of strength in animal models, so versatile protocols are needed.

The aim of this study is to identify the most relevant factors to be considered when designing and applying a protocol for resistance training and evaluation using static and dynamic ladders in animal models, as well as provide specific examples.

Protocol

The methods presented in this protocol have been evaluated and approved by the animal research technical committee (reference PROAE 04/2018, Principado de Asturias, Spain). 1. Planning Carefully select animals for the study based on the characteristics of interest (genetically modified, pathology models, age, etc.) and apply specific adaptations to the protocol (climbing without weights, reducing the number of rungs to climb, and inclination). Identify th…

Representative Results

Results with static ladder The progressive resistance training protocol used and described by Codina-Martinez et al.4 (Table 4) was tested in a preliminary study consisting of 7 weeks of training on a static ladder with 6-months-old wild-type C57BL6J mice (n = 4). In this preliminary study, incremental tests to assess maximal strength were performed before and after the training period. We observed a 46.4% increase in maximal strength, meaning that at the en…

Discussion

Training is an intervention with multiple applications in research, apart from the study of exercise itself. Thus, the analysis of its effect on ageing20 or certain pathological conditions and physical therapy21 has received much attention in recent years. In addition, numerous authors have analyzed the effect of pharmacological22 or dietary21 interventions on physical fitness. In this context, interest has…

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Spain (DEP2012-39262 to EI-G and DEP2015-69980-P to BF-G). Thanks to Frank Mcleod Henderson Higgins from McLeod´s English Centre in Asturias, Spain, for language assistance.

Materials

Dynamic ladder in-house production
Elastic adhesive bandage 6 cm x 2.5 m BSN medical 4005556
Gator Clip Steel NON-INSUL 10A Digikey electronics BC60ANP
Static ladder in-house production
Weights in-house production
Wire for holding weigths in-house production

References

  1. Pedersen, B. K., Saltin, B. Exercise as medicine – evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in 26 different chronic diseases. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. 25, 1-72 (2015).
  2. Westcott, W. L. Resistance training is medicine: effects of strength training on health. Current Sports Medicine Reports. 11 (4), 209-216 (2012).
  3. Garatachea, N., et al. Exercise attenuates the major hallmarks of aging. Rejuvenation Research. 18 (1), 57-89 (2015).
  4. Codina-Martinez, H., et al. Autophagy is required for performance adaptive response to resistance training and exercise-induced adult neurogenesis. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. 30 (2), 238-253 (2020).
  5. Conner, J. D., Wolden-Hanson, T., Quinn, L. S. Assessment of murine exercise endurance without the use of a shock grid: an alternative to forced exercise. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE. (90), e51846 (2014).
  6. Meijer, J. H., Robbers, Y. Wheel running in the wild. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 281 (1786), 20140210 (2014).
  7. Suchomel, T. J., Nimphius, S., Bellon, C. R., Hornsby, W. G., Stone, M. H. Training for muscular strength: Methods for monitoring and adjusting training intensity. Sports Medicine. 51 (10), 2051-2066 (2021).
  8. Pousson, M., Perot, C., Goubel, F. Stiffness changes and fibre type transitions in rat soleus muscle produced by jumping training. Pflügers Archive. 419 (2), 127-130 (1991).
  9. Marqueti, R. C., et al. Biomechanical responses of different rat tendons to nandrolone decanoate and load exercise. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. 21 (6), 91-99 (2011).
  10. Cunha, T. S., Tanno, A. P., Costa Sampaio Moura, M. J., Marcondes, F. K. Influence of high-intensity exercise training and anabolic androgenic steroid treatment on rat tissue glycogen content. Life Sciences. 77 (9), 1030-1043 (2005).
  11. Heinemeier, K. M., et al. Expression of collagen and related growth factors in rat tendon and skeletal muscle in response to specific contraction types. The Journal of Physiology. 582, 1303-1316 (2007).
  12. Hornberger, T. A., Farrar, R. P. Physiological hypertrophy of the FHL muscle following 8 weeks of progressive resistance exercise in the rat. Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology. 29 (1), 16-31 (2004).
  13. Yarasheski, K. E., Lemon, P. W., Gilloteaux, J. Effect of heavy-resistance exercise training on muscle fiber composition in young rats. Journal of Applied Physiology. 69 (2), 434-437 (1990).
  14. Khamoui, A. V., et al. Aerobic and resistance training dependent skeletal muscle plasticity in the colon-26 murine model of cancer cachexia. Metabolism. 65 (5), 685-698 (2016).
  15. Kregel, K. C., et al. Resource book for the design of animal exercise protocols. American Physiological Society. 152, (2006).
  16. Marino, G., et al. Autophagy is essential for mouse sense of balance. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 120 (7), 2331-2344 (2010).
  17. Figueiredo, V. C., de Salles, B. F., Trajano, G. S. Volume for muscle hypertrophy and health outcomes: The most effective variable in resistance training. Sports Medicine. 48 (3), 499-505 (2018).
  18. Gentil, P., et al. Using velocity loss for monitoring resistance training effort in a real-world setting. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism. 43 (8), 833-837 (2018).
  19. Fernández-Sanjurjo, M., et al. Is physical performance (in mice) increased by Veillonella atypica or decreased by Lactobacillus bulgaricus. Journal of Sport and Health Science. 9 (3), 197-200 (2020).
  20. Shiguemoto, G. E., et al. Effects of resistance training on matrix metalloproteinase-2 activity and biomechanics and physical properties of bone in ovariectomized and intact rats. Scandivavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. 22 (5), 607-617 (2012).
  21. de Sousa Neto, I. V., et al. Effects of resistance training on matrix metalloproteinase activity in skeletal muscles and blood circulation during aging. Frontiers in Physiology. 9, 190 (2018).
  22. Ghosh, S., Golbidi, S., Werner, I., Verchere, B. C., Laher, I. Selecting exercise regimens and strains to modify obesity and diabetes in rodents: an overview. Clinical Science. 119 (2), 57-74 (2010).
  23. Mônico-Neto, M., et al. Resistance training minimizes catabolic effects induced by sleep deprivation in rats. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism. 40 (11), 1143-1150 (2015).
  24. Hawley, J. A., Hargreaves, M., Joyner, M. J., Zierath, J. R. Integrative biology of exercise. Cell. 159 (4), 738-749 (2014).
  25. Booth, F. W., Laye, M. J., Spangenburg, E. E. Gold standards for scientists who are conducting animal-based exercise studies. Journal of Applied Physiology. 108 (1), 219-221 (1985).
  26. Kruger, K., et al. Functional and muscular adaptations in an experimental model for isometric strength training in mice. PLoS One. 8 (11), 79069 (2013).
  27. Hendrickse, P. W., Krusnauskas, R., Hodson-Tole, E., Venckunas, T., Degens, H. Endurance exercise plus overload induces fatigue resistance and similar hypertrophy in mice irrespective of muscle mass. Experimental Physiology. 105 (12), 2110-2122 (2020).
  28. Knab, A. M., et al. Repeatability of exercise behaviors in mice. Physiology & Behavior. 98 (4), 433-440 (2009).
  29. Konhilas, J. P., et al. Loaded wheel running and muscle adaptation in the mouse. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 289 (1), 455-465 (2005).
  30. Reiter, A., et al. Functional measures of grip strength and gait remain altered long-term in a rat model of post-traumatic elbow contracture. The Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. , (2019).
  31. Stieglitz, T., Schuettler, M., Schneider, A., Valderrama, E., Navarro, X. Noninvasive measurement of torque development in the rat foot: measurement setup and results from stimulation of the sciatic nerve with polyimide-based cuff electrodes. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. 11 (4), 427-437 (2003).
  32. Seo, D. Y., et al. Humanized animal exercise model for clinical implication. Pflügers Archiv. 466 (9), 1673-1687 (2014).
  33. Tanaka, H., Swensen, T. Impact of resistance training on endurance performance. A new form of cross-training. Sports Medicine. 25 (3), 191-200 (1998).
  34. Hakkinen, K., Mero, A., Kauhanen, H. Specificity of endurance, sprint and strength training on physical performance capacity in young athletes. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 29 (1), 27-35 (1989).
  35. Vellers, H. L., Kleeberger, S. R., Lightfoot, J. T. Inter-individual variation in adaptations to endurance and resistance exercise training: genetic approaches towards understanding a complex phenotype. Mammalian Genome. 29 (1), 48-62 (2018).
check_url/63098?article_type=t

Play Video

Cite This Article
Iglesias-Gutiérrez, E., Fernández-Sanjurjo, M., Fernández, Á. F., Rodríguez Díaz, F. J., López-Taboada, I., Tomás-Zapico, C., Fernández-García, B. Versatility of Protocols for Resistance Training and Assessment Using Static and Dynamic Ladders in Animal Models. J. Vis. Exp. (178), e63098, doi:10.3791/63098 (2021).

View Video