구두 작업 기억 범위 측정
English
Share
Overview
출처: 조나단 플롬바움 연구소 -존스 홉킨스 대학
소수의 품목만 포함한다면 쇼핑 리스트의 모든 것을 기억하는 것이 상대적으로 어려운 이유는 무엇입니까? 왜 방금 들었던 전화 번호를 기억할 수 있지만 한 번에 두 개 또는 세 개의 전화 번호가 기억되지 않습니까? 여러 명의 새로운 사람들이 동시에 소개될 때 이름을 기억하는 것은 왜 어려운가?
대답은 짧은 기간 동안 사람들이 작업 메모리라는 전문 메모리 시스템에 의존한다는 사실과 관련이있다. 장기 메모리와 달리 작업 메모리에는 용량이 매우 제한되어 있습니다. 정보를 염두에 두고, 연구하고, 조작한 다음, 다른 기억력 및 인지 시스템으로 전송할 수 있도록 하는 것입니다. 그러나 이 적극적인 역할을 수행하기 위해서는 선택적이어야 하며 한 번에 제한된 양의 정보만 인정해야 합니다.
실험 심리학자들은 사람들이 언어와 시각적 정보 사이의 주요 부서와 함께 다양한 종류의 정보에 대한 독립적 인 작업 메모리 시스템을 가지고 있다고 생각하는 경향이 있습니다. 이러한 각 시스템에는 독립적인 용량 제한이 있습니다.
종종 자신의 기억 범위라고 불리는 사람의 구두 작업 메모리 용량 제한을 측정하기 위해 실험 심리학자는 종종 구두 목록 패러다임을 사용합니다.
이 비디오는 구두 목록 패러다임을 사용하여 구두 작업 메모리 범위의 측정을 보여줍니다.
Procedure
Results
In terms of verbal memory span, one way to classify a person’s ability is as the longest list for which he/she performs better than 75% correct for all word positions. For this participant, that seems to be a list with five words (Figure 1), which makes the verbal working memory span five.
Figure 1. List learning accuracy as a function of word position and list length. Each line represents a list of a given length, and each point is the percent of occasions in which a word in a given position was recalled.
One feature of performance here and in general in list learning experiments is that accuracy is much better at the beginning and end of a list, compared to words in the middle. As shown in Figure 1, for the seven-word performance (colored in teal), the first word was recalled with 80% accuracy (one mistake out of five trials), and the last word too. But in the middle, performance was 40% or 60%.
Such results are typical, and experimental psychologists have used results like this to draw several conclusions about verbal working memory. The first is that it involves an active rehearsal process. This is why words in the beginning of the list are remembered better—sometimes called a primacy effect. They are rehearsed more than other words over the duration of maintenance. The second conclusion is that the contents of verbal working memory interfere with one another; this is why words in the middle of the list are recalled with greater difficulty. They have more neighbors to compete with and interfere with. And this is also why the very end of a list is often spared—called a recency effect. The words there were heard most recently, and with no interfering neighbors afterwards.
Applications and Summary
Measures of verbal working memory, including list learning, are used in a variety of contexts as a quickly and easily obtainable measure of an individual’s cognitive ability. This is because memory span is known to correlate very reliably with IQ. In fact, memory span is a sub-test on many IQ tests. In clinical settings, verbal span can thus be used to determine whether illness or brain damage has had an effect on cognitive functioning in general, and as indicator of degenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s.
Transcript
To actively remember information over a short duration, Individuals rely on a specialized memory system called working memory.
Unlike long-term memory, working memory has a very limited capacity, which allows selective information to remain active-to be studied, manipulated, and then transferred to other memory and cognitive systems.
Researchers can measure the capacity limit of verbal working memory-the memory span-through the use of a verbal list paradigm. This paradigm involves the researcher reading word lists of varied lengths to subjects and then asking the subjects to repeat back the words in sequential order.
This video demonstrates standard procedures for studying verbal working memory span by explaining how to design and conduct the experiment, as well as how to analyze and interpret the results.
In this experiment, participants listen as an experimenter reads word lists with varying lengths. In this case, word positions among the varied-length lists are the independent variables.
Participants are then asked to hold words in working memory while a list is read, after which they are asked to recall the words on the list in the same order. Recall accuracy, or how many words on the list are repeated back in the correct order, is the dependent variable.
At the beginning of the list, words are mentally rehearsed more than those in latter positions. Therefore, higher recall accuracy is hypothesized for words in the primary positions. Such performance is referred to as a primacy effect.
In contrast, when longer lists need to be recalled, contents of verbal working memory interfere with each other. Thus, the words in the middle of a list are recalled with greater difficulty, because they have more neighbors.
Since words at the end of the list were heard most recently and have few interfering neighbors, they are expected to be recalled with high accuracy. This aspect of verbal working memory is referred to as the recency effect.
Finally, verbal working memory span is classified by identifying the longest list for which participants performed better than 75% correct across all word positions.
To conduct this study, prepare stimuli by generating a random word list of 210 common nouns, such as car, dog, pen, or boat.
From the master list of nouns, create seven varied-length piles, each containing five index cards with different nouns written on each one. Thus, for the first stack, start by writing three of the generated nouns, and increase the number of words for each stack until you have a list length of nine.
To finalize the word lists, verify that no nouns are repeated across the lists or clustered into categories that would unintentionally make recall easier. Arrange the stacks into piles of increasing order-from shortest to longest-and place facedown.
To begin the experiment, greet the participant and have them take a seat facing you, with the pile of index cards placed in front of you. Explain the instructions to the participant, providing details on how they should remember the words read to them and then repeat the list back in the proper order.
First, pick up a card and slowly read the words out loud in order from top to bottom. When you reach the end of the list, say ‘Go.’
As the participant recites the list back, follow along on the card and mark whether each word was repeated back correctly or incorrectly in the right order by placing a checkmark or X, respectively.
Make sure to go through all cards in each pile before moving on to the next one. Complete the session with the longest list.
To analyze the data, tally the results based on the number of words and the position of each word in the list for all of cards in each set. Remember that there were five total responses for each position.
To visualize list recall performance, plot percent correct as a function of word position by list length. Notice that recall is more accurate for words positioned in the beginning and end of the lists than the middle words, confirming the primacy and recency effects in verbal working memory.
To calculate working memory span, summarize percent correct as a function of list length and word position. Identify the longest list for which a participant performed better than 75% correct for all word positions.
Now that you are familiar with designing a verbal list paradigm, you can apply this approach to answer specific questions about working memory function.
Working memory is engaged on a daily basis, for recalling detailed steps to a favorite recipe, or trying to remember the names of several new people at a social function.
In addition, memory span is included as a component of many intelligence tests, as the measure correlates very reliably with IQ.
Such correlations also allow memory span to be used with functional imaging to determine whether brain damage impacts cognitive functioning in general, or as an indicator for degenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s.
You’ve just watched JoVE’s introduction on verbal working memory span. Now you should have a good understanding of how to design and conduct the experiment, as well as how to analyze results and apply the phenomenon.
Thanks for watching!