Waiting
Login processing...

Trial ends in Request Full Access Tell Your Colleague About Jove

Bioengineering

Harvesting, Embedding, and Culturing Dorsal Root Ganglia in Multi-compartment Devices to Study Peripheral Neuronal Features

Published: June 28, 2024 doi: 10.3791/66854

Abstract

The most common peripheral neuronal feature of pain is a lowered stimulation threshold or hypersensitivity of terminal nerves from the dorsal root ganglia (DRG). One proposed cause of this hypersensitivity is associated with the interaction between immune cells in the peripheral tissue and neurons. In vitro models have provided foundational knowledge in understanding how these mechanisms result in nociceptor hypersensitivity. However, in vitro models face the challenge of translating efficacy to humans. To address this challenge, a physiologically and anatomically relevant in vitro model has been developed for the culture of intact dorsal root ganglia (DRGs) in three isolated compartments in a 48-well plate. Primary DRGs are harvested from adult Sprague Dawley rats after humane euthanasia. Excess nerve roots are trimmed, and the DRG is cut into appropriate sizes for culture. DRGs are then grown in natural hydrogels, enabling robust growth in all compartments. This multi-compartment system offers anatomically relevant isolation of the DRG cell bodies from neurites, physiologically relevant cell types, and mechanical properties to study the interactions between neural and immune cells. Thus, this culture platform provides a valuable tool for investigating treatment isolation strategies, ultimately leading to an improved screening approach for predicting pain.

Introduction

Chronic pain is the leading cause of disability and loss of work globally1. Chronic pain affects about 20% of adults globally and imposes a significant societal and economic burden2, with total costs estimated between $560 and $635 billion every year in the United States3.

The main peripheral feature exhibited by chronic pain patients is a lowered stimulation threshold of nerves, which leads to the nervous system being more responsive to stimuli4,5. The lowered stimulation threshold can result in a painful response to a previously non-painful stimulus (allodynia) or a heightened response to a painful stimulus (hyperalgesia)6. Current chronic pain treatments have limited efficacy, and treatments that succeed in animal models often fail in human trials due to mechanistic differences in pain manifestation7. In vitro models that can more accurately mimic peripheral sensitization mechanisms have the potential to increase the translation of new therapeutics8,9. Further, by modeling key aspects of sensitized nerves in a culture system, researchers could develop a deeper understanding of the mechanisms that drive lowered thresholds and identify novel therapeutic targets that reverse them10.

The ideal in vitro platforms or microphysiological systems would incorporate the physical separation of distal neurites and dorsal root ganglia (DRG) cell body, a three-dimensional (3D) cellular environment, and the presence of native support cells to closely mimic in vivo conditions. However, a recent paper by Caparaso et al.11 shows that current DRG culture platforms lack one or more of these key features, making them insufficient in replicating in vivo conditions. Even though these platforms are easy to set up, they do not mimic the biological basis of peripheral sensitization and thus may not translate to in vivo efficacy. To address this limitation, a physiologically relevant in vitro model has been developed for the culture of dorsal root ganglia (DRG) within a hydrogel matrix with three isolated compartments to allow temporal fluidic isolation of neurites and DRG cell bodies11. This model offers both physiological and anatomical relevance, which has the potential to study peripheral sensitization of neurons in vitro.

The growing interest in the use of DRG explants in a 3D culture is due to their ability to facilitate robust neurite growth, which serves as an indirect indicator of DRG viability12. While primary neonatal or embryonic DRG explants are predominantly used in current in vitro culture platforms13,14, using explants from adult rodents provides a better model of mature neuronal physiology, which closely mimics human DRG physiology compared to explants from neonatal or embryonic rodents15. Explant DRGs refer to the preservation of the cellular and molecular tissue of native DRG tissue, primarily by maintaining native non-neuronal support cells.Herein, this protocol describes the methodology to harvest and culture DRG explants from adult Sprague Dawley rats in a multi-compartment (MC) device (Figure 1).

Efficacy has been shown in culturing DRGs from the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine with no observable differences in neurite growth. For this application, the objective was to elicit neurite growth into the outer compartments of the device; therefore, this article did not discriminate among DRG levels. However, if needed for a specific experiment, the DRG level can be tailored to meet experimenters' needs. There are currently other compartmentalized culture models for the 3D culture of DRGs16, however, these devices do not contain preserved native non-neuronal support cells, which can limit translation. Preserving the native structure of harvested DRGs is important because it ensures the retention of non-neuronal support cells, whose interactions with DRG neurons are essential for maintaining the functional properties of these neurons. Several studies co-cultured dissociated DRGs with non-native neuronal cells such as Schwann cells to promote myelination of neurons17,18,19.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Protocol

DRG harvest was performed in compliance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Female Sprague Dawley rats aged 12 weeks (~250 g) were used for the study. The details of the animals, reagents, and equipment used in the study are listed in the Table of Materials.

1. Multi-compartment device fabrication and assembly

  1. Computer-aided design and 3D printing of the multi-compartment device
    NOTE: The MC device consists of three compartments for the isolation of DRG cell bodies and neurites (Figure 2A). The MC device is not commercially available; however, the STL file is provided herein (Supplementary Coding File 1) to enable 3D printing. Printing the MC takes one (1) day to complete.
  2. Upload the STL file of the MC to a Resin 3D printer using compatible software.
    NOTE: The material ideal for printing is a high-temperature resin. A key advantage of using high-temperature resin is it is biocompatible and can be autoclaved and reused. A Digital light processing (DLP) 3D printer or other 3D printers could also be used to print the device.
  3. Transfer the printed devices into a washing solution for 30 min in isopropanol (>96%) to remove residual resin from the surface of the printed MC device.
  4. Post-cure the devices at 80 °C for 120 min using a commercially available curing agent (see Table of Materials). The curing agent enhances the mechanical properties of the printed MC device by exposing it to temperature and UV.
  5. Cure the MC devices thermally in an oven at 160 °C for 180 min.
  6. Sterilize the devices using an autoclave for 45 min on a gravity cycle.

2. Hydrogel preparation

  1. Synthesize methacrylated hyaluronic acid (MAHA, 85%-115% methacrylation) and characterize using a protocol described by Seidlits et al.20.
    NOTE: To support the growth of DRGs, triple hydrogels composed of methacrylated hyaluronic acid, type I collagen, and laminin are commonly used. Findings indicate that DRGs commonly grow in MAHA, ranging from 1.25-2.5 mg/mL and collagen from 2.0-4.5 mg/mL. For laminin, it is found that 0.75 mg/mL is enough to ensure robust growth of DRGs. Herein, methods to create a triple gel with 1.25 mg/mL MAHA, 4.5 mg/mL collagen, and 0.75 mg/mL laminin are detailed. Hydrogel preparation should be done in a laminar flow cabinet to provide an aseptic workspace.

3. Photoinitiator solution preparation

NOTE: A photoinitiator is necessary to crosslink the MAHA under UV light. It is commonly used at percentages from 0.3% to 0.6%.

  1. Prepare the photoinitiator solution 3 days prior to the DRG harvest.
  2. Pre-heat the sonicating water bath to 37 °C before preparing the photoinitiator solution.
  3. Working with the sterile technique in a flow hood, prepare 23.125 mg/mL sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) solution by dissolving NaHCO3 in 5x Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM)-HEPES solution.
  4. In a glass vial, mix 0.6% weight/volume (w/v) photoinitiator in a 20% vol/vol 1x sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and 80% vol/vol 5X DMEM/HEPES solution.
  5. To protect from light, wrap the glass vial in aluminum foil. However, ensure to remove the aluminum foil before transferring the vial to the sonicating water bath heated to 37 °C with sonication between 30-40 min.
    NOTE: Photoinitiator solution must be protected from light because it can break down into radicals and start the polymerization process when exposed to light21.
  6. Sterile filter the solution with a 0.22 µm syringe filter into a new sterile glass vial.

4. Methacrylated hyaluronic acid dissolution

  1. Dissolve the methacrylated hyaluronic acid (prepared in step 2) on the same day the photoinitiator solution is prepared (step 3).
  2. Place the frozen lyophilized MAHA in a desiccator for 15 min to come to room temperature.
  3. Working in a laminar flow hood and using the sterile weighing technique, weigh the lyophilized MAHA in a glass vial.
  4. Add the necessary volume of filtered photoinitiator solution to MAHA to come to the desired MAHA concentration. The common final gel concentration is 1.25 mg/mL MAHA and 4.5 mg/mL collagen.
  5. Seal the cap with laboratory sealing film, wrap the glass vial with aluminum foil, and place it on an orbital shaker plate at room temperature until fully dissolved (usually 3 days). Occasionally, vortex the solution to break apart large clumps of MAHA to ensure uniform dissolution of MAHA.

5. Device assembly

  1. Place the MC device into a 48-well plate a day before the DRG harvest.
  2. Apply a thin line of silicone gel in the groove beneath the MC device (Figure 2B) using a 3 mL syringe. This will help the device to securely attach to the well plate.
  3. With the help of #3 forceps, gently place the MC device into the well of a 48-well plate, as shown in Figure 2C.
    NOTE: The size of the device can be modified to suit the intended application, and a plate of a different size can be used if desired. The devices can be reused. To reuse, the hydrogel must be gently washed out from all tunnels, and the loading groove beneath the device must be used with 70% ethanol with gentle agitation. After this is complete, devices can be re-autoclaved to sterilize prior to use.

6. Animal preparation

  1. Autoclave all the necessary dissection tools prior to the start of harvest.
  2. Obtain an adult male or female Sprague Dawley rat aged 12-20 weeks. The sex of the rat does not impact DRG growth.
  3. Euthanize the rat according to the approved IACUC protocol using CO2 overdose as the primary method of euthanasia and bilateral pneumothorax puncture as a secondary method of euthanasia according to American Veterinary Medical Association Guidelines22.
  4. Place the rat on a sterile underpad on a dissecting table with the ventral side down. Spray the fur down with 70% ethanol.

7. Dorsal root ganglia (DRG) harvest

  1. Prepare trimming media containing 86% Neurobasal A media, 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% penicillin-streptomycin (PS), 1% Glutamine, and 2% B27 plus 50x and transfer into a 24-well plate. This media and well-plate will be used for temporary storage of harvested DRGs prior to embedding them in the hydrogel.
  2. Wear a lab coat, surgical mask, bonnet, safety glasses, and gloves.
  3. Using large blunt-nose scissors, cut through the skin at the base of the cervical spine and then down the length of the spine.
  4. To further drain blood away from the spinal canal, cut underneath the shoulder blades and down through the muscle to sever major blood vessels.
  5. Use large, sharp-nose scissors to cut the muscle away from the spine. Clear as much muscle as possible to visualize the spine.
  6. Remove the dorsal and lateral segments of the vertebrae. Use a straight Rongeur and sharp-nosed scissors to remove the spinous and transverse processes of the vertebrae, starting at the cervical end and moving toward the lumbar end.
  7. Remove the spinal cord. Use small sharp-nose scissors to carefully cut through the nerve roots connected to the DRGs along both sides of the spinal cord. Cut the cervical end of the spinal cord and carefully lift out of the spinal canal gradually, cutting through any remaining nerve roots connected to the DRGs.
    NOTE: Fine motor skills are essential to ensure the DRG body is not severed in the process.
  8. To expose DRGs, use the curved Rongeur to remove more of the lateral parts of the vertebrae. Pull outward from the midline, alternating sides. Be careful not to cut through the DRG body since it may cause damage to the cell bodies and axons.
  9. Using the #3 forceps and straight-edge spring scissors, remove DRGs in between each level of the vertebrae. Grip the spinal nerve roots from the DRG, carefully pull them out of the pocket, and cut through the other end of the spinal nerve. Be careful not to grip the DRG body directly.
  10. Place the DRGs in wells of a 24-well plate (containing trimming media, step 7.1) on ice.
  11. After collecting all DRGs, clean up the workspace, place the carcass in an autoclave bag, and store/dispose of it appropriately according to IACUC protocol.

8. DRG trimming and cutting

  1. Fill a 60 mm Petri dish on a clean bench with trimming media (step 7.1). Set up the dissecting scope and glass bead sterilizer and place an autoclaved toolbox with trimming tools (#3 forceps and straight-edge spring scissors) by the scope.
  2. Under the dissecting scope, remove excess tissue around the DRG and trim the nerve roots close to the DRG body (typically slightly darker than the surrounding nerves).
  3. Fill a second 60 mm Petri dish with fresh media. Under the dissecting scope, cut the trimmed DRGs to about 0.5 mm (or between 0.5 mm and 0.8 mm). A ruler is placed under the Petri dish during cutting to have the correct estimated size of cut DRGs.
  4. Transfer cut DRGs into a fresh 24-well plate with the media on ice.
    NOTE: DRG trimming, cutting, and embedding should be done in a laminar flow cabinet to provide an aseptic workspace. In the absence of a laminar flow cabinet, aseptic techniques must be observed, with minimum appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) recommended (lab coat, masks, goggles, and gloves) and all tools sterilized throughout the process to mitigate potential contamination.

9. Collagen neutralization

  1. Neutralize the collagen on the same day as the DRG harvest after trimming and cutting the DRGs.
  2. Working on ice, pipette ~8.16 % ultra-pure water, ~1.84% 1 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH), ~10% 10x PBS, and ~80% of collagen of the total volume of solution into a glass vial.
  3. Mix slowly using a sterile low-retention pipette tip to pipette collagen (usually added last) into the mixture. Ensure to keep the pipette tip in the solution while mixing to avoid creating bubbles. Check the pH of the neutralized collagen using pH strips to be sure it is ~7.
    NOTE: Neutralized collagen can be kept on ice for 2-3 h without gelling; therefore, hydrogel fabrication should be carried out expeditiously once collagen is neutralized.

10. Hydrogel fabrication

  1. Working on ice, pipette laminin (to a final concentration of 0.75 mg/mL) and 1x PBS into a glass vial.
  2. Using sterile low retention pipette tips, pipette neutralized collagen and MAHA solution into the mixture to arrive at the desired concentration.
  3. Mix slowly and check the pH of the resulting hydrogel (should be ~7).

11. DRG embedding

  1. Perform multi-compartment embedding.
    1. Pipette 65.1 µL and 52.8 µL of the pre-mixed hydrogel into the soma and neurite compartments, respectively.
      NOTE: This assumes the use of MC devices in a 48-well plate. These volumes can be changed based on the size of the MC device used.
    2. Gently embed the cut DRGs into the soma compartment (Figure 2A), ensuring they do not scratch the bottom of the well plate. Place the DRG in the middle so the neurites can grow into the adjacent compartments through the tunnels.
    3. Thermal crosslink the hydrogel in the incubator at 37 °C for 30 min. While this occurs, turn on the UV lamp to warm up.
    4. After thermal crosslinking, UV crosslink the hydrogel for 90 s.
    5. Add DRG growth media to the hydrogel and DRG and perform a full media change after an hour to eliminate unreacted or remaining traces of photoinitiator that persist in the media.
    6. Perform a half media change every 3 days and monitor the growth of the DRGs by viewing under the microscope.
    7. After ~4 weeks, when DRG neurites begin to grow (Figure 3A), capture images with the fluorescent plate imager and quantify the length of neurites using FIJI (ImageJ).

12. Control DRG embedding

  1. Pipette 250 µL of hydrogel in a 48-well plate (without MC).
  2. Gently place the cut DRG in the middle of the well and halfway down into the hydrogel, ensuring it does not scratch the bottom of the well plate.
  3. Thermal crosslink the hydrogel in the incubator at 37 °C for 30 min.
  4. UV crosslink the hydrogel for 90 s.
  5. Add DRG growth media to the hydrogel and DRG and perform a full media change after an hour.
  6. Perform half media change every 3 days and monitor the growth of the DRG by viewing it under the microscope.
  7. After ~4 weeks, when DRG neurites begin to grow (Figure 3B), capture images with the fluorescent plate imager.
    NOTE: Any brightfield microscope will work for imaging. An automated plate-based microscope makes this process faster. Control embedding in plain gels without the device is done to compare the growth of DRG neurites in multi-compartment. Once users validate that DRGs grow similarly in MC and control gels, they may not need to repeat control gels each time.

13. DRG imaging

  1. Capture brightfield images at 4x magnification using a fluorescent plate imager at a range of focal distances to visualize the entire DRG and MC Device.
  2. Adjust the brightness and contrast of the image to make it easier to view the neurites.
  3. Save the image as a .tiff file.

14. DRG neurite quantification

  1. Download and install FIJI (ImageJ).
  2. Open ImageJ. Open the image file and ensure that the file is monochrome.
  3. Enhance the contrast so that the smallest neurites are visible. Do this by opening the brightness and contrast option using the shortcut Ctrl+Shift+C.
  4. Adjust the sliders of the controller as needed to visualize the neurites, and click on Apply for the desired brightness and contrast.
  5. Open the neurite tracer by opening the Plugins menu, selecting Segmentation, and clicking on Simple Neurite Tracer.
  6. Start a new trace by clicking on one end of the neurite right up against the DRG body.
  7. Click another point along the neurite to add a trace until the neurite is traced end to end. Click on Finish Path after tracing the neurite.
  8. Convert the traced length to real units and save the results by copying and pasting them into Excel.
  9. Use the straight-line tool in FIJI to draw a line of the same length as the scale bar (not letting go of the end of the line) and look at the length value visible under the toolbar. The length value is used for the conversion.
  10. Measure the length of six long neurites extending from both sides of the DRG (Figure 3C,D) and calculate the average length of these neurites to give a representative average length of the DRG, as shown in Figure 4.
    NOTE: Immunostaining has been tested on DRG explants in plain gels to show the presence of non-neuronal support cells7. DRGs are fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) at room temperature, washed three times with 1x PBS for 15 min, and stored in 1x PBS at 4 °C until immunostaining.
  11. For explants in MC devices, remove the MC device and follow the same process described above7.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Representative Results

The present protocol described a technique to harvest and culture DRG from adult Sprague Dawley rats in a multi-compartment (MC) device. As shown in Figure 1, DRG harvested from adult rats was trimmed and cut into ~0.5 mm. The trimmed and cut DRGs were then embedded in a hydrogel in the soma region of the MC device (Figure 2) and cultured for 27 days before neurite quantification. DRG was cultured in plain gel to serve as the control. The concentration of hydrogel formulation used for this experiment was 4.5/1.25 mg/mL collagen: MAHA. On days 27 and 21 for multi-compartment and plain gels, respectively, there was a robust growth of neurites (Figure 3). The average length of neurites in MC (894.22 µm ± 308.75 µm) was comparable to neurite length in control plain gels (864.26 µm ± 362.84 µm) (Figure 4). This demonstrates the ability of the MC device to support DRG culture and neurite growth. Neurite lengths were quantified using ImageJ software.

Figure 1
Figure 1: Schematic diagram showing the experimental procedure. (A) Dorsal root ganglia (DRG) harvest from adult Sprague Dawley rats. (B) Trimming and cutting of harvested DRG. (C) Hydrogel formulation, DRG embedding, and culture in hydrogel within MC fitted into a 48-well plate. (D) Growth of DRG neurites after 21-30 days of culture. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2
Figure 2: Printed multi-compartment with three isolated compartments and can be used in a 48-well plate. (A) A representative image showing the top view of the printed MC device shows the DRG and neurite compartments (red lines) and the DRG embedding area (green). (B) Side view of MC. (C) An image of MC fitted into a 48-well plate. Scale bar = 10 mm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3
Figure 3: Neurite growth in multi-compartment (MC) device, and control plain gels. (A) A representative image showing traced neurite growth in a multi-compartment (MC) device in brightfield. (Below) Neurites that grew through the tunnels of MC are indicated with arrows. (B) Image of neurite growth in control plain gels (without MC). (C) A representative image showing neurite tracing of twelve long neurites in control plain gels (purple lines). Six long neurites at both sides of the DRG were quantified to give the average neurite length. Images were captured with a fluorescent plate imager at 4x magnification, and neurites were quantified using FIJI (ImageJ). Scale bars = 1000 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4
Figure 4: Neurite length in multi-compartment (MC) compared to that of plain gel (PG). Scatter plot showing individual neurite lengths with means and standard deviations represented by error bars. The average neurite length in MC was 1204.40 µm ± 690.43 µm (mean ± SD) compared to 864.26 µm ± 362.84 µm (mean ± SD) in the plain gel, indicating MC support neurite growth. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Supplementary Coding File 1: STL file of multi-compartment (MC) device generated using computer-aided design software. Please click here to download this File.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Discussion

This protocol outlines a method to harvest adult Sprague Dawley DRGs and culture them in 3D natural hydrogels. In contrast to this method, other approaches to harvesting DRGs from mice and rats involve isolating the spinal column. The excised spinal column is halved, and the spinal cord is removed to expose DRGs23,24,25. Damage to the spinal cord limits blood supply, which affects DRGs and internal neurons26. This reduces the activity of DRGs, making the surgical approaches more appropriate. Further, a method to 3D print a robust MC device that allows for a physiologically relevant culture of DRGs has been outlined.

This protocol outlines a method to culture DRG in vitro, emphasizing studying peripheral sensitization of neurons in an anatomically and physiologically relevant model. This culture method can establish a physical separation of distal neurites and the DRG cell body in a 3D environment. The MC device mimics the in vivo environment since DRG explants with cells are preserved and may be co-cultured with native glial cells. DRG explant contains non-native neuronal cells, which could be co-cultured with other cells to mimic physiological conditions. This physiological relevance promotes studies into how non-neuronal cells regulate neurite activity and helps in the understanding of basic mechanisms involved in nociception. Incorporating these non-neuronal interactions should yield more accurate predictions of cell signaling outcomes compared to simplified culture models with dissociated DRGs. The presence of two neurite compartments maximizes physiological relevance because single DRGs innervate different tissues in vivo. This design permits the treatment of one neurite compartment while the other serves as the control. Control and treatment compartments connected to a single soma could be used to study cross-compartment effects, mimicking in vivo conditions where neurites extend from a single soma and experience different stimuli as they innervate different tissues, providing insight into cross-talk between neurites. If cross-talk occurs between neurites in adjacent compartments, untreated DRGs can serve as a true control.

This device could be used for treatment isolation or to study the interaction between neurons and DRG in the context of pain. Since distal neurites can be selectively treated separately from the DRG soma and proximal neurites, this system could be used for peripheral treatments such as targeted joint therapeutics, where the terminal end of peripheral sensory neurons is directly treated.

A key advantage of the MC device is the high-throughput experiments across multiple wells of the same plate, as the MC device is designed to fit into a 48-well plate. An additional benefit of the in vitro platform is the capacity to alter hydrogel stiffness within the MC by tuning collagen and MAHA concentrations to mimic the properties of various tissue microenvironments. One potential limitation of this protocol is that fluidic isolation between the neurite and DRG soma compartments is not ideal for cultures beyond 72 h without a media change. A previous study confirmed that fluidic isolation is maintained in the compartments for up to 72 h without media changes11. Prior studies have shown that increasing hyaluronic acid concentration significantly enhances collagen crosslinking density, thus restricting the diffusivity of macromolecules across the hydrogel matrix27. Therefore, to improve fluidic isolation for cultures past 72 h, the concentration of MAHA can be increased, as demonstrated in a study by Caparaso et al.7, where an increase in MAHA resulted in improved fluidic isolation. Control embedding is done to ensure comparable growth of DRG neurites in MC and plain gel. This is to ensure MC has no impact on DRG growth. It is not recommended to repeat control embedding with every experiment once DRG growth in MC is validated.

The authors acknowledge that human DRGs are larger, contain more cells, and have varying proportions of neuron subtype compared to rat DRGs28. The use of rodent DRGs is a limitation of this study in terms of translation to the clinic; however, this system could be valuable as a screening platform to identify compounds that impact neuronal excitability. Although there are compositional differences between rodent and human DRGs, there is also a high overlap within the proteome between rat and human DRGs29. This overlap in proteome - and the presence of the same neuronal subtypes - suggests that the rat DRG can be used to screen therapeutics at a high level, and further testing can be conducted to probe if changes in the rat DRG mechanistically translate to the human DRG.

This platform allows for targeted pharmacological stimulation and the study of neurons or cell bodies with temporal control. Changes in neuronal excitability and signal transmission may be easily measured by manipulating neurites or the DRG. The ability to assess neuronal excitability using calcium imaging in plain control hydrogels with explant DRGs has been demonstrated7. Similar methods can be employed in the MC device to assess neuronal excitability.

This method can be used to study various pain conditions where stimulation of peripheral primary sensory neurons is a driving factor, such as disc-associated low back pain. Screening nociceptor hypersensitivity can be a promising tool for discovering novel drugs to reduce hyperexcitability. Reducing hyperexcitability has the potential to translate clinically to reduced pain. This platform can screen high-throughput drugs to identify the most efficacious candidates for in vivo validation using pain-like behavior assays.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Disclosures

The authors of this study declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by an NSF Grant (2152065) and an NSF CAREER Award (1846857). The authors would like to thank all current and past members of the Wachs Lab for contributing to this protocol. Diagrams in Figure 1 were made in Biorender.

Materials

Name Company Catalog Number Comments
#5 forceps Fine Science Tools 11252-00 For trimming and cutting DRG
10x DMEM MilliporeSigma D2429
1x PBS (autoclaved) Prepared in lab 7.3 - 7.5 pH
24 well plates VWR 82050-892 To temporarily store harvested and cut DRGs
3 mL Syringe sterile, single use BD 309657
48 well plates Greiner Bio-One 677180
60 mm Petri dish Fisher Scientific FB0875713A To hold media for trimming and cutting
Aluminium foil Fisherbrand 01-213-104
B27 Plus 50x ThermoFisher 17504044 For DRG media
Collagen type I Ibidi 50205
Curved cup Friedman Pearson Rongeur Fine Science Tools 16221-14 For dissection
Dumont #3 forceps Fine Science Tools 11293-00 For dissection
Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) ThermoFisher 16000044 For DRG media
Form cure Form Labs curing agent
Form wash Form Labs To wash excess resins off MC
Glass bead sterilizer Fisher Scientific NC9531961
Glass vials (8 mL) DWK Life Sciences (Wheaton) 224724
GlutaMax ThermoFisher 35050-061 For DRG media
HEPES (1M) Millipore Sigma H0887
High temp V2 resin FormLabs FLHTAM02
Hyaluronic Acid Sodium Salt MilliporeSigma 53747 Used to make MAHA
Irgacure MilliporeSigma 410896
Laminin R&D Systems 344600501
Large blunt-nose scissors Militex EG5-26 For dissection
Large forceps (serrated tips) Militex 9538797 For dissection
Large sharp-nosed scissors Fine Science Tools 14010-15 For dissection
Low Retention pipette tips Fisher Scientific 02-707-017 For pipetting collagen and MAHA
Methacrylated hyaluronic acid (MAHA) Prepared in lab N/A 85 - 115 % methacrylation
Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) R&D Systems 556-NG-100 For DRG media
Neurobasal A Media ThermoFisher 10888022 For DRG media
Parafilm Bemis PM996
Parafilm Bemis PM996
Penicillin/Streptomycin (PS) EMD Millipore 516106 For DRG media
pH test strips VWR International BDH35309.606
Pipette tips (1000 µL) USA Scientific 1111-2021
Preform 3.23.1 software Formslab To upload STL file
Rat Charles River
Resin 3D printer Form Labs Form 3L 3D printing MC device
Small sharp-nosed scissors Fine Science Tools 14094-11 For dissection
Sodium bicarbonate MilliporeSigma S6014
Straight cup rongeur Fine Science Tools 16004-16 For dissection
Straight edge spring scissors Fine Science Tools 15024-10 For dissection
Surgical Scaplel blade (No. 10) Fisher Scientific 22-079-690
Syring filters, PES (0.22 µm) Celltreat 229747
Tiny spring scissors World Precision Instruments 14003 For trimming and cutting DRG
UV lamp Analytik Jena US To photocrosslink hydrogel (15 - 18 mW/cm2)

DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

References

  1. Vos, T., et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990-2015: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet. 388 (10053), 1545-1602 (2016).
  2. Goldberg, D. S., Mcgee, S. J. Pain as a global public health priority. BMC Public Health. 11 (1), 770 (2011).
  3. Gaskin, D. J., Richard, P. The economic costs of pain in the United States. J Pain. 13 (8), 715-724 (2012).
  4. Kim, Y. S., et al. Coupled activation of primary sensory neurons contributes to chronic pain. Neuron. 91 (5), 1085-1096 (2016).
  5. Im, H. J., et al. Alteration of sensory neurons and spinal response to an experimental osteoarthritis pain model. Arthritis Rheum. 62 (10), 2995-3005 (2010).
  6. Jensen, T. S., Finnerup, N. B. Allodynia and hyperalgesia in neuropathic pain: Clinical manifestations and mechanisms. Lancet Neurol. 13 (9), 924-935 (2014).
  7. Berge, O. G. Predictive validity of behavioral animal models for chronic pain. Br J Pharmacol. 164 (4), 1195-1206 (2011).
  8. Anderson, W. A., Willenberg, A. R., Bosak, A. J., Willenberg, B. J., Lambert, S. Use of a capillary alginate gel (capgel™) to study the three-dimensional development of sensory nerves reveals the formation of a rudimentary perineurium. J Neurosci Methods. 305, 46-53 (2018).
  9. Mohammed Izham, N. A., et al. Exploring the possibilities of using in vitro model for neuropathic pain studies. Neurosci Res Notes. 5, 144 (2022).
  10. Park, S. E., et al. A three-dimensional in vitro model of the peripheral nervous system. NPG Asia Mater. 13 (1), 2 (2021).
  11. Caparaso, S. M., Redwine, A. L., Wachs, R. A. Engineering a multi-compartment in vitro model for dorsal root ganglia phenotypic assessment. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 111 (11), 1903-1920 (2023).
  12. Krug, A. K., et al. Evaluation of a human neurite growth assay as specific screen for developmental neurotoxicants. Arch Toxicol. 87 (12), 2215-2231 (2013).
  13. F, M., et al. Extracellular matrix stiffness negatively affects axon elongation, growth cone area and F-actin levels in a collagen type I 3D culture. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 16 (2), 151-162 (2021).
  14. Spearman, B. S., et al. Tunable methacrylated hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels as scaffolds for soft tissue engineering applications. J Biomed Mater Res A. 108 (2), 279-291 (2020).
  15. Zhu, W., Oxford, G. S. Differential gene expression of neonatal and adult DRG neurons correlates with the differential sensitization of TRPV1 responses to nerve growth factor. Neurosci Lett. 500 (3), 192-196 (2011).
  16. Van De Wijdeven, R., et al. Structuring a multi-nodal neural network in vitro within a novel design microfluidic chip. Biomed Microdevices. 20, 1-8 (2018).
  17. Chan, J. R., et al. NGF controls axonal receptivity to myelination by Schwann cells or oligodendrocytes. Neuron. 43 (2), 183-191 (2004).
  18. Ng, B. K., Chen, L., Mandemakers, W., Cosgaya, J. M., Chan, J. R. Anterograde transport and secretion of brain-derived neurotrophic factor along sensory axons promote Schwann cell myelination. J Neurosci. 27 (28), 7597-7603 (2007).
  19. Xiao, J., et al. BDNF exerts contrasting effects on peripheral myelination of NGF-dependent and BDNF-dependent drg neurons. J Neurosci. 29 (13), 4016-4022 (2009).
  20. Seidlits, S. K., et al. The effects of hyaluronic acid hydrogels with tunable mechanical properties on neural progenitor cell differentiation. Biomaterials. 31 (14), 3930-3940 (2010).
  21. Tomal, W., Ortyl, J. Water-soluble photoinitiators in biomedical applications. Polymers. 12 (5), 1073 (2020).
  22. Leary, S., et al. Avma guidelines for the euthanasia of animals: 2013 edition. , American Veterinary Medical Association. Schaumburg, Illinois. (2013).
  23. Sleigh, J. N., Weir, G. A., Schiavo, G. A simple, step-by-step dissection protocol for the rapid isolation of mouse dorsal root ganglia. BMC Res Notes. 9 (1), 82 (2016).
  24. Naveed, M., et al. Simple methods of dissection protocols for the rapid isolation of rat dorsal root ganglia under the non-microscopic condition. Neuroscience Research Notes. 6 (2), 212 (2023).
  25. Perner, C., Sokol, C. L. Protocol for dissection and culture of murine dorsal root ganglia neurons to study neuropeptide release. STAR Protocols. 2 (1), 100333 (2021).
  26. Bai, X., et al. A high-resolution anatomical rat atlas. J Anatomy. 209 (5), 707-708 (2006).
  27. Bian, L., et al. The influence of hyaluronic acid hydrogel crosslinking density and macromolecular diffusivity on human MSC chondrogenesis and hypertrophy. Biomaterials. 34 (2), 413-421 (2013).
  28. Haberberger, R. V., Barry, C., Dominguez, N., Matusica, D. Human dorsal root ganglia. Front Cell Neurosci. 13, 271 (2019).
  29. Schwaid, A. G., Krasowka-Zoladek, A., Chi, A., Cornella-Taracido, I. Comparison of the rat and human dorsal root ganglion proteome. Scientific Rep. 8 (1), 13469 (2018).

Tags

Keywords: Dorsal Root Ganglia DRG In Vitro Model Peripheral Neurons Nociceptor Hypersensitivity Multi-compartment Culture Hydrogel Neural-immune Interactions Pain Research
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
PDF DOI DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

Cite this Article

Gane, B. M., Caparaso, S. M., Lee,More

Gane, B. M., Caparaso, S. M., Lee, F. S., Redwine, A. L., Wachs, R. A. Harvesting, Embedding, and Culturing Dorsal Root Ganglia in Multi-compartment Devices to Study Peripheral Neuronal Features. J. Vis. Exp. (208), e66854, doi:10.3791/66854 (2024).

Less
Copy Citation Download Citation Reprints and Permissions
View Video

Get cutting-edge science videos from JoVE sent straight to your inbox every month.

Waiting X
Simple Hit Counter