A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Agar-Block Microcosms for Controlled Plant Tissue Decomposition by Aerobic Fungi

14.4K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/2283

⸱

February 3rd, 2011

 , 

* These authors contributed equally

In This Article

Summary

This video demonstrates a controlled environment approach to study degradation of lignocellulosic plant tissues by aerobic fungi. The ability to control nutrient sources and moisture is a key advantage of agar-block microcosms, but the approach often yields mixed success. We address critical pitfalls to yield reproducible, low-variability results.

Abstract

The two principal methods for studying fungal biodegradation of lignocellulosic plant tissues were developed for wood preservative testing (soil-block; agar-block). It is well-accepted that soil-block microcosms yield higher decay rates, fewer moisture issues, lower variability among studies, and higher thresholds of preservative toxicity. Soil-block testing is thus the more utilized technique and has been standardized by American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (method D 1413-07). The soil-block design has drawbacks, however, using locally-variable soil sources and in limiting the control of nutrients external (exogenous) to the decaying tissues. These drawbacks have emerged as a problem in applying this method to other, increasingly popular research aims. These modern aims include degrading lignocellulosics for bioenergy research, testing bioremediation of co-metabolized toxics, evaluating oxidative mechanisms, and tracking translocated elements along hyphal networks. Soil-blocks do not lend enough control in these applications. A refined agar-block approach is necessary.

Here, we use the brown rot wood-degrading fungus Serpula lacrymans to degrade wood in agar-block microcosms, using deep Petri dishes with low-calcium agar. We test the role of exogenous gypsum on decay in a time-series, to demonstrate the utility and expected variability. Blocks from a single board rip (longitudinal cut) are conditioned, weighed, autoclaved, and introduced aseptically atop plastic mesh. Fungal inoculations are at each block face, with exogenous gypsum added at interfaces. Harvests are aseptic until the final destructive harvest. These microcosms are designed to avoid block contact with agar or Petri dish walls. Condensation is minimized during plate pours and during incubation. Finally, inoculum/gypsum/wood spacing is minimized but without allowing contact. These less technical aspects of agar-block design are also the most common causes of failure and the key source of variability among studies. Video publication is therefore useful in this case, and we demonstrate low-variability, high-quality results.

Protocol

This protocol applies to woody and non-woody substrates, as outlined, as well as to oven- or air-dried material. Read through the protocol first, however, before set-up. There are several points raised that may apply to your study, and these points (underlined) require planning. Also, note that there are two published agar-block methods that are occasionally used, one the British Standard 838 and another following an International Research Group on Wood Protection (IRG-WP) paper submitted by Bravery (1978). Our resembles method 838, with modifications primarily in the microcosm design and the control of the agar medium, but again, both approaches are often avoided due....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Using our agar-block set-up (Figure 1) Serpula lacrymans grew in direct contact with the gypsum surfaces and into wood blocks (Figure 2), leading to more than 60% weight loss in the control brown-rotted pine blocks (Figure 3). This easily satisfies the ASTM standard goal of >50% decay, and the average coefficient of variation (CV) in decay at was 0.055 at week 16. This data is published in Schilling7. Again, other fungi will require longer incubation in agar-block than in soil-block. Fo.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

No conflicts of interest declared.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Petri dishesNalge Nunc international401425 x 150 mm
Agar, Type ASigma-AldrichA4550
Ammonium nitrate, NH4NO3Millinckrodt3436-12
Potassium phosphate, KH2PO4JT Baker3246-01
Magnesium sulfate 7-hydrate, MgSO4•7H2OSigma-Aldrich230391
D-(+)-GlucoseSigma-AldrichG8270Dextrose
Boric acid, H3BO4Mallinckrodt Baker Inc.2549-04
Zinc sulfate 7-hydrate, ZnSO4•7H2OMallinckrodt Baker Inc.8880-12
Manganous chloride 4-hydrate, MnCl2•4H2OJT Baker2540-04
Copper(II) sulfate 5-hydrate, CuSO4•5H2OSigma-Aldrich209198
Ammonium heptamolybdate 4-hydrate, (NH4)6Mo7O24•4H2OSigma-Aldrich431346
Calcium chloride dihydrate, CaCl2•2H2OMallinckrodt Baker Inc.4160-12
Sodium chloride, NaClMallinckrodt Baker Inc.7581-12
Ferrous sulfate 7-hydrate, FeSO4•7H2OMallinckrodt Baker Inc.5056-12
Pipet-aidDrummond Scientific4-000-110Cordless
EtOH the surface
10 ml sterile polystyrene pipetteBD Biosciences357551
Gutter GuardThermwell Products Co.VX620Pre-scrubbed with soap
Hardware store
Calcium sulfate hemihydrate, CaSO4•0.5H2OAcros Organics385355000
#4 cork borerBoekel Scientific1601
Parafilm "M"Pechiney Plastic PackagingPM-996

References

  1. ASTM D1413-07. Standard test method for testing wood preservatives by laboratory soil-block cultures. . Annual Book of ASTM Standards. , 185-192 (2007).
  2. Bravery, A. F. A miniaturized wood block for the rapid evaluation of wood preservative fungicides. , International Research Group on Wood Protection (IRG/WP 2113). (1978).
  3. Low, G. A., Young, M.....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

Fungal BiodegradationWood DecompositionExogenous SubstratesMass Loss MeasurementsMycelial MorphologyElemental AnalysisGypsum TreatmentPlastic Mesh Grids