A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities

10.4K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/51054

⸱

January 29th, 2014

 , 

In This Article

Summary

Objective and easy measurement of sensory processing is extremely difficult in nonverbal or vulnerable pediatric patients. We developed a new methodology to quantitatively assess infants and children's cortical processing of light touch, speech sounds, and the multisensory processing of the 2 stimuli, without requiring active subject participation or causing discomfort in vulnerable patients.

Abstract

Objective and easy measurement of sensory processing is extremely difficult in nonverbal or vulnerable pediatric patients. We developed a new methodology to quantitatively assess children's cortical processing of light touch, speech sounds and the multisensory processing of the 2 stimuli, without requiring active subject participation or causing children discomfort. To accomplish this we developed a dual channel, time and strength calibrated air puff stimulator that allows both tactile stimulation and sham control. We combined this with the use of event-related potential methodology to allow for high temporal resolution of signals from the primary and secondary somatosensory cortices as well as higher order processing. This methodology also allowed us to measure a multisensory response to auditory-tactile stimulation.

Introduction

The study of developing cortical sensory processes is essential to understanding the basis for most higher order functions. Sensory experiences are responsible for much of the brain's organization through infancy and childhood, laying the foundation for complex processes such as cognition, communication, and motor development1-3. Most pediatric studies of sensory processes focus on auditory and visual domains, mainly because these stimuli are easiest to develop, standardize, and test. However, tactile processing is of particular interest in infants and children as it is the first sense to develop in the fetus4,5, and somatosensory information....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

1. Assessment of Response to Light Touch

  1. Place the electrode net (e.g. 128-channels geodesic sensor net) on child or infant's head. Adjust sensors for full contact using warm saline solution. If on a child, ensure child is sitting comfortably in parent or caregiver lap. If on an infant, ensure that infant is lightly swaddled and either held in caregiver's arms or in a supine position in an open crib.
  2. Position a 1 mm nozzle 0.5 cm below the tip of the index finger of the tested hand. Place finger for a young child or palm for an infant in a mold holder and secure with Velcro tape proximal and distal to joint to ensure consist....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Assessment of light touch (Figure 3):

Characteristics of the cortical response to tactile stimulation using the Puffer system: The patterns of peaks in response to the puff are very similar to the cortical responses obtained using median nerve stimulation in normal adults10,11. The early response (P50, N70, P100 peaks) primarily reflects activity in the primary sensory cortex12 and does not require awareness of stimulation........

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

This novel combination of air puff and ERP (referred to as the "Puffer system") to measure cortical processing of light touch and tactile-auditory responses is well tolerated by young children with disabilities and by infants. This holds true for unisensory and multisensory versions, and whether the attentional component is added or not in the case of young children. The reasons for the success of this methodology in assessing a young and vulnerable population are due to both the use of an innocuous tactile stimu.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Acknowledgements

The project described was supported by the National Center for Research Resources, Grant UL1 RR024975-01, and is now at the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Grant 2 UL1 TR000445-06. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Geodesic sensor netEGI, Inc., Eugene, ORdepends on size
Net Station EEG software v. 4.2EGI, Inc., Eugene, ORNA
E-Prime stimulus control applicationPST, Inc. Pittsburgh, PANA
Manometer (model 6 in, 0-60 psi)H. O. Trerice Co, Oak Park, MI
Custom Puffer setupNathalie Maitre

References

  1. Nelson, C. A. Neural plasticity and human development: the role of early experience in sculpting memory systems. Dev. Sci. 3 (2), 115-136 (2000).
  2. Wallace, M. T., Stein, B. E. Early experience determines how the senses will interact. J. Neurophysiol. ....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

Event-related Potential MethodologyTactile Delivery SystemEEG Net PlacementSomatosensory ProcessingMultisensory Response AssessmentChild-friendly ProtocolERP Data AnalysisAuditory-tactile StimulationSensory Processing Measurement