A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Experimental Procedure for Laboratory Studies of In Situ Burning : Flammability and Burning Efficiency of Crude Oil

12.5K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/57307

⸱

May 1st, 2018

 , 

In This Article

Summary

Here, we present a protocol to simultaneously study the flammability and burning efficiency of fresh and weathered crude oil under conditions that simulate in situ burning operations on the sea.

Abstract

A new method for the simultaneous study of the flammability and burning efficiency of fresh and weathered crude oil through two experimental laboratory setups is presented. The experiments are easily repeatable compared to operational scale experiments (pool diameter ≥2 m), while still featuring quite realistic in situ burning conditions of crude oil on water. Experimental conditions include a flowing water sub-layer that cools the oil slick and an external heat flux (up to 50 kW/m2) that simulates the higher heat feedback to the fuel surface in operational scale crude oil pool fires. These conditions enable a controlled laboratory study of the burning efficiency of crude oil pool fires that are equivalent to operational scale experiments. The method also provides quantitative data on the requirements for igniting crude oils in terms of the critical heat flux, ignition delay time as a function of the incident heat flux, the surface temperature upon ignition, and the thermal inertia. This type of data can be used to determine the required strength and duration of an ignition source to ignite a certain type of fresh or weathered crude oil. The main limitation of the method is that the cooling effect of the flowing water sub-layer on the burning crude oil as a function of the external heat flux has not been fully quantified. Experimental results clearly showed that the flowing water sub-layer does improve how representative this setup is of in situ burning conditions, but to what extent this representation is accurate is currently uncertain. The method nevertheless features the most realistic in situ burning laboratory conditions currently available for simultaneously studying the flammability and burning efficiency of crude oil on water.

Introduction

In situ burning of spilled crude oil on water is a marine oil spill response method that removes the spilled oil from the water surface by burning it and converting it to soot and gaseous combustion products. This response method was successfully applied during the Exxon Valdez1 and Deepwater Horizon2 oil spills and is regularly mentioned as a potential oil spill response method for the Arctic3,4,5,6. Two of the key parameters that determine whether in situ burning of oil will....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

This protocol makes use of two different experimental setups that are used in steps 4-8, as shown in the accompanying schematics. The first setup is the Crude Oil Flammability Apparatus (COFA) (Figure 1 and Figure 4), which is a 1.0 × 1.0 × 0.50 m3 metal water basin designed to conduct small scale in situ burning of crude oil experiments, as shown for example in Van Gelderen, Brogaard, et al.22 The second setup is a cone heater23 with a spark igniter that features a custom-made sample holder and a gas analyzer that measures t....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Figure 5 shows the evaporation curve of a light crude oil that was evaporated over multiple days to a loss of 30 wt% using the method described in step 2. The figure clearly shows that after the first day (19 h) of evaporative weathering, the evaporation rate is reduced significantly, which allows for pauses as mentioned in the protocol.

Figure 6 shows the ignition dela.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

The two weathering methods discussed in this paper are a relatively simple approximation of the weathering processes that a spilled oil on water is subjected to17. Other, more sophisticated weathering methods can also be used to provide weathered crude oil samples, such as the circulating flume described by Brandvik and Faksness35. The advantage of the presented methods is that they require simple equipment and can be easily conducted in a laboratory environment. The result.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Danish Council for Independent research for funding the project (Grant DDF - 1335-00282). COWIfonden funded the construction of the Crude Oil Flammability Apparatus and the gas analyzer, including the duct insert. Maersk Oil and Statoil provided the crude oils that were used for the representative results. None of the sponsors have been involved in the protocol or the results of this paper. The authors would also like to thank Ulises Rojas Alva for assistance with constructing the modified cone sample holder.

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
DUC Crude OilMaerskN/ALight crude oil with r = 0.853 g/ml and h = 6.750 mPa*s.
Grane Crude OilStatoilN/AHeavy crude oil with r = 0.925 g/ml and h = 133.6 mPa*s.
SVM 3000 Stabinger ViscometerAnton PaarC18IP007EN-PViscosity and density meter for the fresh and weathered crude oils.
Laboshake RO500Gerhardt11-0002Rotary shaking table for emulsifying water and oil mixtures.
Jebao Wave Maker RW-4JebaoN/APropeller (flow of 500-4000 L/h) used in the COFA setup to generate a current.
Aquabee UP 3000AquabeeUP 3000Aquarium pump for cooling of heat flux gauge.
Adventurer Precision Electronic BalanceOHAUSAX5205Load scale used to weigh the oil for the COFA experiments and in the custom-made cone sample holder for the cone setup.
3M Oil Sorbent PadsVWRMMMAHP156Hydrophobic absorption pads used to collect oil residues to determine the burning efficiency of the fire.
Mass Loss CalorimeterFire Testing Technology (FTT)B11325-650-1-1608A custom-made, circular holder was used for the testing of crude oil rather than the standard square sample holder. Includes a heat flux gauge with a range up to 100 kW/m2.
34972A Data Acquisition / Data Logger Switch UnitRS Components Ltd.702-7958Produced by Keysight Technologies. Operated by Keysight benchLink data logger 3 software and equipped with a 20-channel multiplexer.
Keysight Technologies 34901A 20-channel multiplexerRS Components Ltd.702-7939Produced by Keysight Technologies.
Bellows-Sealed ValveSwagelokSS-1GS6MMToggle valve to open/close the water in- and outlet of the custom-made cone sample holder for the cone setup.
Kronos 50 Peristaltic PumpSEKOKRFM0210M6000Peristaltic pump used to cool the custom-made cone sample holder for the cone setup.
ARCTIC A28 Refrigerated CirculaterThermoFisher Scientific152-5281Water cooling reservoir used to cool the cooling water that flows through the custom-made cone sample holder for the cone setup. Includes a SC 100 Immersion Circulator controller.
Gas Analysis Instrumentation Console with Duct InsertFire Testing Technology (FTT)B11328-650-1-1609Gas analyzer for O2, CO2 and CO. Uses a 34972A Data Acquisition / Data Logger Switch Unit.
Ceramic & Stainless Steel 2.5mm ElectrodeFire Testing Technology (FTT)M015-4Spark igniter from the Mass Loss Calorimeter. Used in the COFA setup to measure the surface temperature upon ignition.
Infrared Emitter-Module M110/348Heraeus80046199Original Infrared heaters on which the new design with a water-cooled holder for the heating elements was based. Includes two short wave twin tube emitters (09751751). Operated by a type CB1x25 P power controller.
Power Controller Heratron Heraeus80055836Type CB1x25 P power controller for the infrared heaters.

References

  1. Allen, A. A. Contained Controlled Burning of Spilled Oil During the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Arctic and Marine Oilspill Program (AMOP) Technical Seminar. 305-313 Environment Canada, , 305-313 (1990).
  2. Allen, A. A., Jaeger, D., Mabile, N. J., Costanzo, D. The Use of Controlled Burning During the Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Horizon MC-252 Oil Spill Response. International Oil Spill Confere....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

Crude Oil FlammabilityOil Spill ResponseCritical Heat FluxIgnition Delay TimeHeat Release RateBurning RateSurface TemperatureWater Cooling System