A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Polarization-Sensitive Two-Photon Microscopy for a Label-Free Amyloid Structural Characterization

2.2K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/65670

⸱

September 8th, 2023

 ,  , 

In This Article

Summary

This paper describes how polarization-sensitive two-photon microscopy could be applied to characterize the local organization within label-free amyloid superstructures-spherulites. It also describes how to prepare and measure the sample, assemble the required setup, and analyze the data to obtain information about the local organization of amyloid fibrils.

Abstract

Compared to its one-photon counterpart, two-photon excitation is beneficial for bioimaging experiments because of its lower phototoxicity, deeper tissue penetration, efficient operation in densely packed systems, and reduced angular photoselection of fluorophores. Thus, the introduction of polarization analysis in two-photon fluorescence microscopy (2PFM) provides a more precise determination of molecular organization in a sample compared to standard imaging methods based on linear optical processes. In this work, we focus on polarization-sensitive 2PFM (ps-2PFM) and its application in the determination of molecular ordering within complex bio-structures-amyloid spherulites. Neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's or Parkinson's are often diagnosed through the detection of amyloids-protein aggregates formed due to an impaired protein misfolding process. Exploring their structure leads to a better understanding of their creation pathway and consequently, to developing more sensitive diagnostic methods. This paper presents the ps-2PFM adapted for the determination of local fibril ordering inside the bovine insulin spherulites and spherical amyloidogenic protein aggregates. Moreover, we prove that the proposed technique can resolve the three-dimensional organization of fibrils inside the spherulite.

Introduction

Over the past decades, although there has been significant development of numerous fluorescence microscopy techniques for bioimaging of proteins and their aggregates1, only a few have been used to resolve their local ordering within the sample2,3. Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy4 was used to study the intrinsic structural heterogeneity of amyloid superstructures-spherulites. Moreover, quantitative determination of the local ordering inside complex and densely-packed biostructures such as spherulites could be resolved using polarization-sensitive methods3. However, standard fluorescence techniques with superficial tissue penetration are limited since using UV-VIS wavelengths to excite fluorophores in vivo leads to high tissue light scattering5. In addition, such imaging often requires designing and binding specific fluorescent probes to a targeted biomolecule, thereby increasing the cost and amount of work needed to perform imaging.

Recently, to address these issues, our team has adapted polarization-sensitive two-photon excited fluorescence microscopy (ps-2PFM) for label-free imaging of biological structures6,7. Ps-2PFM allows for the measurement of the dependence of two-photon fluorescence intensity on the direction of linear polarization of the excitation beam and analysis of the polarization of the emitted fluorescence8. The implementation of this technique requires supplementation of the standard multi-photon microscope setup excitation path (Figure 1) with a half-wave plate to control the light polarization plane. Then, polar graphs, depicting the dependence of two-photon excited fluorescence intensity on the polarization of the excitation laser beam, are created from signals collected by two avalanche photodiodes, thus collecting the two, mutually perpendicular components of fluorescence polarization.

The last step is the data analysis process, taking into account the impact of the optical elements, such as dichroic mirrors or a high numerical aperture objective, on polarization. Because of the nature of the two-photon process, this method provides both reduced angular photo-selection and enhanced axial resolution, as two-photon excitation of fluorophores outside the focal plane is probabilistically limited. It was also proven that similar methods could be successfully implemented for in vivo imaging of near-infrared probes (NIR) for deep-tissue imaging9. Ps-2PFM has been previously applied to image fluorophores in cell membranes10 and DNA11,12, as well as non-standard fluorescent markers of biological systems, such as gold nanoparticles13. However, in all these examples, the information about the organization of biomolecules was obtained indirectly and required a predefined mutual orientation between a fluorophore and a biomolecule.

In one of our recent papers, we have shown that ps-2PFM could be successfully applied for determining the local polarization of the autofluorescence of amyloid superstructures and fluorescence from Thioflavin T, an amyloid-specific dye, bound to amyloid fibrils in spherulites6. Furthermore, in another one, we have proven that ps-2PFM could be utilized to detect amyloid fibril orientation inside amyloid spherulites in a sub-micron size regime, which was confirmed by correlating it with transmission electron microscopy (TEM) imaging7. The achievement of this outcome was possible thanks to i) intrinsic autofluorescence of spherulites-amyloids, when excited with either one or two photons, exhibit intrinsic autofluorescence with emission maxima located in a range from 450 to 500 nm and two-photon absorption cross sections comparable with standard fluorescent dyes14, ii) mathematical models introduced previously to describe how ps-2PEF of dyes labeling biological membranes and DNA structures could be applied to fluorescence exhibited by spherulites and dyes bound to them8,11,15. Thus, before proceeding with the analysis, we highly recommend looking through the required theory described in both, the main text and supporting information of our first paper concerning this topic6. Here, we present the protocol for how to apply the ps-2PFM technique for a label-free amyloid structural characterization of bovine insulin spherulites.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

1. Preparing the microscope slides with fully-grown spherulites

NOTE: See the Table of Materials for details about all materials, reagents, and equipment used in this protocol. All solutions were prepared with deionized water (18.2 MΩ·cm at 25 °C) obtained from the water purification system.

  1. Incubate the amyloid spherulites based on the protocol described by Krebs et al16. with some modifications, as described below.
    1. Weigh 10 mg of insulin powder in a 1.5 mL tube.
    2. Dissolve the powder with a 1 mL aliquot of the deionized H2O/HCl solution (pH 1.5).
    3. Seal the sample with the tape and put it in a thermal mixer to incubate for 24 h at 70 °C (0 rpm).
      NOTE: To perform imaging of amyloids in their native (i.e., hydrated) environment and prevent sample deformation due to dehydration, it is necessary to prepare microscope slides according to the following description (scheme shown in Figure 2).
  2. Wash the microscope glass slide thoroughly with water.
  3. Dip the slides in methanol and leave them to dry under ambient conditions on a dust-free wipe.
  4. Take a 100 µL aliquot of the spherulite solution from the tube with an automatic pipette (step 1.1.2) and add it to the well located in the central area of the microscope slide.
  5. Cover the solution with a coverslip, avoiding air bubble formation.
  6. Deposit mountant along the edges of the coverslip on the slide with an automatic pipette to seal the spherulites' native solution.
    NOTE: It is of great importance to deposit slide mountant on both the coverslip as well as slide surfaces. Do this under the fuming hood because of the toxicity of the volatile solvent (xylene). See the inset in Figure 2.
  7. Leave the microscope sample under ambient conditions for the mountant to harden.
    NOTE: The hardening process is temperature- and humidity-dependent but should be completed within 12 h.
  8. Check if insulin spherulites were formed correctly using a polarized optical microscope (POM) with crossed polarizers. Scan through the sample looking for a characteristic pattern of bright areas, called a Maltese cross, as shown in Figure 3.
    NOTE: The amyloid spherulites can be defined as spherical superstructures characterized by a heterogeneous morphology with a core-shell structure. In detail, they are composed of an amorphous core and radially growing amyloid fibrils16. Due to the anisotropic character of spherulite structures, they can distinctively interact with polarized light (e.g., by refraction) and alter their phase, which can be easily observed under POM with crossed polarizers. This method was used to study only fully developed spherulites characterized by a model-like Maltase cross pattern. Consequently, aggregates or structurally distorted spherulites were excluded from further investigations.

2. Building and aligning the system

NOTE: A schematic representation of a polarization-sensitive two-photon microscope can be found in Figure 1.

  1. Install a femtosecond laser with the output wavelength tunability in the 690-1,080 nm range, for example, operating on a mode-locked Ti: Sapphire laser with ~100 fs pulses of 80 MHz repetition rate.
  2. Add a half-wave plate mounted on a rotation stage to the excitation path of the setup to control the polarization of the incident light in the XY microscope sample plane.
  3. Install the dichroic mirror to cut off the excitation beam from the detecting optics.
    NOTE: The optical characteristics of a dichroic mirror should allow to reflect the excitation beam (to the specimen) in the NIR range of wavelengths and be simultaneously transparent for the wavelength range corresponding to emission from the samples.
  4. Install a piezoelectric scanning stage for raster scans within the XY plane for a chosen Z.
  5. Mount the high NA immersion objective, for example, an apochromatic oil immersion objective 100x/1.4 NA.
    NOTE: As the entire setup operates in an epi-fluorescence mode, the incident and emitted signals are passing by the same objective.
  6. In the emission path, add a polarizing beam-splitter that splits two-photon excited emission into two orthogonally polarized components (IX and IY)
  7. Install two photon-counting avalanche photodiodes (APDs) in a configuration allowing them to collect light transferred and reflected using the beam-splitter, respectively (Figure 1).
  8. Mount correct wavelength-dependent cut-off filters on the excitation and emission path of the system, for example, an 800 nm long-pass filter directly in the excitation optical path and a 700 short-pass filter in the emission path.
    NOTE: Analyze the emission spectra from spherulite so that any potential contribution from second harmonic generation (SHG) or laser light could be excluded using the correct emission filters. It is also worth noting that this system should also allow measurements of polarization-sensitive SHG, which could be used to resolve the ordering of biomolecules within the samples. However, the data analysis of the SHG signal differs from fluorescence, which, in more detail, was described by Aït-Belkacem et al.17.
  9. Align the whole system (using the alignment mode built in many lasers) until similar signal intensities are collected using both photodiodes.
  10. Check if the excitation beam focused by the high NA objective and imaged on a camera has a concentric circular shape as presented in Figure 4A.
  11. Adjust the scan time and corresponding power to minimalize the damage induced by the incident laser on the sample. Exemplary point-like burning is presented in Figure 4B. Measure the nominal power using a digital handheld power meter connected to a photodiode power sensor located at the entrance to the body of the microscope.
    NOTE: Biological specimens can be easily burned due to laser illumination. In this case, the 100 -900 µW power range (at the focal point of the objective lens) was found to be an excellent trade-off between sample stability and intense emission.
  12. Before the sample measurement, test the quality of alignment of optics with an isotropic reference sample (e.g., fluorescein embodied in the amorphous polymer). To perform the calibration check, follow the procedure described in section 3 using an isotropic reference instead of an amyloid sample.
    NOTE: With an assumption that the microscopy setup is ideally adjusted for the sample with isotropic properties, both 2P emission components (IX and IY) detected with two APDs should be characterized by the same intensity (Figure 4C).

3. Measurement of the bovine insulin spherulites

NOTE: To perform all the described ps-2PF measurements, hand-written software was used, which controls the positions of the piezoelectric stage and half-waveplate and collects the signal from both photodiodes, allowing for plotting of the XY scans (raster scans) from selected areas on microscope slides as well as polar graphs from specific sample coordinates. Additional notes have also been added to the protocol, which will allow users to perform the measurement without it, since both the piezo-stage and rotation stage used to rotate the half-wave plate could be controlled using their own controllers or corresponding software. Still, it is strongly recommended to write an algorithm combining the rotation angle of a half-wave plate with 2PEF intensity collected with both photodiodes since this correlation (polar graphs) is crucial for proper data analysis resulting in structural information.

  1. Mount the specimen with the spherulites on the piezoelectric stage (immobilize the glass slide with tape). Be sure to mount it in a way where a thin glass side (coverslip) is facing the objective as high numerical objectives are characterized by relatively short working distances.
    NOTE: As oil immersion is used, a small drop of mineral oil should be applied to the objective before specimen mounting and focusing.
  2. By changing XY and Z positions using microscope knobs, focus the objective on one of the spherulites found in the solution, but be aware that because spherulite diameters are typically in the range of tens of µm, focus within the central area of the entire structure. Look for black and white haloes around the specific spherulite as signs of under- and upper-focus, respectively. Adjust the "Z" axis to be between these extremes.
    NOTE: It is important to find an isolated sample without structural defects. Extremely small spherulites may drift off due to the material stress introduced by the objective while the biggest structures are probably aggregated or highly distorted.
  3. Center the spherulite in the field of view of the observed microscopic plane and determine the size of XY scan by looking at how many piezostage steps in X and Y directions (displayed on the piezostage controller or in its software) are needed to cover the area of the whole structure.
    NOTE: It is recommended to set the system in such a way that the beginning of the XY scan is located near one of the corners of the spherulite and coincides with the zero position of the stage (X and Y = 0)
  4. Adjust the following scanning parameters:
    1. Adjust the polarization of the excitation beam, and rotate the half-wave plate to obtain the polarization corresponding to the "X" and "Y" axes of the microscope sample plane.
      NOTE: This can be done by measuring the polar graphs of isotropic fluorescent medium such as fluorescein. For such materials, maximum fluorescence intensity is parallel to the excitation beam polarization; thus, rotating the half-wave plate adjusts the polarization with X and Y axis on the observation plane, also denoted as X and Y axis on polar graphs as in Figure 4C. Full polar graphs could be measured by collecting the measured 2PEF intensity on both photodiodes for 180° rotation of half-wave plate (360° rotation of excitation light polarization) and correlating the intensity with the excitation light polarization angle. It could be done manually, by measuring the emission intensity for every half-wave plate angle separately and then assembling it into a polar graph in data analysis software or automatically, using dedicated or self-written software.
    2. Adjust the piezostage parameters: scanning speed, step, and range to cover the area of the whole spherulite.
      NOTE: The scanning range must be higher than the spherulite diameter to fully frame the entire superstructure within the raster scan. Low scanning speed and step allow users to obtain high-quality images; however, this may result in sample burning. Therefore, a trade-off dependent on the spherulite size is necessary. These parameters cannot be universally applied. Exemplary parameters used in Figure 5A: scanning range 45 x 45 µm, scanning step 1 µm, and scanning speed 2 µm/s.
  5. Open the shutter, turn on the photodiodes, and collect Static equilibrium, ΣFx=0; equilibrium equation, scientific diagram; research, engineering concepts. and Static equilibrium formula, ΣIy=2PEFy equation, mechanical analysis diagram. 2P emission components for every single step of the selected scanning area-for the excitation beam polarized correspondingly to the X and then, the Y axes. Exemplary two-photon excited autofluorescence (2PAF) raster scans of insulin spherulites are presented in Figure 5A.
    NOTE: Measuring raster scans requires correlating piezo stage coordinates with Static equilibrium, ΣFx=0; equilibrium equation, scientific diagram; research, engineering concepts. and Static equilibrium formula, ΣIy=2PEFy equation, mechanical analysis diagram. collected emission components, which could be done manually, by measuring the intensity in every single point of the selected area and then assembling it into a 2D matrix, or automatically, via self-written software. Raster scans can be presented as a summation of Static equilibrium, ΣFx=0; equilibrium equation, scientific diagram; research, engineering concepts. and Static equilibrium formula, ΣIy=2PEFy equation, mechanical analysis diagram. emission components' intensity or distinctively for a specific emission component. As they are highly structure-dependent, structural distortions within spherulites are easily visible. However, due to the movement of the microscope stage, some samples may drift off from the field of view. Therefore, images need to be screened for artifacts. It is necessary to check the position of the spherulite before and after the scan.
  6. To perform full polarization analysis from the specific spot on the sample, turn off the excitation beam.
  7. Subsequently, pick specific coordinates of piezostage corresponding to the chosen location on the spherulite where the information about the orientation of molecules is required with the sub-µm resolution.
  8. Adjust the piezoelectric stage to center the field of view at indicated (X, Y).
  9. Turn on the excitation beam and perform full (360°) polarization analysis of Static equilibrium, ΣFx=0; equilibrium equation, scientific diagram; research, engineering concepts. and Static equilibrium formula, ΣIy=2PEFy equation, mechanical analysis diagram. emission by turning on the rotation of the half-wave plate (180° rotation). Present 2PF Ix and Iy components in the form of a polar graph (as shown in Figure 5B).
    ​NOTE: This step can be repeated in different locations in the sample to collect a sufficient amount of data.

4. Determination of local fibril ordering inside the bovine insulin spherulites

NOTE: All numerical calculations connected to the data analysis were done using the Python programming language and based on the functions available in libraries NumPy and SciPy. Plotting the data requires the Matplotlib library. All calculations are based on formulas presented in supporting information in one of the papers by Obstarczyk et al.6.

  1. Simulating the intensity of two-photon fluorescence excited for the specified distribution of molecules with a selected direction of the incident light polarization (denoted by α)
    NOTE: The presented formulas are based on the assumption of parallel absorption and emission dipole moments of a fluorophore. For a discussion of other cases (e.g., different directions of the absorption and emission dipole moments, energy transfer between the fluorophores), see the paper by Le Floc'h et al8.
    1. Find the parameters accounting for the variation of the electric field by polarization mixing and depolarization effects caused by the dichroic mirror mounted in a setup:
      1. γ represents the amplitude factor between the reflectivity of p(rₚ) mathematical equation representation for probability distribution analysis. and Static equilibrium equation, s(rs), in a formula focused on mechanical balance concepts. polarized light from a dichroic mirror.
      2. δ represents the phase shift (ellipticity) between p(rₚ) mathematical equation representation for probability distribution analysis. and Static equilibrium equation, s(rs), in a formula focused on mechanical balance concepts. polarized light.
        NOTE: Correctly defining these two parameters is crucial for successful structural characterization because of their strong influence on the shape of measured polar graphs11,18. In the case of the presented system, both parameters were determined during ellipsometry measurements of a dichroic mirror applied in a system.
    2. Calculate the incident electric field vectors propagating in the X and Y axesof every angle measured during the ps-TPFM measurement using equations (1-5).
      Equation for optical property analysis; integral of cosine variables; research formula. (1)
      Elliptic integral equation analysis, \(E_{YYYY}(\alpha, \delta) = \int_0^{2\pi} (\sin(\alpha)\cos(\rho + \delta))^4 d\rho\). (2)
      Static equilibrium integral equation, E_xxyy(a,γ,δ), mathematical formula for research analysis. (3)
      Equation for advanced optics; integral of trigonometric functions; optics analysis formula. (4)
      Static equilibrium formula, Ey, integral equation, research use, mathematical analysis. (5)
      NOTE If the intensity is measured over the whole 360° with step 1°, calculate electric field vectors for all 360°. All angles should be in radians. ρ parameter is connected to optical frequency ω of the simulated electric field (ρ=ω·t) and used integrated from 0 to 2π during the calculations of the incident electric field vectors propagating in X and Y axis for every angle α measured during the ps-TPFM measurement.
    3. Define the functions for transition dipole moments in directions of three axes of a cartesian system according to equations (6-8):
      Polarization equation: μx(Φ,θ,φ)=-sin(Φ)sin(θ)sin(φ)+cos(Φ)cos(θ); educational diagram. (6)
      Mathematical expression for 3D spherical coordinates, μy(Φ,θ,φ)=cos(Φ)sin(θ)sin(φ)+sin(Φ)cos(θ) (7)
      Magnetic moment equation, μz(θ,φ)=-sin(θ)cos(φ), angular dependency analysis. (8)
      NOTE: φ is the orientation angle of the amyloid fibril long axis in the XY sample frame. θ and ϕ angles are the polar and azimuthal angles used to define the transition dipole moment orientation of a fluorophore. 
    4. Use the functions defined in step 4.1.3. to define functions for Jx (Φ,θ,ϕ) and JY (Φ,θ,ϕ), which account for the contribution of tight light focusing with high numerical aperture objective to the fluorescence polarization detection in X and Y direction using equations (9, 10). 
      Equation for static equilibrium analysis; symbolic formula; educational reference. (9)
      Mathematical equation for dynamic forces in static equilibrium, featuring variables and constants. (10)
      NOTE: K1, K2, K3 factors are related to the microscope objective used during the ps-TPFM measurement. In these experiments, an apochromatic oil immersion objective 100x/1.4 NA was used and K1, K2, K3 factors were 2.945, 0.069, and 1.016, respectively.
    5. Define a function for f(Ω), which is a molecular angular distribution, depending on the half aperture of a fluorophore cone Ψ, with a variable thickness ΔΨ; use equation (11). The graphical representation of all three angles concerning amyloid fibril is presented in Figure 6.
      Equation showing probability distribution; involves sinusoidal and exponential functions; math formula.  (11)
      NOTE: Be careful while writing the exponent-the power of 2 works on the function argument, not the whole function!
    6. Define all fWWIJKL factors as shown in equations (12-21).
      Equation displaying an integral formula, possibly related to angular momentum in quantum mechanics. (12)
      Quantum mechanics equation for wavefunction Ψ integration; mathematical physics concept. (13)
      Static equilibrium; ΣF=0 equation; mathematical formula; educational research; physics analysis. (14)
      Scattering formula for differential cross-section integration, integral calculus, scientific equations. (15)
      Statistical mechanics integral equation, formula for phase space distribution, mathematical analysis. (16)
      Equation of quantum scattering in photonics; integral formula diagram; optical analysis. (17)
      Equation of quantum mechanics integration formula, scientific research use, mathematical analysis. (18)
      Static equilibrium equation, integral formula; mathematical analysis in physics research. (19)
      Spectral analysis equation, integral setup, mathematical formulation in optical study context. (20)
      Mathematical integration equation, scientific analysis, advanced research formulas. (21)
    7. Calculate two-photon excited fluorescence intensities Static equilibrium, ΣFx=0, equation, educational use. and Static equilibrium equation ΣFx=0 diagram with equilibrium forces concept illustration. for every measured angle (similarly as in point 4.1.2) using equations (22, 23).
      Static equilibrium equation \(I_{x, sim}^{2PEF}(\theta)\) formula for optical excitation diagram. = Static equilibrium equations ΣFx=0, MA=0; mathematical formula analysis; scientific computation. (22)
      Two-photon excitation fluorescence intensity equation I<sub>y,sim</sub><sup>2PEF</sup>(θ), diagram. = Equation of elasticity tensor component calculation, featuring multiple indices and summation. (23)
    8. Check if the simulation is working correctly using the following variable values (placed in the legend to Figure 7) and compare the obtained results with Figure 7A-C.
      NOTE: All degrees should be written in radians.
  2. Fit the simulated intensities into the intensity of two-photon-excited autofluorescence of bovine insulin spherulites collected during ps-2PFM measurements.
    NOTE: Resolving the spherulite structure based on ps-2PFM measurements requires using the equations written in the protocol to simulate the theoretical intensity of two-photon excited fluorescence and fitting all the parameters connected to the ordering of molecular fluorophore. It requires multiple iterations over the various values of Φ, an angle describing the rotation of the fibril in the XY microscope sample, and ΔΨ, aberrations of the conical distribution of the emission dipole Ψ due to the molecular rotations in filaments for fixed Ψ until reaching the highest possible R2 coefficient between normalized two-photon excited fluorescence signal intensity collected during measurement and normalized intensities simulated according to step 4.1 of the protocol.
    1. Determine the Ψ half-angle.
      NOTE: For bovine insulin spherulites, it should be equal to Ψ = 29°6.
    2. Fitting workflow:
      1. Choose the value of Φ from 0° to 180° (in Figure 8A and 8B Φ = 16° and 127°, respectively).
      2. Choose the value of ΔΨ from 0° to 90° (in Figure 8A,B, ΔΨ = 24° and 1°, respectively).
      3. Calculate Static equilibrium equation \(I_{x, sim}^{2PEF}(\theta)\) formula for optical excitation diagram. (equation 22) and Two-photon excitation fluorescence intensity equation I<sub>y,sim</sub><sup>2PEF</sup>(θ), diagram.(equation 23) for the whole measured range of θ angles using the chosen values of Φ and ΔΨ.
      4. Compare the intensities calculated during simulations (both normalized to the maximum value of
      5. Calculate Static equilibrium equation \(I_{x, sim}^{2PEF}(\theta)\) formula for optical excitation diagram.) with normalized intensities of
      6. Calculate Static equilibrium, ΣFx=0; equilibrium equation, scientific diagram; research, engineering concepts. and Static equilibrium formula, ΣIy=2PEFy equation, mechanical analysis diagram. (both normalized to the maximum value of Static equilibrium, ΣFx=0; equilibrium equation, scientific diagram; research, engineering concepts.) measured during ps-2PFM measurement.
        NOTE: In the presented experiments, Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients were calculated using the “corrcoef” function from the NumPy Python library.
    3. In the end, choose the values of Φ and ΔΨ leading to the highest correlation coefficients and convergence between the simulated intensities and measured signal similar to what is shown in Figure 8.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

The presented protocol provides step-by-step guidance through the preparation of amyloid superstructures for testing with ps-2PFM, construction of the microscopic system, and measurements of the proper sample. However, before the final set of measurements, it is vital to properly align the APDs with an isotropic reference, which should result in collecting a symmetrical signal of similar shape and intensity on both detectors (Figure 4C). Even minimal differences between the intensities measu...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Polarization-sensitive two-photon microscopy is a valuable tool for studying the local ordering of fibrils inside the amyloid superstructures, requiring only small modifications of the standard multiphoton setup. Since it operates on nonlinear optical phenomena, reduced angular photo-selection and enhanced axial resolution can be achieved compared to one-photon excited fluorescence microscopy methods. In addition, it leads to lower light scattering, lower phototoxicity, and deeper sample penetration when compared to the ...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Sonata Bis 9 project (2019/34/E/ST5/00276) financed by National Science Centre in Poland.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Sample preparation
Coverslips, 24 x 24 mmChemland04-298.202.04
DPX mountant for histologySigma-Aldrich6522Slide mountant
Eppendorf Safe-Lock tubes, 1.5 mL, polypropyleneChemland02-63102
Eppendorf ThermoMixer CEppendorfUsed for spherulite incubation
HLP 5UV Water purification systemHydrolabSource of dionized water used in sample preparation
Hydrochloric acid (≥37%, APHA ≤10),Sigma-Aldrich30721-M
Insulin powder from the bovine pancreas (≥25 units/mg (HPLC))Sigma-AldrichI5500
Methanol (HPLC grade)Sigma-Aldrich270474
Microscope slides with a concave, 76 x 26 x 1 mmChemland04-296.202.09
Olympus BX60OlympusPolarized Optical Microscope used in Figure 2
PTFE thread seal tape, 12 mm x 12 mm x 0.1 mm, 60 gm2ChemlandVIT131097
Microscope ps-2PFM setup
Chameleon Ultra IICoherent
FELH0800 - Ø25.0 mm Longpass FilterThorlabs
FESH0700 - Ø25.0 mm Shortpass FilterThorlabs
IDQ100 photon-counting avalanche photodiodes ID Quantique
Multiphoton short-pass emission filter 720 nm Semrock
Mounted Achromatic Half-Wave Plate, 690-1200 nmThorlabs
Nikon Plan Apo Oil Immersion 100x/1.4 NANikon
piezo 3D stagePiezosystem Jena
Polarizing BeamsplitterThorlabs
S130C - Slim Photodiode Power Sensor, Si, 400 - 1100 nm, 500 mWThorlabs
Software
LabView 2018National InstrumentsVersion 18.0.1f2
Matplotlib libraryVersion 3.3.2
NumPy libraryVersion 1.19.2
SciPy libraryVersion 1.5.2
Spyder Python 3 IDEVersion 4.1.5

References

  1. Petazzi, R. A., Aji, A. K., Chiantia, S. Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science. Giraldo, J., Ciruela, F. 169, Academic Press. 1-41 (2020).
  2. Kress, A., et al. Probing orientational behavior of MHC class I protein and lipid probes in cell membranes by fluorescence polarization-resolved imaging. Biophysical Journal. 101 (2), 468-476 (2011).
  3. Duboisset, J., et al. Thioflavine-T and Congo Red reveal the polymorphism of insulin amyloid fibrils when probed by polarization-resolved fluorescence microscopy. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 117 (3), 784-788 (2013).
  4. De Luca, G., et al. Probing ensemble polymorphism and single aggregate structural heterogeneity in insulin amyloid self-assembly. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 574, 229-240 (2020).
  5. Helmchen, F., Denk, W. Deep tissue two-photon microscopy. Nature Methods. 2 (12), 932-940 (2005).
  6. Obstarczyk, P., Lipok, M., Grelich-Mucha, M., Samoć, M., Olesiak-Bańska, J. Two-photon excited polarization-dependent autofluorescence of amyloids as a label-free method of fibril organization imaging. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 12 (5), 1432-1437 (2021).
  7. Obstarczyk, P., Lipok, M., Żak, A., Cwynar, P., Olesiak-Bańska, J. Amyloid fibrils in superstructures - local ordering revealed by polarization analysis of two-photon excited autofluorescence. Biomaterials Science. 10 (6), 1554-1561 (2022).
  8. Le Floc'h, V., Brasselet, S., Roch, J. -F., Zyss, J. Monitoring of orientation in molecular ensembles by polarization sensitive nonlinear microscopy. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 107 (45), 12403-12410 (2003).
  9. Chen, C., et al. In vivo near-infrared two-photon imaging of amyloid plaques in deep brain of Alzheimer's disease mouse model. ACS Chemical Neuroscience. 9 (12), 3128-3136 (2018).
  10. Gasecka, P., Balla, N. K., Sison, M., Brasselet, S. Lipids-fluorophores interactions probed by combined nonlinear polarized microscopy. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 125 (50), 13718-13729 (2021).
  11. Mojzisova, H., et al. Polarization-sensitive two-photon microscopy study of the organization of liquid-crystalline DNA. Biophysical Journal. 97 (8), 2348-2357 (2009).
  12. Olesiak-Banska, J., et al. Liquid crystal phases of DNA: Evaluation of DNA organization by two-photon fluorescence microscopy and polarization analysis. Biopolymers. 95 (6), 365-375 (2011).
  13. Olesiak-Banska, J., et al. Gold nanorods as multifunctional probes in a liquid crystalline DNA matrix. Nanoscale. 5 (22), 10975-10981 (2013).
  14. Grelich-Mucha, M., Lipok, M., Różycka, M., Samoć, M., Olesiak-Bańska, J. One- and two-photon excited autofluorescence of lysozyme amyloids. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 13 (21), 4673-4681 (2022).
  15. Brasselet, S., et al. Fluorescent Methods to Study Biological Membranes. Mély, Y., Duportail, G. , Springer. Berlin Heidelberg. 311-337 (2013).
  16. Krebs, M. R., et al. The formation of spherulites by amyloid fibrils of bovine insulin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 101 (40), 14420-14424 (2004).
  17. Aït-Belkacem, D., Gasecka, A., Munhoz, F., Brustlein, S., Brasselet, S. Influence of birefringence on polarization resolved nonlinear microscopy and collagen SHG structural imaging. Optics Express. 18 (14), 14859-14870 (2010).
  18. Schön, P., Munhoz, F., Gasecka, A., Brustlein, S., Brasselet, S. Polarization distortion effects in polarimetric two-photon microscopy. Optics Express. 16 (25), 20891-20901 (2008).
  19. Svoboda, K., Yasuda, R. Principles of two-photon excitation microscopy and its applications to neuroscience. Neuron. 50 (6), 823-839 (2006).
  20. Zipfel, W. R., Williams, R. M., Webb, W. W. Nonlinear magic: multiphoton microscopy in the biosciences. Nature Biotechnology. 21 (11), 1369-1377 (2003).
  21. Ferrand, P., et al. Ultimate use of two-photon fluorescence microscopy to map orientational behavior of fluorophores. Biophysical Journal. 106 (11), 2330-2339 (2014).
  22. Chipman, R. A. Depolarization index and the average degree of polarization. Applied Optics. 44 (13), 2490-2495 (2005).
  23. de Reguardati, S., Pahapill, J., Mikhailov, A., Stepanenko, Y., Rebane, A. High-accuracy reference standards for two-photon absorption in the 680–1050 nm wavelength range. Optics Express. 24 (8), 9053-9066 (2016).
  24. Mansfield, J. C., Mandalia, V., Toms, A., Winlove, C. P., Brasselet, S. Collagen reorganization in cartilage under strain probed by polarization sensitive second harmonic generation microscopy. Journal of The Royal Society Interface. 16 (150), 20180611(2019).
  25. Duboisset, J., Aït-Belkacem, D., Roche, M., Rigneault, H., Brasselet, S. Generic model of the molecular orientational distribution probed by polarization-resolved second-harmonic generation. Physical Review A. 85 (4), 043829(2012).
  26. Loksztejn, A., Dzwolak, W. Chiral Bifurcation in aggregating insulin: an induced circular dichroism study. Journal of Molecular Biology. 379 (1), 9-16 (2008).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

Polarization AnalysisAmyloid CharacterizationProtein AggregatesAmyloid FibrilsAutofluorescence ImagingNonlinear Optical MicroscopyMolecular OrganizationBioimaging TechniquesNeurodegenerative Diseases