Summary

반응성 신경교 증 트리거링<em> 생체</em> 전뇌 찔러 상해로

Published: June 29, 2015
doi:

Summary

This article describes a detailed protocol to produce a forebrain stab injury in adult mice. The stab injury induces severe reactive gliosis and glial scar formation which can be subsequently examined by standard immunohistochemistry methods.

Abstract

Following injury to the CNS, astrocytes undergo a broad range of biochemical, morphological, and molecular changes collectively referred to as reactive astrogliosis. Reactive astrocytes exert both inflammatory and protective effects that inhibit and promote, respectively, neural repair. The mechanisms underlying the diverse functional properties of reactive astrogliosis are not well understood. Achieving a greater understanding of these mechanisms is critical to developing therapeutic strategies to treat the injured CNS. Here we demonstrate a method to trigger reactive astrogliosis in the adult mouse forebrain using a forebrain stab lesion. This lesion model is simple, reliable, and requires only a stereotaxic device and a scalpel blade to produce the injury. The use of stab lesions as an injury model in the forebrain is well established and amenable to studies addressing a broad range of neuropathological outcomes, such as neuronal degeneration, neuroinflammation, and disruptions in the blood brain barrier (BBB). Thus, the forebrain stab injury model serves as a powerful tool that can be applied for a broad range of studies on the CNS response to trauma.

Introduction

A major challenge for developing successful therapies to treat the injured CNS is an incomplete understanding of the complex multicellular events that are triggered by the trauma. Reactive astrocytes are gaining increasing recognition as a promising target for novel therapies1. Though historically regarded as hostile to neural repair, reactive astrocytes are now recognized as critical components of a complex, multicellular neuroprotective response that includes attenuation of inflammatory processes and limiting secondary damage and neurodegeneration2-6. Although the neuropathological characteristics of reactive gliosis have long been well defined, the cellular and molecular mechanisms regulating reactive gliosis, and the diverse array of downstream consequences remain poorly understood. Understanding the mechanisms that drive reactive gliosis, as well as the subsequent cellular and molecular events, is an important step towards developing strategies aimed at promoting the neuroprotective properties of reactive gliosis, while attenuating the detrimental effects.

Here we demonstrate a method to induce severe reactive astrogliosis in the forebrain of adult mice using a stab injury. In contrast to other traumatic brain injury (TBI) models, such as controlled cortical impact (CCI) or fluid percussion injury (FPI), which require specialized equipment to produce an injury, the forebrain stab requires only a stereotaxic device to stabilize the head and a No. 11 scalpel blade. Thus the forebrain stab lesion model is more broadly accessible to a wide range of laboratories that do not have access to the specialized devices necessary for creating an FPI or CCI injury. The method described here enables investigators to reliably and reproducibly trigger a robust gliosis response to investigate subsequent cellular and molecular events. Once recovered from surgery, animals that have received a forebrain stab injury can survive for prolonged periods without the need for specialized care and can be returned to the colony for acute, intermediate, or chronic studies. Though less clinically translatable than FPI or CCI models of TBI, a forebrain lesion produced by a stab injury serves as a simple yet useful experimental model to investigate basic biological mechanisms underlying reactive gliosis and other neuropathological events following trauma to the CNS.

Protocol

혼합 C57BL / 6 배경에 성인 (3-4 개월) 수컷 마우스는이 프로토콜에 사용되었다. 동물은 12 시간의 빛 / 어둠주기에 보관하고, 음식과 물에 자유롭게 접근 할 수있게 하였다. 이 프로토콜에서 수행되는 모든 절차는 드렉 셀 대학 기관 동물 관리 및 사용위원회에 의해 승인 된 프로토콜에 따라 수행되었다. 1. 외과 영역 준비 70 % 에탄올로 수술 테이블을 소독 한 후 흡수 패?…

Representative Results

이 절차를 겪는 동물이 필요하지 않기 때문에, 수술후 치료 전문 단기 또는 장기 생존 시간주기 쉽게 손상 후 급성 또는 만성 병리학 조사 할 필요성에 따라, 연구에 포함된다. 이러한 GFAP와 소마의 비대의 상향 조절 반응성 신경교 증의 주요 기능은, 일찍 부상 다음 2~3일으로 관찰 할 수있다. 반응성 성상 세포에 대한 증식의 최고 단계는 부상 10 다음 일 ~ 5시입니다. 아래의 대표적인 결과 …

Discussion

그것은 두개골 또는 기본 두라는 시추하는 동안 손상되​​지 것이 중요합니다. 구멍이되지 두개골을 보장하기 위해 시추하는 동안 가벼운 압력을 사용합니다. 경질을 보장​​하기 위해 두개골 조각을 해제하는 것은 뼈와 함께 들어 올려되지 않은 상태뿐만 아니라,주의를 기울여야합니다.

전뇌의 자상 부상 모델 여기 중추 신경계에 침투 부상을 설명했다. 이러한 FPI 또는 …

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

We thank Katherine Clark for technical assistance. A.D.R.G. is funded in part by 5K01MH097957-03

Materials

Stereotax Harvard Apparatus 726049
High speed micro drill Harvard Apparatus 724950
stainless steel scalpel blade, #11 MedVet JOR581S
5/45 angled forceps Fine Science Tools 11251-35
Gelfoam sponge 12cmx7mm Fisher NC9841478
Antibodies and other reagents Manufacturer Catalog Number Dilution (brightfield)
Dilution (fluorescence)
Rb anti-GFAP DAKO  Z033429-2 1:20k
1:1k
Shp anti-BrdU Abcam ab1893 1:2k
1:500
Biotinylated goat anti-rabbit Vector Laboratories BA-1000  1:400
Biotinylated rabbit anti-sheep Vector Laboratories BA-6000 1:400
Alexafluor 488 goat anti-rabbit Life Technologies A-11008 1:400
Alexafluor 568 donkey anti-sheep Life Technologies A-21099 1:1000
DAPI Nucleic Acid Stain Life Technologies D3571 1:1000
Cresyl Violet Acetate Sigma Aldrich C5042-10G 1%

References

  1. Hamby, M. E., Sofroniew, M. V. Reactive astrocytes as therapeutic targets for CNS disorders. Neurotherapeutics. 7 (4), 494-506 (2010).
  2. Bush, T. G., et al. Leukocyte infiltration, neuronal degeneration, and neurite outgrowth after ablation of scar-forming, reactive astrocytes in adult transgenic mice. Neuron. 23 (2), 297-308 (1999).
  3. Faulkner, J. R., et al. Reactive astrocytes protect tissue and preserve function after spinal cord injury. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 24 (9), 2143-2155 (2004).
  4. Okada, S., et al. Conditional ablation of Stat3 or Socs3 discloses a dual role for reactive astrocytes after spinal cord injury. Nature Medicine. 12 (7), 829-834 (2006).
  5. Voskuhl, R. R., et al. Reactive Astrocytes Form Scar-Like Perivascular Barriers to Leukocytes during Adaptive Immune Inflammation of the CNS. Journal of Neuroscience. 29 (37), 11511-11522 (2009).
  6. Burda, J. E., Sofroniew, M. V. Reactive Gliosis and the Multicellular Response to CNS Damage and Disease. Neuron. 81 (2), 229-248 (2014).
  7. Maikos, J. T., Elias, R. A., Shreiber, D. I. Mechanical properties of dura mater from the rat brain and spinal cord. Journal of neurotrauma. 25 (1), 38-51 (2008).
  8. Garcia, A. D., Doan, N. B., Imura, T., Bush, T. G., Sofroniew, M. V. GFAP-expressing progenitors are the principal source of constitutive neurogenesis in adult mouse forebrain. Nat Neurosci. 7 (11), 1233-1241 (2004).
  9. Garcia, A. D., Petrova, R., Eng, L., Joyner, A. L. Sonic hedgehog regulates discrete populations of astrocytes in the adult mouse forebrain. J Neurosci. 30 (41), 13597-13608 (2010).
  10. Amat, J. A., Ishiguro, H., Nakamura, K., Norton, W. T. Phenotypic diversity and kinetics of proliferating microglia and astrocytes following cortical stab wounds. Glia. 16 (4), 368-382 (1996).
  11. Hozumi, I., et al. Administration of prosaposin ameliorates spatial learning disturbance and reduces cavity formation following stab wounds in rat brain. Neuroscience letters. 267 (1), 73-76 (1999).
  12. Ness, R., David, S. Leptomeningeal cells modulate the neurite growth promoting properties of astrocytes in vitro. Glia. 19 (1), 47-57 (1997).
  13. Byrnes, K. R., Fricke, S. T., Faden, A. I. Neuropathological differences between rats and mice after spinal cord injury. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI. 32 (4), 836-846 (2010).
  14. Steward, O., et al. Genetic approaches to neurotrauma research: opportunities and potential pitfalls of murine models. Experimental neurology. 157 (1), 19-42 (1999).
  15. Davalos, D., et al. ATP mediates rapid microglial response to local brain injury in vivo. Nature neuroscience. 8 (6), 752-758 (2005).
  16. Hanisch, U. -. K., Kettenmann, H. Microglia: active sensor and versatile effector cells in the normal and pathologic brain. Nature neuroscience. 10 (11), 1387-1394 (2007).
  17. Neumann, H., Kotter, M. R., Franklin, R. J. M. Debris clearance by microglia: an essential link between degeneration and regeneration. Brain. 132 (2), 288-295 (2008).
  18. Nimmerjahn, A. Resting Microglial Cells Are Highly Dynamic Surveillants of Brain Parenchyma in Vivo. Science. 308 (5726), 1314-1318 (2005).
  19. Horn, K. P., Busch, S. A., Hawthorne, A. L., van Rooijen, N., Silver, J. Another Barrier to Regeneration in the CNS: Activated Macrophages Induce Extensive Retraction of Dystrophic Axons through Direct Physical Interactions. Journal of Neuroscience. 28 (38), 9330-9341 (2008).
  20. Ip, C. W. Immune Cells Contribute to Myelin Degeneration and Axonopathic Changes in Mice Overexpressing Proteolipid Protein in Oligodendrocytes. Journal of Neuroscience. 26 (31), 8206-8216 (2006).
  21. Perry, V. H. Contribution of systemic inflammation to chronic neurodegeneration. Acta neuropathologica. 120 (3), 277-286 (2010).
  22. McKeon, R. J., Jurynec, M. J., Buck, C. R. The chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans neurocan and phosphacan are expressed by reactive astrocytes in the chronic CNS glial scar. Journal of Neuroscience. 19 (24), 10778-10788 (1999).
  23. Silver, J., Miller, J. H. Regeneration beyond the glial scar. Nature reviews. Neuroscience. 5 (2), 146-156 (2004).
  24. Zamanian, J. L., et al. Genomic analysis of reactive astrogliosis. J Neurosci. 32 (18), 6391-6410 (2012).
  25. Buffo, A., et al. Origin and progeny of reactive gliosis: A source of multipotent cells in the injured brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 105 (9), 3581-3586 (2008).
  26. Sirko, S., et al. Reactive glia in the injured brain acquire stem cell properties in response to sonic hedgehog. [corrected]. Cell stem cell. 12 (4), 426-439 (2013).
check_url/cn/52825?article_type=t

Play Video

Cite This Article
Allahyari, R. V., Garcia, A. D. R. Triggering Reactive Gliosis In Vivo by a Forebrain Stab Injury. J. Vis. Exp. (100), e52825, doi:10.3791/52825 (2015).

View Video