Summary

Multiplexed Live-Cell Imaging for Drug Responses in Patient-Derived Organoid Models of Cancer

Published: January 05, 2024
doi:

Summary

Patient-derived tumor organoids are a sophisticated model system for basic and translational research. This methods article details the use of multiplexed fluorescent live-cell imaging for simultaneous kinetic assessment of different organoid phenotypes.

Abstract

Patient-derived organoid (PDO) models of cancer are a multifunctional research system that better recapitulates human disease as compared to cancer cell lines. PDO models can be generated by culturing patient tumor cells in extracellular basement membrane extracts (BME) and plating them as three-dimensional domes. However, commercially available reagents that have been optimized for phenotypic assays in monolayer cultures often are not compatible with BME. Herein, we describe a method to plate PDO models and assess drug effects using an automated live-cell imaging system. In addition, we apply fluorescent dyes that are compatible with kinetic measurements to quantify cell health and apoptosis simultaneously. Image capture can be customized to occur at regular time intervals over several days. Users can analyze drug effects in individual Z-plane images or a Z Projection of serial images from multiple focal planes. Using masking, specific parameters of interest are calculated, such as PDO number, area, and fluorescence intensity. We provide proof-of-concept data demonstrating the effect of cytotoxic agents on cell health, apoptosis, and viability. This automated kinetic imaging platform can be expanded to other phenotypic readouts to understand diverse therapeutic effects in PDO models of cancer.

Introduction

Patient-derived tumor organoids (PDOs) are rapidly emerging as a robust model system to study cancer development and therapeutic responses. PDOs are three-dimensional (3D) cell culture systems that recapitulate the complex genomic profile and architecture of the primary tumor1,2. Unlike traditional two-dimensional (2D) cultures of immortalized cancer cell lines, PDOs capture and maintain intratumoral heterogeneity3,4, making them a valuable tool for both mechanistic and translational research. Although PDOs are becoming an increasingly popular model system, commercially available reagents and analysis methods for cellular effects that are compatible with PDO cultures are limited.

The lack of robust methods to analyze subtle changes in treatment response hinders clinical translation. The gold standard cell health reagent in 3D cultures, CellTiter-Glo 3D, utilizes ATP levels as a determinant of cell viability5,6. While this reagent is useful for endpoint assays, there are several caveats, most notably the inability to use samples for other purposes after completion of the assay.

Live-cell imaging is a sophisticated form of kinetic microscopy that, when combined with fluorescent reagents, has the capacity to quantify a variety of cell health readouts within PDO models, including apoptosis7,8,9 and cytotoxicity10. Indeed, live-cell imaging has been integral to high throughput screening of compounds in 2D platforms11,12. Systems such as the Incucyte have made the technology affordable and thus accessible to research groups in a variety of settings. However, the application of these systems to analyze 3D cultures is still in its infancy.

Herein, we describe a method to assess drug response in PDO models of cancer using multiplexed live-cell imaging (Figure 1). Through analysis of bright field images, changes in PDO size and morphology can be kinetically monitored. Furthermore, cellular processes can be simultaneously quantified over time using fluorescent reagents, such as Annexin V Red Dye for apoptosis and Cytotox Green Dye for cytotoxicity. The methods presented are optimized for the Cytation 5 live-cell imaging system, but this protocol may be adapted across different live-cell imaging platforms.

Protocol

Studies using human tumor specimens were reviewed and approved by the University of Iowa Institutional Review Board (IRB), protocol #201809807, and performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects participating in the study. Inclusion criteria include a diagnosis of cancer and the availability of tumor specimens. 1. Plating intact PDOs in a 96-well plate …

Representative Results

Our objective was to demonstrate the feasibility of using multiplexed live-cell imaging to assess PDO therapeutic response. Proof of concept experiments were performed in two separate PDO models of endometrial cancer: ONC-10817 and ONC-10811 (see Supplementary Figure 1 and Supplementary Figure 2 for ONC-10811 data). Apoptosis (annexin V staining) and cytotoxicity (Cytotox Green uptake) were kinetically monitored in response to the apoptosis-inducing agent, staurosporine. Specifically, PD…

Discussion

PDO cultures are becoming an increasingly popular in vitro model system due to their ability to reflect cellular responses and behaviors2. Significant advances have been made in PDO generation, culture, and expansion techniques, yet methods to analyze therapeutic responses have lagged. Commercially available 3D viability kits are lytic endpoint assays, missing out on potentially valuable kinetic response data and limiting subsequent analyses by other methods8. Emerging stud…

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Tissue Procurement Core and Dr. Kristen Coleman at the University of Iowa for providing patient tumor specimens and to Dr. Sofia Gabrilovich in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology for assisting with PDO model generation. We also thank Dr. Valerie Salvatico (Agilent, USA) for critical analysis of the manuscript. We acknowledge the following funding sources: NIH/NCI CA263783 and DOD CDMRP CA220729P1 to KWT; Cancer Research UK, Prostate Cancer UK, Prostate Cancer Foundation and Medical Research Council to JSdB. The funders had no role in the design or analysis of experiments or decision to publish.

Materials

1.5 mL microcentrfuge tube Dot Scientific Inc 1008113
15 mL conical centrifuge tube Sarstedt 62.554.100
554 NM LED Cube Agilent 1225012
96-well plate Corning Costar 3596 Prewarmed to 37 °C
96-well plate Agilent 204626-100 Prewarmed to 37 °C
A83-01 Tocris 2939 Final concentration is 500 nM (component of organoid culture media)
Advanced DMEM/F-12 Gibco 12634-010 component of organoid culture media
B27 Supplement Gibco 17504044 Final concentration is 1x (component of organoid culture media)
BioTek BioSpa 8 Automated Incubator Agilent BIOSPAG-SN Tabletop incubator; BioSpa OnDemand scheduling software comunicates with Gen5 to transfer plates between the BioSpa and the Cytation 5 for imaging (this protocol uses version 1.01.10)
BioTek Cytation 5 Cell Imaging Multimode Reader Agilent CYT5PW-SN Plate reader; Gen5 software is used for this device (this protocol uses version 3.12.08)
Cultrex UltiMatrix Reduced Growth Factor Basement Membrane Extract R&D Systems BME001-10
Daunorubicin HCl Sigma-Aldrich S3035 Reconstituted in DMSO
Dimethyl sulfoxide Sigma-Aldrich D2438
EDTA (0.5 M) Thermo Fisher AM9260G
Forskolin Tocris 1099 Final concentration is 10 µM (component of organoid culture media)
Glutamax Gibco 35050-061 Final concentration is 1x (component of organoid culture media)
HEPES Gibco 15630-080 Final concentration is 10 mM (component of organoid culture media)
Human EGF, Animal-Free Recombinant Protein Gibco AF-100-15-1MG Final concentration is 0.5 ng/mL (component of organoid culture media)
Human FGF-10 Recombinant Protein Gibco 100-26-1MG Final concentration is 10 ng/mL (component of organoid culture media)
Human R-Spondin 1 Recombinant Protein Gibco 120-38-5UG Final concentration is 250 ng/mL (component of organoid culture media)
Hydrocortisone Stock Solution StemCell Technologies 7926 Final concentration is 500 ng/mL (component of organoid culture media)
Imaging Filter Cube- GFP Agilent 1225101
Imaging Filter Cube- TRITC Agilent 1225125
Imaging LED GFP/CFP Agilent 1225001
Incucyte Annexin V Red Dye Sartorius 4641 Reconstituted in organoid culture media
Incucyte Cytotox Green Dye Sartorius 4633 DMSO solution
N-Acetyl-L-cysteine Sigma-Aldrich A7250 Final concentration is 1.25 mM (component of organoid culture media)
Nexcelom Bioscience ViaStain AOPI Staining Solution Fisher-Scientific 13366169 Add 1:50 volume
Nicotinamide Sigma-Aldrich N0636 Final concentration is 10 mM (component of organoid culture media)
Noggin R&D Systems 6057-NG Final concentration is 100 ng/mL (component of organoid culture media)
Penicillin-Streptomycin Gibco 15140122 Final concentration is 10 units/mL (component of organoid culture media)
Phosphate Buffered Saline (1x) Gibco 14190-144
Primocin InvivoGen ant-pm-05 Final concentration is 100 µg/mL (component of organoid culture media)
Recombinant Human Heregulinβ-1 Pepro Tech 100-03 Final concentration is 37.5 ng/mL (component of organoid culture media)
Staurosporine solution from Streptomyces sp. Sigma-Aldrich S6942
TrypLE Express Life Technologies 12604013
Y-27632, CAS 331752-47-7 Sigma-Aldrich 688000 Final concentration is 5 µM (component of organoid culture media)
β-Estradiol Sigma-Aldrich E2758 Final concentration is 100 nM (component of organoid culture media)

References

  1. Drost, J., Clevers, H. Organoids in cancer research. Nat Rev Cancer. 18 (7), 407-418 (2018).
  2. Lohmussaar, K., Boretto, M., Clevers, H. Human-derived model systems in gynecological cancer research. Trends Cancer. 6 (12), 1031-1043 (2020).
  3. Sachs, N., et al. A living biobank of breast cancer organoids captures disease heterogeneity. Cell. 172 (1-2), 373-386 (2018).
  4. de Witte, C. J., et al. Patient-derived ovarian cancer organoids mimic clinical response and exhibit heterogeneous inter- and intrapatient drug responses. Cell Rep. 31 (11), 107762 (2020).
  5. Adan, A., Kiraz, Y., Baran, Y. Cell proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 17 (14), 1213-1221 (2016).
  6. Driehuis, E., Kretzschmar, K., Clevers, H. Establishment of patient-derived cancer organoids for drug-screening applications. Nat Protoc. 15 (10), 3380-3409 (2020).
  7. Alzeeb, G., et al. Gastric cancer cell death analyzed by live cell imaging of spheroids. Sci Rep. 12 (1), 1488 (2022).
  8. Deben, C., et al. OrBITS: label-free and time-lapse monitoring of patient derived organoids for advanced drug screening. Cell Oncol (Dordr). 46 (2), 299-314 (2023).
  9. Tamura, H., et al. Evaluation of anticancer agents using patient-derived tumor organoids characteristically similar to source tissues). Oncol Rep. 40 (2), 635-646 (2018).
  10. Le Compte, M., et al. Multiparametric tumor organoid drug screening using widefield live-cell imaging for bulk and single-organoid analysis. J Vis Exp. 190, 64434 (2022).
  11. Hanson, K. M., Finkelstein, J. N. An accessible and high-throughput strategy of continuously monitoring apoptosis by fluorescent detection of caspase activation. Anal Biochem. 564-565, 96-101 (2019).
  12. Isherwood, B., et al. Live cell in vitro and in vivo imaging applications: accelerating drug discovery. Pharmaceutics. 3 (2), 141-170 (2011).
  13. Bi, J., et al. Successful patient-derived organoid culture of gynecologic cancers for disease modeling and drug sensitivity testing. Cancers (Basel). 13 (12), 2901 (2021).
  14. Binaschi, M., Zunino, F., Capranico, G. Mechanism of action of DNA topoisomerase inhibitors. Stem Cells. 13 (4), 369-379 (1995).
  15. Park, Y. Y., Ahn, J. H., Cho, M. G., Lee, J. H. ATP depletion during mitotic arrest induces mitotic slippage and APC/C(Cdh1)-dependent cyclin B1 degradation. Exp Mol Med. 50 (4), 1-14 (2018).
  16. Lukonin, I., Zinner, M., Liberali, P. Organoids in image-based phenotypic chemical screens. Exp Mol Med. 53 (10), 1495-1502 (2021).
  17. Herpers, B., et al. Functional patient-derived organoid screenings identify MCLA-158 as a therapeutic EGFR x LGR5 bispecific antibody with efficacy in epithelial tumors. Nat Cancer. 3 (4), 418-436 (2022).
  18. Ramm, S., et al. High-throughput live and fixed cell imaging method to screen matrigel-embedded organoids. Organoids. 2 (1), 1-19 (2023).
  19. Dekkers, J. F., et al. High-resolution 3D imaging of fixed and cleared organoids. Nat Protoc. 14 (6), 1756-1771 (2019).
  20. Van Hemelryk, A., et al. Viability analysis and high-content live-cell imaging for drug testing in prostate cancer xenograft-derived organoids. Cells. 12 (10), 1377 (2023).
  21. Bi, J., et al. Advantages of tyrosine kinase anti-angiogenic cediranib over bevacizumab: Cell cycle abrogation and synergy with chemotherapy. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 14 (7), 682 (2021).
  22. Bi, J., et al. Blocking autophagy overcomes resistance to dual histone deacetylase and proteasome inhibition in gynecologic cancer). Cell Death Dis. 13 (1), 59 (2022).
  23. Guo, C., et al. B7-H3 as a Therapeutic target in advanced prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 83 (3), 224-238 (2023).
  24. Gil, V., et al. HER3 is an actionable target in advanced prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 81 (24), 6207-6218 (2021).
check_url/cn/66072?article_type=t

Play Video

Cite This Article
Colling, K. E., Symons, E. L., Buroni, L., Sumanasiri, H. K., Andrew-Udoh, J., Witt, E., Losh, H. A., Morrison, A. M., Leslie, K. K., Dunnill, C. J., de Bono, J. S., Thiel, K. W. Multiplexed Live-Cell Imaging for Drug Responses in Patient-Derived Organoid Models of Cancer. J. Vis. Exp. (203), e66072, doi:10.3791/66072 (2024).

View Video