Summary

Non-invasive Imaging of Acute Allograft Rejection after Rat Renal Transplantation Using 18F-FDG PET

Published: April 28, 2013
doi:

Summary

We herein present a rat renal transplantation model to non-invasively assess acute allograft rejection using positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose.

Abstract

The number of patients with end-stage renal disease, and the number of kidney allograft recipients continuously increases. Episodes of acute cellular allograft rejection (AR) are a negative prognostic factor for long-term allograft survival, and its timely diagnosis is crucial for allograft function 1. At present, AR can only be definitely diagnosed by core-needle biopsy, which, as an invasive method, bares significant risk of graft injury or even loss. Moreover, biopsies are not feasible in patients taking anticoagulant drugs and the limited sampling site of this technique may result in false negative results if the AR is focal or patchy. As a consequence, this gave rise to an ongoing search for new AR detection methods, which often has to be done in animals including the use of various transplantation models.

Since the early 60s rat renal transplantation is a well-established experimental method for the examination and analysis of AR 2. We herein present in addition small animal positron emission tomography (PET) using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) to assess AR in an allogeneic uninephrectomized rat renal transplantation model and propose graft FDG-PET imaging as a new option for a non-invasive, specific and early diagnosis of AR also for the human situation 3. Further, this method can be applied for follow-up to improve monitoring of transplant rejection 4.

Protocol

1. Donor Organ Recovery Set up the stereotactic microscope, record weight of the 8-10 week old rat (donor and recipient body weight should match). Anesthetize the donor rat (Lewis Brown Norway F1, LBN F1) using oxygen/isoflurane inhalation (isoflurane 4 %/2 L/min oxygen). Maintain anesthesia by lowering isoflurane to 2-2.5%. Place the anesthetized rat on the surgery pad. Fix the rat’s extremities with adhesive tape onto the pad and apply ophthalmic ointment (Bepanthen, Bayer) to the rat’s …

Representative Results

Histology During AR leukocytes, i.e. mainly T-lymphocytes are recruited into the transplant, whereas the severity of the rejection is reflected by the degree of inflammation. In the Periodic-Acid-Schiff (PAS) staining depicted here (Figure 1), the renal allograft shows significant histological signs of AR, namely glomerulitis, tubulitis, endothelialitis and graft infiltration (Figure 1, aTX POD4) (POD = postoperative day) while signs of rejection a…

Discussion

FDG-PET imaging is a new option for the diagnosis of acute rejection. Because of its non-invasive and specific nature, FDG-PET is advantages in comparison to classical diagnostics by core needle biopsy. In contrast to the limited sample size of a biopsy, FDG-PET analysis the whole graft. Moreover, one can apply it to patients on anticoagulant therapy, and one can perform PET measures repetitively e.g. to monitor treatment efficiency 4. In addition, we already have shown that two major different…

Offenlegungen

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 656, Münster, Germany, projects C7 & C6) and the IZKF Münster (Core unit SmAP). The authors are grateful to Truc Van Le, Anne Kanzog, Ute Neugebauer, Wiebke Gottschlich and Roman Priebe for excellent technical assistance and to Daniel Burkert and Sven Fatum for producing radiotracers.

Materials

Equipment
Mathieu Needle Holder – 14 cm Fine Science Tools 12010-14
Castroviejo Micro Needle Holder – 9 cm Fine Science Tools 12061-01
Surgical Scissors – Sharp_Blunt Fine Science Tools 14001-12
Iris Scissors – ToughCut Straight 11.5 cm Fine Science Tools 14058-11
Student Vannas Spring Scissors Fine Science Tools 91500-09
Vannas Spring Scissors – 3 mm Blades Fine Science Tools 15000-00
Student Tissue Forceps – 1×2 Teeth 12 cm Fine Science Tools 91121-12
Dumont SS-45 Forceps – Inox Medical Fine Science Tools 11203-25
Micro-Serrefine Clip Applicator with Lock Fine Science Tools 18056-14
Micro-Serrefine 6 mm x 1 mm Fine Science Tools 18055-03
Micro-Serrefine 4 mm x 0.75 mm Fine Science Tools 18055-04
Reagent
Isoflurane (e.g. Forene 100% v/v) Abott
cutane antiseptic (e.g. Octeniderm) Schülke
Povidone Iodine (e.g. Betaisodona) Mundipharma
ophthalmic ointment (e.g. Bepanthen) Bayer
Buprenorphin (e.g. Temgesic) RB Pharmaceuticals
HTK perfusion solution (e.g. CUSTODIOL HTK) Dr. Franz Köhler Chemie
surgical thread Mersilene 0 Ethicon EH6665E
surgical thread Mersilene 4-0 Ethicon EH6732H
surgical thread Prolene 6-0 Ethicon 8697H
surgical thread Ethilon 9-0 Ethicon 2809G
surgical silk 5-0 Vömel 14739
Canula (e.g. Microlance 3, 27G ¾) BD 302200

Referenzen

  1. Wu, O., Levy, A. R., Briggs, A., Lewis, G., Jardine, A. Acute rejection and chronic nephropathy: a systematic review of the literature. Transplantation. 87, 1330-1339 (2009).
  2. Miller, B. F., Gonzales, E., Wilchins, L. J., Nathan, P. Kidney transplantation in the rat. Nature. 194, 309-310 (1962).
  3. Reuter, S., Schnöckel, U., Schröter, R., Schober, O., Pavenstädt, H., Schäfers, M., Gabriëls, G., Schlatter, E. Non-invasive imaging of acute renal allograft rejection in rats using small animal F-FDG-PET. PLoS. One. 4, e5296 (2009).
  4. Reuter, S., Schnöckel, U., Edemir, B., Schröter, R., Kentrup, D., Pavenstädt, H., Schober, O., Schlatter, E., Gabriëls, G., Schäfers, M. Potential of noninvasive serial assessment of acute renal allograft rejection by 18F-FDG PET to monitor treatment efficiency. J. Nucl. Med. 51, 1644-1652 (2010).
  5. Schnöckel, U., Reuter, S., Stegger, L., Schlatter, E., Schäfers, K. P., Hermann, S., Schober, O., Gabriëls, G., Schäfers, M. Dynamic 18F-fluoride small animal PET to noninvasively assess renal function in rats. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 35, 2267-2274 (2008).
  6. Grabner, A., Schnöckel, U., Kentrup, D., Schäfers, M., Reuter, S. Strategies for Non-Invasive Molecular Imaging of Acute Allograft Rejection by Gamma Scintigraphy and Positron Emission Tomography. Curr. Radiopharm. 4, 10-23 (2011).
  7. Racusen, L. C., Solez, K., Colvin, R. B., Bonsib, S. M., Castro, M. C., Cavallo, T., Croker, B. P., Demetris, A. J., Drachenberg, C. B., Fogo, A. B., et al. The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int. 55, 713-723 (1999).
  8. Edemir, B., Reuter, S., Borgulya, R., Schröter, R., Neugebauer, U., Gabriëls, G., Schlatter, E. Acute rejection modulates gene expression in the collecting duct. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 19, 538-546 (2008).
  9. Velic, A., Gabriëls, G., Hirsch, J. R., Schröter, R., Edemir, B., Paasche, S., Schlatter, E. Acute rejection after rat renal transplantation leads to downregulation of Na+ and water channels in the collecting duct. Am. J. Transplant. 5, 1276-1285 (2005).
  10. Reuter, S., Velic, A., Edemir, B., Schröter, R., Pavenstädt, H., Gabriëls, G., Bleich, M., Schlatter, E. Protective role of NHE-3 inhibition in rat renal transplantation undergoing acute rejection. Pflugers Arch. 456, 1075-1084 (2008).
check_url/de/4240?article_type=t

Play Video

Diesen Artikel zitieren
Grabner, A., Kentrup, D., Schnöckel, U., Gabriëls, G., Schröter, R., Pavenstädt, H., Schober, O., Schlatter, E., Schäfers, M., Reuter, S. Non-invasive Imaging of Acute Allograft Rejection after Rat Renal Transplantation Using 18F-FDG PET. J. Vis. Exp. (74), e4240, doi:10.3791/4240 (2013).

View Video