Mesh electronics probes seamlessly integrate and provide stable, long-term, single-neuron level recording within the brain. This protocol uses mesh electronics for in vivo experiments, involving the fabrication of mesh electronics, loading into needles, stereotaxic injection, input/output interfacing, recording experiments, and histology of tissue containing mesh probes.
Implantable brain electrophysiology probes are valuable tools in neuroscience due to their ability to record neural activity with high spatiotemporal resolution from shallow and deep brain regions. Their use has been hindered, however, by mechanical and structural mismatches between the probes and brain tissue that commonly lead to micromotion and gliosis with resulting signal instability in chronic recording experiments. In contrast, following the implantation of ultraflexible mesh electronics via syringe injection, the mesh probes form a seamless, gliosis-free interface with the surrounding brain tissue that enables stable tracking of individual neurons on at least a year timescale. This protocol details the key steps in a typical mouse neural recording experiment using syringe-injectable mesh electronics, including the fabrication of mesh electronics in a standard photolithography-based process possible at many universities, loading mesh electronics into standard capillary needles, stereotaxic injection in vivo, connection of the mesh input/output to standard instrumentation interfaces, restrained or freely moving recording sessions, and histological sectioning of brain tissue containing mesh electronics. Representative neural recordings and histology data are presented. Investigators familiar with this protocol will have the knowledge necessary to incorporate mesh electronics into their own experiments and take advantage of the unique opportunities afforded by long-term stable neural interfacing, such as studies of aging processes, brain development, and the pathogenesis of brain disease.
The development of tools capable of mapping the brain with single-neuron resolution is of central importance to neuroscience and neurology. Noninvasive technologies for neural studies such as electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) have proven valuable for correlating brain activity with behavior in humans1,2, but they lack the spatiotemporal resolution necessary for studying the structure and dynamics of neural networks at their fundamental micrometer and millisecond scales, respectively3,4. Certain electrocorticography (ECoG) probes and optical imaging methods using voltage-sensitive dyes have succeeded in recording single-unit spiking activity in vivo5,6, but they are generally effective only near the brain surface, limiting applicability to studies of shallow brain regions. In contrast, implantable electrical probes can measure single-neuron electrophysiology in freely moving animals from virtually any brain region without the need for fluorescent labeling, making them indispensable to systems-level neuroscience, especially as microfabrication techniques from the semiconductor industry have pushed channel counts into the hundreds and thousands3,7,8,9. By virtue of these capabilities, implantable electrical probes have made many important contributions to neuroscience and neurology, including fundamental studies of information processing in the visual system10, the treatment of neurological disorders such as Parkinson's disease11, and the demonstration of brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) for advanced prosthetics12,13.
Nevertheless, long-term instability manifested as decreasing spike amplitudes and unstable signals on timescales of weeks to months14,15 has limited the applicability of implantable probes to the study of relatively short-term phenomena, leaving questions such as brain aging and development largely unanswered. The limitations in long-term instability are a result of a mismatch between conventional probes and brain tissue in size, mechanics, and topology14,15,16,17,18. In terms of size, while neuronal synapses and somata are approximately tens of nanometers to tens of micrometers in diameter19, respectively, traditional probes are often significantly larger, in the case of silicon microelectrode arrays >4 times the size of a single neuron cell body7,8. The relatively large size of these probes may disrupt the natural structure and connectivity of dense neural tissue, thus contributing to chronic immune response and perturbing the neural circuitry being studied. In terms of mechanical properties, traditional probes are drastically stiffer than the extremely soft neural tissue in which they are implanted; even "flexible" probes made from 10–20 µm thick sheets of polyimide are at least 100,000 times stiffer than brain tissue20,21. This mismatch in bending stiffness causes relative shear motion between the probe and brain tissue, leading to unreliable single-unit tracking during extended recordings and inducing chronic gliosis at the implantation site. Finally, the topological structure of conventional brain probes necessarily excludes a solid volume of the tissue. Such mismatch in topology disrupts the connectivity of neural circuits, precludes the natural three-dimensional (3D) interpenetrated distribution of neurons, glial cells, and blood vessels within brain tissue22, and hinders 3D transport of signaling molecules23. Together, these shortcomings of conventional probes have made them fall short of the long-term compatibility sought for clinical applications and longitudinal neuroscience studies at the single-neuron level.
To overcome these shortcomings, we sought to blur the line between the neural and electronic systems by developing a new paradigm of "tissue-like" neural probes termed mesh electronics16,21,24. Mesh electronics addresses the above matching issues in size, mechanics, and topology by incorporating (1) structural features of the same nanometer to micrometer size scale of neural tissue, (2) mechanical properties similar to those of brain tissue, and (3) a 3D macroporous topology that is >90% open space and thus accommodates interpenetration by neurons and diffusion of molecules through the extracellular environment. Mesh electronics probes can be precisely delivered to specific brain regions through a syringe and a needle, causing minimal acute damage while implanting even in deep brain regions21,25. Neuronal soma and axons have been shown to interpenetrate the open 3D mesh electronics probe structure within weeks post-injection, thereby creating a seamless, gliosis-free interface between recording electronics and surrounding brain tissue21,26,27. These unique features have enabled mesh electronics probes to stably track spiking activity from the same individual neurons over at least a year timescale27. Moreover, the fabrication of the mesh electronics based on photolithography (PL) provides high scalability of the number of electrodes that can be incorporated, with demonstrated channel counts up to 128 electrodes per probe using simple contact mask lithography28 and a plug-and-play input/output (I/O) design that allows for rapid electrical connection to peripheral electronics without specialized equipment29.
A broad range of studies may benefit from incorporating mesh electronics into measurement protocols. Most intracortical recording experiments could benefit from mesh electronics' minimally invasive implantation procedure via syringe injection, the drastically reduced immune response following implantation, and the ability to leave mesh electronics in the tissue during subsequent histology and immunostaining for precise analysis of the biological environment surrounding each recording site. Chronic recording experiments in particular will derive value from the unique ability of mesh electronics to track large numbers of individual neurons for months to years. This capability creates opportunities for studies with single-neuron resolution that were previously impractical, such as longitudinal aging studies of neural circuits, investigations of the developing brain, and inquiries into the pathogenesis of encephalopathies16.
In this protocol, we describe all the key steps in a typical mouse neural recording experiment using syringe-injectable mesh electronics (see Figure 1). Steps described include the fabrication of mesh electronics in a standard PL-based process possible at many universities, loading mesh electronics into standard capillary needles, stereotaxic injection of mesh electronics in vivo, connection of the mesh I/O to standard instrumentation interfaces, restrained or freely moving recording sessions, and histological sectioning of brain tissue containing mesh electronics. Some researchers using mesh electronics only for histology studies may not require electrical interfacing and recording, in which case they may skip those steps. After familiarizing themselves with this protocol, investigators should have all the knowledge necessary to use mesh electronics in their own experiments.
All steps in the fabrication and the use of mesh electronics are important, but a few are especially critical. Before releasing the mesh electronics from their wafer, it is essential to oxidize the surface to make the meshes readily suspended in aqueous solution (step 1.6.1). If this step is skipped, the meshes usually float on the surface of the water, making them difficult to load into the needles, and if they can be loaded, they often stick to the sides of the glass needles, requiring large volumes (>100 µL) for the injection. Failure to oxidize the surface before release, therefore, typically means that the meshes cannot be used and the fabrication must be re-performed from the beginning. Another critical step is bending the mesh electronics "stem" to ~90° during the I/O interfacing (step 4.3). If the angle is less than 90°, then all 32 I/O pads will not fit into the ZIF connector; some will have to be cut off the end to allow the insertion, reducing the number of connected electrodes. The process must also be done gently to prevent the stem from breaking.
The design of mesh electronics can be customized for various applications by modifying the photomasks and using the same fabrication procedure outlined in Figure 2. For example, while the mesh electronics probes used to record the data in Figure 9 were designed to have 32 recording electrodes span the mouse hippocampus and primary somatosensory cortex, the electrode placement within the ultraflexible mesh can be selected to target virtually any brain region(s), or larger electrodes for stimulation can be incorporated27. The same basic mesh structure and fabrication procedure are retained, but the electrode placement and design are adjusted to meet the needs of the study. Investigators should use caution, however, and always test that modified designs can be injected easily through the intended needles. Small changes to the bending mechanics of mesh electronics can have substantial effects on injectability. One such example is that a 45° angle between transverse and longitudinal SU-8 ribbons yields a mesh electronics probe that can be facilely injected but a 90° angle results in one that crumples and clogs needles21.
Measuring the impedance of the recording electrodes is helpful for troubleshooting. A 20-µm diameter circular Pt electrode should have an impedance magnitude near 1 MΩ when measured at a frequency of 1 kHz in vivo or in 1x PBS29. An impedance significantly larger than this implies that the electrode is not exposed, as may happen if it is contaminated with photoresist residue, or not electrically connected. The latter may occur if, for example, there is dust on the photo mask during PL that results in a disconnect in the Au interconnects, or if one of the mesh I/O pads is not contacted by the ZIF connector pins during I/O interfacing. An impedance magnitude roughly half the expected value suggests that the channel may be shorted to the adjacent one, creating a circuit of two electrode impedances in parallel to each other. The measured impedance values act as a guide during troubleshooting; combined with optical microscopy of the mesh electronics probes, the source of the problem can usually be identified and corrected accordingly in the next fabrication run or I/O interfacing attempt.
The use of syringe-injectable mesh electronics for acute studies is limited in that single-unit spiking activity usually is not observed until 1 week post injection27, although recent work (unpublished) shows that this issue is readily overcome. Key determinants of the time required to see spiking activity are the mesh design, the volume of fluid injected into the brain along with mesh electronics, and the diameter of the needle used for injection, as these affect the degree of tissue damage during the injection and the rate of healing. Large injection volumes may be required if the mesh electronics are not treated with oxygen plasma prior to the release in Ni etchant; that is, if the mesh is not hydrophilic, it can adhere to the glass needle. Occasionally, the meshes have defects that lead to bending mechanics which make them difficult to inject. During the loading of the mesh electronics, it is important to check that meshes are moving easily and smoothly within the needle (as shown in Supplementary Video 1). If not, a different mesh electronic probe should be used. Best results for seamless neural interfacing will be achieved with the ideal injection volumes of 10–50 µL per 4 mm of injected mesh length. More recent results with finer mesh electronics probes injected and/or smaller diameter capillary needles (as small as 150 µm inner diameter, 250 µm outer diameter) show that single unit spiking can be observed from shortly after the injection (acute measurements) through longer times. Mask design files for these finer mesh structures are available by request or from the resource website, meshelectronics.org. We estimate the overall yield of our in vivo mesh injection procedures using 400 µm inner diameter (650 µm outer diameter) needles to be around 70%, although the yield is closer to 80–90% for our more recent work with 150 µm inner diameter (250 µm outer diameter) needles. The most common reasons for failure are (1) that the mesh does not inject smoothly, resulting in brain edema from unexpectedly large injection volumes into the brain, (2) mesh breakage during the manual manipulation required in the I/O interfacing procedure, and (3) bleeding from damaging a blood vessel during injection. Damaging a blood vessel during injection is rare (the cause of less than 10% of failures) and could be reduced further by using image-guided surgery. We also note that damage of blood vessels is a common limitation of all procedures involving penetration of the brain tissue, including injection of viral particles for transfection, implantation of rigid brain probes, and injection of the mesh electronics.
Mesh electronics probes are able to stably record from and track the same individual neurons on at least months to year timescales and evoke almost no chronic immune response, as demonstrated in Figure 9 and Figure 10, respectively. This represents a significant advantage compared to convention depth electrodes, which commonly suffer from decreasing spike amplitudes, unstable signals, and chronic inflammation over the course of long-term recording experiments14,15. Additionally, the mesh electronics have the advantage that they can be left in the tissue during histological sectioning, staining, and imaging, in contrast to conventional probes, which are too rigid and must therefore be removed prior to histology analyses. Hence, mesh electronics allow for the unique ability to use immunohistochemical analysis to precisely study the cellular environment surrounding each recording site.
The protocol presented here opens-up exciting new opportunities in neuroscience. The minimally invasive delivery method and seamless integration of mesh electronics with brain tissue minimizes disruption to neural circuits and avoids chronic immune response, which could benefit most types of chronic neural recording experiments. The ability of mesh electronics to record and track the same single neurons for long periods of time will especially be of interest to investigators seeking to correlate millisecond-scale spiking activity with month- to year-long processes such as aging, the pathogenesis of brain disease, or brain development16,18. Additionally, there exist substantial opportunities to extend and customize this protocol, such as adding active electronics to the PCB head-stage to implement functionality like digital multiplexing8,35, wireless communication35,36,37, and signal processing35, co-injecting stem cells or polymers with the mesh electronics to aid in tissue regeneration18,38,39, and incorporating nanowire field-effect transistors (NW-FETs) into mesh electronics for highly localized and multifunctional brain probes24,29,40,41,42.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
C.M.L. acknowledges support of this work by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-14-1-0136), a Harvard University Physical Sciences and Engineering Accelerator award, and a National Institutes of Health Director's Pioneer Award (1DP1EB025835-01). T.G.S. acknowledges support by the Department of Defense (DoD) through the National Defense Science & Engineering Graduate Fellowship (NDSEG) program. G.H. acknowledges fellowship support from the American Heart Association (16POST27250219) and the Pathway to Independence Award (Parent K99/R00) from the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health. This work was performed in part at the Harvard University Center for Nanoscale Systems (CNS), a member of the National Nanotechnology Coordinated Infrastructure Network (NNCI), which is supported by the National Science Foundation under NSF ECCS Award No. 1541959.
Motorized stereotaxic frame | World Precision Instruments | MTM-3 | For mouse stereotaxic surgery |
512-channel recording controller | Intan Technologies | C3004 | A component of the neural recording system |
RHD2132 amplifier board | Intan Technologies | C3314 | A component of the neural recording system |
RHD2000 3-ft ultra thin SPI interface cable | Intan Technologies | C3213 | A component of the neural recording system |
Mouse restrainer | Braintree Scientific | TV-150 STD | Standard 1.25 inch inner diameter; used to restrain the mouse during restrained recording sessions. |
Si wafers | Nova Electronic Materials | 3" P <100> .001-.005 ohm-cm 356-406μm Thick Prime Grade SSP Si wafers w/2 Semi-Std. Flats & 6,000 A°±5% Wet Thermal Oxide on both sides. |
|
Photomasks (chrome on soda lime glass) | Advance Reproductions | Advance Reproductions and other vendors manufacture photomasks from provided design files. Our photomask design files are available by request or from the resource website, meshelectronics.org. Alternatively, some university clean rooms have mask writers for making photomasks on site. | |
AutoCAD software | Autodesk Inc. | Design software for drawing photomasks. A free alternative is LayoutEditor. Our photomask design files are available by request or from the resource website, meshelectronics.org. | |
Thermal evaporator | Sharon Vacuum | Used to evaporate Ni, Cr, and Au onto mesh electronics during fabrication. Many university clean rooms have this or a similar tool. | |
SU-8 2000.5 negative photoresist | MicroChem Corp. | Negative photoresist used to define the bottom and top passivating layers of mesh electronics. | |
MA6 mask aligner | Karl Suss Microtec AG | Used to align each photomask to the pattern on the wafer and expose the wafer to UV light. Most university clean rooms have this or a similar tool. | |
SU-8 developer | MicroChem Corp. | Used to develop SU-8 negative photoresist following exposure to UV light. | |
LOR3A lift-off resist | MicroChem Corp. | Used with Shipley 1805 photoresist to promote undercutting during metal lift-off processes | |
Shipley 1805 positive photoresist | Microposit, The Dow Chemical Company | Positive photoresist used to define metal interconnects and Pt electrodes in mesh electronics | |
MF-CD-26 positive photoresist developer | Microposit, The Dow Chemical Company | To develop S1805 positive photoresist after exposure in a mask aligner. Many university clean rooms stock this chemical. | |
Spin coater | Reynolds Tech | For coating wafers with positive and negative resists. Most university clean rooms have spin coaters. | |
PJ plasma surface treatment system | AST Products, Inc. | Used to oxidize the surface of mesh electronics prior to release into aqueous solution. Most university clean rooms have this or a similar tool. | |
Electron beam evaporator | Denton Vacuum | For evaporating Cr and Pt during fabrication of mesh electronics. Many university clean rooms have this or a similar tool. | |
Remover PG | MicroChem Corp. | Used to dissolve LOR3A and Shipley S1805 resists during metal lift-off | |
Ferric chloride solution | MG Chemicals | 415-1L | A component of Ni etching solution |
36% hydrochloric acid solution | Kanto Corp. | A component of Ni etching solution | |
Glass capillary needles | Drummond Scientific Co. | Inner diameter 0.40 mm, outer diameter 0.65 mm. Other diameters are available. | |
Micropipette holder U-type | Molecular Devices, LLC | 1-HL-U | Used to hold the glass capillary needles during stereotaxic injection |
1-mL syringe | NORM-JECT®, Henke Sass Wolf | Used for manual loading of mesh electronics into capillary needles | |
Polyethylene intrademic catheter tubing | Becton Dickinson and Company | Inner diameter 1.19 mm, outer diameter 1.70 mm | |
5-mL syringe | Becton Dickinson and Company | Used in the syringe pump for injection of mesh electronics in vivo | |
Eyepiece camera | Thorlabs Inc. | DCC1240C | Used to view mesh electronics within capillary needles during injection |
ThorCam uc480 image acquisition software for USB cameras | Thorlabs Inc. | Used to view mesh electronics within capillary needles during injection | |
Syringe pump | Harvard Apparatus | PHD 2000 | Used to flow precise volumes of solution through capillary needles during injection of mesh electronics |
EXL-M40 dental drill | Osada | 3144-830 | For drilling the craniotomy |
0.9 mm drill burr | Fine Science Tools | 19007-09 | For drilling the craniotomy |
Hot bead sterilizer 14 cm | Fine Science Tools | 18000-50 | Used to sterlize surgical instruments |
CM1950 cryosectioning instrument | Leica Microsystems | Used to slice frozen tissue into sections. Many universities have this or a similar tool available in a shared facility. | |
0.3% Triton x-100 | Life Technologies | Used for histology | |
5% goat serum | Life Technologies | Used for histology | |
3% goat serum | Life Technologies | Used for histology | |
Rabbit anti-NeuN | Abcam | ab177487 | Used for histology |
Mouse anti-Neurofilament | Abcam | ab8135 | Used for histology |
Rat anti-GFAP | Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | PA516291 | Used for histology |
ProLong Gold Antifade Mountant | Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | P36930 | Used for histology |
Poly-D-lysine | Sigma-Aldrich Corp. | P6407-5MG | Molecular weight = 70-150 kDA |
Right-angle end clamp | Thorlabs Inc. | RA180/M | Used to attach the pipette holder to the stereotaxic frame |
Printed circuit board (PCB) | Advanced Circuits | Used to interface between mesh electronics and peripheral measurement electronics such as the Intan recording system. Advanced Circuits and other vendors manufacture and assemble PCBs based on provided design files. Our PCB design files are available by request or at the resource site meshelectronics.org | |
32-channel standard amplifier connector | Omnetics Connector Corp. | A79024-001 | Component assembled onto the PCB |
32-channel flat flexible cable (FFC) | Molex, LLC | 152660339 | Used as a clamping substrate when interfacing to mesh electronics I/O pads with the PCB-mounted ZIF connector |
32-ch zero insertion force (ZIF) connector | Hirose Electric Co., LTD | FH12A-32S-0.5SH(55) | Component assembled onto the PCB |