Summary

Biomechanical Analysis Methods to Assess Professional Badminton Players' Lunge Performance

Published: June 11, 2019
doi:

Summary

Here, we present a protocol to evaluate the differences in injury mechanisms between professional and amateur players when performing a badminton maximal right lunge movement by analyzing lower limb kinematics.

Abstract

Under the condition of simulating a badminton court in the laboratory, this study used the injury mechanism model to analyze the maximal right lunge movements of eight professional badminton players and eight amateur players. The purpose of this protocol is to study the differences in kinematics and joint moment of the right knee and ankle. A motion capture system and force plate were used to capture data of the joint movements of the lower extremity and the vertical ground reaction force (vGRF). Sixteen young men who did not have any sports injuries in the past 6 months took part in the study. The subjects performed a maximal right lunge from the start position with their right foot, stepping on and fully contacting with the force plate, hit the shuttlecock with an underhand stroke to the designated position in the backcourt, and then returned to the start/end position. All subjects wore the same badminton shoes to avoid a difference in impact from different badminton shoes. The amateur players showed a greater range of ankle movement and reverse joint moment on the frontal plane, and a larger internal joint rotation moment on the horizontal plane. The professional badminton players exhibited greater knee moment on the sagittal and frontal planes. Therefore, these factors should be considered in the development of the training program to reduce the risk of sports injuries in knee and ankle joints. This study simulates the real badminton court and calibrates the range of activities of each movement of the subjects so that the subjects complete the experimental action in a natural state with high quality. A limitation of this study is that it does not combine joint load and muscle activity. Another limitation is that the sample size is small and should be expanded in future studies. This research method can be applied to the lower limb biomechanical research of other footwork in the badminton project.

Introduction

Badminton has always been one of the most popular sports in the world. In a game, the frequency of performing lunges is relatively high1. It is of vital importance to master the ability to quickly perform a lunge and return to the start position or move in the other direction2. The lunge not only is crucial to badminton but also is of great importance to tennis, table tennis, and other sports.

The forward lunge has been taken as a function evaluation method for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency and knee stability3,4. Studies show that badminton players need both high muscular strength and professional techniques. In general, amateur players pay more attention to technical training than to muscular strength training. If an individual of low-strength ability takes a low-quality training, the training time becomes longer, therefore leading to an overload of the lower limbs and even to a sports injury.

High-intensity training results in a large load on the lower limbs, which may be the cause of sports injuries5. Lower limb injuries account for 60% of the total number of injuries. For both male and female badminton players, the knee and the foot are the most vulnerable parts6,7,8,9. Kinetic data analysis can be used to explain the lower limb injuries of players at different levels. It was reported that professional badminton players have considerable intratendinous flow which rises after repetitive load movements, especially in the patella tendon of the dominant leg.

Reports show that previously conducted research on racquet sports mainly assessed kinematic parameters but focused less on kinetics2,10. When a professional player has played a competition, the pressure is concentrated in their Achilles tendon and anterior knee tendons, especially in the dominant lunge leg5. In racquet sports, clinical analyses of injuries mainly focused on the lower limb, which exceeded 58%, specifically on the knee and ankle5,8,10,11,12,13.

Previous studies have evaluated the physiological indicators of badminton14,15,16 and the features of physical abilities17,18,19,20. Due to these basic features, basic actions on the agility of badminton are proposed to improve the training effect and the on-the-spot performance of the players21,22. Previous studies on badminton focused on different movements or directions of lunge movement without comparing the movement characteristics between professional and amateur badminton players23,24,25,26,27. These differences in dynamics and joint movement make them susceptible to different mechanisms of sports injuries.

The aim of this study is to study the differences in kinematics and dynamics between professional badminton players and amateur badminton players, as well as the range of movement (ROM) of the dominant leg. It is assumed that professional and amateur badminton players show differences in the right forward lunge and that a greater ROM increases the risk of sports injuries.

Protocol

The experiment was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Sports Science in Ningbo University. All the participants have signed written consents and were told about the requirements and process of the lunge experiment. 1. Gait Laboratory Preparation When calibrating, remove or cover other potentially reflective items in the volume, avoid the effects of reflections from sunlight, light, and other reflective items on the identification, and ensure a reasonable fluorescent…

Representative Results

Figure 2 shows the mean vGRF of phases I, II, III, and IV (i.e., the initial impact peak, secondary impact peak, weight acceptance, and drive-off phases, respectively) of the professional players and the amateur players when they performed a lunge. There is no significant difference in phases I, II, and III. However, the vGRF of the professional players is markedly higher than that of the amateur players, indicating a significant difference (<st…

Discussion

One of the disadvantages of most studies analyzing the biomechanical characteristics of the badminton lunging step is that they ignore the skill level of the badminton players performing the lunge. This study divides the subjects into professional players and amateur players to explore the differences in joint ROM and joint moment at different levels when performing a right forward lunge.

As for the ankle joint ROM on the frontal plane, the amateur players exhibited greater ROM than the profes…

Offenlegungen

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This study was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81772423), the K. C. Wong Magna Fund of Ningbo University, and the National Social Science Foundation of China (16BTY085).

Materials

Motion Tracking Cameras Oxford Metrics Ltd., Oxford, UK n= 8
Valid Dongle Oxford Metrics Ltd., Oxford, UK Vicon Nexus 1.4.116
Force Platform Amplifier Kistler, Switzerland n=1
Force Platform Kistler, Switzerland n=1
Vicon Datastation ADC  Oxford Metrics Ltd., Oxford, UK
T-Frame Oxford Metrics Ltd., Oxford, UK
14 mm Diameter Passive Retro-reflective Marker Oxford Metrics Ltd., Oxford, UK n=16
Double Adhesive Tape Oxford Metrics Ltd., Oxford, UK For fixing markers to skin
Badmionton racket  Li-ning, China BADMINTON RACKET CLUB PLAY BLADE 1000
[AYPL186-4]
MATERIAL: Standard Grade Carbon Fiber
WEIGHT: 81-84 grams
OVERALL LENGTH: 675mm
GRIP LENGTH: 200mm
BALANCE POINT: 295mm
TENSION: Vertical 20-24 lbs, Horizontal 22-26 lbs

Referenzen

  1. Cronin, J., McNair, P. J., Marshall, R. N. Lunge performance and its determinants. Journal of Sports Sciences. 21 (1), 49-57 (2003).
  2. Kuntze, G., Mansfield, N., Sellers, W. A biomechanical analysis of common lunge tasks in badminton. Journal of Sports Sciences. 28 (2), 183-191 (2010).
  3. Alkjær, T., Henriksen, M., Dyhre-Poulsen, P., Simonsen, E. B. Forward lunge as a functional performance test in ACL deficient subjects: test-retest reliability. The Knee. 16 (3), 176-182 (2009).
  4. Alkjær, T., Simonsen, E. B., Magnusson, S. P., Aagaard, H., Dyhre-Poulsen, P. Differences in the movement pattern of a forward lunge in two types of anterior cruciate ligament deficient patients: copers and non-copers. Clinical Biomechanics. 17, 586-593 (2002).
  5. Boesen, A. P., et al. Evidence of accumulated stress in Achilles and anterior knee tendons in elite badminton players. Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy. 19 (1), 30-37 (2011).
  6. Hensley, L. D., Paup, D. C. A survey of badminton injuries. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 13, 156-160 (1979).
  7. Jorgensen, U., Winge, S. Epidemiology of badminton injuries. International Journal of Sports Medicine. 8, 379-382 (1987).
  8. Kroner, K., et al. Badminton injuries. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 24, 169-172 (1990).
  9. Shariff, A. H., George, J., Ramlan, A. A. Musculoskeletal injuries among Malaysian badminton players. Singapore Medical Journal. 50, 1095-1097 (2009).
  10. Lees, A. Science and the major racket sports: a review. Journal of Sports Sciences. 21 (9), 707-732 (2003).
  11. Bahr, R., Krosshaug, T. Understanding injury mechanisms: a key component of preventing injuries in sport. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 39 (6), 324-329 (2005).
  12. Chard, M. D., Lachmann, M. D. Racquet sports-patterns of injury presenting to a sports injury clinic. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 21 (4), 150-153 (1987).
  13. Fong, D. T., Hong, Y., Chan, L. K., Yung, P. S., Chan, K. M. A systematic review on ankle injury and ankle sprain in sports. Sports Medicine. 37 (1), 73-94 (2007).
  14. Lin, H., et al. Specific inspiratory muscle warm-up enhances badminton footwork performance. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism. 32, 1082-1088 (2007).
  15. Manrique, D. C., González-Badillo, J. J. Analysis of the characteristics of competitive badminton. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 37, 62-66 (2003).
  16. Salmoni, A. W., Sidney, K., Michel, R., Hiser, J., Langlotz, K. A descriptive analysis of elite-level racquetball. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 62, 109-114 (1991).
  17. Chen, B., Mok, D., Lee, W. C. C., Lam, W. K. High-intensity stepwise conditioning programme for improved exercise responses and agility performance of a badminton player with knee pain. Physical Therapy in Sport. 16, 80-85 (2015).
  18. Chow, J. Y., Seifert, L., Hérault, R., Chia, S. J. Y., Lee, M. C. Y. A dynamical system perspective to understanding badminton singles game play. Human Movement Science. 33, 70-84 (2014).
  19. Cronin, J., McNair, P. J., Marshall, R. N. Lunge performance and its determinants. Journal of Sports Sciences. 21, 49-57 (2003).
  20. Phomsoupha, M., Guillaume, L. The science of badminton: Game characteristics, anthropometry, physiology, visual fitness and biomechanics. Sports Medicine. 45, 473-495 (2015).
  21. Madsen, C. M., Karlsen, A., Nybo, L. Novel speed test for evaluation of badminton-specific movements. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 29, 1203-1210 (2015).
  22. Walklate, B. M., O’Brien, B. J., Paton, C. D., Young, W. Supplementing regular training with short-duration sprint-agility training leads to a substantial increase in repeated sprint-agility performance with national level badminton players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 23, 1477-1481 (2009).
  23. Huang, M. T., Lee, H. H., Lin, C. F., Tsai, Y. J., Liao, J. C. How does knee pain affect trunk and knee motion during badminton forehand lunges. Journal of Sports Sciences. 32 (7), 690-700 (2014).
  24. Lin, C., Hua, S., Huang, M., Lee, H., Liao, J. Biomechanical analysis of knee and trunk in badminton players with and without knee pain during backhand diagonal lunges. Journal of Sports Sciences. 33 (14), 1429-1439 (2015).
  25. Hu, X., Li, J. X., Hong, Y., Wang, L. Characteristics of plantar loads in maximum forward lunge tasks in badminton. PloS One. 10 (9), 1-10 (2015).
  26. Lam, W. K., Ding, R., Qu, Y. Ground reaction forces and knee kinetics during single and repeated badminton lunges. Journal of Sports Sciences. 414, 1-6 (2016).
  27. Mei, Q., Gu, Y., Fu, F., Fernandez, J. A biomechanical investigation of right-forward lunging step among badminton players. Journal of Sports Sciences. 35 (5), 457-462 (2017).
  28. Abernethy, P., Wilson, G., Logan, P. Strength and power assessment: issues, controversies and challenges. Sports Medicine. 19, 401-417 (1995).
  29. Fong, D. T., Chan, Y. Y., Mok, K. M., Yung, P. S., Chan, K. M. Understanding acute ankle ligamentous sprain injury in sports. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1 (1), 14 (2009).
  30. Lin, C., Hua, S., Huang, M., Lee, H., Liao, J. Biomechanical analysis of knee and trunk in badminton players with and without knee pain during backhand diagonal lunges. Journal of Sports Sciences. 33 (14), 1429-1439 (2015).
  31. Kimura, Y., et al. Mechanisms for anterior cruciate ligament injuries in badminton. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 44 (15), 1124-1127 (2010).
  32. Mei, Q., Zhang, Y., Li, J., Rong, M. Different sole hardness for badminton movement. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research. 6 (6), 632-634 (2014).
  33. Hall, M., et al. Forward lunge knee biomechanics before and after partial meniscectomy. The Knee. 22 (6), 506-509 (2015).
check_url/de/58842?article_type=t

Play Video

Diesen Artikel zitieren
Huang, P., Fu, L., Zhang , Y., Fekete, G., Ren, F., Gu, Y. Biomechanical Analysis Methods to Assess Professional Badminton Players’ Lunge Performance. J. Vis. Exp. (148), e58842, doi:10.3791/58842 (2019).

View Video