Summary

ACT1-CUP1 Assays Determine the Substrate-Specific Sensitivities of Spliceosomal Mutants in Budding Yeast

Published: June 30, 2022
doi:

Summary

The ACT1-CUP1 assay, a copper growth assay, provides a quick readout of precursor messenger RNA (pre-mRNA) splicing and the impact mutant splicing factors have on spliceosomal function. This study provides a protocol and highlights the customization possible to address the splicing question of interest.

Abstract

Mutations introduced in the spliceosome or its substrate have significantly contributed to our understanding of the intricacies of spliceosomal function. Whether disease-related or functionally selected, many of these mutations have been studied using growth assays in the model organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast). The splicing-specific copper growth assay, or ACT1-CUP1 assay, provides a comprehensive analysis of mutation at the phenotypic level. The ACT1-CUP1 assay utilizes reporters that confer copper tolerance when correctly spliced. Thus, in the presence of copper, changes in yeast viability correlate to changes in mRNA production through splicing. In a typical experiment, the yeast spliceosome is challenged with different non-consensus splicing reporters and the splicing factor mutation of interest to detect any synergetic or antithetical impact on splicing. Here a full description of copper plate preparation, plating of yeast cells, and data evaluation are given. A selection of complimentary experiments is described, highlighting the versatility of the ACT1-CUP1 reporters. The ACT1-CUP1 assay is a handy tool in the splicing toolbox thanks to the direct read-out of mutational effect(s) and the comparative possibilities from the continuing use in the field.

Introduction

The spliceosome is a large, biological machine that catalyzes the removal of introns, non-coding regions in precursor messenger RNA (pre-mRNA)1,2. Characterizing the effect of a single point mutant in 1 of the nearly 100 proteins and 5 non-coding RNAs is often ambiguous when studying the protein or RNA in isolation. The change in the mutated component's function can best be evaluated in vivo in the context of the full, functioning spliceosome.

The copper growth assay described here is a quick gauge of splicing efficiency in Saccharomyces cerevisiae or budding yeast. Developed by C.F. Lesser and C. Guthrie and published in 1993, this assay combines the ease of working with a simple model organism and the straightforward readout of cell viability3. The viability correlates with how well the spliceosomes in these cells can recognize and splice the reporter transcript.

This copper growth assay is more commonly called the ACT1-CUP1 assay. The name ACT1-CUP1 originates from the two genes fused to create a reporter of splicing efficiency. ACT1 is yeast's actin gene, which is highly expressed and has an efficiently spliced intron4,5. Cup1p is a copper chelator that sequesters copper in the cell to prevent interference with regular cellular functions6,7,8. The ACT1-CUP1 reporter contains these genes in sequence such that CUP1 is in the proper reading frame only if pre-mRNA splicing of ACT1's intron occurs (Figure 1). The resulting fusion protein contains the first 21 amino acids of actin and the full length Cup1p protein, which increases yeast viability in a copper-rich environment3. Thus, an increase in the amount of splicing of the reporter results in a higher concentration of Cup1p and a higher copper resistance (Figure 1). In comparison to other reporter genes, CUP1 impacts cell viability even at low levels, has a wide sensitivity range, and can be used to directly select for splicing mutations3,6,7. In addition, CUP1 is non-essential for standard yeast growth, and thus cellular homeostasis is not impacted during the setup for this assay. Complementary to deletion or temperature growth assays, ACT1-CUP1 provides information about the effects on splicing under otherwise optimal yeast growth conditions.

The spliceosome recognizes its substrate through three intronic sequences, namely the 5' splice site (5' SS), branch-site (BS), and 3' splice site (3' SS). Numerous ACT1-CUP1 reporters have been generated containing non-consensus sequences at these sites. A selection of the most common ACT1-CUP1 reporters is shown in Figure 1 and Table 1. As the spliceosome interacts with each splice site uniquely at different points in the splicing cycle, the robustness of the spliceosome can be tested at different steps based on which non-consensus reporter is used. Non-consensus reporters are named for the mutated position within the intron and the base it was mutated to. For example, A3c is a reporter with a mutation at the 5' SS, specifically position 3 from the consensus adenosine to a cytosine. This reporter will interact strongly with spliceosome mutations that impact 5' SS selection and use. In their initial study, Lesser and Guthrie determined which 5' SS mutations inhibited splicing3. Later the same year, non-consensus reporters at all three splice sites were published by Burgess and Guthrie in a suppressor screen of mutations in the ATPase Prp16p9. Comparing consensus to non-consensus reporters, the ACT1-CUP1 assay has been an important key to understanding the robustness and selectivity of the yeast spliceosome and to infer the function of other eukaryotes' spliceosomes.

As non-consensus ACT1-CUP1 reporters sensitize the spliceosome to further perturbation, the impact of a single splicing factor mutation can be characterized through the reporters it positively or negatively impacts. This has been applied to splicing research questions in a variety of ways. First, the ACT1-CUP1 assay can and has been used as a genetic screen for mutations in splicing factors. For example, Prp8p, the largest splicing protein, serves as a platform upon which the RNA core of the spliceosome catalyzes the splicing reaction. This was deduced, in part, through how Prp8p mutants improved or reduced the splicing of different ACT1-CUP1 reporters10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17. Other protein components of the spliceosome have also been investigated using ACT1-CUP1, including Hsh155p, Cwc2p, Cef1p, and Ecm2p18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25. The energetic thresholds for Prp16p and four other ATPases involved in spliceosomal transition have also been studied with this assay9,26,27,28,29,30. The small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) have also been extensively studied utilizing ACT1-CUP1 to identify the pre-mRNA sequences they coordinate and the changes in secondary structure the snRNAs undergo during splicing3,31,32,33,34,35,36,37.

The ACT1-CUP1 assay requires a yeast strain where all copies of the CUP1 gene have been knocked-out. As CUP1 can have a high copy number6,38, preparation of a full knock-out strain can require multiple rounds or extensive screening. As a result, cup1Δ yeast strains have often been shared between labs, as have the reporters.

If mutation(s) in a splicing factor are being assessed from a plasmid copy, the wild-type gene for this factor should be knocked-out. In addition, the yeast background should allow for the selection of at least two plasmids, one containing an ACT1-CUP1 reporter, historically on a leucine nutrient-selection plasmid, and one containing a mutation or perturbation in the splicing machinery that will be studied (Figure 2). Usually, in a single assay, multiple yeast strains, each carrying the query splicing perturbation (QSP) and a different reporter, will test the query's impact on splicing.

The independent variables in the ACT1-CUP1 assay allow a researcher to assess the severity of a QSP. These independent variables are the concentration of copper and the selection of multiple non-consensus splicing reporters. First, as the yeast strains are grown on plates containing a range of copper concentrations (Figure 2), setting up the assay includes selecting the gradient of concentrations used. Studies can utilize a course copper concentration gradient to get an initial readout of viability and then repeat the assay with a finer gradient to identify subtle viability differences. The second variable is the wide range of ACT1-CUP1 reporters possible to test (Figure 1 and Table 1). If the QSP impacts yeast viability differently in the presence of a non-consensus reporter versus wild-type, a conclusion can be made that the QSP affects a step in splicing or a region of the spliceosome important during the recognition or processing of that region of the intron.

The yeast toolbox is extensive, and the ACT1-CUP1 assay is an integral part of splicing research. The ACT1-CUP1 assay is often performed alongside a more in-depth genetic, structural, and/or biochemical analysis on the impact of a QSP. As these more detailed studies generally have a lengthier procedure and/or higher price tag, a frequent approach is screening for interesting mutants with ACT1-CUP1 first.

Provided here is an ACT1-CUP1 assay protocol, including copper plate preparation. This assay provides researchers with an initial answer to a QSP's effect on splicing and which intronic regions are most impacted by the perturbation.

Protocol

1. Yeast strain construction Generate or obtain an S. cerevisiae strain whose background includes leu2 and cup1Δ. To generate this background, use the well-established yeast method that employs lithium acetate and single-stranded DNA39. NOTE: Haploid yeast strains may contain one, two, or more copies of CUP16,38. Refer to genomic information for the selected yeast…

Representative Results

Growth assays, like ACT1-CUP1, require the visual, comparative assessment of multiple colonies. Here, each strain was grown to saturation overnight, diluted to an OD600 of 0.5, and plated on 20 plates containing a range of copper concentrations from 0 mM to 1.1 mM CuSO4 (Figure 3). This range is smaller than that listed in the protocol as it allowed for the full assessment of the impact of the QSPs and ACT1-CUP1 reporters used and described below. The plates were imaged…

Discussion

ACT1-CUP1 is a growth assay, and care must be taken to ensure that observed growth differences can only be attributed to splicing defects. All strains should be handled in a similar fashion prior to plating, including having a similar length and type of growth and storage conditions. If using temperature-sensitive strains, ACT1-CUP1 assays should only be performed under conditions where those strains grow comparably to wild type. Relatedly, for the QSP component, it is advised to have identical yeast backgrounds and expr…

Offenlegungen

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Thank you to Aaron Hoskins and the Hoskins lab members at the University of Wisconsin-Madison for use of yeast strains and equipment in the generation of figures 3-5. Thank you to Harpreet Kaur and Xingyang Fu for their insightful comments on the manuscript. Thank you to the supportive students, staff, and faculty at Northwest University during the writing, editing, and filming of this paper. Thank you to Isabelle Marasigan for help in filming this method.

Materials

1.5 mL sterile microcentrifuge tubes Fisher Scientific 05-408-129 Or comparable item from a different manufacturer.
2 mL sterile microcentrifuge tubes Fisher Scientific 05-408-138 Or comparable item from a different manufacturer.
50 mL sterile centrifuge tubes Fisher Scientific 07-201-332 Or comparable item from a different manufacturer.
96-well round bottom microplate Fisher Scientific 07-200-760 Or comparable item from a different manufacturer.
190 proof ethanol Fisher Scientific 22-032-600 Or comparable item from a different manufacturer.
500 mL Filter System (0.22 µm) CellTreat Scientific Products 229707 Or comparable item from a different manufacturer.
Agar Fisher Scientific BP1423-500 Any molecular grade agar will work.
Autoclave Tuttnauer 3870EA Or comparable item from a different manufacturer.
Bunsen burner Humboldt PN6200.1 Or comparable item from a different manufacturer.
Cell Density Meter VWR 490005-906 Or other spectral device that can measure absorbance at 595 nm.
Copper sulfate Pentahydrate Fisher Scientific LC134051 Or comparable item from a different manufacturer.
Digital imaging system Cytiva 29399481 ImageQuant 4000 (used for Figure 3),  Amersham ImageQuant 800, or comparable item from a different manufacturer.
Dropout mix (-Leu) USBiological Life Sciences D9525 Use the appropriate drop out mix for your experiment. It is possible you will be using a yeast nutrient marker for your query perturbation also. In that case, the drop out mix should be for that marker and Leu
D-Glucose Fisher Scientific AAA1682836 Or comparable item from a different manufacturer.
Gel band quantifying software Cytiva 29-0006-05 ImageQuant TL v8.1 (used for figure 5A) or comparable item from a different manufacturer.
Hand held camera Nikon D3500 Or comparable item from a different manufacturer.
Near infra-red gel imaging device Cytiva 29238583 Amersham Typhoon NIR (used for Figure 5a) or comparable item from a different manufacturer.
Laboratory grade clamp Fisher Scientific 05-769-7Q Or comparable item from a different manufacturer.
Laboratory grade stand and clamp Fisher Scientific 12-000-101 Or comparable item from a different manufacturer.
Magnetic stir bars Fisher Scientific 14-513-51 Or comparable item from a different manufacturer.
Pin replicator VP Scientific VP 407AH
Semi-micro disposable cuvettes VWR 97000-590 Or comparable item from a different manufacturer.
Shaker JEIO Tech IST-3075 Or comparable item from a different manufacturer.
Spectrophotometer Biowave 80-3000-45 Or any spectophotometer that can measure the absorbance at 600 nm.
Square plates VWR 102091-156 Circular plates may also be used though are more challenging if using a pin replicator.
Stir plate Fisher Scientific 11-520-16S Or comparable item from a different manufacturer.
Yeast nitrogen base USBiological Life Sciences Y2025 Or comparable item from a different manufacturer.

Referenzen

  1. Wahl, M. C., Will, C. L., Luhrmann, R. The spliceosome: Design principles of a dynamic RNP machine. Cell. 136 (4), 701-718 (2009).
  2. Wilkinson, M. E., Charenton, C., Nagai, K. RNA splicing by the spliceosome. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 89, 359-388 (2020).
  3. Lesser, C. F., Guthrie, C. Mutational analysis of pre-mRNA splicing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using a sensitive new reporter gene, CUP1. Genetik. 133 (4), 851-863 (1993).
  4. Ng, R., Abelson, J. Isolation and sequence of the gene for actin in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 77 (7), 3912-3916 (1980).
  5. Gallwitz, D., Sures, I. Structure of a split yeast gene: Complete nucleotide sequence of the actin gene in I. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 77 (5), 2546-2550 (1980).
  6. Fogel, S., Welch, J. W., Cathala, G., Karin, M. Gene amplification in yeast: CUP1 copy number regulates copper resistance. Current Genetics. 7 (5), 347-355 (1983).
  7. Hamer, D. H., Thiele, D. J., Lemontt, J. E. Function and autoregulation of yeast copperthionein. Science. 228 (4700), 685-690 (1985).
  8. Winge, D. R., Nielson, K. B., Gray, W. R., Hamer, D. H. Yeast metallothionein. Sequence and metal-binding properties. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 260 (27), 14464-14470 (1985).
  9. Burgess, S. M., Guthrie, C. A mechanism to enhance mRNA splicing fidelity: The RNA-dependent ATPase Prp16 governs usage of a discard pathway for aberrant lariat intermediates. Cell. 73 (7), 1377-1391 (1993).
  10. Collins, C. A., Guthrie, C. Allele-specific genetic interactions between Prp8 and RNA active site residues suggest a function for Prp8 at the catalytic core of the spliceosome. Genes & Development. 13 (15), 1970-1982 (1999).
  11. Siatecka, M., Reyes, J. L., Konarska, M. M. Functional interactions of Prp8 with both splice sites at the spliceosomal catalytic center. Genes & Development. 13 (15), 1983-1993 (1999).
  12. Umen, J. G., Guthrie, C. Mutagenesis of the yeast gene PRP8 reveals domains governing the specificity and fidelity of 3′ splice site selection. Genetik. 143 (2), 723-739 (1996).
  13. Grainger, R. J., Beggs, J. D. Prp8 protein: At the heart of the spliceosome. RNA. 11 (5), 533-557 (2005).
  14. Query, C. C., Konarska, M. M. Suppression of multiple substrate mutations by spliceosomal prp8 alleles suggests functional correlations with ribosomal ambiguity mutants. Molecular Cell. 14 (3), 343-354 (2004).
  15. Konarska, M. M., Vilardell, J., Query, C. C. Repositioning of the reaction intermediate within the catalytic center of the spliceosome. Molecular Cell. 21 (4), 543-553 (2006).
  16. Liu, L., Query, C. C., Konarska, M. M. Opposing classes of prp8 alleles modulate the transition between the catalytic steps of pre-mRNA splicing. Nature Structural and Molecular Biology. 14 (6), 519-526 (2007).
  17. MacRae, A. J., et al. Prp8 positioning of U5 snRNA is linked to 5′ splice site recognition. RNA. 24 (6), 769-777 (2018).
  18. Query, C. C., Konarska, M. M. CEF1/CDC5 alleles modulate transitions between catalytic conformations of the spliceosome. RNA. 18 (5), 1001-1013 (2012).
  19. Tang, Q., et al. SF3B1/Hsh155 HEAT motif mutations affect interaction with the spliceosomal ATPase Prp5, resulting in altered branch site selectivity in pre-mRNA splicing. Genes & Development. 30 (24), 2710-2723 (2016).
  20. Carrocci, T. J., Zoerner, D. M., Paulson, J. C., Hoskins, A. A. SF3b1 mutations associated with myelodysplastic syndromes alter the fidelity of branchsite selection in yeast. Nucleic Acids Research. 45 (8), 4837-4852 (2017).
  21. Kaur, H., Groubert, B., Paulson, J. C., McMillan, S., Hoskins, A. A. Impact of cancer-associated mutations in Hsh155/SF3b1 HEAT repeats 9-12 on pre-mRNA splicing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS One. 15 (4), 0229315 (2020).
  22. vander Feltz, C., et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ecm2 modulates the catalytic steps of pre-mRNA splicing. RNA. 27 (5), 591-603 (2021).
  23. Carrocci, T. J., Paulson, J. C., Hoskins, A. A. Functional analysis of Hsh155/SF3b1 interactions with the U2 snRNA/branch site duplex. RNA. 24 (8), 1028-1040 (2018).
  24. Hogg, R., de Almeida, R. A., Ruckshanthi, J. P., O’Keefe, R. T. Remodeling of U2-U6 snRNA helix I during pre-mRNA splicing by Prp16 and the NineTeen Complex protein Cwc2. Nucleic Acids Research. 42 (12), 8008-8023 (2014).
  25. Hansen, S. R., Nikolai, B. J., Spreacker, P. J., Carrocci, T. J., Hoskins, A. A. Chemical inhibition of pre-mRNA splicing in living Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell Chemical Biology. 26 (3), 443-448 (2019).
  26. Xu, Y. Z., Query, C. C. Competition between the ATPase Prp5 and branch region-U2 snRNA pairing modulates the fidelity of spliceosome assembly. Molecular Cell. 28 (5), 838-849 (2007).
  27. Staley, J. P., Guthrie, C. An RNA switch at the 5′ splice site requires ATP and the DEAD box protein Prp28p. Molecular Cell. 3 (1), 55-64 (1999).
  28. Bousquet-Antonelli, C., Presutti, C., Tollervey, D. Identification of a regulated pathway for nuclear pre-mRNA turnover. Cell. 102 (6), 765-775 (2000).
  29. Villa, T., Guthrie, C. The Isy1p component of the NineTeen complex interacts with the ATPase Prp16p to regulate the fidelity of pre-mRNA splicing. Genes & Development. 19 (16), 1894-1904 (2005).
  30. Mayas, R. M., Maita, H., Staley, J. P. Exon ligation is proofread by the DExD/H-box ATPase Prp22p. Nature Structure and Molecular Biology. 13 (6), 482-490 (2006).
  31. Lesser, C. F., Guthrie, C. Mutations in U6 snRNA that alter splice site specificity: Implications for the active site. Science. 262 (5142), 1982-1988 (1993).
  32. McPheeters, D. S. Interactions of the yeast U6 RNA with the pre-mRNA branch site. RNA. 2 (11), 1110-1123 (1996).
  33. Perriman, R. J., Ares, M. Rearrangement of competing U2 RNA helices within the spliceosome promotes multiple steps in splicing. Genes & Development. 21 (7), 811-820 (2007).
  34. Mefford, M. A., Staley, J. P. Evidence that U2/U6 helix I promotes both catalytic steps of pre-mRNA splicing and rearranges in between these steps. RNA. 15 (7), 1386-1397 (2009).
  35. Hilliker, A. K., Mefford, M. A., Staley, J. P. U2 toggles iteratively between the stem IIa and stem IIc conformations to promote pre-mRNA splicing. Genes & Development. 21 (7), 821-834 (2007).
  36. Wu, G., et al. Pseudouridines in U2 snRNA stimulate the ATPase activity of Prp5 during spliceosome assembly. EMBO Journal. 35 (6), 654-667 (2016).
  37. Crotti, L. B., Bacikova, D., Horowitz, D. S. The Prp18 protein stabilizes the interaction of both exons with the U5 snRNA during the second step of pre-mRNA splicing. Genes & Development. 21 (10), 1204-1216 (2007).
  38. Fogel, S., Welch, J. W. Tandem gene amplification mediates copper resistance in yeast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 79 (17), 5342-5346 (1982).
  39. Gardner, J. M., Jaspersen, S. L. Manipulating the yeast genome: Deletion, mutation, and tagging by PCR. Methods Molecular Biology. 1205, 45-78 (2014).
  40. JoVE. Yeast Transformation and Cloning. In Biology I: yeast, Drosophila and C. Elegant. JoVE Science Education Database. , (2021).
  41. Gietz, R. D., Woods, R. A. Yeast transformation by the LiAc/SS Carrier DNA/PEG method. Methods Molecular Biology. 313, 107-120 (2006).
  42. Gietz, R. D., Woods, R. A. Genetic transformation of yeast. Biotechniques. 30 (4), 816 (2001).
  43. Mayerle, M., et al. Structural toggle in the RNaseH domain of Prp8 helps balance splicing fidelity and catalytic efficiency. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 114 (18), 4739-4744 (2017).
  44. Schindelin, J., et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods. 9 (7), 676-682 (2012).
  45. Beier, D. H., et al. Dynamics of the DEAD-box ATPase Prp5 RecA-like domains provide a conformational switch during spliceosome assembly. Nucleic Acids Research. 47 (20), 10842-10851 (2019).
  46. vander Feltz, C., DeHaven, A. C., Hoskins, A. A. Stress-induced pseudouridylation alters the structural equilibrium of yeast U2 snRNA Stem II. Journal of Molecular Biology. 430 (4), 524-536 (2018).
  47. Rodgers, M. L., Didychuk, A. L., Butcher, S. E., Brow, D. A., Hoskins, A. A. A multi-step model for facilitated unwinding of the yeast U4/U6 RNA duplex. Nucleic Acids Research. 44 (22), 10912-10928 (2016).
  48. Stutz, F., Rosbash, M. A functional interaction between Rev and yeast pre-mRNA is related to splicing complex formation. EMBO Journal. 13 (17), 4096-4104 (1994).
  49. Libri, D., Lescure, A., Rosbash, M. Splicing enhancement in the yeast rp51b intron. RNA. 6 (3), 352-368 (2000).
  50. Libri, D., Stutz, F., McCarthy, T., Rosbash, M. RNA structural patterns and splicing: Molecular basis for an RNA-based enhancer. RNA. 1 (4), 425-436 (1995).
  51. Howe, K. J., Kane, C. M., Ares, M. Perturbation of transcription elongation influences the fidelity of internal exon inclusion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. RNA. 9 (8), 993-1006 (2003).
  52. Cuenca-Bono, B., et al. SUS1 introns are required for efficient mRNA nuclear export in yeast. Nucleic Acids Research. 39 (19), 8599-8611 (2011).
  53. Scherrer, F. W., Spingola, M. A subset of Mer1p-dependent introns requires Bud13p for splicing activation and nuclear retention. RNA. 12 (7), 1361-1372 (2006).
  54. Hálová, M., et al. Nineteen complex-related factor Prp45 is required for the early stages of cotranscriptional spliceosome assembly. RNA. 23 (10), 1512-1524 (2017).
  55. Umen, J. G., Guthrie, C. A novel role for a U5 snRNP protein in 3′ splice site selection. Genes & Development. 9 (7), 855-868 (1995).
  56. Crotti, L. B., Horowitz, D. S. Exon sequences at the splice junctions affect splicing fidelity and alternative splicing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 106 (45), 18954-18959 (2009).
  57. Perriman, R., Ares, M. Invariant U2 snRNA nucleotides form a stem loop to recognize the intron early in splicing. Molecular Cell. 38 (3), 416-427 (2010).
check_url/de/63232?article_type=t

Play Video

Diesen Artikel zitieren
van der Feltz, C. ACT1-CUP1 Assays Determine the Substrate-Specific Sensitivities of Spliceosomal Mutants in Budding Yeast. J. Vis. Exp. (184), e63232, doi:10.3791/63232 (2022).

View Video