Summary

5-Aminolevulinic Acid-mediated Photodynamic Therapy on Primary Bone Tumor and Bone Metastases Cell Lines

Published: May 10, 2022
doi:

Summary

This protocol presents a step-by-step methodological approach of exposing bone metastatic cells lines and primary bone tumors to 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic therapy (PDT). The effects on cell migration potential/invasiveness, viability, apoptosis, and senescence potential are also analyzed following PDT exposure.

Abstract

Bone metastases are associated with poor prognosis and low quality of life for the affected patients. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) emerges as a noninvasive therapy that can target local metastatic bone lesions. This paper presents an in vitro method to study the PDT effect in adherent cell lines. To this end, we demonstrate a step-by-step approach to subject both primary (giant cell bone tumor) and human bone metastatic cancer cell lines (derived from a primary invasive ductal breast carcinoma and renal carcinoma) to 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA)-mediated PDT.

After 24 h post 5-ALA-PDT irradiation (blue light-wavelength 436 nm), the therapeutic effect was assessed in terms of cell migration potential, viability, apoptotic features, and cellular growth arrest (senescence). Post 5-ALA-PDT irradiation, musculoskeletal-derived cell lines respond differently to the same doses and exposure of PDT. Depending on the extent of cellular damage triggered by PDT exposure, two different cell fates-apoptosis and senescence were noted. Variable sensitivity to PDT therapy among different bone cancer cell lines provides useful information for selecting more appropriate PDT settings in clinical settings. This protocol is designed to exemplify the use of PDT in the context of musculoskeletal neoplastic cell lines. It may be adjusted to investigate the therapeutic effect of PDT on various cancer cell lines and various photosensitizers and light sources.

Introduction

Therapeutic options for bone metastases are still limited and challenging despite ongoing developments in oncological treatment. The current standard method is radiotherapy, which is associated with complications such as local erythema, toxicity to inner organs1, and insufficient fractures2. There is a need for alternative antineoplastic therapies as patients with bone metastases often suffer from pain, hypercalcemia, and neurological symptoms that result in impaired mobility and reduced quality of life3. Recent findings demonstrate that PDT provides a promising, alternative, antineoplastic treatment option to directly target bone lesions, which can be used alone or supportively to radiotherapy4.

The mechanism of PDT is essentially based on an energy transfer from a light-excited photosensitive compound (photosensitizer) to tissue oxygen. This photosensitizer works similarly to a capacitor on a nanoscopic level. It can store energy in a ground state when irradiated with an appropriate wavelength of light and releases stored energy when it returns from an excited state to the original ground state5. The released energy leads to two photochemical reactions: one is the transformation of oxygen to reactive oxygen radicals by transferring hydrogen or an electron. The second is the production of singlet oxygen particles by horizontal energy transfer from the photosensitizer substrate to local triplet oxygen particles6. Reactive oxygen radicals and singlet oxygen molecules have highly cytotoxic effects on local tumor cells and induce vascular occlusion and local inflammatory response by apoptosis of endothelial cells of tumor blood vessels7.

Conventional photosensitizers are derivatives of the porphyrin family such as hematoporphyrins and benzoporphyrins8. Applying photosensitizer substances with higher affinity to tumor tissue can increase the selectivity of PDT9 y. In particular, 5-ALA, which is a biosynthetic precursor of protoporphyrin IX, can accumulate in tumor cells such as actinic keratosis, basal cell carcinoma, bladder tumor, and gastrointestinal cancer5. Different delivery approaches using 5-ALA can also vary the efficiency of PDT in relation to tumor localization. Thus, topical use of 5-ALA with the application of PDT became the first-line dermatologic therapy against actinic keratosis10. Recent results for bone metastases of invasive ductal breast cancer cell lines indicate possible inhibition of cell migration and induction of apoptosis after exposure to PDT with 5-ALA11. However, using PDT in subfascial human tissue such as bone tissue is still in its preclinical to experimental clinical stage as the efficacy needs to be improved. Applications of nanoparticles with light-based therapy already show great impact in dentistry12. Thus, it is likely that combining the use of nanoparticles with PDT will expand its application range towards orthopedic oncology.

The following protocol describes how to prepare both cells originating from primary bone tumors and bone metastases cell lines and subject them to 5-ALA-mediated PDT for a predefined time exposure. A detailed description of how to perform and assess the cellular migration potential, vitality, and senescence post 5-ALA-PDT irradiation is also included. Step-by-step instructions provide a straightforward and concise approach to acquire reliable and reproducible data. The advantages, limitations, and future perspectives of the PDT approach for bone neoplastic lesions are also discussed.

Protocol

Three different types of cell lines were employed: "MAM"-a cell line originating from bone metastases of renal cell carcinoma, "MAC"-bone metastases of an invasive ductal breast carcinoma, and "17-1012"-a giant cell tumor of bone. Marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were used as a control group. Institutional and ethical approval was obtained before the commencement of the study (project number: 008/2014BO2-for the cancer cell lines and project number: 401/2013 BO2 for MSCs). <p class…

Representative Results

Following 5-ALA PDT exposure, the MSC-control group showed no notable effect in terms of migration following 5-ALA PDT irradiation (Figure 2A, i, v, ix). In contrast, MAC cells (Figure 1B and Figure 2A, iii, vii, xi) and 17-1012 (Figure 1B and Figure 2A, ii, vi, x) cells exhibited a decrease in migration potential for both …

Discussion

Despite current treatment options, cancer therapeutic response is variable, advocating in favor of novel approaches or even combination therapies to treat bone metastases while preserving the initial tissue structure. In this context, PDT is a promising alternative. From a simplistic point of view, PDT is comprised of two basic components: (1) a nontoxic light-sensitive dye termed photosensitizer (PS) and (2) an external light source of the appropriate wavelength that matches the absorption spectrum of the PS and activat…

Offenlegungen

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

We thank our co-authors from the original publications for their help and support.

Materials

300 s metered card for PDT IlluminOss Medical Inc., East Providence, Rhode Insland, USA n/a http://www.illuminoss.com
5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) photosensitizer Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA A7793 10 mg
6 Well plates Greiner Bio-One, Frickenhausen, Germany 657160
8 Well Chamber Slides SARSTEDT AG & Co. KG, Munich, Germany 94.6140.802
96 Well plates (F-buttom) Greiner Bio-One, Frickenhausen, Germany 655180
CellTiter 96 Aqueous One
Solution Cell Proliferation
Assay (MTS-Assay)
Promega, Fitchburg,
Wisconsin, USA
G3580
Cellular Senescence Assay Biotrend Chemikalien GmbH, Köln, Germany CBA-231 Quantitative senescence-associated ß-galactosidase assay
Coomassie Brilliant Blue R250 Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, Missouri, USA 35055 0.5% (w/v)
Culture-Inserts 2Well ibidi GmbH, Gräfelfing, Germany 80209
DMEM (1x) + GlutaMax-I Life Technologies, Carlsbad, Kalifornien, USA 31966-021
Fetal bovine serum (FBS) Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, Missouri, USA F7524
Fluorescence microplate reader Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA GlowMAx®,
GM3510
Hemocytometer Hecht Assistent, Sondheim, Deutschland 4042
ImageJ National Institutes of Health, Be-thesda, Maryland, USA ImageJ (version: 1.53a) Software for processing and analyzing scientific images; https://imagej.net/
Inverse phase-contrast microscope Leica, Wetzlar, Germany DM IMBRE 100
Methanol AnulaR Normapur VWR, Fontenay-Sous-Bois, France 20847.307
Paraformaldehyd Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, Missouri, USA 158127 Powder, 95% purity
PDT device (light box and accesories) IlluminOss Medical Inc., East Providence, Rhode Insland, USA n/a Blue light 436 nm, 36 J/cm2 http://www.illuminoss.com
Penicillin-Streptomycin Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA 15140-122 10,000 U/mL Penicillin
10,000 μg/mL Streptomycin
Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA 10010-015
RPMI 1640 Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA 21875034
Spectrophotomete/ microplate reader BioTek Instruments GmbH, Bad Friedrichshall, Germany EL800
Trypan Blue dye 0.4% Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, Missouri, USA T8154
Trypsin-EDTA 10x Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, Missouri, USA T4174

Referenzen

  1. Milano, M. T., Constine, L. S., Okunieff, P. Normal tissue tolerance dose metrics for radiation therapy of major organs. Seminars in Radiation Oncology. 17 (2), 131-140 (2007).
  2. Higham, C. E., Faithfull, S. Bone health and pelvic radiotherapy. Clinical Oncology. 27 (11), 668-678 (2015).
  3. von Moos, R., et al. Pain and health-related quality of life in patients with advanced solid tumours and bone metastases: integrated results from three randomized, double-blind studies of denosumab and zoledronic acid. Supportive Care in Cancer. 21 (12), 3497-3507 (2013).
  4. Stewart, F., Baas, P., Star, W. What does photodynamic therapy have to offer radiation oncologists (or their cancer patients). Radiotherapy and Oncology. 48 (3), 233-248 (1998).
  5. Dolmans, D. E. J. G. J., Fukumura, D., Jain, R. K. Photodynamic therapy for cancer. Nature Reviews Cancer. 3 (5), 380-387 (2003).
  6. Kwiatkowski, S., et al. Photodynamic therapy-mechanisms, photosensitizers and combinations. Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy. 106, 1098-1107 (2018).
  7. Huang, Z., et al. Photodynamic therapy for treatment of solid tumors–potential and technical challenges. Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment. 7 (4), 309-320 (2008).
  8. Kou, J., Dou, D., Yang, L. Porphyrin photosensitizers in photodynamic therapy and its applications. Oncotarget. 8 (46), 81591-81603 (2017).
  9. Josefsen, L. B., Boyle, R. W. Photodynamic therapy: novel third-generation photosensitizers one step closer. British Journal of Pharmacology. 154 (1), 1-3 (2008).
  10. Dragieva, G., et al. A randomized controlled clinical trial of topical photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolaevulinate in the treatment of actinic keratoses in transplant recipients. British Journal of Dermatology. 151 (1), 196-200 (2004).
  11. Sachsenmaier, S. M., et al. Assessment of 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic therapy on bone metastases: an in vitro study. Biologie. 10 (10), 1020 (2021).
  12. Mitsiadis, T. A., Woloszyk, A., Jiménez-Rojo, L. Nanodentistry: combining nanostructured materials and stem cells for dental tissue regeneration. Nanomedicine. 7 (11), 1743-1753 (2012).
  13. Ricardo, R., Phelan, K. Counting and determining the viability of cultured cells. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE. (16), e752 (2008).
  14. Nunes, J. P. S., Dias, A. A. M. ImageJ macros for the user-friendly analysis of soft-agar and wound-healing assays. BioTechniques. 62 (4), 175-179 (2017).
  15. Dai, T., et al. Concepts and principles of photodynamic therapy as an alternative antifungal discovery platform. Frontiers in Microbiology. 3, 120 (2012).
  16. Chen, X., Zhao, P., Chen, F., Li, L., Luo, R. Effect and mechanism of 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic therapy in esophageal cancer. Lasers in Medical Science. 26 (1), 69-78 (2011).
  17. Bacellar, I. O., Tsubone, T. M., Pavani, C., Baptista, M. S. Photodynamic efficiency: from molecular photochemistry to cell death. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 16 (9), 20523-20559 (2015).
  18. Song, Y. S., Lee, B. Y., Hwang, E. S. Dinstinct ROS and biochemical profiles in cells undergoing DNA damage-induced senescence and apoptosis. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development. 126 (5), 580-590 (2005).
  19. Faber, J., Fonseca, L. M. How sample size influences research outcomes. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. 19 (4), 27-29 (2014).
  20. Anker, H. S. Biological aspects of cancerby Julian Huxley. Review. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine. 2 (2), 246 (1959).
  21. Alizadeh, A. A., et al. Toward understanding and exploiting tumor heterogeneity. Nature Medicine. 21 (8), 846-853 (2015).
  22. McGranahan, N., Swanton, C. Clonal heterogeneity and tumor evolution: past, present, and the future. Cell. 168 (4), 613-628 (2017).
  23. Dai, Z., et al. Research and application of single-cell sequencing in tumor heterogeneity and drug resistance of circulating tumor cells. Biomarker Research. 8 (1), 60 (2020).
  24. Barron, G. A., Moseley, H., Woods, J. A. Differential sensitivity in cell lines to photodynamic therapy in combination with ABCG2 inhibition. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology. 126, 87-96 (2013).
  25. Perry, R. R., et al. Sensitivity of different human lung cancer histologies to photodynamic therapy. Krebsforschung. 50 (14), 4272-4276 (1990).
  26. Choi, B. -. H., Ryoo, I. -. G., Kang, H. C., Kwak, M. -. K. The sensitivity of cancer cells to pheophorbide a-based photodynamic therapy is enhanced by NRF2 silencing. PLoS One. 9 (9), 107158 (2014).
  27. Du, K. L., et al. Preliminary results of interstitial motexafin lutetiuç mediated PDT for prostate cancer. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 38 (5), 427-434 (2006).
  28. Gunaydin, G., Gedik, M. E., Ayan, S. Photodynamic therapy-current limitations and novel approaches. Frontiers in Chemistry. 9, 691697 (2021).
  29. Fisher, C., et al. Photodynamic therapy for the treatment of vertebral metastases: a phase I clinical trial. Clinical Cancer Research. 25 (19), 5766-5776 (2019).
  30. Cochrane, C., Mordon, S. R., Lesage, J. C., Koncar, V. New design of textile light diffusers for photodynamic therapy. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 33 (3), 1170-1175 (2013).
  31. Wen, J., et al. Mitochondria-targeted nanoplatforms for enhanced photodynamic therapy against hypoxia tumor. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 19 (1), 440 (2021).
  32. Li, W. -. P., Yen, C. -. J., Wu, B. -. S., Wong, T. -. W. Recent advances in photodynamic therapy for deep-seated tumors with the aid of nanomedicine. Biomedicines. 9 (1), 69 (2021).
  33. Ozdemir, T., Lu, Y. -. C., Kolemen, S., Tanriverdi-Ecik, E., Akkaya, E. U. Generation of singlet oxygen by persistent luminescent nanoparticle-photosensitizer conjugates: a proof of principle for photodynamic therapy without light. ChemPhotoChem. 1 (5), 183-187 (2017).
  34. Abrahamse, H., Hamblin, M. R. New photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. The Biochemical Journal. 473 (4), 347-364 (2016).
  35. Kim, M. M., Darafsheh, A. Light sources and dosimetry techniques for photodynamic therapy. Photochemistry and Photobiology. 96 (2), 280-294 (2020).
  36. Saravana-Bawan, S., David, E., Sahgal, A., Chow, E. Palliation of bone metastases-exploring options beyond radiotherapy. Annals of Palliative Medicine. 8 (2), 168-177 (2019).
  37. Wise-Milestone, L., et al. Local treatment of mixed osteolytic/osteoblastic spinal metastases: is photodynamic therapy effective. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 133 (3), 899-908 (2012).
  38. Dentro, S. C., et al. Characterizing genetic intra-tumor heterogeneity across 2,658 human cancer genomes. Cell. 184 (8), 2239-2254 (2021).
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Keep me updated:

.

Diesen Artikel zitieren
Sachsenmaier, S. M., Walter, C., Liang, C., Riester, R., Wülker, N., Danalache, M. 5-Aminolevulinic Acid-mediated Photodynamic Therapy on Primary Bone Tumor and Bone Metastases Cell Lines. J. Vis. Exp. (183), e63644, doi:10.3791/63644 (2022).

View Video