Summary

Muscle Velocity Recovery Cycles to Examine Muscle Membrane Properties

Published: February 19, 2020
doi:

Summary

Presented here is a protocol for the recording of muscle velocity recovery cycles (MVRCs), a new method of examining muscle membrane properties. MVRCs enable in vivo assessment of muscle membrane potential and alterations in muscle ion channel function in relation to pathology, and it enables the demonstration of muscle depolarization in neurogenic muscles.

Abstract

Although conventional nerve conduction studies (NCS) and electromyography (EMG) are suitable for the diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders, they provide limited information about muscle fiber membrane properties and underlying disease mechanisms. Muscle velocity recovery cycles (MVRCs) illustrate how the velocity of a muscle action potential depends on the time after a preceding action potential. MVRCs are closely related to changes in membrane potential that follow an action potential, thereby providing information about muscle fiber membrane properties. MVRCs may be recorded quickly and easily by direct stimulation and recording from multi-fiber bundles in vivo. MVRCs have been helpful in understanding disease mechanisms in several neuromuscular disorders. Studies in patients with channelopathies have demonstrated the different effects of specific ion channel mutations on muscle excitability. MVRCs have been previously tested in patients with neurogenic muscles. In this prior study, muscle relative refraction period (MRRP) was prolonged, and early supernormality (ESN) and late supernormality (LSN) were reduced in patients compared to healthy controls. Thereby, MVRCs can provide in vivo evidence of membrane depolarization in intact human muscle fibers that underlie their reduced excitability. The protocol presented here describes how to record MVRCs and analyze the recordings. MVRCs can serve as a fast, simple, and useful method for revealing disease mechanisms across a broad range of neuromuscular disorders.

Introduction

Nerve conduction studies (NCS) and electromyography (EMG) are the conventional electrophysiological methods used for the diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders. NCS enables detection of axonal loss and demyelination in the nerves1, while EMG can differentiate whether myopathy or neurogenic changes are present in the muscle due to nerve damage. However, NCS or EMG provide limited information about muscle fiber membrane properties and underlying disease mechanisms. This information can be achieved using intracellular electrodes in isolated muscles from muscle biopsies2,3,4. However, it is of clinical importance to use methodologies using recordings from intact muscles in patients.

The velocity of a second muscle fiber action potential changes as a function of the delay after the first5, and this velocity recovery function (or recovery cycle) has been shown to change in dystrophic or denervated muscles. The yield of such recordings from single muscle fibers was, however, too low to be of use as a clinical tool6. However, Z'Graggen and Bostock later found that multi-fiber recordings, obtained by direct stimulation and recording from the same bundle of muscle fibers, provide a fast and simple method of obtaining such recordings in vivo7. A sequence of paired pulse electrical stimuli with varying interstimulus intervals (ISIs) is used in this method7,8,9,10,11.

The evaluated MVRC parameters include the following: 1) muscle relative refractory period (MRRP), which is the duration after a muscle action potential until the next action potential can be elicited; 2) early supernormality (ESN); and 3) late supernormality (LSN). ESN and LSN are the periods after the refractory period in which the action potentials are conducted along the muscle membrane faster than normal. The depolarizing afterpotential, and potassium accumulation in the t-tubules of the muscle respectively, are hypothesized as the main causes for the two periods of supernormality.

The wide applicability of MVRCs to muscle disorders has been shown in detecting membrane depolarization in ischemia7,10,12 and renal failure13, as well as providing information about muscle membrane abnormalities in critical illness myopathy14 and inclusion body myositis15. Frequency ramp and intermittent 15 Hz and 20 Hz simulation protocols have since been introduced. MVRCs, together with these additional protocols, have demonstrated the different effects on muscle membrane excitability related to loss-of-function or gain-of-function mutations in various muscle ion channels in the inherited muscle ion channelopathies (i.e., sodium channel myotonia, paramyotonia congenita16, myotonic dystrophy17, Andersen-Tawil syndrome18, and myotonia congenita19,20).

In a recent study, the applicability of MVRCs to neurogenic muscles was shown for the first time. The term "neurogenic muscle" refers to the secondary changes in skeletal muscles that develop as denervation and reinnervation after any injury to the anterior horn cells or motor axons. Denervation is characterized in EMG as spontaneous activity (i.e., fibrillations [fibs] and positive sharp waves [psws]), while large motor unit potentials with prolonged duration and increased amplitude present reinnervation21. EMG changes are evident in denervated muscles, but the underlying cellular changes in muscle fiber membrane potentials have only been demonstrated in experimental studies on isolated muscle tissue2,3,4. MVRCs provide further insight into in vivo human muscle membrane properties regarding the denervation process.

This paper describes the methodology of MVRCs in detail. It also summarizes the changes in neurogenic muscles in a subgroup of patients from a previously reported study22 and healthy control subjects that enables determination of whether the method is appropriate for a planned study.

The recordings are performing using a recording protocol that is part of a software program. Other equipment used is an isolated linear bipolar constant current stimulator, 50 Hz noise eliminator, isolated electromyography amplifier, and analogue-to-digital converter.

Protocol

All subjects must provide written consent prior to examination, and the protocol must be approved by the appropriate local ethical review board. All methods described here were approved by the Regional Scientific Ethical Committee and Danish Data Protection Agency. 1. Preparation of the subject Assess subjects' medical histories to ensure that they do not have any previous nervous system disorders other than the disease group that will be investigated. Inform the subj…

Representative Results

The following results were obtained in a subgroup of patients from a recent study22, in which there were fibs/psws in all sites showing profuse denervation activity. The results showed that changes in muscle fibers after denervation were assessed in vivo using the MVRC technique described in this protocol. MVRCs showed changes consistent with depolarization of the resting membrane potential in the neurogenic muscle fibers. Fourteen patients were compared with 29 healthy…

Discussion

MVRCs, as programmed in the recording software, is a highly automated procedure, but care is needed to obtain reliable results. In the recording stage, while adjusting the needles, it is important to avoid stimulating the end-plate zone or nerve. This usually leads to large twitches of the whole muscle, which increases the risk of displacement of the stimulation and/or recording needle during recording MVRCs. To date, the method has been applied to several muscles that have better described end-plate zone; however, the e…

Divulgaciones

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported mainly by the two grants from Lundbeck Foundation (Grant number R191-2015-931 and Grant number R290-2018-751). Additionally, the study was financially supported by Novo Nordisk Foundation Challenge Programme (Grant number NNF14OC0011633) as part of the International Diabetic Neuropathy Consortium.

Materials

50 Hz Noise Eliminator Digitimer Ltd Humbug
Analogue-to-Digital Converter National Instruments NI-6221
Analysing software program Digitimer Ltd (copyright Institute of Neurology, University College, London) QtracP, MANAL9
Disposable concentric needle electrode, 25 mm x 30G Natus Dantec DCN
Disposable monopolar needle electrode, 25 mm x 26G Natus TECA elite
Isolated EMG amplifier Digitimer Ltd D440
Isolated linear bipolar constant-current stimulator Digitimer Ltd DS5
Software and recording protocol Digitimer Ltd (copyright Institute of Neurology, University College, London) QtracW software, M3REC3 recording protocol written by Hugh Bostock, Istitute of Neurology, London, UK)

Referencias

  1. Tankisi, H., et al. Pathophysiology inferred from electrodiagnostic nerve tests and classification of polyneuropathies. Suggested guidelines. Clinical Neurophysiology. 116 (7), 1571-1580 (2005).
  2. Gregorio, C. C., Hudecki, M. S., Pollina, C. M., Repasky, E. A. Effects of denervation on spectrin concentration in avian skeletal muscle. Muscle and Nerve. 11 (4), 372-379 (1988).
  3. Kotsias, B. A., Venosa, R. Role of sodium and potassium permeabilities in the depolarization of denervated rat muscle fibers. Journal of Physiology. 392, 301-313 (1987).
  4. Kirsch, G. E., Anderson, M. F. Sodium channel kinetics in normal and denervated rabbit muscle membrane. Muscle and Nerve. 9 (8), 738-747 (1986).
  5. Stalberg, E. Propagation velocity in human muscle fibers in situ. Acta Physiologica Scandinava Supplementum. 287, 1 (1966).
  6. Mihelin, M., Trontelj, J. V., Stalberg, E. Muscle fiber recovery functions studied with double pulse stimulation. Muscle and Nerve. 14 (8), 739-747 (1991).
  7. Z’Graggen, W. J., Bostock, H. Velocity recovery cycles of human muscle action potentials and their sensitivity to ischemia. Muscle and Nerve. 39 (5), 616-626 (2009).
  8. Bostock, H., Tan, S. V., Boerio, D., Z’Graggen, W. J. Validity of multi-fiber muscle velocity recovery cycles recorded at a single site using submaximal stimuli. Clinical Neurophysiology. 123 (11), 2296-2305 (2012).
  9. Z’Graggen, W. J., Troller, R., Ackermann, K. A., Humm, A. M., Bostock, H. Velocity recovery cycles of human muscle action potentials: repeatability and variability. Clinical Neurophysiology. 122 (11), 2294-2299 (2011).
  10. Lee, J. H. F., Boland-Freitas, R., Ng, K. Sarcolemmal excitability changes in normal human aging. Muscle and Nerve. 57 (6), 981-988 (2018).
  11. Lee, J. H. F., Boland-Freitas, R., Ng, K. Physiological differences in sarcolemmal excitability between human muscles. Muscle and Nerve. 60 (4), 433-436 (2019).
  12. Humm, A. M., Bostock, H., Troller, R., Z’Graggen, W. J. Muscle ischaemia in patients with orthostatic hypotension assessed by velocity recovery cycles. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry. 82 (12), 1394-1398 (2011).
  13. Z’Graggen, W. J., et al. Velocity recovery cycles of human muscle action potentials in chronic renal failure. Clinical Neurophysiology. 121 (6), 874-881 (2010).
  14. Z’Graggen, W. J., et al. Muscle membrane dysfunction in critical illness myopathy assessed by velocity recovery cycles. Clinical Neurophysiology. 122 (4), 834-841 (2011).
  15. Lee, J. H., Boland-Freitas, R., Liang, C., Ng, K. Sarcolemmal depolarization in sporadic inclusion body myositis assessed with muscle velocity recovery cycles. Clinical Neurophysiology. 19 (31205-2), 1388 (2019).
  16. Tan, S. V., Z’Graggen, W. J., Hanna, M. G., Bostock, H. In vivo assessment of muscle membrane properties in the sodium channel myotonias. Muscle and Nerve. 57 (4), 586-594 (2018).
  17. Tan, S. V., et al. In vivo assessment of muscle membrane properties in myotonic dystrophy. Muscle and Nerve. 54 (2), 249-257 (2016).
  18. Tan, S. V., et al. Membrane dysfunction in Andersen-Tawil syndrome assessed by velocity recovery cycles. Muscle and Nerve. 46 (2), 193-203 (2012).
  19. Tan, S. V., et al. Chloride channels in myotonia congenita assessed by velocity recovery cycles. Muscle and Nerve. 49 (6), 845-857 (2014).
  20. Boland-Freitas, R., et al. Sarcolemmal excitability in the myotonic dystrophies. Muscle and Nerve. 57 (4), 595-602 (2018).
  21. Stalberg, E., et al. Standards for quantification of EMG and neurography. Clinical Neurophysiology. 130 (9), 1688-1729 (2019).
  22. Witt, A., et al. Muscle velocity recovery cycles in neurogenic muscles. Clinical Neurophysiology. 130 (9), 1520-1527 (2019).
  23. Kristensen, R. S., et al. MScanFit motor unit number estimation (MScan) and muscle velocity recovery cycle recordings in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. Clinical Neurophysiology. 130 (8), 1280-1288 (2019).
  24. Marrero, H. G., Stalberg, E. V. Optimizing testing methods and collection of reference data for differentiating critical illness polyneuropathy from critical illness MYOPATHIES. Muscle and Nerve. 53 (4), 555-563 (2016).
  25. Allen, D. C., Arunachalam, R., Mills, K. R. Critical illness myopathy: further evidence from muscle-fiber excitability studies of an acquired channelopathy. Muscle and Nerve. 37 (1), 14-22 (2008).
check_url/es/60788?article_type=t

Play Video

Citar este artículo
Witt, A., Bostock, H., Z’Graggen, W. J., Tan, S. V., Kristensen, A. G., Kristensen, R. S., Larsen, L. H., Zeppelin, Z., Tankisi, H. Muscle Velocity Recovery Cycles to Examine Muscle Membrane Properties. J. Vis. Exp. (156), e60788, doi:10.3791/60788 (2020).

View Video