The study of fatty acylation has important implications in cellular protein interactions and diseases. Presented here is a modified protocol to improve click chemistry detection of fatty acylated proteins, which can be applied in various cell types and combined with other assays, including pulse-chase and mass spectrometry.
Fatty acylation, the covalent addition of saturated fatty acids to protein substrates, is important in regulating a myriad of cellular functions in addition to its implications in cancer and neurodegenerative diseases. Recent developments in fatty acylation detection methods have enabled efficient and non-hazardous detection of fatty acylated proteins, particularly through the use of click chemistry with bio-orthogonal labeling. However, click chemistry detection can be limited by the poor solubility and potential toxic effects of adding long chain fatty acids to cell culture. Described here is a labeling approach with optimized delivery using saponified fatty acids in combination with fatty-acid free BSA, as well as delipidated media, which can improve detection of hard to detect fatty acylated proteins. This effect was most pronounced with the alkynyl-stearate analog, 17-ODYA, which has been the most commonly used fatty acid analog in click chemistry detection of acylated proteins. This modification will improve cellular incorporation and increase sensitivity to acylated protein detection. In addition, this approach can be applied in a variety of cell types and combined with other assays such as pulse-chase analysis, stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture, and mass spectrometry for quantitative profiling of fatty acylated proteins.
Fatty acylation involves the covalent addition of fatty acids to proteins and is well known for its importance in promoting protein-membrane interactions but has been also shown to promote protein-protein interactions, conformational changes, and regulate catalytic sites of enzymes1,2,3,4,5,6,7. Fatty acylation has emerged as a potential drug target in a myriad of diseases, including infection, cancer, inflammation, and neurodegeneration, where disruptions in palmitoylation have been documented8,9,10,11,12,13. This has been primarily spurred by the development of new chemical detection methods, which enabled large-scale identification of S-acylated protein targets.
Fatty acylation can include a variety of modifications involving the covalent addition of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids, but typically refers to N-myristoylation and S-acylation. N-myristoylation refers to the addition of myristic acid to N-terminal glycines either co-translationally on nascent polypeptides or post-translationally on newly exposed N-terminal glycines following proteolytic cleavage2,14. N-myristoylation occurs through an irreversible amide bond. On the other hand, S-acylation typically refers to the reversible addition of long chain fatty acids to cysteine residues via a thioester bond. The most common form of this modification includes the incorporation of palmitate and, therefore, is commonly referred to as S-palmitoylation, or simply palmitoylation11,15. In many ways, S-palmitoylation is similar to phosphorylation. It is dynamic, enzymatically regulated, and proving to be highly tractable.
Up until the last decade, studying fatty acylation was hindered by limited detection methods, which required radioactively labeled fatty acids. This had several disadvantages, including cost, safety issues and very long detection times. Typically, either tritiated or iodinated palmitate was used for the detection of S-acylation16. Tritiated palmitate required lengthy detection periods with autoradiography film, which can take weeks to months. While [125I] iodo-fatty acid analogs shortened detection times, it presented a much higher safety risk and required close thyroid monitoring of experimenters. In addition, these methods were non-quantitative, therefore, limiting the ability to measure dynamic palmitoylation, and also time consuming to set-up and clean-up due to the extra personal protective equipment and radioactive monitoring. Finally, radioactive labels were not well suited for proteomic studies and typically limited to low throughput detection of specific proteins of interest. As more substrates were detected and, inevitably the enzymes that mediate each modification were identified, it was clear that new detection methods were required17,18,19,20,21. Almost simultaneously, several new methods arose for the detection of fatty acylated proteins. The first exploits the reversibility and reactivity of the thioester bond of S-acylation. The acyl-biotin exchange (ABE) assay chemically replaces palmitate with biotin for subsequent pulldown of S-acylated proteins using avidin agarose beads and direct detection by western blot22,23,24. Next, bio-orthogonal labeling of fatty acids and chemoselective addition to tags or handles were developed that included the use of the Staudinger ligation and click chemistry25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33. Finally, similar to the ABE, acyl-resin assisted capture (RAC) essentially replaces S-acylated sites with thiol-reactive beads for capture and detection of S-acylated proteins34,35. Together, the exchange and click-chemistry-based assays have provided more efficient and sensitive methods of acylation detection and affinity purification for downstream analysis and have subsequently led to the discovery of thousands of S-acylated proteins8,36.
The term click chemistry encompasses a group of chemical reactions, but most commonly refers to the Cu(I)-catalyzed azido-alkyne [3+2] cycloaddition reaction mechanism between an alkynyl group and an azido group27,28,37. Particularly, in the case of fatty acylation, click chemistry involves the detection of S-palmitoylation or N-myristylation by incorporating bio-orthogonal 16-carbon alkynyl-palmitate (15-hexadecynoic acid; 15-HDYA) or the 14-carbon alkynyl-myristate (13-tetradecynoic acid; 13-TDYA), respectively, into cells to label endogenously acylated proteins28. After cell lysis and immunoprecipitation of the protein of interest, a click chemistry reaction (covalent linkage between an alkyne and an azide) is performed to bind an affinity probe, typically biotin, for detection by western blot28,37. Alternatively, click chemistry can be performed on the total cell lysate and fatty acylated proteins can be affinity purified for identification by mass spectrometry. The initial click chemistry reaction with azido-biotin increased the selectivity and sensitivity of detection over a million times compared to radioactivity2. Another advantage of click chemistry is that it can be combined with other classical labeling methods, such as pulse-chase analysis of protein turnover using azido-homoalanine for quantitative analysis38. In addition, fluorescent probes can be used instead of biotin or other biochemical probes, such as FLAG or Myc tags, in order to examine protein localization16,28,39.
Despite the relative ease of use of click chemistry, detection can be limited by the low solubility and potential toxicity of using long chain free fatty acids in cell culture40. In particular, despite the preference of palmitate during S-acylation for the majority of proteins, many studies have used the 18-carbon stearate (17-octadecynoic acid – 17-ODYA) rather than palmitate (15-HDYA) for detecting S-acylated proteins due to its commercial availability and relatively low cost. However, 17-ODYA is very insoluble and requires special attention when being used. In addition, click chemistry can require some nuanced preparation and storage of chemicals. Herein, the protocol describes a labeling approach, which optimizes delivery using saponification of fatty acids, delivery with fatty-acid free BSA, and delipidated fetal bovine serum (FBS) to increase solubility and bypass potential toxic effects of adding free fatty acids to cells28. This method works in a variety of cell types and has even been used in live animals28.
Direct addition of fatty acids to cells in culture can result in insolubility, precipitation of lipids, and lipotoxicity40. Consequently, adding fatty acids directly to cells may not only result in poor cellular uptake and low availability of the fatty acid label, but also a decreased number of viable cells for downstream analysis, as well as activation of off-target pathways. However, many metabolic labeling protocols for click chemistry detection involve direct addition of fatty acids and a large number of palmitoyl-proteome studies using click chemistry detection to date seldom saponify the fatty acids labels or incubate them with BSA8,36. It is important to consider the fact that the efficiency and sensitivity of click chemistry detection of fatty-acylated proteins are dependent on sufficient cellular uptake of the fatty acid analogs. Therefore, it is reasonable to speculate that many S-acylated proteins may have escaped detection in proteomic studies due to a low availability of the fatty acid labels from poor incorporation into the cells, especially when the longer chain fatty acid 17-ODYA was used. 17-ODYA, or alkynyl-stearate, has been the widely used label of choice for several studies due to its commercial availability and its early use8,36. However, the results of this protocol demonstrate that saponification of 17-ODYA results in the largest increase in the detection of S-acylated proteins, in comparison to shorter chain fatty acids such as palmitate or myristate. Therefore, repeating these experiments with saponified labels may yield additional substrates of S-acylation that may have been previously overlooked. Further, while most palmitoyl acyltransferases prefer palmitate for S-acylation, some do have preferences for other lengths of fatty acids such as stearate15,38,44. In addition, some proteins or even specific sites within proteins prefer one fatty acid over another15,45. Therefore, studies using 17-ODYA may have a bias towards proteins S-acylated with stearate, not palmitate, while also under-representing those proteins due to lower detection.
The improved metabolic labeling efficiency for click chemistry relies on the saponification of lipids and incubation with FAFBSA steps, as well as the delipidated FBS. All fatty acids must be completely saponified in KOH with no visible solids remaining before proceeding with incubation with FAFBSA. This can be a difficult step and timing is crucial. After the saponified fatty acids have gone into solution at 65 °C, add warm BSA immediately as further heating will cause evaporation of the DMSO from the fatty acids. In addition, the saponified label will begin to re-solidify as soon as it begins to cool. Therefore, the FAFBSA must be warm and added rapidly after the salt has become soluble. The glass reaction vials, and their shape are important for this step. They allow the saponified lipid to be warm enough to remain soluble, while cool enough to ensure that the FAFBSA does not congeal. Sufficient mixing via pipetting is also important at this step to ensure a homogenous solution for labeling.
The reagents for click chemistry need to be properly stored, typically with desiccants or under N2 or Ar gas at -20 °C to -80 °C. Lack of acylation signal or weak signal may be due to unstable reagents, particularly older TBTA and azide stock solutions. Furthermore, care must be taken with fluorescent azide stock solutions, which need to be protected from light as much as possible. In addition, variables such as method of lipid deprivation and labeling time may need to be tested to determine the optimal conditions depending on the type of cell used. For example, neuronal cells may need longer labeling times because media changes and lipid deprivation are difficult (unpublished).
The benefit of this protocol is most dramatic when used for longer-chain fatty acids. For shorter chains, the increase in signal intensity becomes less dramatic, but is still likely protective to the cells. While the suggested modifications will improve protein acylation detection in general, click chemistry is still considered a lipid-centric method1 that is limited to detection of dynamically, not stably S-acylated proteins1. Other limitations to consider include the requirement of fatty acid deprivation to promote labeling, and its relatively limited range of compatible cell types when compared to the acyl-biotin exchange (ABE) detection of S-acylation16. Despite these limitations, click chemistry detection is quicker than most acyl-exchange assays and is better suited for detection of proteins that do not tolerate the repeated protein precipitation steps required for acyl-exchange assays. In addition, this approach can be combined with simultaneous labeling using other click assays such as pulse-chase analysis38.
The use of this modification for metabolic labeling for click chemistry increased overall detection of acylated proteins, particularly S-acylated, with a variety of proteomic techniques that are used in conjunction with click chemistry. As shown, fluorogenic detection can be used as an alternative to biotin (Figure 1)28. This is particularly useful because there are no endogenously fluorescent proteins in the cell lysates. In addition, fluorophores that are only activated after click chemistry can be used46. The saponified and FAFBSA-bound fatty acid for click chemistry labeling can help with difficulties detecting proteins of interest due to an overall increase in the amount of label available in the cell and by limiting toxic effects of adding fatty acids directly to the media. It can also be utilized in conjunction with mass spectrometry27 to increase detection of low abundance proteins, especially when taken together with the recent advancement using machine-learning algorithms preventing redundant measurements to increase sensitivity to low abundance proteins, as opposed to existing data-dependent acquisition that favors detection of the most abundant proteins47. In addition, click chemistry can be combined with stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) and pulse-chase methods to produce quantifiable data on dynamic protein S-acylation27. Finally, the Hannoush group has combined click chemistry with proximity ligation assay (PLA) to allow single-cell visualization and examinations into subcellular distribution of palmitoylated proteins43,48.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was funded by the National Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC; RGPIN-2019-04617). Lucia Liao was funded by The Ram and Lekha Tumkur Memorial Scholarship through the Department of Biology at the University of Waterloo, and the Lucy Morrison Memorial Bursary through IODE Ontario, in addition to the graduate research funding from the University of Waterloo comprising the Graduate Research Studentship (50503-11072), Science Graduate Award, and Graduate Teaching Assistantship. The authors would like to thank all members of the Martin lab for their support in preparing this manuscript, particularly Stephanie Ryall, Harleen Gill, and Sadia Khan who helped initially set-up the Martin Lab in preparation for these studies. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Luc Berthiaume for the kind gift of the ctHTT-GFP constructs and Dr. Shaun Sanders for critical input in preparing the manuscript. Figure 3 was created with BioRender.com.
13-tetradecynoic acid (alkynyl myristic acid) (25mM) | Click Chemistry Tools | 1164 | |
15-hexadecynoic acid (alkynyl palmitic acid) (100mM) | Click Chemistry Tools | 1165 | |
17-octadecynoic acid (alkynyl stearic acid) (100 mM) | Cayman Chemical Company | 90270 | |
30% acrylamide/bis solution 29:1 | Biorad | 1610156 | |
96-well plate reader | Biorad | N/A | |
AFDye 647 azide plus | Click Chemistry Tools | 1482 | |
Ammonium persulfate (APS) | Biorad | 1610700 | |
Anti-GAPDH hFAB Rhodamine | Biorad | 12004167 | |
Anti-rabbit Alexa 488 | Invitrogen | A11034 | |
Anti-Tubulin hFAB Rhodamine | Biorad | 12004166 | |
Biotin Azide | Click Chemistry Tools | 1265 | |
Bis-tris, ultrapure | VWR | 715 | |
Calcium chloride | J.T. Baker | 1332-1 | |
Centrifuge 16,000xg, 4°C | Thermo Scientific | N/A | |
Charcoal STRP FBS One Shot (DCC-FBS) | Life Technologies | A3382101 | |
ChemiDoc Imager | Biorad | N/A | |
Copper sulfate (1 mM) | VWR | BDH9312 | |
Deoxycholic acid sodium salt monohydrate | MP Biomedicals | 102906 | |
Detergent compatible (DC) assay | Biorad | N/A | |
Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) | VWR | 0231-500 mL | |
DMEM, 1x | Wisent Inc | 319015CL | |
Ethanol, anhydrous | N/A | N/A | |
Fatty Acid Free BSA | MP Biomedicals | 219989950 | |
Fast Blot Turbo Semi-dry transfer | Biorad | N/A | |
Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 12483-020 | |
FluoroTrans W PVDF (polyvinylidene fluoride) transfer membrane | Pall Life Sciences | BSP0161 | |
HEPES (4-(2-Hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazinyl]-ethanesulfonic) acid | VWR | 5011 | |
Humidified Incubator at 37°C and 5% CO2 | VWR | N/A | |
Igepal CA-630 | Alfa Aesar | J61055 | |
Image Lab Software | Biorad | N/A | |
L-glutamine supplement solution | Wisent Inc | 609-065-EL | |
Magnesium chloride | Fisher Scientific | BP214-500 | |
Methanol | VWR | BDH1135 | |
Myristic Acid (25 mM) | VWR | M0476-25G | |
Palmitic acid (100 mM) | VWR | P0002-25G | |
Penicillin-Streptomycin, 10x | Wisent Inc | 450201EL | |
Pepstatin A (synthetic) | Enzo Life Sciences | ALX-260-085-M005 | |
Phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride | Enzo Life Sciences | ALX-270-184-G005 | |
Phosphate buffered saline, 10x, pH 7.4 | VWR | 75801-000 | |
Polyclonal Goat antibody to GFP (Affinity Purified) | Eusera | EU4 | |
FluoroTrans W PVDF (polyvinylidene fluoride) transfer membrane | Pall Life Sciences | BSP0161 | |
Potassium hydroxide | Ward's Science | 470302-100 | |
Rabbit polyclonal antibody to GFP | Eusera | EU1 | |
Sodium chloride | VWR | 0241-1KG | |
Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS) | Fisher Scientific | BP166-500 | |
Sodium pyruvate | Wisent Inc | 600-110-EL | |
Streptavidin Alexa Fluor 680 conjugate | Thermo Fisher Scientific | S21378 | |
Tris-(benzyltriazolylmethyl)amine (TBTA) (100 uM) | Click Chemistry Tools | 1061 | |
Tris-(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine HCl (TCEP) (1mM) | Soltec Ventures | M115 | |
Tris Base | Fisher Scientific | BP152-5 | |
Trypsin/EDTA | Wisent Inc | 325-043-CL | |
Tween 20 Reagent Grade 1L | VWR | 97062-332 | |
WHEATON NextGen V Vials 3 mL | VWR | 89085-424 |