An Approach to Point-Of-Care Ultrasound Evaluation of the Abdominal Aorta

Summary

This protocol reviews the steps to image the abdominal aorta with point-of-care ultrasound. We discuss image acquisition, troubleshooting imaging pitfalls and artifacts, and the recognition of life-threatening abdominal aortic pathology.

Abstract

Disorders of the abdominal aorta, including aneurysms and dissection, have potentially high rates of morbidity and mortality. While computed tomography (CT) is the current gold standard to image the abdominal aorta, the process of obtaining a CT may be time-consuming, requires the use of intravenous contrast dye, and involves exposure to ionizing radiation. Point-of-care Ultrasound (POCUS) can be performed at the bedside and has excellent sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm and excellent specificity for the diagnosis of abdominal aortic dissection. Additionally, POCUS is non-invasive, cost-effective, lacks ionizing radiation, requires no intravenous contrast dye, and can be performed without taking the patient from a critical care area. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) can be done in primary care settings as well.

This article will review the approach to POCUS of the abdominal aorta to evaluate such critical pathology. In this paper, we will review the sonographic anatomy of the abdominal aorta as well as the choice of the ultrasound probe, description of POCUS image acquisition, and some pearls and pitfalls of using POCUS to aid in the diagnosis of potentially life-threatening abdominal aortic pathology.

Introduction

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has increased in use over the last several years and is being increasingly incorporated into various residency training programs^1,2. POCUS has great utility in critical care areas such as the emergency department and the intensive care unit, specifically to aid in the rapid diagnosis of life-threatening intraabdominal emergencies such as acute aortic dissection, as well as abdominal aortic aneurysms, especially those at risk for rupture and those that have ruptured into the peritoneum.

AAA rupture and acute aortic dissection are associated with high mortality. The mortality of ruptured aortic aneurysms ranges from 67% to 94%^3,4. The mortality associated with type A aortic dissection increases at a rate of 1% per hour after acute dissection and the mortality of type B aortic dissection ranges from 10% to 25% at 30 days⁵. Abdominal aortic dissection in isolation is rare and accounts for only 0.2% to 4% of all aortic dissections^6,7,8,9,10. Since most abdominal aortic dissections occur as an extension of thoracic aortic dissections, evaluation of the abdominal aorta for evidence of dissection may aid in the diagnosis of thoracic aortic dissection¹¹.

Computed tomography with angiography (CTA) is the gold standard for imaging pathology associated with the abdominal aorta; however, it has several drawbacks. It may be time-consuming, especially in an unstable patient, and requires a technician to perform and a radiologist or vascular surgeon to interpret the images. CTA uses ionizing radiation and requires the use of intravenous contrast dye for optimal detection of pathology. Furthermore, the performance of CTA requires potentially unstable patients to leave the critical care area. In contrast, POCUS is non-invasive, cost-effective, and lacks the ionizing radiation and contrast dye that CT requires. It can also be performed and interpreted by the same individual in real time and does not require the patient to leave the monitored area.

A systematic review of emergency department POCUS for diagnosing AAA by Rubano et al. revealed a sensitivity of 99% and specificity of 98%, with a positive likelihood ratio of 99 and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.01¹². This pooled analysis evaluated the test characteristics over a varied group of operators, including resident and attending physicians with a wide range of training in POCUS.

The test characteristics for the POCUS evaluation of abdominal aortic dissection are different from those of AAA and may vary depending on the origin of the dissection. Sonographic findings of an intimal flap separating the true and false lumens have a sensitivity of 67%-79% and a specificity of 99%-100% for aortic dissection^13,14. As most aortic dissections found in the abdomen are an extension of a thoracic aortic dissection, additional POCUS applications of the heart and lungs to evaluate for pericardial effusion, aortic root dilatation, and left pleural effusion may be performed, but will not be the focus of this paper¹³.

Finally, it is important to note that the United States Preventative Services task force provides a Grade B recommendation for a one-time ultrasound screening for AAA in men aged 65-75 who have ever smoked. This is particularly relevant to the primary care setting.

This review will describe a step-by-step protocol for the performance of POCUS in the bedside evaluation of the abdominal aorta, specifically to evaluate for AAA and abdominal aortic dissection. This protocol assumes a basic knowledge of diagnostic ultrasound, including physics, instrumentation, as well as medical knowledge of anatomy and pathologic states of the abdominal aorta and major branching arteries. Readers are advised to refer to other sources for prerequisite knowledge.

Protocol

All ultrasounds in this protocol were performed on human subjects and were conducted following the ethical standards of the University of Illinois Hospital and the Declaration of Helsinki and its revisions. The imaging was performed on the authors themselves and patients in the emergency department as part of routine education and clinical care with preceding verbal consent as is the standard for the institution. Images collected illustrate both normal anatomy and physiology as well as abnormal findings collected at the …

Representative Results

Adequate exam One of the biggest challenges in obtaining accurate results from an abdominal aortic ultrasound is the lack of consensus about measurement. As noted in protocol step 4.3.1.10, any diameter of the abdominal aorta greater than 3 cm is considered aneurysmal15,16,22,23. There is, however, great variation in the methods used to measure the aorta's diameter, a…

Discussion

Timely diagnosis of AAA and aortic dissection is key in the treatment of these high-morbidity conditions. POCUS used in the diagnosis of AAA leads to improved outcomes and significantly decreases the time to diagnosis and operative intervention when compared with traditional imaging²⁷. POCUS has high sensitivity and specificity for AAA and high specificity for aortic dissection^12,13,19,<sup cla…

Materials

M9 Ultrasound Machine

Mindray

n/a

Used to obtain all adequate and inadequate images/clips