Ecotoxicological Methodologies to Evaluate Biomarkers at Different Scales in Neotropical Anurans
Summary
In this paper, standardized ecotoxicological methods for the evaluation of biomarkers in neotropical anuran species are presented. Specifically, this paper details several methodologies at different scales of ecotoxicological evaluation, such as the genetic, cellular-histological, biochemical, morphological, and individual levels.
Abstract
The new questions in ecotoxicology highlight the importance of applying a battery of biomarkers, as this results in ecotoxicological predictions that improve not only the interpretation of the effects of environmental stressors on organisms but also the determination of their possible impact. It is well known that the use of ecotoxicological biomarkers at different levels of organization allows for the prediction of the biological responses of organisms to environmental stressors, which is useful in environmental risk assessment.
Nevertheless, it is necessary to consider the optimization of basic procedures, to generate historical data in control groups, and to employ specific bioassays to evaluate responses in organs and tissues in order to elucidate the nature and variation of the effects observed. Therefore, the present work aims to describe several ecotoxicological methodologies employed in all stages of neotropical anurans at different ecological levels and to validate them as useful biomarkers to be used both in wildlife and in laboratory conditions. In this work, these biomarkers were applied at the individual/organismic level (body condition index), histological/physiological level (histopathology, histometric, and pigmentary analyses), biochemical level (oxidative stress enzymes), and genetic level (direct and oxidative damage in DNA by comet assay).
Although these methodologies have small variations or modifications depending on the species, these techniques provide effective biomarkers for evaluating the effect of xenobiotics on anurans, which possess certain characteristics that make them useful indicator species of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. In conclusion, the battery of biomarkers employed in the present study has proven to be adequate for estimating toxic responses in Neotropical anurans and can be further recommended as bioindicators for identifying the impact of pollutants on the aquatic ecosystems of the region. Finally, it is recommended to achieve the standardization of these important biomarkers for anurans in specific regions as well as to possibly include them in risk assessments and decision-making.
Introduction
The input of environmental stressors into natural water bodies can affect the health of the aquatic ecosystem1. Exposure to these environmental stressors can affect the survival or fitness of aquatic organisms through different toxicity mechanisms, including direct exposure (both short- and long-term)2. Hence, standardized laboratory bioassays to assess toxicological endpoints related to fitness and survival may be an unreliable estimate of the many indirect effects of stress in the field. Furthermore, alterations in normal physiological levels and effects on individuals, such as in terms of prey capture, may be better long-term indicators of the impact on survival and reproductive fitness in organisms and, ultimately, on the health of the ecosystem1,3. Predicting changes in ecosystem composition and function, as well as organism health, based on a known set of environmental parameters and contaminant concentrations, is important for improving pollution management1.
Biomarkers are defined as biochemical, physiological, or histological changes due to either exposure to or the effects of xenobiotic chemicals4,5. Biomarkers have proven to be very useful as early warning signals4,5. An important question that biomarkers help answer is whether certain stressors are present in high enough concentrations in the environment to cause adverse effects. This information contributes to the assessment of whether it is worth investigating the nature and extent of the damage and the causative agents or whether no more resources should be invested in that case6,7,8. Moreover, since the concept of evaluating a single biomarker as a bioindicator may not be adequate5,7,8,9,10, there is a growing trend toward performing a comprehensive evaluation of multiple biomarkers in order to detect early warning signs and, thus, prevent irreversible effects on ecosystems.
It is very important to note that all toxic effects begin with the interaction of a stressor with biomolecules. In this sense, effects can cascade through the biochemical, subcellular, cellular, tissue, organ, individual, population, community, ecosystem, landscape, and biospheric levels of organization. Cells are the primary site of interaction between environmental stressors and biological systems. Thus, understanding molecular and genetic effects allows researchers to associate low and high levels of ecological organization and helps them to predict the effect of environmental pollutants, for example, on human health, that have not yet been tested5. Moreover, due to the high specificity of cells, they are not only useful for evaluating environmental pollutants but also human health5,11. Therefore, understanding the effects of stressors at the biochemical level may provide insights into the causes of the observed effects and allow them to be connected with those at the next higher level5. In addition, by understanding the biochemical mechanisms of stressors, the effects of new stressors that have not yet been toxicologically evaluated may be predicted with respect to other well-known contaminants based on their similarities in function. In the presence of various environmental stressors, genetic and biochemical biomarkers may provide valuable information on the specific effects observed. In addition to this, histochemical evaluations related to biochemical changes can provide information on toxicodynamics5. In short, a comprehensive analysis of cellular, biochemical, and histological biomarkers is necessary10,12, and this type of analysis, in turn, should be included in biomonitoring programs for local species5,13,14.
The study of biomarkers under laboratory conditions may, nonetheless, present some difficulties, including difficulties in the detection of sublethal effects and chronic impacts after exposure to pollutants and in the validation and standardization of the methods employed, as well as the complex time- or dose-dependent responses, the unclear or undetermined links to fitness, and the lack of integrated mechanistic models1,4. To solve these problems, the solution is not to increase the number of biomarkers measured but to carefully design studies and testable hypotheses that contribute to explaining the mechanistic bases of chemical effects on whole organisms4.
The new questions in ecotoxicology highlight the importance of applying a battery of biomarkers to generate ecotoxicological predictions that improve the interpretation of the effects of environmental stressors on organisms, as well as decision-making about their possible impact. Moreover, the importance of combining both concepts-biomarkers and bioindicators-in environmental risk assessments and biomonitoring is that this will allow researchers to determine whether organisms in a specific environment of interest are physiologically normal or stressed. The approach taken in this study resembles that of the biochemical analysis that is carried out in humans. In this sense, a battery of biomarkers may be analyzed to see if an organism is healthy both in the field and in the laboratory6. Finally, biomarkers will contribute to ecological risk assessments in two ways: (1) assessing the exposure of rare and/or long-lived species, and (2) testing hypotheses about the mechanisms of chemical impacts at different levels of biological organization4.
In the last decade, biomarkers have been used in anurans for biomonitoring the exposure to cytotoxic and genotoxic contaminants. Among these, the techniques that have been used most frequently are the micronucleus (MN) assay and the comet assay or the induction of single-stranded DNA breaks by single-cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE) assay. In addition, those techniques have been successfully used to estimate the DNA damage induced by various environmental stressors in several neotropical anurans14,15,16,17,18,19. Other biomarkers can used to examine changes in the oxidative status in organisms exposed to environmental pollutants16,17,18,19. Oxidative stress is a response to exposure to different xenobiotics, leading to several detrimental effects, including on the antioxidant capacity of the exposed individuals5,6,7,19,20.
In ecotoxicological studies, bioindicator species are used because they are organisms that identify the long-term interactions and adverse effects of environmental stressors at higher organizational levels (e.g., organism, population, community, and ecosystem levels)10,20,21. By integrating the two concepts-biomarkers and bioindicators-species can be screened to broadly define biochemical, physiological, or ecological structures or processes that are correlated or linked with measured biological effects at one or more levels of biological organization. Finally, the great challenge of utilizing both concepts to improve the estimates of the toxicity of a stressor relates to analyzing biomarkers and bioindicators that have high utility in the evaluation of ecological risks20. In this sense, there is consensus on the relevance of employing biomarkers and bioindicators as early warning signs, as they offer relevant information about the response of a test organism to environmental stressors12,20,21.
Amphibians are one of the most threatened and rapidly declining groups of organisms worldwide. One of the main reasons for this decline is pollutants that enter their habitat, such as pesticides, metals, and emerging pollutants22,23,24,25. Anurans have several characteristics that make them useful as bioindicator species, such as their permeable skin, close relationship with water, and sensitivity to environmental pollution2,23,24. These characteristics make amphibians effective bioindicators of environmental health7,8,22,23,24,26.
Nevertheless, it is necessary not only to consider the optimization of basic procedures and the generation of historical data in control groups but also to employ specific bioassays to evaluate responses in organs and tissues to elucidate the nature and variation of effects observed in bioindicators. In this sense, the present work aims to describe several ecotoxicological methodologies to be employed in all stages of neotropical anurans at different ecological levels and validate them as useful biomarkers to be employed both in wildlife and laboratory conditions. This work presents a battery of biomarkers that may be integrated and that have been proven for laboratory and wildlife biomonitoring in anurans exposed to environmental stressors.
Protocol
Representative Results
Discussion
The biomarkers at the individual level are very simple to determine and very low-cost, as examining these biomarkers requires only a few pieces of equipment that are usually available in any research laboratory. In addition, these biomarkers provide general information on the health and fitness of the animals. The number of animals employed in each protocol is critical for obtaining reliable results. Due to the variability of data, a minimum of five animals (N = 5) is necessary for each treatment. In detail, a critical s…
Divulgations
The authors have nothing to disclose.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge Instituto de Química de San Luis "Dr. Roberto Olsina"- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (INQUISAL-CONICET), Universidad Nacional de San Luis (Project PROICO 2-1914), Laboratório de Patologia Experimental (LAPEx) – Instituto de Biociências (INBIO) – Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Cátedra de Citología – Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP), and Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica (FONCYT; PICT-2018-02570 and PICT-2018-01067) for financial support. We would also like to thank native speaker Lidia Unger and GAECI-UNSL (scientific writing assistance center) from the National University of San Luis for the proofreading of the manuscript.
Materials
| Analytical scale | |||
| Electrophoresis power supply | Enduro | E0203-250V | |
| Eosin | Merck | ||
| Fluorescence photomicroscope | Olympus | BX50 | Equipped with an appropriate filter combination |
| Hematoxylin of Harris | Merck | ||
| High resolution photo camera | >16 megapixels | ||
| Homogenizer | |||
| Horizontal electrophoresis chamber | Sigma | ||
| Microcentrifuge | Denver Instrument | ||
| Microscope | Leica | DM4000 B | Equipped with image capture system Leica DFC 280 |
| Microtome | Leica | 2265 | |
| Paraplast | Sigma | P3558 | |
| Personal Computer | Eqquiped with Mac OS X, Lynux or Windows | ||
| Refrigerated centrifuge | |||
| UV–Vis spectrophotometer | Rayleigh | 723G | With UV-lamp |
References
- Hook, S. E., Gallagher, E. P., Batley, G. E. The role of biomarkers in the assessment of aquatic ecosystem health. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. 10 (3), 327-341 (2014).
- Connon, R. E., et al. Linking mechanistic and behavioral responses to sublethal esfenvalerate exposure in the endangered delta smelt; Hypomesus transpacificus (Fam. Osmeridae). BMC Genomics. 10, 608 (2009).
- Scholz, N. L., et al. A perspective on modern pesticides, pelagic fish declines, and unknown ecological resilience in highly managed ecosystems. Bioscience. 62 (4), 428-434 (2012).
- Forbes, V. E., Palmqvist, A., Bach, L. The use and misuse of biomarkers in ecotoxicology. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry: An International Journal. 25 (1), 272-280 (2006).
- Newman, M. C. . Fundamentals of Ecotoxicology: The Science of Pollution., Fifth edition. , (2019).
- Walker, C. . Ecotoxicology: Effects of Pollutants on the Natural Environment. , (2014).
- Venturino, A., et al. Biomarkers of effect in toads and frogs. Biomarkers. 8 (3-4), 167-186 (2003).
- Lajmanovich, R. C., et al. Técnicas para el relevamiento de anfibios en ambientes contaminados. Manual de Técnicas y Protocolos para el Relevamiento y Estudio de Anfibios de Argentina., 1a Edition. , (2021).
- Vander Oost, R., Beyer, J., Vermeulen, N. P. Fish bioaccumulation and biomarkers in environmental risk assessment: A review. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology. 13 (2), 57-149 (2003).
- Pérez-Iglesias, J. M., González, P., Calderón, M. R., Natale, G. S., Almeida, C. A. Comprehensive evaluation of the toxicity of the flame retardant (decabromodiphenyl ether) in a bioindicator fish (Gambusia affinis). Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 29 (33), 50845-50855 (2022).
- Bickham, J. W., Sandhu, S., Hebert, P. D., Chikhi, L., Athwal, R. Effects of chemical contaminants on genetic diversity in natural populations: Implications for biomonitoring and ecotoxicology. Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research. 463 (1), 33-51 (2000).
- Adams, S. M., Ham, K. D. Application of biochemical and physiological indicators for assessing recovery of fish populations in a disturbed stream. Environmental Management. 47 (6), 1047-1063 (2011).
- Rautenberg, G. E., Amé, M. V., Monferrán, M. V., Bonansea, R. I., Hued, A. C. A multi-level approach using Gambusia affinis as a bioindicator of environmental pollution in the middle-lower basin of Suquía River. Ecological Indicators. 48, 706-720 (2015).
- Larramendy, M. L. . Ecotoxicology and Genotoxicology: Non-Traditional Terrestrial Models. , (2017).
- Guilherme, S., Gaivão, I., Santos, M. A., Pacheco, M. DNA damage in fish (Anguilla anguilla) exposed to a glyphosate-based herbicide-elucidation of organ-specificity and the role of oxidative stress. Mutation Research. 743 (1-2), 1-9 (2012).
- Lajmanovich, R. C., et al. Harmful effects of the dermal intake of commercial formulations containing chlorpyrifos, 2, 4-D, and glyphosate on the common toad Rhinella arenarum (Anura: Bufonidae). Water, Air, & Soil Pollution. 226 (12), 427 (2015).
- Pérez-Iglesias, J. M., de Arcaute, C. R., Natale, G. S., Soloneski, S., Larramendy, M. L. Evaluation of imazethapyr-induced DNA oxidative damage by alkaline Endo III-and Fpg-modified single-cell gel electrophoresis assay in Hypsiboas pulchellus tadpoles (Anura, Hylidae). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 142, 503-508 (2017).
- Carvalho, W. F., et al. DNA damage exerted by mixtures of commercial formulations of glyphosate and imazethapyr herbicides in Rhinella arenarum (Anura, Bufonidae) tadpoles. Ecotoxicology. 28 (3), 367-377 (2019).
- Jacobsen-Pereira, C. H., et al. Markers of genotoxicity and oxidative stress in farmers exposed to pesticides. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 148, 177-183 (2018).
- Bartell, S. M. Biomarkers, bioindicators, and ecological risk assessment-A brief review and evaluation. Environmental Bioindicators. 1 (1), 60-73 (2006).
- Hamza-Chaffai, A. Usefulness of bioindicators and biomarkers in pollution biomonitoring. International Journal of Biotechnology for Wellness Industries. 3 (1), 19-26 (2014).
- Kacoliris, F. P., et al. Current threats faced by amphibian populations in the southern cone of South America. Journal for Nature Conservation. 69, 126254 (2022).
- Sparling, D. W., Linder, G., Bishop, C. A., Krest, S. K. . Ecotoxicology of Amphibians and Reptiles. , (2010).
- Kiesecker, J. M., Blaustein, A. R., Belden, L. K. Complex causes of amphibian population declines. Nature. 410 (6829), 681-684 (2001).
- Brühl, C. A., Schmidt, T., Pieper, S., Alscher, A. Terrestrial pesticide exposure of amphibians: An underestimated cause of global decline. Scientific Reports. 3, 1135 (2013).
- Wagner, N., Lötters, S., Veith, M., Viertel, B. Effects of an environmentally relevant temporal application scheme of low herbicide concentrations on larvae of two anuran species. Chemosphere. 135, 175-181 (2015).
- Peig, J., Green, A. J. New perspectives for estimating body condition from mass/length data: the scaled mass index as an alternative method. Oikos. 118 (12), 1883-1891 (2009).
- Brodeur, J. C., et al. Frog body condition: Basic assumptions, comparison of methods and characterization of natural variability with field data from Leptodactylus latrans. Ecological Indicators. 112, 106098 (2020).
- MacCracken, J. G., Stebbings, J. L. Test of a body condition index with amphibians. Journal of Herpetology. 46 (3), 346-350 (2012).
- Brodeur, J. C., et al. Frog somatic indices: Importance of considering allometric scaling, relation with body condition and seasonal variation in the frog Leptodactylus latrans. Ecological Indicators. 116, 106496 (2020).
- Carson, A. F., Hladik, L. C. . Histotechnology: A Self-Instructional Text. , (2009).
- Bernet, D., Schmidt, H., Meier, W., Burkhardt-Holm, P., Wahli, T. Histopathology in fish: Proposal for a protocol to assess aquatic pollution. Journal of Fish Diseases. 22 (1), 25-34 (1999).
- Santos, L. R. D. S., Franco-Belussi, L., Zieri, R., Borges, R. E., de Oliveira, C. Effects of thermal stress on hepatic melanomacrophages of Eupemphix nattereri (Anura). Anatomical Record. 297 (5), 864-875 (2014).
- Bradford, M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry. 72, 248-254 (1976).
- Aebi, H. Catalase in vitro. Methods in Enzymology. 105, 121-126 (1984).
- Habig, W. H., Pabst, M. J., Jakoby, W. B. Glutathione S-transferases: The first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 249 (22), 7130-7139 (1974).
- Buege, J. A., Aust, S. D. Microsomal lipid peroxidation. Methods in Enzymology. 52, 302-310 (1978).
- Ellman, G. L., Courtney, K. D., Andres, V., Featherstone, R. M. A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochemical Pharmacology. 7 (2), 88-95 (1961).
- Fenech, M. Cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytome assay. Nature Protocols. 2 (5), 1084-1104 (2007).
- Pitarque, M., et al. Evaluation of DNA damage by the Comet assay in shoe workers exposed to toluene and other organic solvents. Mutation Research. 441 (1), 115-127 (1999).
- Nersesyan, A., Kundi, M., Atefie, K., Schulte-Hermann, R., Knasmuller, S. Effect of staining procedures on the results of micronucleus assays with exfoliated oral mucosa cells. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. 15 (10), 1835-1840 (2006).
- Pérez-Iglesias, J. M., Brodeur, J. C., Larramendy, M. An imazethapyr-based herbicide formulation induces genotoxic, biochemical, and individual organizational effects. Leptodactylus latinasus tadpoles (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 27 (2), 2131-2143 (2020).
- Pérez-Iglesias, J. M., et al. Multiple level effects of imazethapyr on Leptodactylus latinasus (Anura) adult frogs. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 81 (3), 492-506 (2021).
- Pérez-Iglesias, J. M., et al. The genotoxic effects of the imidacloprid-based insecticide formulation Glacoxan Imida on Montevideo tree frog Hypsiboas pulchellus tadpoles (Anura, Hylidae). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 104, 120-126 (2014).
- Jha, A. N. Ecotoxicological applications and significance of the comet assay. Mutagenesis. 23 (3), 207-221 (2008).
- Garber, J. C., Barbee, R. W., Bielitzki, J. T. Committee for the Update of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. , (2011).
- Council, N.S.a.T.R. (Ed.). Reference Ethical Framework for Biomedical Research: Ethical Principles for Research with Laboratory, Farm, and Wild Animals. CONICET. , (2005).
- INTA. Guía para cuidado y uso de animales para experimentación. INTA. , (2008).
- Beliaeff, B., Burgeot, T. Integrated biomarker response: A useful tool for ecological risk assessment. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 21 (6), 1316-1322 (2002).
- Pérez-Iglesias, J. M., Natale, G. S., Brodeur, J. C., Larramendy, M. L. Realistic scenarios of pesticide exposure alters multiple biomarkers in BOANA PULCHELLA (ANURA) adult frogs. Ecotoxicology. , (2023).
- Bassó, A., Devin, S., Peltzer, P. M., Attademo, A. M., Lajmanovich, R. C. The integrated biomarker response in three anuran species larvae at sublethal concentrations of cypermethrin, chlorpyrifos, glyphosate, and glufosinate-ammonium. Journal of Environmental Science, Part B. 57 (9), 687-696 (2022).
.