Summary

Microbiological Rapid On-Site Evaluation for Pulmonary Infectious Diseases

Published: March 01, 2024
doi:

Summary

The protocol here demonstrates a fast and standardized microbiological rapid on-site evaluation (M-ROSE) workflow, including three steps: slide making, staining, and interpretation. This protocol will help physicians make rapid clinical decisions.

Abstract

The prompt initiation of empirical anti-infective therapy is crucial in patients presenting with unexplained pulmonary infection. Although imaging acquisition is relatively straightforward in clinical practice, its lack of specificity often necessitates additional time-consuming tests such as sputum culture, bronchoalveolar-lavage fluid culture, or genetic sequencing to identify the underlying etiology of the disease accurately. Moreover, the limited efficacy of empirical anti-infective treatment may contribute to antibiotic misuse. Recent advancements in interpreting microbial background on rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) slides have enabled clinicians to promptly obtain samples through bronchoscopy (e.g., alveolar lavage, mucosal brushing, tissue clamp), facilitating bedside staining and interpretation that provides essential microbial background information. Consequently, this establishes a foundation for developing targeted anti-infection treatment and individualized drug therapy plans. With a better understanding of which pathogens are causing infections in real-time, physicians can avoid unnecessary broad-spectrum antibiotics contributing to antibiotic resistance. Establishing a rapid and standardized M-ROSE workflow within respiratory medicine departments or intensive care units will greatly assist physicians in formulating accurate treatment strategies for patients, which holds significant clinical implications.

Introduction

The technique of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) is a highly efficient method employed in the field of pulmonary disease procedures. It enables real-time sampling and diagnostic intervention, facilitating immediate cytological analysis1. This innovative approach involves imprinting a portion of the tissue specimen onto a slide while preserving its integrity. One of the key advantages of ROSE lies in its capacity to facilitate prompt interpretation of clinical information through specialized microscopy techniques. This encompasses the analysis of cell morphology, classification, quantification, determination of constituent ratios, assessment of arrangement, correlation analysis, evaluation of background, and identification of foreign objects. By integrating all this data with the patient’s clinical information, ROSE plays a pivotal role in evaluating sampling adequacy and guiding real-time interventional procedures and techniques2.

As a subsidiary of ROSE technology, M-ROSE technology primarily focuses on acquiring the microbiological background of target lesions rather than discerning between benign and malignant cells3,4. On one hand, M-ROSE enables the microscopic identification of pathogens such as Aspergillus, Cryptococcus, Pneumocystis, and Candida5. On the other hand, it holds significant guiding implications in assessing respiratory specimen quality, distinguishing infectious from non-infectious diseases, discriminating infection from contamination, as well as evaluating infection severity and prognosis6,7. For instance, within a respiratory specimen, the coexistence of bacteria exhibiting identical morphology alongside infiltrating inflammatory cells indicates an infection; conversely, the presence of multiple morphologically diverse bacteria accompanied by epithelial cells suggests contamination. The capacity to comprehensively analyze clinical information and predict outcomes renders M-ROSE an invaluable tool in pulmonary disease procedures.

In conclusion, ROSE serves as a crucial cytological carrier that significantly enhances the efficiency and precision of diagnosing lung diseases. Its multifaceted capabilities contribute to improved patient outcomes by ensuring timely intervention and facilitating accurate diagnosis through real-time sampling and diagnostic intervention techniques. However, it is important to note that these advancements rely on obtaining qualified samples. Herein, we present a standardized M-ROSE protocol encompassing slide preparation, staining techniques, and interpretation guidelines. This protocol serves as an invaluable reference for clinicians to establish accurate evaluation and treatment plans while facilitating decision-making regarding subsequent handling of target specimens.

Protocol

The clinical trial has been approved by the Approval Committee of Chongqing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (No. 2022-ky-31). The typical case involved a patient diagnosed with Pneumocystis pneumonia, and informed consent was obtained from the patient. 1. Equipment and material requirements for ROSE Equipment: Refer to the Table of Materials file for the equipment used in this protocol. NOTE: Utilizing a dedicated cytological micros…

Representative Results

In a typical case, a 63-year-old man presented to the hospital with a cough, fever, and chest pain. The patient was previously diagnosed with nephrotic syndrome, characterized by proteinuria and edema, and received treatment with prednisone and tacrolimus for a long time. The initial laboratory findings demonstrated a white blood cell count of 10.49 x 109/L, neutrophil counts of 8.87 x 109/L, whole blood C-reactive protein and (1-3)-β-D-glucan concentrations of 155.81 mg/L and 249.7 pg/mL. The …

Discussion

Interventional pulmonology is an valuable branch of modern respiratory disease; in particular, it has been widely used in the diagnosis of lung diseases8,9. In recent years, diagnostic interventional pulmonology has been thriving due to the increased prevalence of pulmonary malignant tumors, more drug-resistant pathogen infections occuring in the lower respiratory tract, and demanding requests for diagnosis of baffling and critical respiratory diseases<sup class=…

Divulgations

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the Chongqing Scientific Research institution's performance incentive and guidance project (jxyn-2021-1-15 and jxyn-2021-2-6) for financial support.

Materials

Cytological microscope Olympus Corporation CX43
Diff Quik (DQ) staining solutions Besso Biotechnology Co. LTD G1541
Disposable 2.5-5 mL syringe needles Shandong Zhu Pharmaceutical Group 20183150304
Powder-free latex gloves Henan Yadu Industrial Co., LTD 20182140728
Sterile cell culture slides Jinan Preret industry and trade Co., LTD 7101

References

  1. Zhang, S., et al. Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid on-site evaluation performed by endoscopists in solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 37 (10), 1975-1982 (2022).
  2. Bruno, P., et al. Efficacy and cost effectiveness of rapid on site examination (ROSE) in management of patients with mediastinal lymphadenopathies. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 17 (11), 1517-1522 (2013).
  3. Li, T., et al. Microbiology rapid on-site evaluation: a better method for Mucoid Pseudomonas Aeruginosa diagnosis in bronchiectasic patients. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 26 (5), 1738-1742 (2022).
  4. Tao, Y., et al. Application of microbiological rapid on-site evaluation in respiratory intensive care units: a retrospective study. Ann Transl Med. 10 (1), 7 (2022).
  5. Yan, P., et al. The value of microbiology rapid on-site evaluation of sepsis caused by pulmonary infection. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 27 (12), 5862-5868 (2023).
  6. Muri, R., Trippel, M., Borner, U., Weidner, S., Trepp, R. The impact of rapid on-site evaluation on the quality and diagnostic value of thyroid nodule fine-needle aspirations. Thyroid. 32 (6), 667-674 (2022).
  7. Wang, Z., Shi, Y. Application of rapid on-site evaluation in contemporary pediatric interventional respiratory diseases. Chinese Journal of Practical Pediatrics. 12, 470-475 (2019).
  8. Shah, P. L., Herth, F. J. F. Progress in interventional pulmonology. Respiration. 95 (5), 287-288 (2018).
  9. Hsia, D., Musani, A. I. Interventional pulmonology. Med Clin North Am. 95 (6), 1095-1114 (2011).
  10. Moore, A. J., Mercer, R. M., Musani, A. I. Advances in interventional pulmonology. Clin Chest Med. 39 (1), 271-280 (2018).
  11. Majid, A., Fernandez-Bussy, S., Folch, E. Interventional pulmonology and solitary pulmonary nodule. Arch Bronconeumol. 54 (10), 497-498 (2018).
  12. Ali, M. S., Sorathia, L. Palliative care and interventional pulmonology. Clin Chest Med. 39 (1), 57-64 (2018).
  13. Czarnecka, K., Yasufuku, K. Interventional pulmonology: focus on pulmonary diagnostics. Respirology. 18 (1), 47-60 (2013).
  14. Schacht, M. J., et al. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: performance of biomedical scientists on rapid on-site evaluation and preliminary diagnosis. Cytopathology. 27 (5), 344-350 (2016).
  15. Pearson, L., et al. Rapid on-site evaluation of fine-needle aspiration by non-cytopathologists: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies for adequacy assessment. Acta Cytol. 62 (4), 244-252 (2018).
  16. Arimura, K., et al. Cryobiopsy with endobronchial ultrasonography using a guide sheath for peripheral pulmonary lesions and DNA analysis by next generation sequencing and rapid on-site evaluation. Respir Investig. 57 (2), 150-156 (2019).
  17. Gianella, P., et al. Utility of rapid on-site cytologic evaluation during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in malignant and nonmalignant disease. Acta Cytol. 62 (5-6), 380-385 (2018).
  18. Natella, V., Cozzolino, I., Sosa Fernandez, L. V., Vigliar, E. Lymph nodes fine needle cytology in the diagnosis of infectious diseases: clinical settings. Infez Med. 20, 12-15 (2012).
  19. Baughman, R. P., Spencer, R. E., Kleykamp, B. O., Rashkin, M. C., Douthit, M. M. Ventilator associated pneumonia: quality of nonbronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage sample affects diagnostic yield. Eur Respir J. 16 (6), 1152-1157 (2000).
  20. Petrone, M. C., et al. Does cytotechnician training influence the accuracy of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic masses. Dig Liver Dis. 44 (4), 311-314 (2012).
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Keep me updated:

.

Citer Cet Article
Weng, X., Sun, W., Luo, Z., Zhou, Y., An, X. Microbiological Rapid On-Site Evaluation for Pulmonary Infectious Diseases. J. Vis. Exp. (205), e66059, doi:10.3791/66059 (2024).

View Video