Summary

A Simple Fecal Flotation Method for Diagnosing Zoonotic Nematodes Under Field and Laboratory Conditions

Published: December 15, 2023
doi:

Summary

This work describes the use of a flotation method to identify Toxocara canis and Ancylostoma spp. detected in fecal samples collected from dogs in Mexico from 2017 to 2021 under field conditions.

Abstract

Diagnosis of canine parasites with zoonotic potential such as Toxocara canis and Ancylostoma caninum under field conditions is usually difficult due to limited access to a laboratory in rural and suburban areas in Mexico. This study aimed to detect T. canis and Ancylostoma spp. in fecal samples collected from dogs in Mexico from 2017 to 2021 under field conditions. Sample size calculation resulted in a target enrollment of 534 dogs across the country.

Samples were collected directly from the rectum or the ground after defecation. Samples were stored in individual, tightly sealed, plastic bags at 4 °C. A saturated solution of sodium chloride (specific gravity [SpG] 1.20) was prepared both under field and laboratory conditions. Within 3 days of collection, 2-4 g of feces were tested for parasites using a flotation method by suspending each fecal sample in a saline solution. Feces were mixed with the flotation solution and crushed using a metal spoon.

Once a uniform consistency was achieved, the fecal sample was poured into a new plastic cup using a sieve and allowed to sit for 10-15 min. Three drops from the top of the mixture were collected using a sterilized inoculating loop. The slides were placed on the microscope and parasites were identified by trained parasitologists. Fecal samples from 1,055 dogs were screened microscopically. The number of positive samples for Ancylostoma spp. was 833 (78.95% frequency) and 222 (21.04%) for T. canis. These findings illustrate the importance of identifying zoonotic helminths in dogs living in urban and rural areas in Mexico using a coproparasitoscopic technique in the laboratory and under field conditions.

Introduction

Gastrointestinal parasites are one of the most common health problems that affect dogs1. Estimates suggest that there are ~700 million domestic dogs worldwide, and approximately 175 million may be categorized as free-roaming2. More than 60 parasite species are shared between dogs and humans, suggesting that dogs could be a source of infection for humans with these parasites3. Toxocara canis and Ancylostoma caninum are two parasitic species that infect dogs and, accidentally, human hosts. Currently, there are several studies about the locations where these helminths are able to survive and reproduce in Mexico. The prevalence of Toxocara in dogs varies from 0% to over 87% across the United States, Mexico, Central America, and the Caribbean4. Toxocara canis and Ancylostoma spp., as well as other parasitic species in dogs, have been previously reported in Mexico5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13 (Table 1).

Parasitic species Region Prevalence (%) Reference
Ancylostoma caninum Querétaro 42.90 5
Tabasco 15.90 6
Campeche 35.7 – 42.9  7
Yucatán 73.8 8
Babesia Morelos 13.60 9
Veracruz 10.00
Coccidial oocysts Yucatán 2.30 8
Ctenocephalides Morelos 30.3 10
Dipylidium caninum Yucatán 2.30 8
Dirofilaria  Yucatán 7.0 – 8.3 11
Giardia Tabasco 3.00 6
Yucatán 18.8 8
Leishmania Chiapas 19.00 12
Tapeworms Baja California 6.79 13
Toxocara canis Querétaro 22.10 5
Yucatán 6.20 8
Trichuris vulpis Yucatán 25.40 8
Trypanosoma Jalisco 8.10 9
Campeche 7.60
Chiapas 4.5 – 42.8
Quintana Roo 20.1 – 21.3
Toluca 17.50
Yucatán 9.8 – 34

Table 1: Regional prevalence (%) of dog parasites in Mexico from 2001 to 2020. Findings from previous investigations conducted from 2001 to 2020 have enabled the identification of canine parasite distribution across several urban and rural settings in Mexico. These studies provide a deep understanding of epidemiological elements conducive to the persistence of canine parasites in different ecosystems, contributing to a comprehensive assessment of the zoonotic impact of some parasite species.

Life cycle stages of intestinal parasites, such as eggs, cysts, oocysts, or larvae can be found in stool samples. Thus, examination of fecal material provides valuable information about the parasites of an animal. The need for a method to detect Ancylostomidae eggs in human feces led to the use of the simple fecal smear in 1878, which was used for many years to detect gastrointestinal parasites but was considered not very sensitive. Thus, the need arose to develop better copromicroscopic methods14. More than 100 years have passed since the flotation technique for recovering and counting parasite eggs in fecal samples was first described15. Since then, several methods and variants of the flotation technique have been considered a standard for the detection of some parasites in their hosts.

For example, Lane described a method in 1924 involving the direct centrifugal flotation technique, which integrates centrifugation followed by floating the sediment in a saturated sodium chloride solution with SpG 1.2 in 1 g (Lane) or 10 g (Stoll's modification). The flotation technique was subsequently modified by using solutions with different SpG14. In 1939, Gordon and Whitlock reported the disadvantages of Stoll's technique due to interference from detritus in visualizing parasite eggs and developed the quantitative method known as McMaster16. In 1979, O'Grady and Slocombe demonstrated that the specific gravity of the solution, timing, and mesh sizes of strainers affect the accuracy of egg detection using the flotation technique17. During the last decades, because several modifications have been made to the flotation technique, there is an urgent need for standardization of flotation methods. Currently, detection of canine helminth infections in the context of prevention of zoonotic parasites is required to apply appropriate anthelmintic treatments to limit environmental contamination with infectious stages of zoonotic nematodes18.

Among qualitative methods, the fecal flotation technique is widely used and accepted because it does not require much equipment, is simple, inexpensive, and reproducible; yet it has a major drawback in that it lacks sensitivity when the intensity of the infection is low19. The ability to reveal the presence of a greater number of parasitic elements such as eggs, oocysts, cysts, or nematode larvae is usually determined by the density of the solution20.

Previous reports have compared coproparasitological techniques for the detection of canine nematode eggs. With regard to the detection of motile protozoa, direct fecal smears are used; whereas sedimentation methods are useful for diagnosing heavy eggs of parasites such as trematodes21. One of the most widely used field-based diagnostic tests is the fecal smear method. However, the low level of sensitivity of this technique may be attributed to the fact that it does contain debris that interferes with the detection of parasite eggs. By incorporating a sieving step along with solutions that provide the proper SpG, the flotation method offers a clearer and less cluttered observation of ascarid and hookworm eggs. This leads to a more precise and efficient process for microscopic screening22. Likewise, simple flotation and direct centrifugal flotation techniques are very commonly utilized to recover parasite eggs and oocysts14. The classic flotation methods can be considered qualitative or quantitative depending on the use of a counting chamber such as the McMaster method15. Nonetheless, as the flotation technique has low sensitivity and focuses on the detection of parasites in the patent period, negative results should not be considered conclusive. However, the accuracy not only depends on the preservation procedure of fecal samples or the SpG of flotation solutions but also depends on the technical proficiency and experience in conducting fecal examinations of the user.

Consequently, other methods have been explored for the detection of canine parasites in feces. It has been generally recognized that one of the most widely used approaches for the diagnosis of intestinal helminth infections in dogs is the FLOTAC technique, a multivalent, sensitive, and accurate method that yields accurate and reliable results for the diagnosis of A. caninum in dogs when compared to a flotation protocol in a tube and the McMaster technique19,23. Sedimentation methods are useful for recovering fluke eggs, embryonated nematode eggs, and most tapeworm eggs, which cannot be recovered on the surface of a flotation solution because these structures do not float24. One method that has been proven to be superior to flotation/sedimentation techniques is the Modified Double Centrifugal Flotation method, as it enables the detection of cestode eggs in feces, is less time-consuming, separates Anoplocephala eggs from fecal debris, and decreases crystallization25. Moreover, this technique has been successfully used to detect ascarid eggs with high sensitivity26. Yet, some of these aforementioned techniques and centrifugal methods such as as the Ovassay, as opposed to the flotation protocol we propose in this study, require sample preservation in reagents such as formalin, commercial kits, sample processing under laboratory conditions, and the use of reagents such as zinc sulfate27 which are expensive and require special disposal procedures to avoid environmental toxicity.

The use of techniques that increase the sensitivity of the flotation method by adding solutions with high SpG has been favored recently. However, it must be considered that the disadvantage of these solutions is the increase in debris in the final preparation and hence, the inaccurate detection of parasite eggs. In addition, the commercial availability of materials, reagents, cost, environmental impact issues, and difficulty of use of centrifugal methods affect the selection of a flotation technique14, which can be challenging in field conditions in contrast to the protocol that we present in this work. The preparation of the flotation solutions with table salt is advantageous over the utilization of sugar because under field conditions, sugar attracts insects such as wasps and bees and preparations become sticky. Further, solutions such as phenol, which is added to sugar solutions to avoid stickiness, or ZnSO4are complex to properly discard according to environmental protection guidelines and cannot be disposed of in the field; unlike a table salt solution.

The goal of this manuscript is to demonstrate the steps to detect T. canis and Ancylostoma spp. eggs in fecal samples using an adaptation of the simple flotation technique under field and laboratory conditions. Following the protocol herewith described and using a microscope with a backup battery, the diagnosis of these canine zoonotic parasites in rural and suburban areas is possible when no laboratory equipment and infrastructure are available. The simple flotation method described in this work can provide quick results and is a non-invasive and cost-effective technique for routine screening.

Protocol

The use and care of dogs was approved by the National and Autonomous University of Mexico. 1. Collection of fecal samples NOTE: Handle the dog with the help of a veterinarian or the owner of the animal. In the case of feral dogs (Figure 1A) or nervous animals, collect samples from the ground right after defecation or no more than 10 min later. Lubricate surgical gloves or thin-walled polyethylene b…

Representative Results

In this work, collection and coproparasitoscopic procedures for the identification of T. canis and Ancylostoma spp. are described. The rationale behind the adaptation of the simple fecal flotation method to detect canine helminth eggs is that this technique is cost-effective as the solutions, equipment, and materials are inexpensive. Hence, the method has a high sample handling capacity as multiple samples can be processed in a short period. Moreover, the simple fecal flotation method is easy to perform…

Discussion

Nematodes such as T. canis and Ancylostoma spp. can inhabit the small intestine of dogs and have the potential to be transmitted to humans. Clinical signs caused by T. canis are serious in young dogs, manifesting as poor growth, respiratory issues, or digestive tract lesions28. In adult dogs, the infection typically tends to be mild. Diagnosis relies on identifying characteristic eggs in a fecal sample. This condition is a frequent cause for prescribing anthelmintic trea…

Divulgations

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México for providing the financial resources through grant PAPIIT IN218720 and to Dr. Claudia Mendoza for granting the requested extension. This work is dedicated to my lovely Nicole, who passed away in 2019. You will always live in my heart.

Materials

3 x 1.2 V AA rechargeable batteries Energizer Sold in retail stores
Bunsen burner Viresa FER-M224
Disposable 12-oz glass cup Uline Mexico S-22275 Sold in retail stores
Glass slides Velab, Mexico VEP-P20
Inoculating loop VelaQuin, Mexico CRM-5010PH 
Light Microscope VelaQuin, Mexico VE-B2
Lighter Bic J25 Sold in retail stores
One plastic cup (12 oz) Amazon ASIN B08C2CRHSH Can be any kitchen plastic reuseable cup
Plastic cups  (size of a dice or urine sample cup) diameter 5.5 cm and height 8.5 cm, two cups Amazon Layhit-Containers-ZYHD192919 Can be any kitchen plastic reuseable cup
Plastic strainer 10 cm Ecko ASIN B00TUAAVWI Can be any kitchen plastic strainer
Soda bottle Coca-Cola 1-liter Sold in retail stores
Spoon Amazon Basics ASIN B00TUAAVWI Can be any kitchen spoon
Table salt La Fina Sold in retail stores

References

  1. Duncan, K. T., Koons, N. R., Litherland, M. A., Little, S. E., Nagamori, Y. Prevalence of intestinal parasites in fecal samples and estimation of parasite contamination from dog parks in central Oklahoma. Veterinary Parasitology Regional Studies and Reports. 19, 100362 (2020).
  2. Kisiel, L. M., et al. Owned dog ecology and demography in Villa de Tezontepec, Hidalgo, Mexico. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 135, 37-46 (2016).
  3. Lyons, M. A., Malhotra, R., Thompson, C. W. Investigating the free-roaming dog population and gastrointestinal parasite diversity in Tulúm, México. PLoS One. 17 (10), e0276880 (2022).
  4. Dantas-Torres, F., et al. TROCCAP recommendations for the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of parasitic infections in dogs and cats in the tropics. Veterinary Parasitology. 283, (2020).
  5. Cantó, G. J., García, M. P., García, A., Guerrero, M. J., Mosqueda, J. The prevalence and abundance of helminth parasites in stray dogs from the city of Querétaro in central Mexico. Journal Of Helminthology. 85 (3), 263-269 (2011).
  6. Torres-Chablé, O. M., et al. Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in domestic dogs in Tabasco, Southeastern Mexico. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária. 24 (4), 432-437 (2015).
  7. Cortez-Aguirre, G. R., Jiménez-Coello, M., Gutiérrez-Blanco, E., Ortega-Pacheco, A. Stray dog population in a city of Southern Mexico and its impact on the contamination of public areas. Veterinary Medicine International. 2018, 1-6 (2018).
  8. Rodríguez-Vivas, R. I., et al. An epidemiological study of intestinal parasites of dogs from Yucatán, Mexico, and their risk to public health. Vector Borne Zoonotic Diseases. 11 (8), 1141-1144 (2011).
  9. Maggi, R. G., Krämer, F. A review on the occurrence of companion vector-borne diseases in pet animals in Latin America. Parasites & Vectors. 12 (1), 145 (2019).
  10. Cruz-Vazquez, C., Castro, G., Parada, F., Ramos, P. Seasonal occurrence of Ctenocephalides felis and Ctenocephalides canis (siphonaptera:Pulicidae) infesting dogs and cats in an urban area in Cuernavaca, Mexico. Entomological Society of America. 38 (1), 111-113 (2001).
  11. Bolio-Gonzalez, M. E., et al. Prevalence of the Dirofilaria immitis infection in dogs from Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico. Veterinary Parasitology. 148 (2), 166-169 (2007).
  12. Pastor-Santiago, J. A., Flisser, A., Chávez-López, S., Guzmán-Bracho, C., Olivo-Díaz, A. American visceral leishmaniasis in Chiapas, Mexico. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 86 (1), 108-114 (2012).
  13. Trasviña-Muñoz, E., et al. Detection of intestinal parasites in stray dogs from a farming and cattle region of Northwestern Wexico. Pathogens. 9 (7), (2020).
  14. Ballweber, L. R., Beugnet, F., Marchiondo, A. A., Payne, P. A. American Association of Veterinary Parasitologists’ review of veterinary fecal flotation methods and factors influencing their accuracy and use–is there really one best technique. Veterinary Parasitology. 204 (1-2), 73-80 (2014).
  15. Nielsen, M. K. What makes a good fecal egg count technique. Veterinary Parasitology. 296, 109509 (2021).
  16. Gordon, H. M., Whitlock, H. V. A new technique for counting nematode eggs in sheep faeces. Journal of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research. 12 (1), 50-52 (1939).
  17. O’grady, M. R., Slocombe, J. O. D. An investigation of variables in a fecal flotation technique. Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine. 44 (2), 148 (1980).
  18. ESCCAP. Worm control in dogs and cats. Guideline 01. European Scientific Counsel Companion Animal Parasites. , (2017).
  19. Cringoli, G., et al. Ancylostoma caninum: Calibration and comparison of diagnostic accuracy of flotation in tube, McMaster and FLOTAC in faecal samples of dogs. Experimental Parasitology. 128 (1), 32-37 (2011).
  20. Figueroa, C. J. A. Examen coproparasitoscópico. In: Técnicas para el diagnóstico de parásitos con importancia en salud pública y veterinaria, Consejo Técnico Consultivo Nacional de Sanidad Animal. AMPAVE-CONASA. , 83-105 (2015).
  21. Dryden, M. W., Payne, P. A., Ridley, R., Smith, V. Comparison of common fecal flotation techniques for the recovery of parasite eggs and oocysts. Veterinary Therapeutics. 6 (1), 15-28 (2005).
  22. Adolph, C., et al. Diagnostic strategies to reveal covert infections with intestinal helminths in dogs. Veterinary Parasitology. 247, 108-112 (2017).
  23. Cringoli, G., Rinaldi, L., Maurelli, M. P., Utzinger, J. FLOTAC: New multivalent techniques for qualitative and quantitative copromicroscopic diagnosis of parasites in animals and humans. Nature Protocols. 5 (3), 503-515 (2010).
  24. Katagiri, S., Oliveira-Sequeira, T. C. Comparison of three concentration methods for the recovery of canine intestinal parasites from stool samples. Experimental Parasitology. 126 (2), 214-216 (2010).
  25. Rehbein, S., Lindner, T., Visser, M., Winter, R. Evaluation of a double centrifugation technique for the detection of Anoplocephala eggs in horse faeces. Journal of Helminthology. 85 (4), 409-414 (2011).
  26. Liccioli, S., et al. Sensitivity of double centrifugation sugar fecal flotation for detecting intestinal helminths in coyotes (Canis latrans). Journal of Wildlife Diseases. 48 (3), 717-723 (2012).
  27. Rishniw, M., Liotta, J., Bellosa, M., Bowman, D., Simpson, K. W. Comparison of 4 Giardia diagnostic tests in diagnosis of naturally acquired canine chronic subclinical giardiasis. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine. 24 (2), 293-297 (2010).
  28. Barutzki, D., Schaper, R. Endoparasites in dogs and cats in Germany 1999-2002. Parasitology Research. 90, S148-S150 (2003).
  29. Carlin, E. P., Tyungu, D. L. Toxocara: Protecting pets and improving the lives of people. Advances in Parasitology. 109, 3-16 (2020).
  30. Saari, S., NaReaho, A., Nikander, S. . Canine parasites and parasitic diseases. , (2019).
  31. Bowman, D. D., Montgomery, S. P., Zajac, A. M., Eberhard, M. L., Kazacos, K. R. Hookworms of dogs and cats as agents of cutaneous larva migrans. Trends in Parasitology. 26 (4), 162-167 (2010).
  32. Dryden, M. W., Payne, P. A., Ridley, R., Smith, V. Comparison of common fecal flotation techniques for the recovery of parasite eggs and oocysts. Veterinary Therapeutics. 6 (1), 15-28 (2005).
  33. Barutzki, D., Schaper, R. Results of parasitological examinations of faecal samples from cats and dogs in Germany between 2003 and 2010. Parasitology Research. 109, S45-S60 (2011).
  34. Novobilský, A., Novák, J., Björkman, C., Höglund, J. Impact of meteorological and environmental factors on the spatial distribution of Fasciola hepatica in beef cattle herds in Sweden. BMC Veterinary Research. 11, 128 (2015).
  35. Pickles, R. S., Thornton, D., Feldman, R., Marques, A., Murray, D. L. Predicting shifts in parasite distribution with climate change: A multitrophic level approach. Global Change Biology. 19 (9), 2645-2654 (2013).
  36. Pérez-Rodríguez, A., De La Hera, I., Fernández-González, S., Pérez-Tris, J. Global warming will reshuffle the areas of high prevalence and richness of three genera of avian blood parasites. Global Chaneg Biology. 20 (8), 2406-2416 (2014).
  37. Nava-Castro, K., Hernández-Bello, R., Muñiz-Hernández, S., Camacho-Arroyo, I., Morales-Montor, J. Sex steroids, immune system, and parasitic infections: Facts and hypotheses. Annals Of The New York Academy Of Sciences. 1262, 16-26 (2012).
  38. Morales-Montor, J., Escobedo, G., Vargas-Villavicencio, J. A., Larralde, C. The neuroimmunoendocrine network in the complex host-parasite relationship during murine cysticercosis. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry. 8 (5), 400-407 (2008).
  39. Olave-Leyva, J., et al. Prevalencia de helmintos gastrointestinales en perros procedentes del servicio de salud de Tulancingo, Hidalgo. Abanico Veterinario. 9 (1), 1-10 (2019).
check_url/fr/66110?article_type=t

Play Video

Citer Cet Article
Segura, J., Alcala-Canto, Y., Figueroa, A., Del Rio, V., Salgado-Maldonado, G. A Simple Fecal Flotation Method for Diagnosing Zoonotic Nematodes Under Field and Laboratory Conditions. J. Vis. Exp. (202), e66110, doi:10.3791/66110 (2023).

View Video