Summary

Generation of Tissue Spheroids via a 3D Printed Stamp-Like Device

Published: October 06, 2022
doi:

Summary

The present protocol describes a technique to produce tissue spheroids on a large scale cost-effectively using a 3D printed stamp-like device.

Abstract

Advances in 3D cell culture have developed more physiologically relevant in vitro models, such as tissue spheroids. Cells cultivated as spheroids have more realistic biological responses that resemble the in vivo environment. Due to their advantages, tissue spheroids represent an emerging trend toward superior, more reliable, and more predictive study models with a broad range of biotechnological applicability. However, reproducible platforms that can achieve large-scale production of tissue spheroids have become an unmet need in fully exploring and boosting their potential. Herein, the large-scale production of homogeneous tissue spheroids is reported using a low-cost and time-effective methodology. A 3D printed stamp-like device is developed to generate up to 4,716 spheroids per 6-well plate. The device is fabricated by the stereolithography method using a photocurable resin. The final device is composed of cylindrical micropins, with a height of 1.3 mm and a width of 650 µm. This approach allows the fast generation of homogeneous spheroids and co-cultured spheroids with uniform shape and size and >95% cell viability. Moreover, the stamp-like device is tunable for different sizes of well plates and Petri dishes. It is easily sterilized and can be reused for long periods. The efficient large-scale production of homogeneous tissue spheroids is essential to leverage their translation for multiple areas of industry, such as tissue engineering, drug development, disease modeling, and on-demand personalized medicine.

Introduction

Tissue spheroids are 3D micro-tissues formed by cell suspensions that undergo self-assembly without external forces1. These spheroids have been widely used in biofabrication protocols due to their resemblance with key features of the human physiological system2,3. Tissue spheroids provide more similar metabolism, cytoskeleton dynamics, cell viability, and metabolic and secretion activity than traditional monolayer cell culture1. Due to their fusion capability, they can also be used as building blocks (e.g., bioprinting protocols) to form complex tissue-engineered constructs with enhanced biological relevance4,5.

Due to their biological relevance, tissue spheroids have been used as a biotechnological tool for protocols ranging across tissue engineering, drug development, disease modeling, and nanotoxicological assessment, reducing time, space costs, and animal testing3,6,7,8. Nonetheless, to fully explore and leverage the potential of tissue spheroids, reliable and reproducible methods aiming at their large-scale production are highly necessary, and these remain an ongoing challenge.

Several methodologies produce spheroids, such as hanging drop, coated u-shaped bottom wells, microfluidics, and using a polymeric matrix9,10. Although these methodologies paved the way within the spheroid production market, they are still complex, time-consuming, labor-intensive, or expensive10.

The present protocol reports the large-scale production of homogeneous tissue spheroids using a low-cost and time-effective methodology. We have developed a 3D printed stamp-like device to generate up to 4,716 spheroids per 6-well plate. Moreover, the stamp-like device can be tailored to produce more spheroids per well, suitable for different cell culture plates. It is easily sterilizable and can be reused for long periods. The efficient large-scale production of homogeneous tissue spheroids is essential to translate their use to the clinics, contributing to multiple areas of industry such as tissue engineering, drug development, disease modeling, and on-demand personalized medicine.

Protocol

The L929 cell line, mouse fibroblasts, was used for the present study. The stamp-like 3D printed biodevice was obtained from a commercial source (see Table of Materials). Good cell culture practice and sterile techniques were followed throughout the protocol. The fabricated device was sterilized by wiping it with 70% alcohol and exposing it to UV light for 15 min. The cell culture media and solutions were warmed to 37 °C before contacting with the cells or tissue spheroids. A schematic representatio…

Representative Results

Generation of homogeneous micro resections using the 3D printed stamp-like device The 3D printed stamp-like device was successfully manufactured by the stereolithography method12 using a photocurable resin (Figure 2A). The final device was composed of cylindrical micropins with a height of 1.3 mm and a width of 650 µm (Figure 2A). Its use as a master mold to produce non-adherent micro resections was achieved by…

Discussion

The present protocol describes a simple, fast, and inexpensive method for the large-scale production of tissue spheroids. A stamp-like 3D printed device was used as a master mold, which generated up to 4,716 spheroids per 6-well plate. It has been shown that cells cultivated as spheroids have more realistic biological responses that closely resemble the in vivo environment1. Due to their advantages, tissue spheroids represent an emerging trend toward superior, more reliable, and more pred…

Divulgazioni

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Foundation for Research Support of the State of Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ, Brazil), the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES, Brazil), and the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq, Brazil). We thank Bioedtech for providing the stamp-like devices used in this study and Professor Bartira Bergmann from the Immunopharmacology Laboratory for the use of their cell culture facilities.

Materials

6 well plate Merck CLS3516
Agarose Promega V3121
Biodevice  Bioedtech
Biological Safety Cabinet ThermoFisher  51029701
Centrifugue ThermoFisher  75004031
Corning 50 mL centrifuge tubes Merck CLS430829-500EA
Corning cell culture flasks surface area 75 cm2 Merck CLS430641
Draft Resin  FormLabs FLDRBL01
Dulbecco′s Modified Eagle′s Medium – low glucose Merck D6046
Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) ThermoFisher  16000044
Form 2 FormLabs
Incubator ThermoFisher  51033782
L929 cell lines Stablished in the lab 
Penicillin and Streptomycin (PS) ThermoFisher  15140122
Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS) Merck 806552
Trypsin with EDTA Merck T3924

Riferimenti

  1. Laschke, M., Menger, M. Life is 3D: Boosting spheroid function for tissue engineering. Trends in Biotechnology. 35 (2), 133-144 (2017).
  2. Mekhileri, N., et al. Automated 3D bioassembly of micro-tissues for biofabrication of hybrid tissue engineered constructs. Biofabrication. 10 (2), 024103 (2018).
  3. Itoh, M., et al. Scaffold-free tubular tissues created by a bio-3D printer undergo remodeling and endothelialization when implanted in rat aortae. PLoS One. 10 (12), 0145971 (2015).
  4. Kronemberger, G., et al. The hypertrophic cartilage induction influences the building-block capacity of human adipose stem/stromal cell spheroids for biofabrication. Artificial Organs. 45 (10), 1208-1218 (2021).
  5. Mironov, V., et al. Organ printing: Tissue spheroids as building blocks. Biomaterials. 30 (12), 2164-2174 (2009).
  6. Skardal, A., Shupe, T., Atala, A. Organoid-on-a-chip and body-on-a-chip systems for drug screening and disease modeling. Drug Discovery Today. 21 (9), 1399-1411 (2016).
  7. Garcez, P., et al. Zika virus impairs growth in human neurospheres and brain organoids. Science. 352 (6287), 816-818 (2016).
  8. Charelli, L., et al. Biologically produced silver chloride nanoparticles from B. megaterium modulate interleukin secretion by human adipose stem cell spheroids. Cytotechnology. 70 (6), 1655-1669 (2018).
  9. Cui, X., Hartanto, Y., Zhang, H. Advances in multicellular spheroids formation. Journal of the Royal Society Interface. 14 (127), 20160877 (2017).
  10. Achilli, T., Meyer, J., Morgan, J. Advances in the formation, use and understanding of multi-cellular spheroids. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy. 12 (10), 1347-1360 (2012).
  11. Rolver, M., Elingaard-Larsen, L., Pedersen, S. Assessing cell viability and death in 3D spheroid cultures of cancer cells. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (148), e59714 (2019).
  12. Quan, H., et al. Photo-curing 3D printing technique and its challenges. Bioactive Materials. 5 (1), 110-115 (2020).
  13. Rodriguez-Salvador, M., Perez-Benitez, B., Padilla-Aguirre, K. Discovering the latest scientific pathways on tissue spheroids: Opportunities to innovate. International Journal of Bioprinting. 7 (1), 331 (2021).
  14. Baptista, L., et al. Adult stem cells spheroids to optimize cell colonization in scaffolds for cartilage and bone tissue engineering. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 19 (5), 1285 (2018).
  15. Shakeri, A., Khan, S., Didar, T. Conventional and emerging strategies for the fabrication and functionalization of PDMS-based microfluidic devices. Lab on a Chip. 21 (16), 3053-3075 (2021).
  16. vander Valk, J. Fetal bovine serum (FBS): Past – present – future. ALTEX. 35 (1), 99-118 (2018).
  17. vander Valk, J., Brunner, D., et al. Optimization of chemically defined cell culture media – Replacing fetal bovine serum in mammalian in vitro methods. Toxicology in Vitro. 24 (4), 1053-1063 (2010).
  18. Smyrek, I., et al. microtubules and FAK dominate different spheroid formation phases and important elements of tissue integrity. Biology Open. 8 (1), 037051 (2018).
  19. McMillen, P., Holley, S. Integration of cell-cell and cell-ECM adhesion in vertebrate morphogenesis. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 36, 48-53 (2015).
  20. Tung, Y., et al. High-throughput 3D spheroid culture and drug testing using a 384 hanging drop array. The Analyst. 136 (3), 473-478 (2011).
  21. Guo, X., Li, S., Ji, Q., Lian, R., Chen, J. Enhanced viability and neural differential potential in poor post-thaw hADSCs by agarose multi-well dishes and spheroid culture. Human Cell. 28 (4), 175-189 (2015).
  22. Andréa Dernowsek, J., Rezende, R., Lopes daSilva, J. The role of information technology in the future of 3D biofabrication. Journal of 3D Printing in Medicine. 1 (1), 63-74 (2017).
  23. Garcez, P., et al. Zika virus impairs growth in human neurospheres and brain organoids. Science. 352 (6287), 816-818 (2016).
  24. Skardal, A., et al. Multi-tissue interactions in an integrated three-tissue organ-on-a-chip platform. Scientific Reports. 7, 8837 (2017).
  25. Armoiry, X., et al. Autologous chondrocyte implantation with chondrosphere for treating articular cartilage defects in the knee: An evidence review group perspective of a NICE single technology appraisal. PharmacoEconomics. 37 (7), 879-886 (2018).
  26. Nakamura, A., et al. Bio-3D printing iPSC-derived human chondrocytes for articular cartilage regeneration. Biofabrication. 13 (4), 044103 (2021).
  27. Mesquita, C., Charelli, L., Baptista, L., Naveira-Cotta, C., Balbino, T. Continuous-mode encapsulation of human stem cell spheroids using droplet-based glass-capillary microfluidic device for 3D bioprinting technology. Biochemical Engineering Journal. 174, 108122 (2021).
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Keep me updated:

.

Citazione di questo articolo
Charelli, L. E., Dernowsek, J. A., Balbino, T. A. Generation of Tissue Spheroids via a 3D Printed Stamp-Like Device. J. Vis. Exp. (188), e63814, doi:10.3791/63814 (2022).

View Video