Summary

Laser Capture Microdissection of Drosophila Peripheral Neurons

Published: May 24, 2010
doi:

Summary

In this video-article we present a method for isolating single or multiple Drosophila da neurons from third instar larvae using the infrared capture (IR) class of Laser Capture Microdissection (LCM). RNA obtained from the isolated neurons can be readily used for downstream applications including qRT-PCR or microarray analyses.

Abstract

The dendritic arborization (da) neurons of the Drosophila peripheral nervous system (PNS) provide an excellent model system in which to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying class-specific dendrite morphogenesis1,2. To facilitate molecular analyses of class-specific da neuron development, it is vital to obtain these cells in a pure population. Although a range of different cell, and tissue-specific RNA isolation techniques exist for Drosophila cells, including magnetic bead based cell purification3,4, Fluorescent Activated Cell Sorting (FACS)5-8, and RNA binding protein based strategies9, none of these methods can be readily utilized for isolating single or multiple class-specific Drosophila da neurons with a high degree of spatial precision. Laser Capture Microdissection (LCM) has emerged as an extremely powerful tool that can be used to isolate specific cell types from tissue sections with a high degree of spatial resolution and accuracy. RNA obtained from isolated cells can then be used for analyses including qRT-PCR and microarray expression profiling within a given cell type10-16. To date, LCM has not been widely applied in the analysis of Drosophila tissues and cells17,18, including da neurons at the third instar larval stage of development.

Here we present our optimized protocol for isolation of Drosophila da neurons using the infrared (IR) class of LCM. This method allows for the capture of single, class-specific or multiple da neurons with high specificity and spatial resolution. Age-matched third instar larvae expressing a UAS-mCD8::GFP19 transgene under the control of either the class IV da neuron specific ppk-GAL420 driver or the pan-da neuron specific 21-7-GAL421 driver were used for these experiments. RNA obtained from the isolated da neurons is of very high quality and can be directly used for downstream applications, including qRT-PCR or microarray analyses. Furthermore, this LCM protocol can be readily adapted to capture other Drosophila cell types a various stages of development dependent upon the cell type specific, GAL4-driven expression pattern of GFP.

Protocol

General Comments on LCM of Drosophila Peripheral Neurons Allow from 6 hours, up to a week or longer for LCM depending upon the tissue type and the number of cells required. All the procedures are carried out in strictly RNAse-free conditions following standard procedures. Larvae expressing either 21-7-GAL4,UAS-mCD8::GFP or ppk-GAL4,UAS-mCD8::GFP transgenic reporter lines were used for these experiments. 1. Preparing…

Discussion

The protocol presented herein describes our optimized method for the isolation of Drosophila peripheral neurons via LCM. While this LCM protocol was designed for the specific isolation of single, class-specific or multiple Drosophila da neurons from the third instar larval stage of development, minor modifications of the protocol could readily be adapted for the capture of other Drosophila cell types from all developmental stages using distinct GAL4,UAS-mCD8-GFP reporter transgenes wh…

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

We thank Drs. Yuh-Nung Jan and Wes Grueber for providing fly stocks used in this study, and Virginia Espina, Dr. Emanuel Petricoin and Dr. Lance Liotta for assistance with LCM. The authors acknowledge the Thomas F. and Kate Miller Jeffress Memorial Trust for support of this research (D.N.C.) and the George Mason University Provost s Office (E.P.R.I.).

Materials

Material Name Type Company Catalogue Number Comment
10X Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS)   MP Bioproducts PBS10X02 Diluted to 1X working solution
2.5% Trypsin   Sigma-Aldrich T1426  
RNase-AWAY   Sigma-Aldrich 83931  
Xylenes, histological grade   Fisher Scientific X3S-4  
RNAse-free water   Fisher Scientific BP561-1  
Optimal Cutting Temperature (OCT) compound   Tissue-Tek 4583  
PicoPure RNA Isolation Kit   Molecular Devices KIT0204 Follow manufacturer’s instructions
Thin walled reaction tube with domed cap   GeneAmp, Applied Biosystems N8010611  
ExtracSure Sample Extraction Device   Molecular Devices LCM 0208  
Incubation Block for sample extraction from CapSure HS Caps   Molecular Devices LCM0505  
Alignment Tray for CapSure HS LCM Caps and ExtracSure Sample Extraction Devices   Molecular Devices LCM0504  
CapSure HS LCM caps   Molecular Devices LCM0213  
75×100 mm glass slides   Fisher Scientific 12-544-3  
Tissue embedding molds   Fisher Scientific NC9642669  
Polypropylene pestle for 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tubes   USA Scientific 1415-5390  
70% Ethanol; 95% Ethanol; 100% Ethanol        
Dry ice        

Equipment:

  • Cryostat
  • 50 ml conical tube for slide fixation, rinsing, trypsin treatment and ethanol/xylene dehydration
  • -80°C freezer
  • Incubator
  • PixCell IIe LCM Instrument with Fluor 300 epifluorescence optics optimized for EGFP (Molecular Devices-Molecular Devices)

References

  1. Corty, M. M., Matthews, B. J., Grueber, W. B. Molecules and mechanisms of dendrite development in Drosophila. Development. 136, 1049-1061 (2009).
  2. Parrish, J. Z., Emoto, K., Kim, ., Jan, Y. N. Mechanisms that regulate establishment, maintenance, and remodeling of dendritic fields. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 30, 399-423 (2007).
  3. Wang, X., Starz-Gaiano, M., Bridges, T., Montell, D. Purification of specific cell populations from Drosophila tissues by magnetic bead sorting, for use in gene expression profiling. Nature Protocols. , (2008).
  4. Iyer, E. P. R., Iyer, S. C., Sulkowski, M. J., Cox, D. N. Isolation and purification of Drosophila peripheral neurons by magnetic bead sorting. J Vis Exp. 34, 2912-2917 (2004).
  5. Tirouvanziam, R., Davidson, C. J., Lipsick, J. S., Herzenberg, L. A., Tirouvanziam, R., Tirouvanziam, R. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) of Drosophila hemocytes reveals important functional similarities to mammalian leukocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101, 2912-2917 (2004).
  6. Shigenobu, S., Arita, K., Kitadate, Y., Noda, C., Kobayashi, S. Isolation of germline cells from Drosophila embryos by flow cytometry. Dev. Growth Differ. 48, 49-57 (2006).
  7. Reeves, N., Posakony, J. W. Genetic programs activated by proneural proteins in the developing Drosophila PNS. Dev. Cell. 8, 413-425 (2005).
  8. Jinushi-Nakao, S. Knot/Collier and Cut control different aspects of dendrite cytoskeleton and synergize to define final arbor shape. Neuron. 56, 963-978 (2007).
  9. Yang, Z., Edenberg, H. J., Davis, R. L. Isolation of mRNA from specific tissues of Drosophila by mRNA tagging. Nucl. Acids Res. 33, (2005).
  10. Appay, V. Sensitive Gene Expression Profiling of Human T Cell Subsets Reveals Parallel Post-Thymic Differentiation for CD4+ and CD8+ Lineages. J. Immunol. 179, 7406-7414 (2007).
  11. Ginzinger, D. G. Gene quantification using real-time quantitative PCR: An emerging technology hits the mainstream. Exp. Hematol. 30, 503-512 (2002).
  12. Keays, K. M., Owens, G. P., Ritchie, A. M., Gilden, D. H., Burgoon, M. P. Laser capture microdissection and single-cell RT-PCR without RNA purification. J. Immunol. Methods. 302, 90-98 (2005).
  13. Volgin, D. V., Swan, J., Kubin, L. Single-cell RT-PCR gene expression profiling of acutely dissociated and immunocytochemically identified central neurons. J. Neurosci. Methods. 136, 229-236 (2004).
  14. Emmert-Buck, M. R. Laser capture microdissection. Science. 274, 998-1001 (1996).
  15. Xiao, W. Gene expression profiling in embryonic mouse lenses. Mol. Vis. 12, 1692-1698 (2006).
  16. Scharschmidt, T. Analysis of human osteoarthritic connective tissue by laser capture microdissection and QRT-PCR. Connect. Tissue Res. 48, 316-323 (2007).
  17. Spletter, M. L. regulates Drosophila olfactory projection neuron identity and targeting specificity. Neural Dev. 2, 14-14 (2007).
  18. Hoopfer, E. D., Penton, A., Watts, R. J., Luo, L. Genomic analysis of Drosophila neuronal remodeling: a role for the RNA-binding protein Boule as a negative regulator of axon pruning. J. Neurosci. 28, 6092-6103 (2008).
  19. Lee, T., Luo, L. Mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker for studies of gene function in neuronal morphogenesis. Neuron. 22, 451-461 (1999).
  20. Grueber, W. B. Projections of Drosophila multidendritic neurons in the central nervous system: links with peripheral dendrite morphology. Development. 134, 55-64 (2007).
  21. Song, W., Onishi, M., Jan, L. Y., Jan, Y. N. Peripheral multidendritic sensory neurons are necessary for rhythmic locomotion behavior in Drosophila larvae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 104, 5199-5204 (2007).
  22. Espina, V. Laser capture microdissection. Nat. Prot. 1, 586-603 (2006).
  23. Livak, K. J., Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25, 402-408 (2001).
check_url/kr/2016?article_type=t

Play Video

Cite This Article
Iyer, E. P. R., Cox, D. N. Laser Capture Microdissection of Drosophila Peripheral Neurons. J. Vis. Exp. (39), e2016, doi:10.3791/2016 (2010).

View Video