Summary

Одноместный мутагенеза бисульфит ооцитов

Published: June 27, 2012
doi:

Summary

Бисульфит мутагенеза является золотым стандартом для анализа метилирования ДНК. Наш модифицированный протокол позволяет для анализа ДНК метилирования на уровне одной клетки и была специально разработана для отдельных яйцеклеток. Она также может быть использован для расщепления стадии эмбриона.

Abstract

Epigenetics encompasses all heritable and reversible modifications to chromatin that alter gene accessibility, and thus are the primary mechanisms for regulating gene transcription1. DNA methylation is an epigenetic modification that acts predominantly as a repressive mark. Through the covalent addition of a methyl group onto cytosines in CpG dinucleotides, it can recruit additional repressive proteins and histone modifications to initiate processes involved in condensing chromatin and silencing genes2. DNA methylation is essential for normal development as it plays a critical role in developmental programming, cell differentiation, repression of retroviral elements, X-chromosome inactivation and genomic imprinting.

One of the most powerful methods for DNA methylation analysis is bisulfite mutagenesis. Sodium bisulfite is a DNA mutagen that deaminates cytosines into uracils. Following PCR amplification and sequencing, these conversion events are detected as thymines. Methylated cytosines are protected from deamination and thus remain as cytosines, enabling identification of DNA methylation at the individual nucleotide level3. Development of the bisulfite mutagenesis assay has advanced from those originally reported4-6 towards ones that are more sensitive and reproducible7. One key advancement was embedding smaller amounts of DNA in an agarose bead, thereby protecting DNA from the harsh bisulfite treatment8. This enabled methylation analysis to be performed on pools of oocytes and blastocyst-stage embryos9. The most sophisticated bisulfite mutagenesis protocol to date is for individual blastocyst-stage embryos10. However, since blastocysts have on average 64 cells (containing 120-720 pg of genomic DNA), this method is not efficacious for methylation studies on individual oocytes or cleavage-stage embryos.

Taking clues from agarose embedding of minute DNA amounts including oocytes11, here we present a method whereby oocytes are directly embedded in an agarose and lysis solution bead immediately following retrieval and removal of the zona pellucida from the oocyte. This enables us to bypass the two main challenges of single oocyte bisulfite mutagenesis: protecting a minute amount of DNA from degradation, and subsequent loss during the numerous protocol steps. Importantly, as data are obtained from single oocytes, the issue of PCR bias within pools is eliminated. Furthermore, inadvertent cumulus cell contamination is detectable by this method since any sample with more than one methylation pattern may be excluded from analysis12. This protocol provides an improved method for successful and reproducible analyses of DNA methylation at the single-cell level and is ideally suited for individual oocytes as well as cleavage-stage embryos.

Protocol

День 1 Подготовьте следующие решения свежий в день яйцеклетки коллекции стерильной дистиллированной воды, таких как вода GIBCO. Чтобы снизить вероятность загрязнения ДНК, изменить перчатки часто и использовать фильтр советы. Хранить трубы под углом же, когда открыты, и резю…

Discussion

Это один анализ ооцитов содержит много шагов, число которые имеют решающее значение и требуют особого ухода. Первый яйцеклетки стирки. Это особенно важно мыть каждую яйцеклетку несколько раз в свежей среде падает после гиалуронидазы лечение, чтобы удалить как многие клетки кучевые на?…

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Эта работа была поддержана в Университете Западного Онтарио, кафедра акушерства и гинекологии, а также грант ER06-02-188 от исследований и инноваций Ministryof, ранний премии научный сотрудник. MMD была поддержана Программой CIHR Обучение в репродукции, раннему развитию и воздействие на здоровье (REDIH) Высшее стипендии.

Materials

Table of specific reagents and equipment.

Name of the reagent Company Catalogue number Comments
Oocyte Collection
Hyaluronidase Sigma H4272  
Acidic Tyrode Sigma T1788  
Proteinase K Sigma P5568  
10% IGEPAL Bioshop NON999.500  
Lysis Solution
Tris pH 7.5 Bioshop TRS001.5  
LiCl Sigma L9650  
EDTA pH 8.0 Sigma E5134  
LiDS Bioshop LDS701.10  
DTT Invitrogen P2325  
SDS Lysis Buffer
TE pH 7.5

Bioshop(Tris)

Sigma (EDTA)

TRS001.5

E5134

 
10% SDS Bioshop SDS001.500  
Bisulfite Conversion
Sodium Hydroxide Sigma S8045  
Sodium Hydrogensulfite (Sodium Bisulfite) Sigma 243973  
Hydroquinone Sigma H9003  
Low Melting Point (LMP) Agarose Sigma A9414  
Mineral Oil Sigma M8410  
M2 Medium Sigma M7167  
GIBCO Distilled water Invitrogen 15230-196  
Autoclaved double distilled (dd) water      
PCR
Illustra Hot Start Mix RTG GE Healthcare 28-9006-54  
240 ng/ml yeast tRNA Invitrogen 15401-011  
5x Green GoTaq Reaction Buffer Promega M7911  
Inner and outer nested primers Sigma    
Ligation
Promega pGEM-T Easy Vector Fisher Scientific A1360  
TA Cloning
Competent E.coli cells Zymo Research Corp. T3009  
Equipment
Dissecting Microscope      
70°C and 90°C Heat Blocks      
37°C and 50°C Waterbaths (42°C for transformations)      
Rocker      
PCR machine      

References

  1. Jaenisch, R., Bird, A. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat. Genet. 33, 245-254 (2003).
  2. Rodenhiser, D., Mann, M. Epigenetics and human disease: translating basic biology into clinical applications. CMAJ. 174, 341-348 (2006).
  3. Frommer, M. A genomic sequencing protocol that yields a positive display of 5-methylcytosine residues in individual DNA strands. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89, 1827-1831 (1992).
  4. Clark, S. J., Harrison, J., Paul, C. L., Frommer, M. High sensitivity mapping of methylated cytosines. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 2990-2997 (1994).
  5. Feil, R., Charlton, J., Bird, A. P., Walter, J., Reik, W. Methylation analysis on individual chromosomes: improved protocol for bisulphite genomic sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 695-696 (1994).
  6. Raizis, A. M., Schmitt, F., Jost, J. P. A bisulfite method of 5-methylcytosine mapping that minimizes template degradation. Anal. Biochem. 226, 161-166 (1995).
  7. Patterson, K., Molloy, L., Qu, W., Clark, S. DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis. J. Vis. Exp. (56), e3170 (2011).
  8. Olek, A., Oswald, J., Walter, J. A modified and improved method for bisulphite based cytosine methylation analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 5064-5066 (1996).
  9. Mann, M. R. Selective loss of imprinting in the placenta following preimplantation development in culture. Development. 131, 3727-3735 (2004).
  10. Market-Velker, B. A., Zhang, L., Magri, L. S., Bonvissuto, A. C., Mann, M. R. Dual effects of superovulation: loss of maternal and paternal imprinted methylation in a dose-dependent manner. Hum. Mol. Genet. 19, 36-51 (2010).
  11. Meng, L. H., Xiao, S. Q., Huang, X. F., Zhou, Y., Xu, B. S. A study on bisulfite sequencing method for methylation status of imprinted genes in single human oocytes. Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 25, 289-292 (2008).
  12. Denomme, M. M., Zhang, L., Mann, M. R. Embryonic imprinting perturbations do not originate from superovulation-induced defects in DNA methylation acquisition. Fertil. Steril. 96, 734-738 (2011).
  13. Tahiliani, M. Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science. 324, 930-935 (2009).
  14. Hajj, N. E. l. Limiting dilution bisulfite (pyro)sequencing reveals parent-specific methylation patterns in single early mouse embryos and bovine oocytes. Epigenetics. 6, 1176-1188 (2011).
check_url/kr/4046?article_type=t

Play Video

Cite This Article
Denomme, M. M., Zhang, L., Mann, M. R. Single Oocyte Bisulfite Mutagenesis. J. Vis. Exp. (64), e4046, doi:10.3791/4046 (2012).

View Video