Summary

男性和女性盆腔器官脱垂的磁共振成像对左旋的定量研究

Published: April 17, 2019
doi:

Summary

在这里, 我们提出了一个协议, 以标准化测量的提升机, 并通过磁共振成像。目的是通过比较男女盆腔脱垂患者的休息和紧张值, 使用一致的解剖骨性地标, 从图像分析中提取生物力学推断。

Abstract

在这里, 我们提出了一个协议, 以检查提升和盆腔器官脱垂, 在 Valsalva 机动和同时疏散声学凝胶, 使用水平方向 1.5 T 磁共振 (MR) 扫描仪的男性和女性的悬浮液间隙。在中矢状图像上, 骨盆器官的垂直距离以毫米为单位, 相对于 hymen 平面 (女性) 和与共生 pubis (男性) 的下边界, 前面有-(上) 或 + (下) 的迹象。在轴向图像上, 利用三个关键图像的自由手追踪方法, 以平方厘米的形式计算悬浮物, 通过中突 (i 级), 切线到共生的下边界 (ii 级), 并在最大前直肠的边缘。墙体凸起 (三级)。对休息和紧张的地区进行比较, 以找到增加的百分比的证据。目的是在不受异物干扰或考官接近的情况下, 提供盆腔器官下降和分离最大程度的客观证据, 以克服盆腔检查和会阴检查的局限性(即主观性和性方面的局限性 [仅限女性])。

Introduction

当在悬浮物间隙内作用的力不再被外界对抗, 导致异常扩大和器官撞击时, 骨盆器官脱垂 (POP) 就会发展起来。有几个因素导致这种疾病, 包括韧带, 筋膜, 或肌肉强直活动。无论所涉及的机制如何, 增加的中断规模都被认为是评估无法关闭该机制的可靠指数。通常情况下, 盆腔支撑的状态是在盆腔检查1中通过观察子宫颈、阴道先端和阴道壁在 Valsalva 机动过程中的位置来确定的。然而, 这种方法的不准确, 加上未能识别所有相关的网站2,3和性相关的收缩 (仅限女性), 导致临床医生和研究人员寻求替代方法, 即诊断成像。

目前确定中断大小的方法包括会阴超声 (tpus)4,5和最近的磁共振成像 (mri)。不幸的是, 现有的方法进行检查和测量的个别参数在研究人员6,7,8,9, 10,11,12,1 3日, 对研究结果进行比较很困难。此外, 在最常见的盆腔下降过程的定义和术语方面, 以及在所采用的系统1415 的分类和量化方面, 仍然存在重大差异。

这项研究强调了 MRI 相对于其他方法的优势, 并描述了定量的技术细节和诊断标准的 POP 在男性和男性。特别是, 描述的重点是在紧张的情况下, 在病人仰视的情况下, 对盆腔器官下降和提升体的扩大进行量化, 以证明缺乏垂直定向的 mr 系统16,17 (即, 重力不会对检测与 POP 相关的各种变化产生不利影响)。

Protocol

根据意大利放射学会的《国家准则》进行了涉及人体的程序 1. 患者准备 帮助患者填写一份表格, 提供有关其病史、当前症状、治疗 (医疗或手术) 以及先前的病历 (如果有的话) 的信息。 在开始检查之前, 请征得每位患者的书面同意。 事先清楚地解释了程序的特点和目的, 包括各种动作的表现, 如挤压、拉紧和直肠排空。 提供有关手术的持续时间 (…

Representative Results

2012年至2018年期间, 该协议已在意大利三个不同的诊断中心成功采用, 平均每月累计考试速度为 30±4, 使用相同的 1.5 Tmr 扫描仪型号和技术设置 (见表 1和材料)。在此期间, 对以下三个主要疾病类别的男女患者进行了 2 000多次检查: 盆腔器官脱垂和疏散障碍 (第1组)、肛周瘘 (第2组) 和慢性盆腔疼痛。已知或怀疑神经病变 ( 第 3 组 ) 。患者人口中最相关?…

Discussion

这种方法比盆腔检查有明显的优势, 仅限于评估泌尿生殖道的中断, 只在女性。相反, 这里提出的方法检查整个提升机在男性和男性之间的间隙。此外, 虽然很容易通过检查的触诊的妇科医生, 女性裂隙只能近似地计算与统治者, 以产生一个椭圆形1的面积。同样, 与2和 3-d tpus4,5相比, 确实存在优势, 这两种优势不适合男性患者。然而, 该协?…

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

提交人特别感谢护士保拉·加拉维洛和朱利亚·梅拉拉在检查期间提供的宝贵协助。

Materials

MR scanner Philips Medical Systems, High Tech Campus  37, 5656 AE, Eindhoven,
The Netherlands
Description: 1.5 T horizontally oriented, Multiva model, SENSE XL Torso coil
Procedure: Position the patient in the left lateral decubitus on the diagnostic table with the coil warpped around the pelvis
Catheter Convatek ltd, First avenue Deeside, Flintshire CH5 2NU
UK
Description: Sterile vaginal catheter, 16 ch,180 mm long, 3 mm wide
Procedure: Gently insert the lubricated tip inside the anal canal for contrast administration with patients in the left side position
Holder Kartell Plastilab, Artiglas Srl, Via Carrara Padua, Italy Description: Universal test-tube holder with multiple 13-mm holes
Procedure: Put 3 empty syringes vertically inside the holes with the outlet cone down
Syringe Pikdare Srl, Via Saldarini Catelli 10 , 22070 Casnate con Bernate (Como) Italy Description: Sterile, latex free,60 mL graduated transparent cylinder, catheter cone
Procedure: Fill with contrast, adjust the plunger and connect to the catheter
Contrast Ceracarta SpA, Via Secondo Casadei 14 47122 Forlì
Italy
Description: Eco supergel not irritant, water soluble, salt free
Procedure: Dilute the content of each syringe adding 30 mL of tap water to 50 mL of acustic gel
Mixer device Kaltek Srl, Via del Progresso 2 Padua
Italy
Description: Kito-Brush for endovaginal sampling
Procedure: Rotate one full turn 10-20 times until obtaining an homogeneous gel
Pad Fater SpA, Via A. Volta 10, 65129 Pescara
Italy
Description: Pad for incontinent subjects
Procedure: Wrap around patient's pelvis to collect any material and prevent diagnostic table contamination
Lubricant Molteni farmaceutici, Località Granatieri Scandicci (Florence)
Italy
Description: Luan gel 1%
Procedure: Apply on the tip of catheter before insertion
Apron Mediberg Srl, via Vezze 16/18 Calcinate 24050 (Bergamo)
Italy
Description: Kimono
Procedure: Put on counteriwise (opening back) to maintain patient's dignity
Gloves Gardening Srl, Via B. Bosco 15/10 16121 Genova
Italy
Description: Nitrile, latex free, no talcum powdered
Procedure: Wear during contrast preparation and catheter insertion; change regularly to prevent cross contamination

References

  1. DeLancey, J. O. L., Hurd, W. W. Size of the urogenital hiatus in the levator ani muscles in normal women and women with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 91 (3), 364-368 (1998).
  2. Siproudhis, L., Ropert, A., Vilotte, J. How accurate is clinical examination in diagnosing and quantifying pelvirectal disorders? A prospective study in a group of 50 patients complaining of defecatory difficulties. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 36 (5), 430-438 (1993).
  3. Maglinte, D. D. T., Kelvin, F. M., Fitzgerald, K., Hale, D. S., Benson, J. T. Association of compartment defects in pelvic floor dysfunction. American Journal of Roentgenology. 172 (2), 439-444 (1999).
  4. Dietz, H. P., Jarvis, S. K., Vancaillie, T. G. The assessment of Levator muscle strength: a validation of three ultrasound techniques. International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. 13 (3), 156-159 (2002).
  5. Dietz, H. P., Shek, C., Clarcke, B. Biometry of the pubovisceral muscle and levator hiatus by three-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 25 (6), 580-585 (2005).
  6. Yang, A., Mostwin, J. L., Rosenhein, N. B., Zerhouni, E. A. Pelvic floor descent in women: dynamic evaluation with fast MR imaging and cinematic display. Radiology. 179 (1), 25-33 (1991).
  7. Lienemann, A., Anthuber, C., Baron, A., Kohz, P., Reiser, M. Dynamic MR colpocystorectography assessing pelvic floor descent. European Radiology. 7 (8), 1309-1317 (1997).
  8. Healy, J. C., et al. Patterns of prolapse in women with symptoms of pelvic floor weakness: assessment with MR imaging. Radiology. 203 (1), 77-81 (1997).
  9. Comiter, C. V., Vasavada, S. P., Barbaric, Z. L., Gousse, A. E., Raz, S. Grading pelvic prolapse and pelvic floor relaxation using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Urology. 54 (3), 454-457 (1999).
  10. Kelvin, F. M., Maglinte, D. D. T., Hale, D. S., Benson, J. T. Female pelvic organ prolapse: a comparison of triphasic dynamic MR imaging and triphasic fluoroscopic cystocolpoproctography. American Journal of Roentgenology. 174 (1), 81-88 (2000).
  11. Pannu, H. K., et al. Dynamic MR imaging of pelvis organ prolapse: spectrum of abnormalities. RadioGraphics. 20 (6), 1567-1582 (2000).
  12. Hoyte, L., Ratiu, P. Linear measurements in 2-dimen¬sional pelvic floor imaging: the impact of slice tilt angles on measurement reproducibility. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 185 (3), 537-544 (2001).
  13. Tunn, R., DeLancey, J. O. L., Quint, E. E. Visibility of pelvic organ support system structures in magnetic resonance images without an endovaginal coil. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 184 (6), 1156-1163 (2001).
  14. Bump, R. C., et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 175 (1), 10-17 (1996).
  15. Haylen, B. T., et al. An inter-national Urogynecological Association (IUGA) / International Continence Society (ICS) Joint Report on the Terminology for Female Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. Neurology and Urodynamics. 29 (1), 4-20 (2009).
  16. Fielding, J. R., et al. MR imaging of pelvic floor continence mechanisms in the supine and sitting positions. American Journal of Roentgenology. 171 (6), 1607-1610 (1998).
  17. Bertschinger, K. M., et al. Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor performed with patient sitting in an open-magnet unit versus with patient supine in a closed-magnet unit. Radiology. 223 (2), 501-508 (2002).
  18. Piloni, V., Ambroselli, V., Nestola, M., Piloni, F. Quantification of levator ani (LA) hiatus enlargement and pelvic organs impingement on Valsalva maneuver in parous and nulliparous women with obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS): a biomechanical perspective. Pelviperineology. 35 (1), 25-31 (2016).
  19. Piloni, V., Pierandrei, G., Pignalosa, F., Galli, G. Fusion imaging by transperineal sonography/magnetic resonance in patients with fecal blockade syndrome. EC Gastroenterology and Digestive System. 5 (1), 11-16 (2018).
  20. Piloni, V., Bergamasco, M., Melara, G., Garavello, P. The clinical value of magnetic resonance defecography in males with obstructed defecation syndrome. Techniques in Coloproctology. 22 (3), 179-190 (2018).
  21. Chanda, A., Unnikrishnan, V. U., Roy, S., Ricther, H. E. Computational modeling of the female pelvic support structures and organs to understand the mechanisms of pelvic organ prolapse: a review. Applied Mechanics Reviews. 67 (4), 040801-040814 (2015).
  22. Rostaminia, G., Abramowitch, S. Finite element modeling in female pelvic floor medicine: a literature review. Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports. 4 (2), 125-131 (2015).

Play Video

Cite This Article
Piloni, V., Bergamasco, M., Chiapperin, A. Quantification of Levator Ani Hiatus Enlargement by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Males and Females with Pelvic Organ Prolapse. J. Vis. Exp. (146), e58534, doi:10.3791/58534 (2019).

View Video