Summary

3D Kinematic Analysis for the Functional Evaluation in the Rat Model of Sciatic Nerve Crush Injury

Published: February 12, 2020
doi:

Summary

We introduce a kinematic analysis method that uses a three-dimensional motion capture apparatus containing four cameras and data processing software for performing functional evaluations during fundamental research involving rodent models.

Abstract

Compared to the Sciatic Functional Index (SFI), kinematic analysis is a more reliable and sensitive method for performing functional evaluations of sciatic nerve injury rodent models. In this protocol, we describe a novel kinematic analysis method that uses a three-dimensional (3D) motion capture apparatus for functional evaluations using a rat sciatic nerve crush injury model. First, the rat is familiarized with treadmill walking. Markers are then attached to the designated bone landmarks and the rat is made to walk on the treadmill at the desired speed. Meanwhile, the posterior limb movements of the rat are recorded using four cameras. Depending on the software used, marker tracings are created using both automatic and manual modes and the desired data are produced after subtle adjustments. This method of kinematic analysis, which uses a 3D motion capture apparatus, offers numerous advantages, including superior precision and accuracy. Many more parameters can be investigated during the comprehensive functional evaluations. This method has several shortcomings that require consideration: The system is expensive, can be complicated to operate, and may produce data deviations due to skin shifting. Nevertheless, kinematic analysis using a 3D motion capture apparatus is useful for performing functional anterior and posterior limb evaluations. In the future, this method may become increasingly useful for generating accurate assessments of various traumas and diseases.

Introduction

The Sciatic Functional Index (SFI) is the benchmark method for carrying out functional sciatic nerve evaluations1. The SFI has been widely adopted and is frequently used within various functional evaluation studies on rat sciatic nerve injuries2,3,4,5,6. In spite of its popularity, there are several problems with SFI, including automutilation7, joint contracture risk, and smearing of the footprints8. These problems seriously affect its prognostic value9. Therefore, an alternative, less error-prone method is required as a substitute for the SFI.

One such alternative method is kinematic analysis. This includes comprehensive gait analysis using tracking markers attached to bony landmarks or joints. Kinematic analysis is increasingly used for functional evaluations9. This method is progressively being recognized as a reliable and sensitive tool for functional evaluation10 without the shortcomings attributed to the SFI11,12.

In this protocol, we describe a series of kinematic analyses that use a 3D motion capture apparatus consisting of a treadmill, four 120 Hz charged coupled device (CCD) cameras, and data processing software (see Table of Materials). This kinematic analysis method differs from general video walking or gait analysis13,14. Two cameras are positioned in different directions to record posterior limb movements from a single side. Subsequently, a 3D digital model of the posterior limb is constructed using computer graphics9. We can calculate designated joint angles, such as hip, knee, ankle, and toe joint, by closely recapitulating the actual limb dimensions. Additionally, we can determine various parameters such as stride/step length and the ratio of the stance phase to the swing phase. These reconstructions are based on a completely reconstructed 3D digital model of the posterior limbs, generated from data transmitted by two sets of cameras. Even the imaginary center of gravity (CoG) trajectory can be calculated automatically.

We used this 3D motion capture apparatus to introduce and assess multiple kinematic parameters that reveal functional changes over time within the context of the rat sciatic nerve crush injury model.

Protocol

The protocol was approved by the animal experimentation committee of Kyoto University, and all protocol steps were performed in accordance with the Guidelines of the Animal Experimentation Committee, Kyoto University (approval number: MedKyo17029). 1. Familiarizing rats with treadmill walking Set up two transparent plastic sheets on both sides of the treadmill to let a 12-week-old male Lewis rat walk in a straight, frontward direction, then turn on the electric shock grid. <l…

Representative Results

We selected four parameters to investigate functional changes over time in a rat sciatic nerve crush injury model. These were the ratio of the stance-to-swing phase, center of gravity (CoG) trajectory, ankle angles, and toe angles in the 'toe off' phase9. Twenty-four rats were randomly assigned to one of four groups: the control group (C), rats at the first (1w), third (3w), and sixth (6w) week following left sciatic nerve crush injury. By means of 3D kinematic …

Discussion

In this protocol, a stable and continuously walking rat is the most vital component of kinematic analysis. The treadmill speed was set to 20 cm/s. This walking speed is by no means considered "high" if rats move without space constraints16. Nevertheless, this speed is too fast for untrained rats to stably walk on the treadmill and would likely result in an abnormal gait and nonuniform movements. These events may seriously affect data reliability and authenticity. However, treadmill speeds …

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP19K19793, JP18H03129, and JP18K19739.

Materials

9-0 nylon suture Bear Medic Corporation. T06A09N20-25
Anesthetic Apparatus for Small Animals SHINANO MFG CO.,LTD. SN-487-0T
ISOFLURANE Inhalation Solution Pfizer Japan Inc. (01)14987114133400
Kine Analyzer KISSEI COMTEC CO.,LTD. N.A. A analysis software
Liquid adhesive KANBO PRAS CORPORATION PT-B180
Micro forceps BRC CO. 16171080
Motion Recorder KISSEI COMTEC CO.,LTD. N.A. A recording software
Standard surgical hemostat Fine Science Tools, Inc. 12501-13
Surgical blade No.10 FEATHER Safety Razor CO., LTD 100D
Surgical hemostat World Precision Instruments 503740
Three-dimensional motion capture apparatus (KinemaTracer for Animal) KISSEI COMTEC CO.,LTD. N.A. A 3D motion analysis system that consists of cameras
Three-dimensional(3D) Calculator KISSEI COMTEC CO.,LTD. N.A. A marker tracing software
Treadmill MUROMACHI KIKAI CO.,LTD MK-685 a treadmill with affialiated the electrical schocker, transparent sheats and a speed control apparatus

References

  1. Kanaya, F., Firrell, J. C., Breidenbach, W. C. Sciatic function index, nerve conduction tests, muscle contraction, and axon morphometry as indicators of regeneration. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 98 (7), 1264-1274 (1996).
  2. Takhtfooladi, M. A., Jahanbakhsh, F., Takhtfooladi, H. A., Yousefi, K., Allahverdi, A. Effect of low-level laser therapy (685 nm, 3 J/cm(2)) on functional recovery of the sciatic nerve in rats following crushing lesion. Lasers in Medical Science. 30 (3), 1047-1052 (2015).
  3. Xing, H., Zhou, M., Assinck, P., Liu, N. Electrical stimulation influences satellite cell differentiation after sciatic nerve crush injury in rats. Muscle & Nerve. 51 (3), 400-411 (2015).
  4. Yang, C. C., Wang, J., Chen, S. C., Jan, Y. M., Hsieh, Y. L. Enhanced functional recovery from sciatic nerve crush injury through a combined treatment of cold-water swimming and mesenchymal stem cell transplantation. Neurological Research. 37 (90), 816-826 (2015).
  5. Jiang, W., et al. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound treatment improved the rate of autograft peripheral nerve regeneration in rat. Scientific Reports. 6, 22773 (2016).
  6. Ni, X. J., et al. The Effect of Low-Intensity Ultrasound on Brain-Derived Neurotropic Factor Expression in a Rat Sciatic Nerve Crushed Injury Model. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 43 (2), 461-468 (2017).
  7. Weber, R. A., Proctor, W. H., Warner, M. R., Verheyden, C. N. Autotomy and the sciatic functional index. Microsurgery. 14 (5), 323-327 (1993).
  8. Dellon, A. L., Mackinnon, S. E. Sciatic nerve regeneration in the rat. Validity of walking track assessment in the presence of chronic contractures. Microsurgery. 10 (3), 220-225 (1989).
  9. Wang, T., et al. Functional evaluation outcomes correlate with histomorphometric changes in the rat sciatic nerve crush injury model : A comparison between sciatic functional index and kinematic analysis. PLoS One. 13 (12), e0208985 (2018).
  10. de Ruiter, G. C., et al. Two-dimensional digital video ankle motion analysis for assessment of function in the rat sciatic nerve model. Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System. 12 (3), 216-222 (2007).
  11. Walker, J. L., Evans, J. M., Meade, P., Resig, P., Sisken, B. F. Gait-stance duration as a measure of injury and recovery in the rat sciatic nerve model. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 52 (1), 47-52 (1994).
  12. Dijkstra, J. R., Meek, M. F., Robinson, P. H., Gramsbergen, A. Methods to evaluate functional nerve recovery in adult rats: walking track analysis, video analysis and the withdrawal reflex. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 96 (2), 89-96 (2000).
  13. Lee, J. Y., et al. Functional evaluation in the rat sciatic nerve defect model: a comparison of the sciatic functional index, ankle angles, and isometric tetanic force. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 132 (5), 1173-1180 (2013).
  14. Rui, J., et al. Gait cycle analysis: parameters sensitive for functional evaluation of peripheral nerve recovery in rat hind limbs. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 73 (4), 405-411 (2014).
  15. Yu, P., Matloub, H. S., Sanger, J. R., Narini, P. Gait analysis in rats with peripheral nerve injury. Muscle & Nerve. 24 (2), 231-239 (2001).
  16. Amado, S., et al. The sensitivity of two-dimensional hindlimb joint kinematics analysis in assessing functional recovery in rats after sciatic nerve crush. Behavioural Brain Research. 225 (2), 562-573 (2011).
  17. Monte-Raso, V. V., Barbieri, C. H., Mazzer, N., Yamasita, A. C., Barbieri, G. Is the Sciatic Functional Index always reliable and reproducible?. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 170 (2), 255-261 (2008).
  18. Varejao, A. S. P., et al. Motion of the foot and ankle during the stance phase in rats. Muscle & Nerve. 26 (5), 630-635 (2002).
  19. Lin, F. M., Pan, Y. C., Hom, C., Sabbahi, M., Shenaq, S. Ankle stance angle: a functional index for the evaluation of sciatic nerve recovery after complete transection. Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. 12 (3), 173-177 (1996).
  20. Patel, M., et al. Video-gait analysis of functional recovery of nerve repaired with chitosan nerve guides. Tissue Engineering. 12 (11), 3189-3199 (2006).
  21. Filipe, V. M., et al. Effect of skin movement on the analysis of hindlimb kinematics during treadmill locomotion in rats. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 153 (1), 55-61 (2006).
  22. Tajino, J., et al. Three-dimensional motion analysis for comprehensive understanding of gait characteristics after sciatic nerve lesion in rodents. Scientific Reports. 8 (1), 13585 (2018).
check_url/kr/60267?article_type=t

Play Video

Cite This Article
Wang, T., Ito, A., Tajino, J., Kuroki, H., Aoyama, T. 3D Kinematic Analysis for the Functional Evaluation in the Rat Model of Sciatic Nerve Crush Injury. J. Vis. Exp. (156), e60267, doi:10.3791/60267 (2020).

View Video