Summary

A Comprehensive High-Efficiency Protocol for Isolation, Culture, Polarization, and Glycolytic Characterization of Bone Marrow-Derived Macrophages

Published: February 07, 2021
doi:

Summary

This protocol provides detailed and comprehensive methods for the isolation, culture, polarization, and measurement of the glycolytic metabolic state of live bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs). This paper provides step-by-step instructions with realistic visual illustrations for workflow and glycolytic assessment of BMDMs in real-time.

Abstract

Macrophages are among the most important antigen-presenting cells. Many subsets of macrophages have been identified with unique metabolic signatures. Macrophages are commonly classified as M1-like (inflammatory) and M2-like (anti-inflammatory) subtypes. M1-like macrophages are pro-inflammatory macrophages that get activated by LPS and/or pro-inflammatory cytokines such as INF-γ, IL-12 & IL-2. M1-like polarized macrophages are involved in various diseases by mediating the host's defense to a variety of bacteria and viruses. That is very important to study LPS induced M1-like macrophages and their metabolic states in inflammatory diseases. M2-like macrophages are considered anti-inflammatory macrophages, activated by anti-inflammatory cytokines and stimulators. Under the pro-inflammatory state, macrophages show increased glycolysis in glycolytic function. The glycolytic function has been actively investigated in the context of glycolysis, glycolytic capacity, glycolytic reserve, compensatory glycolysis, or non-glycolytic acidification using extracellular flux (XF) analyzers.

This paper demonstrates how to assess the glycolytic states in real-time with easy-to-follow steps when the bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) are respiring, consuming, and producing energy. Using specific inhibitors and activators of glycolysis in this protocol, we show how to obtain a systemic and complete view of glycolytic metabolic processes in the cells and provide more accurate and realistic results. To be able to measure multiple glycolytic phenotypes, we provide an easy, sensitive, DNA-based normalization method for polarization assessment of BMDMs. Culturing, activation/polarization and identification of the phenotype and metabolic state of the BMDMs are crucial techniques that can help to investigate many different types of diseases.

In this paper, we polarized the naïve M0 macrophages to M1-like and M2-like macrophages with LPS and IL4, respectively, and measured a comprehensive set of glycolytic parameters in BMDMs in real-time and longitudinally over time, using extracellular flux analysis and glycolytic activators and inhibitors.

Introduction

Macrophages are one of the most critical cells of the innate immune system M1-like. They are involved in clearing infectious diseases, phagocytosis, antigen presentation, and inflammation regulation2. Furthermore, macrophages are required to regulate other immune cells via various cytokines they release3. There is a big spectrum in macrophage phenotypes4. Depending on the signals that macrophages are exposed to, they polarize toward different inflammatory and metabolic states5. Macrophages manifest metabolic alterations in various diseases, depending on what tissue the macrophages reside6. Polarized macrophages have the capability to reprogram or switch their glycolytic metabolism, lipid metabolism, amino acid metabolism, and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS)7,8. Classically activated M1-like macrophages and alternatively activated M2-like macrophages are the two most studied phenotypes of macrophages3. Non-activated quiescent macrophages are referred to as M0 macrophages. Polarization of M0 macrophages towards an M1-like phenotype can be induced by stimulation of naive BMDMs with bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS)9. The PI3K-AKT-mTOR-HIF1a signaling pathway can be activated in macrophages in the presence of inflammatory cytokines, interferon-gamma (IFN γ,) or tumor necrosis factor (TNF)10. M1-like macrophages have increased levels of glycolysis metabolism, decreased levels of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), producing inflammatory cytokines involved in infectious and inflammatory diseases8. On the other hand, polarization towards the M2-like phenotype can be induced by Interleukin (IL)-4, via the JAK-STAT, PPAR, and AMPK pathways, or by (IL)-13 and TGFβ pathays11,12.

In contrast to M1-like macrophages, M2-like macrophages have decreased glycolysis and increased OXPHOS and are involved in anti-parasitic and tissue repair activities8,13. BMDMs are a widely used system for the study of macrophages that are derived from bone marrow stem cells. Glycolysis and OXPHOS are the two leading energy production pathways in the cells14. Based on their microenvironment, BMDMs can choose to use either of these pathways; in some cases, switch from one to another, or use both pathways14. In this study, we focused on glycolysis metabolism in activated pro-inflammatory macrophages. When the glucose in the cytoplasm is converted to pyruvate and then lactate, the cells produce protons in the medium that cause an elevation in the acidification rate in the surrounded medium of M1-like cells5. An extracellular flux analyzer was used to measure the acidification rate of the cell media. Results are reported as Extracellular Acidification Rate (ECAR) or as Proton Efflux Rate.

An optimized quick and easy method to access glycolysis levels in polarized macrophages is essential to determine the glycolytic phenotype, metabolite changes, and the effects of inhibitors/activators and drugs on the polarized macrophages. The method described in this manuscript has been optimized to give information about specific glycolysis factors (Glycolysis, Glycolytic capacity, Glycolytic reserve, and Non-glycolytic acidification), as well as the metabolic reprogramming of glycolytic metabolism. The inhibitor (2DG) that has been used in this study explicitly targets the glycolysis pathway.

This optimized protocol has been modified and improved based on the combination of a published protocol16, extracellular flux analysis of glycolytic assays of manufacturer’s user guides, and direct communication with manufacturer’s R&D scientists.

Protocol

Mice were humanely sacrificed according to Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC) and American Association for Laboratory Animal Science (AALAS) guidelines and using protocols approved by the Texas A&M University institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC). 1. Mice bone marrow harvest and culture of BMDMs Sacrifice mouse (6-10 weeks of age C57Bl/6 mice were in this protocol) and lay it on its ventral side, cut the skin and peritoneal layer and g…

Representative Results

Glycolysis and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation are the two major ATP production pathways in the cells (Figure 4A). Some cells have the capability to switch between these two pathways to meet their energy demands. The conversion of glucose to pyruvate in the cytoplasm is called glycolysis. Pyruvate has two fates; it will either get converted to lactate or further metabolized through the TCA cycle and eventually through the electron transport chain (ETC…

Discussion

As mentioned earlier, the extracellular flux analyzer machine can provide real-time information about two major energy-producing pathways of the cells by measuring OCR (oxygen consumption rate), an indicator of mitochondrial OXPHOS activity, and ECAR (extracellular acidification rate) which is an indicator of glycolysis. Macrophages can use both pathways, depending on their microenvironment. They can also switch their energy production pathways17,18. Understandin…

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

We thank Ms. Joanna Rocha for editorial assistance. The work was partially supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01DK118334 (to Drs. Sun and Alaniz) and (NIH) R01A11064Z (to Drs. Jayaraman and Alaniz).

Materials

23G needles VWR BD305145
2-mercaptoethanol Life Technologies 21985023
50ml Conical Tube VWR 21008-951
ACK lysis buffer Thermo Fisher Scientific A1049201 It can be lab-made
Agilent Seahorse XF glycolysis stress test kit Agilent Technologies 103020-100
Agilent Seahorse XF Glycolysis Stress Test Kit User Guide Agilent Technologies 103020-400
Agilent Seahorse XF Glycolytic Rate Assay Kit Agilent Technologies 103344-100
Agilent Seahorse XF Glycolytic Rate Assay Kit User Guide Agilent Technologies 103344-100
Alexa Fluor 488 anti-mouse CD206 (MMR) Antibody BioLegend 141710
anti-mouse CD11b eFluor450 100ug eBioscience 48-0112-82
BD 3ML – SYRINGE VWR BD309657 Other syringes are acceptable too
Cell counter-Vi-CELL- XR Complete System BECKMAN COULTER Life Sciences 731050 Cells can be manually counted too
Cell Strainer-70µm VWR 10199-656
CyQUANT Cell Proliferation Assay Kit Thermo Fisher Scientific C7026
F4/80 monoclonal antibody (BM8) pe-Cyanine7 eBioscience 25-4801-82
Fetal Bovine Serum Life Technologies 16000-044
Flow cytometer: BD LSFRFortessa X-20 BD 656385
Kim Wipes VWR 82003-822
LPS-SM ultrapure (tlrl-smpls) 5 mg Invivogen tlrl-smlps
MCSF Peprotech 315-02
Murine IL-4 Peprotech 214-14
PE Rat Anti-Mouse CD38 BD Biosciences 553764
Penicillin-Streptomycin (10,000 U/mL) Life Technologies 15140122
Petri Dish 100mm x 15 mm Fisher Scientific F80875712
RPMI, Glutamax, HEPES Invitrogen 72400-120
Seahorse Calibrant Solution Agilent Technologies 103059-000
Seahorse XF 200mM Glutamine Solution Agilent Technologies 103579-100
Seahorse XF Glycolytic Rate Assay Kit Agilent Technologies 103344-100
Seahorse XFe96 FluxPaks Agilent Technologies 102416-100
XF Glycolysis Stress Test Kit Agilent Technologies 103020-100
XF RPMI Medium, pH 7.4 without phenol Red Agilent Technologies 103336-100

References

  1. Rosowski, E. E. Determining macrophage versus neutrophil contributions to innate immunity using larval zebrafish. Disease Models & Mechanisms. 13 (1), (2020).
  2. Martinez-Pomares, L., Gordon, S. . The Autoimmune Diseases. , 191-212 (2020).
  3. Orecchioni, M., Ghosheh, Y., Pramod, A. B., Ley, K. Macrophage polarization: different gene signatures in M1 (LPS+) vs. classically and M2- (LPS–) vs. alternatively activated macrophages. Frontiers in immunology. 10, 1084 (2019).
  4. Barrett, T. J. Macrophages in atherosclerosis regression. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 40 (1), 20-33 (2020).
  5. Ni, Y., et al. Adipose tissue macrophage phenotypes and characteristics: the key to insulin resistance in obesity and metabolic disorders. Obesity. 28 (2), 225-234 (2020).
  6. Chu, C., et al. Modulation of foreign body reaction and macrophage phenotypes concerning microenvironment. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 108 (1), 127-135 (2020).
  7. Batista-Gonzalez, A., Vidal, R., Criollo, A., Carreño, L. J. New insights on the role of lipid metabolism in the metabolic reprogramming of macrophages. Frontiers in Immunology. 10, 2993 (2020).
  8. Kang, S., Kumanogoh, A. The spectrum of macrophage activation by immunometabolism. International Immunology. , (2020).
  9. Shi, Y., et al. M1 But Not M0 Extracellular Vesicles Induce Polarization of RAW264. 7 Macrophages Via the TLR4-NFκB Pathway In Vitro. Inflammation. , 1-9 (2020).
  10. Zhang, L., Li, S. Lactic acid promotes macrophage polarization through MCT-HIF1α signaling in gastric cancer. Experimental Cell Research. 388 (2), 111846 (2020).
  11. Geng, T., et al. CD137 signaling induces macrophage M2 polarization in atherosclerosis through STAT6/PPARδ pathway. Cellular Signalling. , 109628 (2020).
  12. Liu, Q., et al. Combined blockade of TGf-β1 and GM-CSF improves chemotherapeutic effects for pancreatic cancer by modulating tumor microenvironment. Cancer Immunology & Immunotherapy. , 1-16 (2020).
  13. Rigoni, T. S., et al. RANK Ligand Helps Immunity to Leishmania major by Skewing M2 Into M1 Macrophages. Frontiers in Immunology. 11, 886 (2020).
  14. Viola, A., Munari, F., Sánchez-Rodríguez, R., Scolaro, T., Castegna, A. The metabolic signature of macrophage responses. Frontiers in Immunology. 10, (2019).
  15. Ivashkiv, L. B. The hypoxia–lactate axis tempers inflammation. Nature Reviews Immunology. 20 (2), 85-86 (2020).
  16. Van den Bossche, J., Baardman, J., de Winther, M. P. Metabolic characterization of polarized M1 and M2 bone marrow-derived macrophages using real-time extracellular flux analysis. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (105), e53424 (2015).
  17. Van den Bossche, J., et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction prevents repolarization of inflammatory macrophages. Cell reports. 17 (3), 684-696 (2016).
  18. Liu, P. S., Ho, P. C. . Metabolic Signaling. , 173-186 (2019).
  19. Wang, F., et al. Glycolytic stimulation is not a requirement for M2 macrophage differentiation. Cell metabolism. 28 (3), 463-475 (2018).
  20. Romero, N., Rogers, G., Neilson, A., Dranka, B. . Quantifying Cellular ATP Production Rate Using Agilent Seahorse XF Technology. , (2018).
  21. Mookerjee, S. A., Brand, M. D. Measurement and analysis of extracellular acid production to determine glycolytic rate. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (106), e53464 (2015).
  22. Mookerjee, S. A., Goncalves, R. L., Gerencser, A. A., Nicholls, D. G., Brand, M. D. The contributions of respiration and glycolysis to extracellular acid production. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta-Bioenergetics. 1847 (2), 171-181 (2015).
  23. Yang, S., et al. Macrophage polarization in atherosclerosis. Clinica Chimica Acta. 501, 142-146 (2020).
  24. Hörhold, F., et al. Reprogramming of macrophages employing gene regulatory and metabolic network models. PLoS Computational Biology. 16 (2), e1007657 (2020).
  25. Han, X., Ma, W., Zhu, Y., Sun, X., Liu, N. Advanced glycation end products enhance macrophage polarization to the M1 phenotype via the HIF-1α/PDK4 pathway. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. , 110878 (2020).
  26. Müller, E., et al. Toll-like receptor ligands and interferon-γ synergize for induction of antitumor M1 macrophages. Frontiers in Immunology. 8, 1383 (2017).
  27. Soto-Heredero, G., Gómez de las Heras, M. M., Gabandé-Rodríguez, E., Oller, J., Mittelbrunn, M. Glycolysis–a key player in the inflammatory response. The FEBS Journal. , (2020).
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Keep me updated:

.

Cite This Article
Eshghjoo, S., Kim, D. M., Jayaraman, A., Sun, Y., Alaniz, R. C. A Comprehensive High-Efficiency Protocol for Isolation, Culture, Polarization, and Glycolytic Characterization of Bone Marrow-Derived Macrophages. J. Vis. Exp. (168), e61959, doi:10.3791/61959 (2021).

View Video