Methods for Tattooing Xenopus laevis with a Rotary Tattoo Machine

Summary

Here, we describe methods for tattooing adult Xenopus laevis (African clawed frog) with a rotary tattoo machine. Proper tattooing results in dark, easily legible numerals that last for several months and make animals easily distinguishable for research and recordkeeping purposes.

Abstract

Animal models expand the scope of biomedical research, furthering our understanding of developmental, molecular, and cellular biology and enabling researchers to model human disease. Recording and tracking individual animals allows researchers to reduce the number of animals required for study and refine practices to improve animal wellbeing. Several well-documented methods exist for marking and tracking mammals, including ear punching and ear tags. However, methods for marking aquatic amphibian species are limited, with the existing resources being outdated, ineffective, or prohibitively costly. In this manuscript, we outline methods and best practices for marking Xenopus laevis with a rotary tattoo machine. Proper tattooing results in high-quality tattoos, making individuals easily distinguishable for researchers and posing minimal risk to animals’ health. We also highlight the causes of poor-quality tattoos, which can result in tattoos that fade quickly and cause unnecessary harm to animals. This approach allows researchers and veterinarians to mark amphibians, enabling them to track biological replicates and transgenic lines and to keep accurate records of animal health.

Introduction

Animal models are useful tools for investigating questions pertaining to human health. In practice, biomedical research using animal models requires careful organization and maintenance of a healthy animal colony. Best practices for ethical animal handling and husbandry aim to reduce the number of animals needed for experimentation and refine practices to ensure animal welfare¹. The clawed frog genus, including Xenopus laevis (X. laevis; African clawed frog) and Xenopus tropicalis (X. tropicalis; Western clawed frog), have been used in biomedical research since the 1930s when X. laevis were used by South African doctors to conduct the first pregnancy tests². While modern pregnancy tests no longer require frogs, the role of Xenopus research persists. Advantages of using Xenopus for biomedical research include their well-annotated genomes³, year-round inducible ovulation of large clutches of eggs⁴, and externally laid eggs amenable to in vitro fertilization. These features make them a useful asset for vertebrate embryology and development^5,6,7, basic molecular and cellular biology^7,8,9,10, and for modeling human disease^7,11,12,13.

Reliable methods for tracking individual Xenopus animals are essential for recording biological replicates and improving rigor and reproducibility in research. As Xenopus are frequently housed in groups, animal marking allows researchers to easily track individual animals⁴. Maintaining an accurate record of animals can save time and resources and improve the ability to track animals' health. For example, individual identification of animals can improve organization workflows for generating transgenic Xenopus lines, as this requires multiple generations of frogs with specific genotypes verified by sequencing¹⁴, which requires organization and individual identification of animals. This is particularly true when these mutations lack easily discernible adult phenotypes. Similarly, the use of Xenopus oocytes and embryos to study basic cellular and developmental biology benefits from tracking individual animals. After inducing ovulation, animals need to rest for a minimum of 3 months to prevent health complications such as hyper-ovulation syndrome¹⁵. Individual identification methods ensure that animals are not induced to ovulate too frequently.

Marking and tracking animals also enables lab personnel to track animals' health concerns. Animals of the same genotype falling ill can indicate excessive inbreeding or unanticipated health concerns associated with the transgene. Similarly, animals falling ill after recent ovulation can indicate issues with reagents, materials, or techniques. Tracking animals and their health enables lab personnel and veterinarians to follow up when concerns resurface and take preventative measures to prevent future illness. In mammals, there are numerous identification methods. Permanent methods for mice include ear punching, ear tags, tattooing, and subcutaneous microchips¹⁶. These can clearly and reliably differentiate animals within a colony or cage and can be easily administered by laboratory personnel. Methods such as ear punching are minimally invasive, require only one piece of specialized equipment, and work for animals of most ages. While these systems are straightforward and useful for mice, their use in frogs presents a unique set of challenges. Frogs and other amphibians lack a pinna (external ear structure). Some researchers have attached tags to the animal's jaw, toe, or hind limb^17,18. This approach resulted in various problems: jaw tags caused irritation, and agitated frogs attempted to pull off tags with their forelimbs¹⁷. Toe tags pierced the webbing between toes, impairing movement and carrying the risk of becoming lost. As such, amphibians require their own methods for identification. Historically, toe-clipping has also been used to mark amphibians^17,19. The toe is clipped with a sharp pair of scissors, and the animal can be identified by the length of toes on the forefeet and hind feet or by the angle at which the toe has grown back (in salamanders). However, this method poses the ethical concern that toe clipping may impair the animal's movement¹⁷. In addition, this can cause bleeding and introduce a risk of infection. Another established marking system is skin autografts, in which skin is taken from one part of the frog and surgically attached to another part. For example, a method is described for marking a frog's back or shoulder using a light-colored skin graft from its chest²⁰. Skin grafts also come with limitations and risks: the procedure is invasive and introduces the risk of Aeromonas hydrophila infection, or red leg, a potentially fatal affliction; complete healing of the autograft takes up to 6 weeks; and with the methods described, only 6 frogs can be housed together because of limited places to put an autograft²⁰.

Less invasive marking approaches include glass beads and transponder chips^17,19. In the glass bead method, glass beads are threaded onto a small suture and sewn into the frog's skin. This provides greater variability than skin autografts, with at least 60 distinctive color combinations. There is, however, a risk that the suture can come out and result in the beads being lost. Alternatively, a microchip transponder can be implanted under the skin in the frog's dorsal lymph sac. This is considered the most permanent marking method and enables a potentially infinite number of animals to be individually identified and cataloged. However, this is also the most expensive method, as individual microchips are expensive, and a large colony would be costly to mark. Microchips also require a special scanner to read¹⁹. One common approach for Xenopus identification is referring to animals' natural coloring and patterning. This works especially well for frogs such as X. laevis, which have distinct patterns that remain throughout adulthood. However, these patterns can change over time with stress, and coloring can appear different when frogs are moved between transparent and tinted containers¹⁵. Additionally, this identification method is less useful for X. tropicalis, which has less distinct marking patterns compared to X. laevis, or for albino animals, which have no color markings²¹. Even for species with distinct markings, lab personnel can interpret the placement and size of markings differently, which can cause errors in identification. Because of this, photographing animals is most reliable in conjunction with an additional identification method. Therefore, we seek to mark and identify Xenopus animals using a technique that is easily discernable, permanent, and minimally invasive.

There are limited published resources describing methods for tattooing amphibians. Tattooing has been described alongside other branding techniques, including heat brands, silver nitrate brands, and freeze brands¹⁷. In the same resource, tattooing was done by drawing numerals with a 27G hypodermic needle, and the process was noted not to cause infection, in contrast to the other branding techniques, which used a wire shaped into a numeral or other mark. In another source, an electric tattooing machine (described as a vibrating needle) was used to mark frogs, but little detail was provided on the technique^17,19. The authors warn that by disturbing the frog's protective slime layer, this procedure increases the risk of red leg. While there is no marking or identification method that is both completely noninvasive (such as photographs) and permanent (such as microchips), tattooing provides an effective compromise. Tattooing is relatively straightforward compared to other techniques, such as skin autografts. Additional benefits include a smaller learning curve and relatively inexpensive equipment. Tattooing aquatic amphibians comes with certain challenges, which can intimidate researchers and impair successful animal marking. This paper aims to provide researchers with well-documented methods for tattooing adult Xenopus with a rotary tattoo machine.

Protocol

All animal procedures described were approved by Dartmouth College's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. 1. Equipment setup NOTE: A workflow for the procedure and an example bench setup are included (Figure 1). Connect the tattoo gun and foot pedal to the power supply. Position the foot pedal underneath the working surface. Assembling the tattoo gun Using an Allen wrench or…

Representative Results

High-quality tattoos will have dark, legible strokes on the frog's chest and can be clearly differentiated from several feet away (Figure 5A). In general, larger numbers and markings are better for readability, but longer names and numbers can be made smaller to fit comfortably on the frog's chest. Tattoo longevity is more difficult to judge, but high-quality frog tattoos should remain dark and legible for at least 3-6 months (Figure 5D-D'</s…

Discussion

Tattooing humans is an art form dating back thousands of years, and for as long as humans have tattooed themselves, they have also tattooed or branded animals²³. The equipment and techniques for marking animals, particularly mammals, are well-established, well-documented, and widely accessible. While marking animals was originally for distinguishing livestock and theft deterrents²³, its role in biomedical research has become just as important.

A …

Materials

3 needle round liners	Worldwide Tattoo Supply	1203RLB	Packaged sterile
5 Needle Round Disposable ULTRA	Worldwide Tattoo Supply	HTIPRS5-U	Packaged sterile
5 needle round liners	Worldwide Tattoo Supply	1205RLB	Packaged sterile
7 needle round liners	Worldwide Tattoo Supply	1207RLB	Packaged sterile
Clip Cord	Worldwide Tattoo Supply	N/A
Foot pedal	Worldwide Tattoo Supply	N/A
Inkpots	Worldwide Tattoo Supply	N/A
Kimwipes, delicate task wipes	Fisher Scientific	06-666A
RCA Connection	Worldwide Tattoo Supply	N/A
Scream Ink Pitch Black, 1oz	Worldwide Tattoo Supply	SI101
Sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3)	Sigma-Aldrich	S5761
Stainless steel grips	Worldwide Tattoo Supply	N/A
Stealth 2.0 Rotary Tattoo Machine	Worldwide Tattoo Supply	N/A
Stealth 2.0 Rotary Tattoo Machine Box Set	Worldwide Tattoo Supply	STEALTH2-SET
Styrofoam island	N/A	N/A	This is the lid of a styrofoam cold shipping container
Tricaine (ethyl 3-aminobenzonate methanesulfate)	Sigma-Aldrich	E10521	CAUTION: IRRITANT
Unbleached paper towels	Grainger	2U229	Paper towels MUST be unbleached, bleach is toxic to amphibians
Voltage Supply	Worldwide Tattoo Supply	N/A
Wash bottle (with frog-safe water)	Fisher Scientific	FB0340923T	Frog safe water is dechlorinated, pH 7.0-8.5, conductivity 1200-1800 uS
X. laevis adult female	Xenopus1	N/A
Zip-top plastic bag	N/A	N/A	This bag should be large enough to hold the styrofoam island