Summary

Evaluation of Hydration Status by Bioelectrical Impedance Vector Analysis in Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease Undergoing Exercise Stress Test

Published: September 22, 2023
doi:

Summary

Hydration status imbalances can have a short-term effect on direct and indirect determinants of oxygen uptake and pulse, and morbidity and mortality prognostic factors in ischemic heart disease. This protocol describes the technique for assessment of hydration status through bioelectrical impedance vector analysis and cardiopulmonary response during exercise stress test.

Abstract

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) represents a group of clinical syndromes characterized by myocardial ischemia, leading to an impairment in the myocardial blood supply and compromised perfusion. Several clinical variables assessed through a stress test, such as oxygen uptake (VO2) and heart rate oxygen pulse (HR/O2), have been attributed as cardiopulmonary prognostic factors in patients with IHD. However, other factors like hydration status (HS), potentially affecting the cardiopulmonary response, have been barely addressed. Unbalanced HS has a short-term effect on plasma volume and the sympathetic nervous system, which impacts blood volume, and lowers VO2 and HR/O2. Recently, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), a method based on the opposition of body tissues (including fluid volume) to a low electrical current, has been widely used to assess HS by obtaining two components: resistance (R) and reactance (Xc) and using prediction formulas. However, several limitations as chronic illness or abnormal fluid status, may affect the results. In this sense, alternative BIA methods, such as bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA), have become relevant. R and Xc (adjusted by height) result in a vector plotted on the R/Xc graph, which allows interpreting the HS as normal or abnormal according to the distance of the mean vector. This study aims to describe how to determine HS by BIVA using a single-frequency device and compare the results with the cardiopulmonary response in patients with IHD.

Introduction

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) represents a group of clinical syndromes characterized by myocardial ischemia, a mismatch in the myocardial blood supply and demand. The underlying pathophysiological defect includes inadequate perfusion, mainly due to atherosclerotic disease of epicardial coronary arteries1,2,3. In general, the presence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is common, showing poor survival worldwide4. Particularly in 2015, IHD contributed to approximately 9 million deaths and more than 160 million disability-adjusted life years, and nowadays, IHD remains one of the main causes of mortality, and it favors the heart disease burden around the world5.

To evaluate both the presence and prognosis of IHD, some non-invasive procedures like the exercise stress test (EST) are routinely used. EST provides an assessment of the overall performance of cardiovascular, muscular, pulmonary, hematopoietic, neurosensory, and skeletal systems when the maximum tolerable stress appears under the EST6.

Under normal conditions, physiological adaptations would be expected while exercising. During exercise, several changes occur, like a dynamic change of fluid in blood within the vascular compartment, the reduction of plasma and blood volume, and the increase in hematocrit and plasma metabolite concentrations. Reduced plasma volume normalizes approximately 1 h after exercise, which may also vary depending on individual training level and water replenishment7.

However, IHD may lead to an acute impaired response to exercise, affecting EST performance in some variables comprising aerobic capacity and exercise tolerance, such as oxygen uptake (VO2) and heart rate/oxygen pulse (HR/O2)8. Recently, hydration status (HS), a measure of the water contained in the body1, has been proposed as a factor linked to plasma volume, able to modify blood flow and viscosity. HS has also been related to systolic volume, heart rate, and arteriovenous oxygen difference, determinants of VO2. Furthermore, some studies describe the relation of HS with a lower cardiopulmonary response (cardiac chronotropic and inotropic, VO2 and HR/O2)9.

In addition, several factors like age, environmental conditions, the level of physical activity/exercise, and dietary factors like fluid intake have been described to participate in HS balance10. Likewise, pathophysiological conditions such as IHD and its progression may influence HS11.

Although HS closely relates to cardiopulmonary, biological-environmental responses or lifestyle factors, the particular association of IHD in population with previous conditions has been scantily addressed; and it represents a significant challenge for clinical research, specifically due to the assessment of early stages, as well as the requirement for reliable and standardized methods to evaluate the HS.

To address this, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), a practical, non-invasive, and cost-effective method, can be used to estimate body composition within a clinical setting but also has been proposed as an alternative method to evaluate HS showing advantages over other methods like biomarkers tests (urinary or plasma osmolality) due to the presence of high variability in the results and even over the gold standard method (isotope dilution) due to the complexity of the technique that requires specific training and highly cost equipment, becoming clinically impractical12,13,14,15.

The conventional BIA method applies an alternating, low electric current intensity (below the perceptual thresholds), entering the human body and crossing internal tissues. Then, based on the principle that body organs may act as electric conductors or dielectrics, we may obtain a register of electric impedance (or bioelectrical impedance [Z]) that reflects the opposition of the organs to the free applied electric flow (EF), depending on their composition (fat or muscle mass, bone, water, etc.)12. Here, Z sources are resistance (R) and reactance (Xc). The former is related to the opposition of the EF throughout cellular ionic solutions (intracellular and extracellular), while the latter is a capacitive component of tissue interfaces, cell membranes, and organelles12.

In addition, bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) is an alternative BIA method approach that uses spatial relationships between R and Xc (both adjusted by height) to assess soft tissue hydration. The R and Xc data are plotted on a bivariate resistance-reactance graph, which allows visualizing body composition and HS12,16.

Considering the less explored field of HS balance associated with cardiopulmonary, as well as the growing interest to characterize new applications of methods like BIVA in the evaluation of HS, this study aims to determine HS by BIVA method and to analyze HS relation with VO2 and HR/O2 in ambulatory patients with IHD.

Protocol

The Institutional Research Ethics Committee from Centro Médico Nacional "20 de Noviembre", ISSSTE, approved this protocol (ID 383.2019). All enrolled patients signed written informed consent. 1. Before bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) measurement NOTE: The BIA protocol procedure is measured using a single-frequency bioelectrical impedance device (Table of Materials). This device provides two values (resistance and r…

Representative Results

First, R and Xc (both adjusted by patient´s height) data registered from the single frequency (SF-BIA) device was used to obtain the BIVA R/Xc graph. Second, we classified hydration status as euhydration, hyperhydration, and hypohydration. Representative hydration data from male patients plotted with circle and triangle, aged 66 years and 67 years, weighing 72.2 kg and 72.3 kg, height 169 cm and 163 cm, are shown (Figure 2). In addition, impedance data are shown R/H= 280.7, Xc/H= 23.6 &…

Discussion

Although BIA is considered a safe, practical, and noninvasive method, which overcomes the limitations of other methods to measure body composition and body water19,23, it is relevant to consider the potential bias occurring regarding the type of bioelectrical impedance (the method described here is specific for a single-frequency bioelectrical impedance device), or the variation in the steps and technique verification methods.

It has b…

Declarações

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

To Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT) that sponsored the scholarship CVU 1004551 for Dulce María Navarrete de la O during her MSc degree.

Materials

BIVA Tolerance BIVA SOFTWARE 2002 Piccoli A, Pastori G: BIVA software. Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy, 2002 (available at E-mail:apiccoli@unipd.it).
Cardiopoint ECG C600 BTL 407-80MANEN03100 ELECTROCARDIOGRAPH
Cardiopoint Trolley BTL 40700B000240 TROLLEY
Portable Digital Flat Scale SECA 813 DIGITAL FLAT SCALE
Portable Stadiometer SECA 213 STADIOMETER
Quantum IV RJL SYSTEMS Q4B-2405 BIOELECTRIC IMPEDANCE ANALYZER
Treadmill Clinical BTL 216A18 TREADMILL

Referências

  1. Alcalá, J. E., Maicas, C., Hernández, P., Rodríguez, L. Ischemic heart disease: concept, classification, epidemiology, risk factors, prognosis and prevention. Medicina. 12 (36), 2145-2152 (2017).
  2. Steenbergen, C., Frangogiannis, N. . Muscle: Fundamental Biology and Mechanisms of Disease. , (2012).
  3. Moreno, P. R., Portillo, J. H. Myocardial ischemia: basic concepts, diagnosis and clinical implications. Revista Colombiana de Cardiología. 23 (5), 403-409 (2016).
  4. Roth, G. A., et al. Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990-2019: Update From the GBD 2019 Study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 76 (25), 2982-3021 (2020).
  5. Zhang, G., et al. Burden of Ischemic heart disease and attributable risk factors in China from the global burden of disease 2015 study. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders. 18, 1-13 (2018).
  6. Lomelí, H. I., et al. . Ejercicio, Dieta y Corazón. , (2013).
  7. García, M., Nuñez, J. P. . Rehabilitación Cardiovascular: Prevención y Deporte. , 35-49 (2019).
  8. Coeckelberghs, E., Buys, R., Goetschalckx, K., Cornelissen, V. A., Vanhees, L. Prognostic value of the oxygen uptake efficiency slope and other exercise variables in patients with coronary artery disease. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. 23 (3), 237-244 (2015).
  9. Lundby, C., Montero, D., Joyner, M. Biology of VO2 max: looking under the physiology lamp. Acta Physiologica. 220 (2), 218-228 (2017).
  10. Baron, S., Courbebaisse, M., Lepicard, E. M., Friedlander, G. Assessment of hydration status in a large population. British Journal of Nutrition. 113 (1), 147-158 (2015).
  11. Kemp, C. D., Conte, J. V. The pathophysiology of heart failure. Cardiovascular Pathology. 21 (5), 365-371 (2012).
  12. Lukaski, H. C., Piccoli, A. Bioelectrical Impedance Vector Analysis for Assessment of Hydration in Physiological States and Clinical Conditions. Handbook of Anthropometry: Physical Measures of Human Form in Health and Disease. , 287-305 (2012).
  13. Roubenoff, R., Heymsfield, S. B., Kehayias, J. J., Cannon, J. J., Rosenberg, I. H. Standardization of nomenclature of body composition in weight loss. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 66 (1), 192-196 (1997).
  14. Armstrong, L. E. Assessing Hydration Status: The Elusive Gold Standard Assessing Hydration Status: The Elusive Gold Standard. Journal of the American College of Nutrition. 26 (5 Suppl), 37-41 (2007).
  15. Armstrong, L. E. Hydration assessment techniques. Nutrition Reviews. 63 (6), S40-S54 (2005).
  16. Picolli, A., Nescolarde, D., Rosell, J. Análisis convencional y vectorial de bioimpedancia en la práctica clínica. Nefrología. 22 (3), 228-238 (2002).
  17. Lohman, T. G., Roche, A. F., Martorell, R. . Anthropometric standardization reference manual. , (1991).
  18. Piccoli, A., Pastori, G. . BIVA software. , (2002).
  19. Espinosa, M. A., et al. Vectores de impedancia bioeléctrica para la composición corporal en población mexicana. Revista de Investigación Clínica. 59 (1), 15-24 (2007).
  20. Fletcher, G. F., et al. Exercise Standards for Testing and Training. A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 128, 873-934 (2013).
  21. Thompson, W. R., Gordon, N. F., Pescatello, L. S. . ACSM’S Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. , (2010).
  22. Mason, R. E., Likar, I. A new system of multi-lead exercise electrocardiography. American Heart Journal. 71 (2), 196-205 (1966).
  23. González, C. H., Caicedo, J. C. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA): a proposal for standardization of the classical method in adults. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 407 (012018), 1-13 (2012).
  24. Kyle, U. G., et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis-part I: review of principles and methods. Clinical Nutrition. 23, 1226-1243 (2004).
  25. Khalil, S. F., Mohktar, M. S., Ibrahim, F. The Theory and Fundamentals of Bioimpedance Analysis in Clinical Status Monitoring and Diagnosis of Diseases. Sensors. 14, 10895-10928 (2014).
  26. Savegnago, M., Faccioli, J. M., Jordao, A. A. Analysis of Body Composition: A Critical Review of the Use of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis. International Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2 (1), 1-10 (2014).
  27. Kyle, U. G., et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis-part II: utilization in clinical practice. Clinical Nutrition. 23, 1430-1453 (2004).
  28. Armstrong, L. E., et al. Human hydration indices:acute and longitudinal reference values. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism. 20 (2), 145-153 (2010).
  29. Di Somma, S., et al. The emerging role of biomarkers and bio-impedance in evaluating hydration status in patients with acute heart failure. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory. 50 (12), 2093-2105 (2012).
  30. Thanapholsart, J., Khan, E., Lee, G. A. A Current Review of the Uses of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis and Bioelectrical Impedance Vector Analysis in Acute and Chronic Heart Failure Patients: An Under-valued Resource. Biological Research For Nursing. 25 (2), 240-249 (2023).
  31. Sugizaki, C. S. A., et al. Comparison of Bioelectrical Impedance Vector Analysis (BIVA) to 7-point Subjective Global Assessment for the diagnosis of malnutrition. Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia. 44 (2), 171-178 (2021).
  32. Marawan, A., et al. Edema Index Predicts Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Journal of the American Heart Association. 10 (8), e018631 (2021).
  33. Rangaswami, J., et al. Cardiorenal Syndrome: Classification, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment Strategies. A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 139 (16), e840-e878 (2019).
check_url/pt/64683?article_type=t

Play Video

Citar este artigo
Juan Antonio, P., Dulce María, N. l. O., Juan Antonio, S., Jorge Antonio, L., José Rodolfo, A., Hugo Alberto, R., Eduardo Alfonso, L., Julieta Danira, M., Enrique, G., Brenda, S., Paul, M. Evaluation of Hydration Status by Bioelectrical Impedance Vector Analysis in Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease Undergoing Exercise Stress Test. J. Vis. Exp. (199), e64683, doi:10.3791/64683 (2023).

View Video